First of all, before you actually consider surgery, you should get a second and even a third opinion on what would be the best course of treatment for you, both short and long term.
Second, there isn't a reason to do a full laminectomy to remove that disc fragment, if that is what you decide to do. I assume that is why you mentioned a laminectomy.
A skilled orthopedic surgeon who specializes in spines and is well experienced would also be well informed and experienced in doing a far less invasive procedure called a laminotomy, which is becoming the preferred procedure for decompression, microdisectomy and removal of disc fragments.
In a laminectomy, the entire laminia is removed to reach the area of the disc. By doing this, it can create havoc, long term, with the spine and cause instability. If you have any future problems with another disc at another level, then doing a second laminectomy could destablize the spine and require a fusion.
When a laminotomy is done, only a very small piece of the lamina is removed, just enough to gain access to the disc. It can be done on one side of the lamina or on both sides. The risk of the spine becoming unstable with a laminotomy is minimal. Also, more than one laminotomy can be done on different levels and still maintain a stable spine.
Laminotomy also doesn't carry the increased risk of disc herniations either.
Another thought as well. Spine surgery should be the last option chosen when there are spinal issues. As with any surgery, there are always risks, including anesthesia, and yes, creating further problems with the spine.
Though, most people recover from spine surgery and go on with their lives, as I have, regardless, whether you have spine surgery or not, your spine will really never be the same as it was before any injury to it.
You will always have the potential for further problems, if for no other reason than you already have had one.
You have to be careful with your spine, continue to do all the core exercises that your learned to do in physical therapy and do them for the rest of your life.
Having been in the situation where no conservative measures helped me at all, I had no alternative but to have a laminotomy done to relieve the pressure on nerves in my L4/L5.
I fully recovered and returned to being able to do about 95% of my prior activities.
Had it not been for an auto accident a few years later, I wouldn't have ended up with a disc bulge at the L3/L4 that required a second laminotomy and microdisection as well.
Even after that though, I full recovered and again returned to the same 95% activity.
If given the choice you are having right now, and knowing that I had a chance for surgery in the end, but also have done well with conservative measures. Well, I would continue with the conservative measures and wait it out. You may never need the surgery and then again you might.
But either way, please get at least one more opinion, I got 7 others before I had my first surgery, and please discuss the option of having a laminotomy instead of the laminectomy.
Avoiding having the full lamina removed is something that should be done unless there are absolutely no other alternatives.
Good luck and keep us posted.
Fran