Medical Questions > Debate Forums > General Debate Forum

Why Does the West Accept Homosexuality? (Page 10)


User Profile
October 7th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Nope.. homosexuality doesn't worry me in the slightest. Bush does though.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 7th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
UCanQuit wrote:


I love you Jesus, I'm just not sure about your fan club.
Rolling Eyes


Eric


Good so now go follow Jesus and forget the fan club. Jesus did not called you to follow the fan club, he called you to follow HIM.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 7th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
diamondsimone wrote:
over twenty people died today in iraq and bush just veto'd a bill that would provide health care for millions of poor children and we are all worried about homosexuality wow

Women were told the same thing during the civil war. They were told, "Don't protest in front of the White House! You're dividing the nation! We need to be unified right now! Your rights aren't important right now!"
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 7th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
nightangel73 wrote:
UCanQuit wrote:


I love you Jesus, I'm just not sure about your fan club.
Rolling Eyes


Eric


Good so now go follow Jesus and forget the fan club. Jesus did not called you to follow the fan club, he called you to follow HIM.

I'm pretty sure that's what he's already doing.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 7th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Jincks013 wrote:
Nope.. homosexuality doesn't worry me in the slightest. Bush does though.


Anyone else enjoy that innuendo? Laughing
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 7th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
Birch wrote:
Jincks013 wrote:
Nope.. homosexuality doesn't worry me in the slightest. Bush does though.


Anyone else enjoy that innuendo? Laughing

Hahaha XD That's funny Very Happy I get it now, didn't notice before.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 7th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Birch wrote:
Jincks013 wrote:
Nope.. homosexuality doesn't worry me in the slightest. Bush does though.


Anyone else enjoy that innuendo? Laughing


Actually I was thinking little mr. senior psychopath in the whitehouse but I get the drift..
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 7th, 2007
Wow...you should start your own Bush Bashing post! Wasn't the topic Homosexuality?
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 7th, 2007
Experienced User
suzys zoo wrote:
Wow...you should start your own Bush Bashing post! Wasn't the topic Homosexuality?


Now that's not a bad idea. It just wouldn't be much of a debate. Even my ultra Republican boss doesn't have much to say when I bring up Bush nowadays.

The scary thing to me is that 31% of the population still thinks that he is doing a good job Shocked

They're either delusional or in denial, but what do you expect... before we went into Iraq, over 60% of the U.S. thought that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11.

Wow, that is just embarassingly stupid. Go American education system!! Rolling Eyes

Oh and I can even tie the Bush adminisrtation into the homosexuality topic. Cheney's (aka Darth Vader) daughter is a lesbian and he refuses to support her having equal relationship rights.


Eric
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 8th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
suzys zoo wrote:
Wow...you should start your own Bush Bashing post! Wasn't the topic Homosexuality?


Wow! Maybe you should have read the previous related posts before jumping in!
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 8th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
UCanQuit wrote:
suzys zoo wrote:
Wow...you should start your own Bush Bashing post! Wasn't the topic Homosexuality?


Now that's not a bad idea. It just wouldn't be much of a debate. Even my ultra Republican boss doesn't have much to say when I bring up Bush nowadays.

The scary thing to me is that 31% of the population still thinks that he is doing a good job Shocked

They're either delusional or in denial, but what do you expect... before we went into Iraq, over 60% of the U.S. thought that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11.

Wow, that is just embarassingly stupid. Go American education system!! Rolling Eyes

Oh and I can even tie the Bush adminisrtation into the homosexuality topic. Cheney's (aka Darth Vader) daughter is a lesbian and he refuses to support her having equal relationship rights.


Eric


Eric, If you want to make your metaphor work, Cheney (although his head is mysteriously shaped like Vader's) is actually the EMPORER. Or the Wizard. (Pay no attention to that man out in the rose garden!)
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 8th, 2007
Experienced User
sillyakchick wrote:


Eric, If you want to make your metaphor work, Cheney (although his head is mysteriously shaped like Vader's) is actually the EMPORER. Or the Wizard. (Pay no attention to that man out in the rose garden!)


