I agree with you.
It makes me feel ill to even think of it.

name is .Genipher

I didn't say it was right or wrong to abort one and "play god"...but it's her choice not yours. so don't judge her this is the support forum...there is no room for you to judge.

Yep, that is were I was going with that.

gone

You didn't make a lick of since...Please don't go ruining other forums and other people's threads becuase you don't like my name. It doesn't make you look good.

I just wanted to say,

Sir this is a decision that you and your wife have to make. the two of you went to have all this done in order to have a baby. I find it very hard tobelive that you and your wife didn't know the risks of having Multiples when you have medical assistance with getting pregnant.

Please think long and hard when it comes to having one removed. it's going to be very hard on you both in the long run.

keep us posted.

**gone**

chase,please grow up and act accordingly

I feel bad for the original poster that this thread has come to this.

I feel bad for the fact that people think they need to drag things to other forums that have no business being there. I think a mod or admin needs to delete all this.

I have requested that admin deleat the drama posts...But apparently the poster did it herself.

Sorry to the origional poster.

I'm sorry, but a compassionate view of life would oppose abortion (and a good number of other things) altogether. A foetus is a foetus is a foetus. It has no rights whatsoever until birth. It is legally classed as a person at birth. One of the most vital criteria needed to be pro-choice is that you support abortion, whatever the circumstances, which makes complete sense as we have the intelligence to realise that the reasons for aborting are totally irrelevant - a foetus is a foetus and a choice is a choice! Therefore, as we can understand from that, the gestational period in which a potentially-terminating woman is found is not the point. The foetus is still a parasite; it still isn't born; it still occupies its mother's womb; it still isn't a person; it still bears no rights. All of these facts apply to an eight-week old foetus and an eight-month old one. Thus, I believe that late-term abortions must be supported - if a woman isn't obliged to give a reason for wanting a termination at eight weeks, why should she at eight months? Why should her rights diminish after a certain period of time? Why should she lose control over her own body for something she doesn't want alive inside of her? And a question to you and all of the others who advocate your opinion: why should you so-called pro-choicers be hypocritical?

And again, I will say that you don't have the right to enforce your view as law. The law must be open always (and especially with abortion rights) for women to make their choices. What they decide to do for social reasons is their business and only theirs. I would find it very, very hard to call a person who supports first- (and possibly second-) trimester abortions for any reason yet late-term ones only if they have a medical problem pro-choice. The whole point of adhering to this view is so we can back women having the right to do as they please with their own body. If you personally disagree with late-term social abortions (which I don't, for the record), then that's fine because it's your view, but it is most certainly necessary to fbe fiercely behind a legislation which allows women to decide for themselves whether they disagree with it or not when they are faced with that decision. We know that no abortion[/i] is murder, by definition, so you have no right to oppose, in my humble view.

As for what I would like to see changed - pure and simple: I would like to see [b]every country (obviously) have abortion legalised for any reason and at any time in the pregnancy. I also believe that only one doctor (rather than two) should give the go ahead to the termination and have it arranged (I believe that legally s/he does not deserve any right to refuse an abortion, hence why I think it should be s/he who arranges the procedure, rather than granting it).

Thanks for listening (reading).

Kypros.

i thought the same thing. Twins are very common with ivf because obvsiously they are inserting several embryos. So they can be one up to the number of the embryos inserted. That is silly to not have considered after paying thousands of dollars in ivf what would happen if two or three embryos make it.

yeah; I agree with you on this one for sure.