Join Our Community!
Share
Debate Forums > Abortion Debate Forum > Post From Pro-life Forum (Page 1)
Avatar
Q: Post From Pro-life Forum
asked by: Moo on April 10th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
The Godly One wrote:
JUNGLE JUICE wrote:
Legalised homicide


This is a legal term.

At least this is what I am taught at Law school. I do not study in the States however, and this has always baffled me.


I'm not sure which law school you are at but if they are teaching you that abortion is homicide then I'd seriously consider asking for a refund as the law is quite clear on this.
This topic seems to crop up a fair amount and I can't let it sit! Pre the Abortion Act 1967 abortion was not homicide - the statutes you will need to look at are s59/58 of the OAPA 1861 and ILPA 1929 and you will see that your statement is false.

Thanks http://ehealthforum.com/health/topic79902. html
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(103)
Avatar
Carifairy
replied on April 10th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Perhaps he means that 'homicide' is a legal term...Not that abortion actually is homicide....
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Moo
replied on April 10th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Carifairy wrote:
Perhaps he means that 'homicide' is a legal term...Not that abortion actually is homicide....

Initially I thought that but as it was on that forum I decided not to give the benefit of the doubt Laughing
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Anonymous
replied on April 10th, 2007
Abortion is classed as homicide by law, just depends on what you mean by "law"
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Sunflower_pie81
replied on April 10th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Not all killing is murder. Murder is actually a small subset of all killing, which includes accidental homicide, killing in self-defense, suicide, euthanasia, etc. When pro-life activists call abortion "murder," they are suggesting that abortion fits the definition of murder; "The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice" abortion doesn't fall into the definition for two reasons. Abortion is not illegal, and normally mothers don't feel malice towards their unborn children.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Anonymous
replied on April 10th, 2007
"Not all killing is homicide. homicide is actually a small subset of all killing, which includes accidental homicide, killing in self-defense, suicide, euthanasia, etc. When pro-life activists call abortion "homicide," they are suggesting that abortion fits the definition of homicide; "the unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice" abortion doesn't fall into the definition for two reasons. Abortion is not illegal, and normally mothers don't feel malice towards their unborn children. "

That is your belief about what homicide is, many other people even see killing animals as homicide.

"the unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice" abortion doesn't fall into the definition for two reasons. Abortion is not illegal, and normally mothers don't feel malice towards their unborn children. "


But arnt you defining for yourself what is law and what is not law?

who says abortion isnt Ilegal and why should you listen to them....because they are stronger than you and can put you in prison if you dont?

What is law and where does it come from?

When a pro lifer calls an abortion homicide you are correct they are saying
that abortion fits the definition of homicide; "The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice" perhaps its not the deffinition of homicide we disagree on but the legality of abortion and the definition of law.

We have State law, federal law, International law, human law, Moral law, social law, divine law, natural law.

Just because it isnt ilegal in according one set of laws dosnt mean it isnt Ilegal in other sets of laws...so which law is the supreeme law?

It cant be state or federal law since, well it maybe legal in america but ilegal in Ireland...lawful killing in the USA but homicide in Ireland... so which law is the supreeme law?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Sunflower_pie81
replied on April 10th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Anonymouslaw? wrote:


so which law is the supreeme law?


the one that is going to make a difference in my life if i do something wrong...like jail or even being sentinced to death.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Anonymous
replied on April 10th, 2007
the one weilding the axe..... and you call yourself free?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on April 10th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
Anonymous wrote:
the one weilding the axe..... and you call yourself free?


We have no idea who you are talking about.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Anonymous
replied on April 11th, 2007
"the one that is going to make a difference in my life if i do something wrong...like jail or even being sentinced to death."



"the one weilding the axe..... and you call yourself free?"

"We have no idea who you are talking about."

Well sunflower has demonstraited that the only law she adheres to is the law that is enforced, in that she demonstraites she does not respect the law but fears the law.

She does not respect the law that homicide/stealing/violence is wrong but rather complies with the law simply because she fears that she may be punished if she does not.

Hence she is afraid of those who weild the Axe.... how then can she be free?

I on the other hand do not fear those who can put me in prison or put me to death, I respect the law that says homicide/stealing/violence is wrong, not because of the threat of police action but because I believe in a number of laws that are a higher law than state, federal, internation laws. The law of Nature, the moral law, human law, and dinvie law aka the law of love.

I am free while sunflower is enslaved.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Moo
replied on April 11th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
"Guest" - -please read the link wher I have explained the law here and Jenn explained it in the states - abortion is not homicide, regardless of whether your pro-life or pro-choice and it's the government (and subsequently the peoplesaying as we live in democracies) that decide that. It has never and will never be homicide.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
diamond splinter
replied on April 11th, 2007
Active User, very eHealthy
Man made law is hypocritical i choose to abide by divine law
Another thing if you are in a court room and have to swear on the bible should you not then follow the laws of the bible not of man?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Moo
replied on April 11th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
diamond splinter wrote:
Man made law is hypocritical i choose to abide by divine law
Another thing if you are in a court room and have to swear on the bible should you not then follow the laws of the bible not of man?

