Pro-choice people say the fetus is just living off the mother. And they have a right no abort. Is it not just living off the mother after it is born too? It centainley can't take care of it's self then either. But you can not starve it to death or kill it.
See my point?
At least the vast majority of pro choice people claim they want to greatly limit the number of abortions. Abortion for sake of convenience is not very convenient for the unborn baby. I think it helps to push pro choicers to accurate use of terms. For instance, the use of the term fetus, zygote or embryo is not accurate. The unborn human being is a human fetus/z/e. He or she is not a dog fetus, or pig fetus. The word fetus just refers to a stage in life much as the word adult or adolescent.
Just read this thread and I was pondering on the term "choice" regarding the pro choice movement, I am as ferverent in defending the choice of all human beings as I am for myself. But can it ever be a human right to have the choice for any human being to deliberatly attack and kill another human being, even if that human being maybe for a short time totally dependent on you?
I can not justify it, in my own mind.... this is just an opinion but it is an opinion based on the fact that the unborn child is a human being