
| Birch wrote: | ||||||
I gotcha. Hypothetically, I do see how a society could totally outlaw abortion-they could feel that the deaths of a "few" "immoral" women would not outweigh the thousands of happy, healthy, and wanted babies they would save. And surely forcing women to carry their pregnancies to term would cure their "depression" (ah-hem meblonde) and any other psychosocial problems they might have surrounding their pregnancy! |
| Quote: |
| Man, I just hate the thought of living in a society that would force me to give birth, and not give a dang about anything else-like health, financial situations, etc, that so many 'conservative' politicians don't support.
God, birth control needs to be 'over the counter'. |
| AyaMiyaki wrote: |
| What I would like to know is, what exactly is supposed to become of all of these babies once they're born? I'm not sure how many abortions were performed in 2006 (and .I'm really not feeling up to .googling it), but assuming every one of those newborns was unwanted... how would that affect our adoption and foster care systems? How would it affect the older children still waiting for families?
And why does pro-life not seem to care about the pregnant woman's rights and emotions? The general attitude .I've seen has been "too bad, so sad, learn to use a condom next time". Why does her body become less valuable than what's inside of it, and why is that okay? |
| AyaMiyaki wrote: |
| Thank you for the reply, and let me first tell you that I have a great level of respect for the works that you do. I truly mean that.
But unfortunately, that doesn't really answer my concerns. If abortion were made illegal and the hundreds of women seeking abortions in this country were forced to either adopt the child out or keep it, how would that affect society? How would it affect the thousands of children already in the system? How do we just assume that life, no matter how it plays out, is better than death? How do we make sure that these babies don't fall through the cracks? Or that other foster children don't fall through the cracks because of the surge of newborn babies just ripe and waiting? And again, I must ask. Why is a woman's body worth less than the tiny life inside of it? Why are her discomforts, desires, and plans less worthy in pro-life's eyes? Because at the end of the day, that is pro-life's argument: that a woman does not have the right to remove a z/e/f from her body, because the z/e/f is precious. The woman should endure the pregnancy despite her wishes. |
| Eiri wrote: | ||||||||||
*shudder* unfortunately, I know as much as anyone else on these forums how capable societies are of being close-minded pricks. I could only hope than in a nation where abortion is already legal, that the government would not remove pre-existing rights.
|
| trina1 wrote: |
| As far as a womans life/body being deemed less than the tiny life/body inside her.....that just isn't it. Her life should not be deemed less....but it also should not be deemed greater. They are both human lives and they should both be deemed as equally important. Both lives(mother and child) are created with purpose....and neither should be seen as disposable. |
| AyaMiyaki wrote: | ||
But you see, from the pro-life perspective, it is. In their eyes, the woman should not be given the choice to abort. She should continue her pregnancy because the z/e/f's life should not be terminated. That means, she should not have a say over what happens with her body. It means, her not wanting to continue her pregnancy and go through a labor and delivery is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is bringing the pregnancy full-term and deliverying a healthy baby. I'm not saying that pro-life doesn't care about the mother. But they seem to favor the z/e/f more. Is it not pro-life that proclaims that the z/e/f is "innocent"? That it has a "right to live"? Even if a woman is raped, the z/e/f should not be punished for that by having its life terminated? Pro-life doesn't see pregnancy as a punishment. They see it as a necessary thing a woman must endure for the greater good: the baby. Or maybe some do see it as a punishment - this is where we get the lovely logic of "you knew what could happen, now step up and take responsibility" and "if you didn't want a baby, you should have kept your legs closed". Either way, pro-life doesn't seem to sympathize with a woman who truly does not want to be pregnant. They seem to want to talk her into keeping her baby, or keeping the pregnancy and giving the baby up for adoption. They beg her not to "kill her baby" and tell her how innocent her child is, and how it deserves a chance. They tell her that pregnancy is a small price to pay. They ask her to sacrifice her body and put her life at risk (make no mistake - pregnancy, labor and delivery can be dangerous) and condemn her if she decides not to. I can't help but think that the sympathy is more for the z/e/f, so innocent of everything, never having asked to be created, simply trying to survive... and not for the woman... the breathing, self-aware, functioning woman whose life could potentially be changed one way or another by this decision. We as pro-choice believe that she should have the right to choose. If she decides on her own to proceed with the pregnancy, we will support her 100%. If she decides to abort, we will not attempt to punish her or tell her she is a bad person. We won't call her a killer and turn our backs on her. We will simply help her find peace without judgment. I'm not sure that it's possible to hold both the mother and the z/e/f in equal standing. In cases where the child is not wanted, there is a clear conflict of interest. That's where the debate lies. That's why pro-life and pro-choice are always at arms and always locked in discussion and argument. But I do hope .I've given you a bit of insight into the pro-choice view. Not from a callous person who thinks abortion is not a big deal, but from a mother who simply believes in freedom and choice. I think you're very well spoken and it's been a pleasure debating with you. I hope you feel the same way. I'm off to bed. |
| wgc wrote: |
| Sorry, but you will not get her peace without judgement.
The of can a woman have have a abortion for her health. Well less than a small portion of people get an abortion for true life threatening reasons. I am sorry if a woman is raped or otherwise but the baby had no part in this act. So it is not the baby who should be excecuted. Not just the people who have abortions have reasons to worry but those who aprove of such things. Ro 1:32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them. |
| wgc wrote: |
| Consider this when murdering a child.
Rev 21:8 But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars —their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.” |
| wgc wrote: |
|
Consider this when murdering a child. Rev 21:8 But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars —their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.” Be carefull of choices you make in this life. There will be a day to answer for it. |
| Eiri wrote: | ||
I will absolutely not consider anything from the bible when debating abortion. I am not christian, so please don't use your religion as part of as a scientific debate, thank you. I don't use mine. |
| Eiri wrote: |
| I will ignore every post containing bible quotes. I do not force my religion on you and I would appreciate you not forcing your religion on me. |
| Eiri wrote: |
| I don't believe in god. nothing "he" is or does lasts forever in my mind, because he doesn't exist at all. |
| Birch wrote: |
| [Christianity is a cult.]
Oh, hey guys, on campus of the university I go to this week there was a group of young adults (who were not students) preaching the most conservative of christianity to anyone who would listen. Wearing their suspenders and long skirts, they shouted out about the evils of the vile homosexuals, how women's place is in the home, how we sinners are all going to hell, how one husband felt that it was his duty to "correct" his wife "by force" if she disobeyed him; et cetera, et cetera. Quite a crowd gathered, and they were heckling them mercilessly. Campus security was present. Some people don't want them on campus. I say let 'em have their time. They show their true colors. Also, I was wondering if they could be charged with public nuisance behavior, or maybe hate crimes. I mean, they were really delving deep into hatred for homosexuals. How is this not a hate crime? |
| Eiri wrote: | ||
It sounds like the same group or a similar group that came to my campus, you've heard my story right? About how they did it on the day of silence? Turns out they didn't do it on purpose, but in an article writted by the man, he seemed proud he was able to stop all over homosexual rights. I am going to continue to refrain from even telling this new person what my beliefs are, and I am going to maintain also that I don't really care what he or she is saying. Until they can come up with a solid, real life (aka scientific) reason against abortion, I don't care. |
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |



