Medical Questions > Debate Forums > Cloning and Stem Cell Debate Forum

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Vs Embryonic Stem Cells

What I have read so far about Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS cells) so far has lead me to believe that these IPS cells are better than embryonic stem cells ethically and are nearly as good in terms of quality.

So I was wondering, are there any aspects where embryonic stem cells are better than IPS cells, maybe with the availability or accessibility of these two types of stem cells or even something to do with the cost of using them?

This is regarding their use in medical treatments and research.
Did you find this post helpful?
Quick Reply