Join Our Community!
Share
Abortion > Medical Abortion Forum > Abortion + No Period After 5 Weeks
A D&C is a standard procedure. But it can be scary when you don't know what to expect. Learn about what happens during dilation and curettage to prepare yoursel...
Dilation and curettage, or D & C for short, is a procedure that is used to diagnose and treat a number of womens health conditions. What are some goals of a D a...
A D&C usually is free of problems, and the recovery period for the procedure is short. But knowing about possible complications can help you detect problems ea...
Avatar
Q: Abortion + No Period After 5 Weeks
asked by: BekahRose on June 11th, 2007
New User
I had an abortion May 5th and I still have not had a period. I do have unprotected sex, but I waited the two weeks. We always use the 'pull out' method'. I have taken a pregnancy test and it comes up negative, but I am worried. I haven't had ANY kind of complications though. I didnt bleed bad at all... It was just normal. I didnt go back for my check up, because they told me since I lived 4 hours away that if I hadnt had any complications and had a negative test after 2 weeks, everything would be fine... What do you think? Rolling Eyes
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(9)
User Profile
Birch
replied on June 11th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Hey Bekah,

I think everyone's different. If you are not experiencing complications, I would not be concerned about a late(r) period. It takes time to get back into the natural rhythm of things. I'd hit up a local gyno just for a check and see what they say if you start getting antsy.

For the future, I would not use the pull out method only. This is consistantly unreliable (oxymoron?) and can barely be called a 'method'. Please be careful with your body and do not put it through excess stress.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Llewellyn
replied on June 11th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
You do not want a baby, yet you have unprotected sex? Is there a reason that you do that? Are you aware that you can easily get pregnant from the pull out method even if your partner pulls out in time? (Lots of questions, I know). Keep in mind that being ready for sex means being ready to do it responsibly!

I would suggest getting an actual form of birth control if you do not want a baby right now. Abortion is kind of tough on your body, so it is definitely not meant to be used in place of birth control. If you are avoiding birth control because you had a bad reaction to it in the past, talk to your ob-gyn as there are many options. If you had a bad reaction to one, it does not mean you will have a bad reaction to another.

Is there any ob-gyn that you can see that is closer to you? Even if it is not at an abortion clinic, I would think an ob-gyn would be able to make sure everything looks ok just to be on the safe side.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
jenn_smithson
replied on June 13th, 2007
Active User, very eHealthy
Llewellyn wrote:
Abortion is kind of tough on your body, so it is definitely not meant to be used in place of birth control.
Abortion may not be pleasant to go through at the time it occurs (depending on anesthesia choice and availability) but it is not actually tough on a woman's body. In fact, it is the safest medical procedure a woman can undergo in an industrialized nation where it is legal. It is also 11 times safer than childbirth and much less "tough" than continuing a pregnancy, even in the first trimester.

I imagine that if the original poster lives in an industrialized nation, hormonal birth control is more than likely easily accessible and much cheaper than abortion and thus, those are the reasons why she should be encouraged to ask her doctor about which method would be right for her.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Jules
replied on June 13th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
As safe as abortion may be, I think Llewellyn's point was that it's tougher on a woman's body than simply using decent contraception. It's plain silly to risk pregnancy over and over again and have multiple abortions when you can attempt to prevent such occurrences.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on June 13th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
PurestGreen wrote:
As safe as abortion may be, I think Llewellyn's point was that it's tougher on a woman's body than simply using decent contraception. It's plain silly to risk pregnancy over and over again and have multiple abortions when you can attempt to prevent such occurrences.


You feel that way, I feel that way, llewy feels that way... but many pro-choicers don't, unfortunately. Just letting you know, incase this becomes an issue.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
mc4ever02
replied on June 13th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Eiri wrote:
PurestGreen wrote:
As safe as abortion may be, I think Llewellyn's point was that it's tougher on a woman's body than simply using decent contraception. It's plain silly to risk pregnancy over and over again and have multiple abortions when you can attempt to prevent such occurrences.


You feel that way, I feel that way, llewy feels that way... but many pro-choicers don't, unfortunately. Just letting you know, incase this becomes an issue.


Feel free to add me to the list of people who feel that way.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on June 13th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
mc4ever02 wrote:
Eiri wrote:
PurestGreen wrote:
As safe as abortion may be, I think Llewellyn's point was that it's tougher on a woman's body than simply using decent contraception. It's plain silly to risk pregnancy over and over again and have multiple abortions when you can attempt to prevent such occurrences.


You feel that way, I feel that way, llewy feels that way... but many pro-choicers don't, unfortunately. Just letting you know, incase this becomes an issue.


Feel free to add me to the list of people who feel that way.

Haha ^^ I was just hoping to let her know beforehand that some pro-choicers will become... inflamed if it is implied that prevention is more moral or ethical or "better" in any way, in comparison to using abortion as birth control.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Jules
replied on June 13th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Thanks .Eiri, that's appreciated Wink

I can see why some people might think it is a moral judgement to say what I said. However, I think the point I made about contraception being the easier option doesn't really have a satisfactory counter-argument.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Llewellyn
replied on June 13th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
PurestGreen wrote:
As safe as abortion may be, I think Llewellyn's point was that it's tougher on a woman's body than simply using decent contraception. It's plain silly to risk pregnancy over and over again and have multiple abortions when you can attempt to prevent such occurrences.


Yes, that is exactly what I meant. Smile
Did you find this post useful?
|
Quick Reply
Search