Ah yes, you are right, but that nickname was already given to him. So I was just repeating what he is already being called.

I think he is more like the wizard than the Emporer, because without him pulling strings while hiding behind the curtain. The "Wizard" wouldn't even function. Wink


Eric
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 8th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
how about we all just use the word, "idiot."

works so much better. Razz

~S
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 9th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
sillyakchick wrote:


Eric, If you want to make your metaphor work, Cheney (although his head is mysteriously shaped like Vader's) is actually the EMPORER. Or the Wizard. (Pay no attention to that man out in the rose garden!)


Ok that was hilarious.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 9th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Eiri wrote:
milletics wrote:
Eiri wrote:
A. I moved this topic since it in no way belongs on the GLBT relationship forms. It is clearly a topic meant for debate, not one supporting or lending supportive advice to people in a GLBT relationship.

B. You're wrong. On so many levels. I don't want to have to quote the dozens and more species of animals that participate in homosexual relations. Can't get much more natural that nature doing it. And considering we are animals and thus, part of nature, the things we do ARE natural.


Yes but some animals eat their own feces. Doesnt make it right or "natural" to do that too.

If an animal does it, then it's automatically "natural". You don't seem to get that concept. An animal is created by nature. Humans are animals.

Is eating poo "gross"? Yes, but gross is again a human construct. I'm pretty sure there's actually a nutritional benefit to consuming feces especially during times of famine.


Feces have fecal coliforms like E. Coli that could kill you if you eat it. That's why they go out the body! That's why you can't even have sex from anal directly to vagina!

Humans can do very unnatural things that is a FACT
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 9th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
Just because something is natural doesn't mean it isn't harmful. It's still natural though. Snakebites aren't awesomely healthy, but 100% natural!!
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied October 9th, 2007
nightangel73 wrote:
UCanQuit wrote:


I love you Jesus, I'm just not sure about your fan club.
Rolling Eyes


Eric


Good so now go follow Jesus and forget the fan club. Jesus did not called you to follow the fan club, he called you to follow HIM.


Why would you follow jesus and not God? Follow What jesus taught but not him....God....
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 9th, 2007
Experienced User
Eiri wrote:
agathe wrote:
Yeah but, is nature a good thing?
Natural things good?

Death is natural. And so is immense suffering.

Good and bad are ethics, and ethics cannot be applied to nature.

A wolf is not bad for eating a deer.

A storm is not bad for destroying a town.

So, homosexulaity as a natural thing, cannot be good or bad. Sexuality as nature knows it is not good or bad.

It simply IS.


bravo that was the best! the way you worded it was amazing
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 9th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
sillysallie1990 wrote:
Eiri wrote:
agathe wrote:
Yeah but, is nature a good thing?
Natural things good?

Death is natural. And so is immense suffering.

Good and bad are ethics, and ethics cannot be applied to nature.

A wolf is not bad for eating a deer.

A storm is not bad for destroying a town.

So, homosexulaity as a natural thing, cannot be good or bad. Sexuality as nature knows it is not good or bad.

It simply IS.


bravo that was the best! the way you worded it was amazing


and there you are again comparing animals who are not conscious of what they are doing with humans who consciously do things..
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied October 9th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
MeaganIsGreat wrote:
nightangel73 wrote:
UCanQuit wrote:


I love you Jesus, I'm just not sure about your fan club.
Rolling Eyes


Eric


Good so now go follow Jesus and forget the fan club. Jesus did not called you to follow the fan club, he called you to follow HIM.


Why would you follow jesus and not God? Follow What jesus taught but not him....God....


God-Jesus-Holy Ghost All the three are 1. You can use any of the three and are refering to the same thing.
|
Did you find this post helpful?
Tags: woman
Quick Reply