You are not required to swear on the bible you can make an affirmation but the bible is full of contradictions and I really don't think "an eye for an eye" is a very sensible law now is it. Times change and the law evolves with it, much like people
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
diamond splinter
replied on April 11th, 2007
Active User, very eHealthy
I think an eye for an eye is a bloody good law as long as you also follow thou shall not kill.

you take my eye i will take yours fairs fair
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Birch
replied on April 11th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
diamond splinter wrote:
I think an eye for an eye is a bloody good law as long as you also follow thou shall not kill.

you take my eye i will take yours fairs fair


"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." -Ghandi

Didn't your jesus say, "Forgive"?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on April 11th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
Birch wrote:
diamond splinter wrote:
I think an eye for an eye is a bloody good law as long as you also follow thou shall not kill.

you take my eye i will take yours fairs fair


"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." -Ghandi

Didn't your jesus say, "Forgive"?


Seriously. XD
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
diamond splinter
replied on April 11th, 2007
Active User, very eHealthy
Where the hell did you get my jesus from i don't even beleive in no diety
I just beleive (which i have had pointed out isn't true) that if you have to swear on the bible you should then be allowed to follow the laws of the bible
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Sunflower_pie81
replied on April 11th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Anonymous wrote:
"the one that is going to make a difference in my life if i do something wrong...like jail or even being sentinced to death."



"the one weilding the axe..... and you call yourself free?"

"We have no idea who you are talking about."

Well sunflower has demonstraited that the only law she adheres to is the law that is enforced, in that she demonstraites she does not respect the law but fears the law.

She does not respect the law that homicide/stealing/violence is wrong but rather complies with the law simply because she fears that she may be punished if she does not.

Hence she is afraid of those who weild the Axe.... how then can she be free?

I on the other hand do not fear those who can put me in prison or put me to death, I respect the law that says homicide/stealing/violence is wrong, not because of the threat of police action but because I believe in a number of laws that are a higher law than state, federal, internation laws. The law of Nature, the moral law, human law, and dinvie law aka the law of love.

I am free while sunflower is enslaved.


Thanks so much for the enlightenment. but dear, I am not enslaved!! No one weild's the axe over me...I can controle who holds that axe over my head by obeying the law. Plan and simple. I don't fear punishment because if i do something wrong. I Don't do it because because i have morals. i believe in devine law, but the laws of the state, federal and internation laws seem to out weigh the laws of nature and the laws of love. Any human can see that if you touch the boiling water you will get burned. that is why there are laws, live by them and you won't pay the price for them.

moo wrote:
"Guest" - -please read the link wher I have explained the law here and Jenn explained it in the states - abortion is not homicide, regardless of whether your pro-life or pro-choice and it's the government (and subsequently the peoplesaying as we live in democracies) that decide that. It has never and will never be homicide.


Thanks!!!
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on April 11th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
If you believe that someone who swears on the bible should follow its laws, then maybe you should actually read all of the horrible laws that are a part of the bible. I certainly wouldn't want anyone following those laws.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Anonymous
replied on April 11th, 2007
"thanks so much for the enlightenment. But dear, I am not enslaved!! No one weild's the axe over me...I can controle who holds that axe over my head by obeying the law."

Exactly... by obaying the law!

would you obay the law if you did not fear the punshiments?

"I Don't do it because because i have morals. i believe in devine law, but the laws of the state, federal and internation laws seem to out weigh the laws of nature and the laws of love."

why because they hold an axe over you?

"Any human can see that if you touch the boiling water you will get burned. that is why there are laws, live by them and you won't pay the price for them. "

thats the law of physics, if you touch something hot your going to get burned....but I am being deliberatly obtuse! I know what you mean.

whatever happened to upholding the law because it the law reflects the moral law and is the right thing to do...where has that gone in todays society?

Remember I talked about respecting the law and that you merely fear the law, If you rely on such and abandon the moral law, the natural law, the divine law then increasingly there is going to be crime and that is what is happening today, less and less people have respect for these laws many dont even know they exist and crime abounds....simply because many are not affraid of law enforcement agencies or even respect the government and laws they make.

The rich man passes a law "dont steal" the poor man with no food why should he respect such laws made by rich people?

Why shouldnt the poor man make his own law.... take as much from the rich as you like in order to feed himself and the poor family?



Why wouldnt he do that,.... because the rich and powerful employ men to enforece there laws, the poor can not afford such bullies

when crime abounds, there is no respect and no fear

what is the answer make penalties harsher or return to teaching a higher law than the government?

How far do you want to take it, how much freedom are you willing to sacrafice?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Search