Join Our Community!
Share
Debate Forums > Abortion Debate Forum > Pro Life Vindicated of Racketeering
User Profile
Q: Pro Life Vindicated of Racketeering
asked by: diamond splinter on May 10th, 2007
Active User, very eHealthy
Chicago, IL - May 9, 2007 - The National Organization of Women (NOW) was handed a final defeat yesterday as U.S. District Judge David Coar once and for all ruled that federal anti-racketeering laws cannot be applied to pro-life protesters, putting an end to 21 years of litigation that resulted in an unprecedented three trips to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Joe Scheidler, head of the Pro-life Action League in Chicago, hailed the long awaited ruling as a victory for free speech and said pro-lifers can now offer help to women outside abortion clinics across the nation without the fear of being sued under the anti-racketeering laws.

Judge Coar also struck down a 1999 national injunction that NOW had obtained against Scheidler and others. The cases involved in the ruling were NOW v. Scheidler and NOW v. Operation Rescue.

"Throughout the twenty-one year battle, we never allowed the legal issues to interfere with our mission of saving lives," said Scheidler. "Our capable legal team, led by Thomas Brejcha of the Thomas More Society, Pro-Life Law Center, handled the Courts, while we remained on the front lines of the fight for life."

Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue, praised Scheidler's courage and determination during the sometimes-wearisome process that stretched over two decades.

"The pro-life movement owes much to Joe Scheidler for persevering to the end of this case and insuring that life-saving efforts of men and women across the country are protected from unfounded legal harassment," said Newman. "Joe is a true American hero."
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(3)
User Profile
meblonde01
replied on May 10th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Re: Pro Life Vindicated of Racketeering
diamond splinter wrote:
Chicago, IL - May 9, 2007 - The National Organization of Women (NOW) was handed a final defeat yesterday as U.S. District Judge David Coar once and for all ruled that federal anti-racketeering laws cannot be applied to pro-life protesters, putting an end to 21 years of litigation that resulted in an unprecedented three trips to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Joe Scheidler, head of the Pro-life Action League in Chicago, hailed the long awaited ruling as a victory for free speech and said pro-lifers can now offer help to women outside abortion clinics across the nation without the fear of being sued under the anti-racketeering laws.

Judge Coar also struck down a 1999 national injunction that NOW had obtained against Scheidler and others. The cases involved in the ruling were NOW v. Scheidler and NOW v. Operation Rescue.

"Throughout the twenty-one year battle, we never allowed the legal issues to interfere with our mission of saving lives," said Scheidler. "Our capable legal team, led by Thomas Brejcha of the Thomas More Society, Pro-Life Law Center, handled the Courts, while we remained on the front lines of the fight for life."

Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue, praised Scheidler's courage and determination during the sometimes-wearisome process that stretched over two decades.

"The pro-life movement owes much to Joe Scheidler for persevering to the end of this case and insuring that life-saving efforts of men and women across the country are protected from unfounded legal harassment," said Newman. "Joe is a true American hero."


Cool Diamond Splitter,, thanks for the imfo..
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Birch
replied on May 10th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Isn't racketeering about making a profit? I don't know much about it at all.
Could you please provide a link to this article? Thanks.

(Too bad women aren't protected from "unfounded...harassment" in front of abortion clinics.)
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on May 10th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
yes, I too am confused as to exactly what has been confirmed as legal here...
Did you find this post useful?
|
Quick Reply
Search