
| Marc209 wrote: |
| If your child is born in america, it will have a 15% chance of being depressed - so thats almost 1 out every 6.5 kids will hate life. Also depression is an inheritable illness. So if you already have depression OR your spouse has depression, than those numbers sky rocket to 30%. I don't know the exact numbers for when both parents have mential illness, but I'm sure it's high.
Your kid will then grow up to spend almost HALF of it's awake hours at a job they have a 39% chance of hating until they are 65. Sounds fun, eh? Never understood it. Having children seems to be a selfish act if you ask me. If you want to put an end to mental diseases, best bet is to prevent people with mental disease from reproducing. |
| danielv wrote: |
| Marc, have you considered that mental disease may be a social phenomenon? You can see that suicide rates vary dramatically from culture to culture. I personally don't believe that it is a physical disorder. I believe that it is a learned reaction to disfunctional society. |
| sillyakchick wrote: |
| Child rearing ios actually one of the most selfless acts one can do.
|
| Marc209 wrote: | ||
Sry, I disagree. What makes doing something you're suppose to do a selfless act? Why, because parents have the option of abortion or foster home or neglecting their kid completely? You could just do the bare essentials such as feeding them and providing them a place to stay, and forget about helping with homework, learning, improving, etc. But thats not giving this person, you brought into the world, great chances of success, which is your responsibility. btw, I focused on depression cause this was originally posted in a depression form. |
| Beline wrote: |
| I took a look at your profile Marc, and my guess is that you hang out in the ‘depression forum’ because you suffer from it yourself - so I do understand where you are coming from.
But you raise a very interesting question nonetheless. I’ve wondered about the same question for most of my life – for different reasons though. Why do people want to have children? Is it because they are ‘brain-washed’ since childhood to ‘get-married-and-have-children’? I can’t remember ever hearing people say that they want to get married and NOT have children. It’s as if it is one concept. Now I’ve asked numerous, and I mean NUMEROUS people why they want to have children and I’ve never gotten anymore than a daft look. Now don’t get me wrong; I’m not saying that parents are selfish because I’m one myself and I know what it feels like to sit with a colicky baby that just won’t shut up and let you sleep for one hour. I wouldn’t even have thought it would be selfish to drop it of at the nearest orphanage. I would just consider it preserving your sanity. But thus far my only conclusion to why people want to procreate is that we need to be needed. There is no other reason that makes sense to me. |
| Beline wrote: |
| Oh, my Greatness, no! There’s nothing wrong with that. Just because I am not that why inclined doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with it.
My point is: if somebody says that they want a specific car, and you ask them why, they will give you a reason – low maintenance, fuel efficient etc. If you ask the same person why they want to have children they give you a daft look like the question never crossed their minds. So why do people want to have kids? You didn’t answer the question yourself. You just said that you knew that you wanted to have children someday. Is it a hormonal thing, because mine is really stuffed up. I never had an inkling of broodiness in my life, and it may be attributed to my hormones being out of whack. |
| Birch wrote: | ||
Because you have a choice not to. |
| Marc209 wrote: |
| Right.
You can chose to have your baby terminated in the womb, totally neglect your kid and allow him or her to die from disease or hunger, or ship them off to live with a family of strangers. It's about as selfless as hitting someone with an automobile and chosing not to drive away. |
| Marc209 wrote: | ||||
Right. You can chose to have your baby terminated in the womb, totally neglect your kid and allow him or her to die from disease or hunger, or ship them off to live with a family of strangers. It's about as selfless as hitting someone with an automobile and chosing not to drive away. |
| Marc209 wrote: |
| If your child is born in america, it will have a 15% chance of being depressed - so thats almost 1 out every 6.5 kids will hate life. Also depression is an inheritable illness. So if you already have depression OR your spouse has depression, than those numbers sky rocket to 30%. I don't know the exact numbers for when both parents have mential illness, but I'm sure it's high.
Your kid will then grow up to spend almost HALF of it's awake hours at a job they have a 39% chance of hating until they are 65. Sounds fun, eh? Never understood it. Having children seems to be a selfish act if you ask me. If you want to put an end to mental diseases, best bet is to prevent people with mental disease from reproducing. |
| s_kalb wrote: |
| I'll try to say something risky, please try to follow me.
Maybe aren't we talking about the same "selfish". I'm not a parent, but there's no need to be a genius to know that a child isn't easy work. Anyway: Yes. you are very generous to your children. However, it's your kid, and maybe that's another meaning of selfish we're talking about. Yes you can sacrifice, but for your kids. You're going to protect your children first, help them first, make sure they end up good first. I've never seen something as agressive as a mother that sees danger around her child. Because it's like a part of you. Maybe in that way can we talk about selfish. I don't think a parent feels happy to see he had nothing in common with his child and no influence at all. In general, no one likes to do sacrifices if they can't have some kind of reward back (a compliment, for example). I think parenting involves pride of saying this to ourself, "I raised this child, I did this well. I am a good parent." That was the other "selfish" that crossed my mind. I'm not saying this is wrong. (besides, any remarks I make can be immediately shot back at me However, if I am right about that selfish feeling (and I sincerely hope I'm not), then I believe it is wrong to have too many children just to feel that feeling again, while you actually have difficulties to raise them because they are so many, and as someone stated above, neglect some of them. Maybe it's because I can only do one thing at a time, but I think I couldn't handle more than 3 children. I want each child to have enough attentions, and 3 would be my maximum to be sure everyone gets enough individual mom-n-dad time. I like the idea of 2 as well, as Darwin said: "There isn't need in more than 2 descendants per couple of individuals to replace them." But that's more a matter of population control than family trees. I just don't like that image of that parent sitting at the table with the hands around the head while 6, 7, 8 kids are running around, screaming, a few crying, none listening, etc. I know we all have our reasons if something goes wrong in parenting, but as long as we can envisage, let's envisage. |
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |



