No, there does not have to be a dominant partner.

There are many ways that two women can have sex or pleasure each other at the same time. There isn't a "right" way or a "wrong" way to do it. So pretty much anything you can think of would be ok to try if your partner is willing. Some female/female couples make use of toys, while others just use their bodies.

"I can't even imagine how two women would do it, unless they just like.. scissored or something..." ~ ms. garrison, southpark.

There are a ton of ways two women can have sex... I know it may sound contrary, but try looking up lesbian porn just for ideas of positions, or a lesbian karma sutra Also, toooys. Strap ons, double-ended dildos... Lots of fun.

Thanks

i find it kinda funny that two women would use strap ons. Why not just use the real thing then?

Maybe they don't like men?

well then you shouldn't get to use a *enis then.

Having one's "space" filled is not the same as having a man in one's bed.

Mike, don't post such sexist stupidity.

I've been asked this question before too. "Why do lesbians wear strap ons?"

Well, just because you don't like men, doesn't mean you don't enjoy the feeling of being filled to the brim and thrusted into. It's an amazing feeling, and only a straight, clueless, unimaginative man could ever think otherwise. Even gay men get it.

Precisely.

but your filling the space with what a man provides. If you don't like the man you can't have his ***. Kinda like when my wife divorced me, fine I said, but you can't keep using my last name.

Mike... stop being stupid. You don't get it. You're not a woman, first of all. SO don't go telling lesbians what they can and cannot do in the bedroom. You have no right.

Have you ever seen a real strap on? Not a lesbian-porn one. A real one. They don't look much like ***, nor do most ***.

i know but the intent is the same. I think you guys misunderstood my original post.

I'm pretty sure we understood completely, and we don't like what you were implying. That's like saying gay men shouldn't want to have anal sex because they clearly don't want to be enveloped by a vagina, so why would they want to be enveloped by anything else?

Perhaps the act of vaginal insertion seems on the outside to be the same. But if this is so, then you wouldn't mind putting your *** into anything that resembles an orifice, right? The mannerism, shape, feel and attitude of a woman are clearly different from that of a man, I am sure you would agree. So therefore, if a woman is what is attractive to a person, that is a separate issue from the sexual act involved. If this were not so, then you wouldn't mind having gay sex with a man. After all, it's the same thing, right? The act of sex is so much smaller than the importance of who it is with.

Nobody is asking to use .Y.O.U.R. ***. Or any man's for that matter. A*** is not a ***. it is a ***.

Yeah. If it was all about "long object and orifice" then everyone would be bisexual, wouldn't they? But clearly, people are not. I want a real **nis in me attached to a real man. I do not want breasts pressing against my back. The thought of sex with another woman slightly frightens me most of the time.

Let me guess, Mike is probably the kind of guy who thinks men who enjoy anal stimulation are all gay, right? Also, according to your logic, Mike, wouldn't people who masturbate be gay? And wouldn't putting fingers into a vagina be pointless? It would kind of the same as using a sex toy.

Mike, where and how a person likes to be stimulated has nothing to do with whom they are attracted to.