Medical Questions > Pregnancy Forum > Teen Pregnancy Forum

Amniocentesis Test (Page 1)

Must Read
What happens during labor? What do contractions feel like? And how do I know that labor has begun? Read on to learn about birthing basics....
Signs of labor occur after 36 weeks of pregnancy. Learn about the difference between real and false contractions. Plus, we outline signs of delivery complicati...
Almost all women worry about the pain of childbirth. Preparing for childbirth includes thinking about how you'd like to cope with the pain of labor. Read on for...
I am 3 months preg. and my doctor suggested I get an amniocentesis test done my next vist considering I carry the sickle cell gene but I heard it increases your risk of having a misscarriage and makes you very sick. Did you have it done? why or why not? and how was the experience?
Did you find this post helpful?
|

replied March 8th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
i've nver had one done but i've heard many a time that its not worth the risk, unless somehow detecting something prior to birth could mean keeping/reversing something in utero.

otherwise, i advise against it.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 8th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Normally Amnios are done later on in pregnancy. I had it done because i was having really bad complications and they wanted to see if carrying my baby as long as i could would help his chances of living. i didnt' ask the results, i didn't care all i wanted was my baby. I later on found out that there was nothing wrong with him other than his heart. And if I didnt' get so ill he would have been able to make it....at least that is what i wanted to thing.....

but no...i didnt' have any complications because of this. I didn't go into labor...i didnt' leak fluids....it went perfectly for me. you can opt to have it or opt out. You dont' have to find out the results either.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 8th, 2007
Experienced User
I had two of them done with my last pregnancy to check the lung maturity of my son. Each time I had no complications and nothing went wrong. However, mine were done around 31 and 32 weeks, the last one just hours before he was born. I would ask your doctor what the risks are for having one done at your stage in pregnancy and if you feel uncomfortable about having it done at this time because of the risks I would ask your doctor if there is any way to put off doing the amnio until you are further along.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied March 9th, 2007
Supporter
i had mine done at around 26 weeks i think, not quite sure... my doctor suggested it because i had a high risk of having a downs syndrome baby becaus emy hormone level was really high, turned out to be nothing thou...

If you think it would be best to know if your baby is ok i would say to go for it. yes there is a risk of misscarring from the amnio but the chance is very slim. Because i did the amnio i also got to find out for 100% that my baby was a boy, so that was a plus.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied March 16th, 2007
Experienced User
Yeah its a pretty serious and risky procedure. Not to scare you or anything but my aunt had one done at like 18-20 and they accidently ruptured her membranes (broke her water) and baby didnt survive because it was so early on in the pregnancy! So you should really weigh your reasons for getting it! Good luck!
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 16th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
They are typically done now at around 16 weeks to check for disorders. There is a 1 in 200 chance of miscarriage. If your not going to terminate the pregnancy I dont think it is worth the risk. They also do them later in pregnancy to check lunch maturity but by then there is little to no risk. Personally I did not get one done and wouldnt advise it.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 16th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
vanessalouanne wrote:
There is a 1 in 200 chance of miscarriage.


it's actually 1 in 1600 now. i *just* read that in my parents magazine like 2 minutes ago.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied March 16th, 2007
Supporter
yea i got mine done because the chance of him having downs was higher then the chance of misscarrage
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 16th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Is amniocentesis safe?
Millions of women have had prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis. In 1976, after careful study, the National Institutes of Health reported that it found midtrimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis to be safe. However, amniocentesis does pose a slight risk of miscarriage. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the rate of miscarriage is between one in 400 and one in 200 procedures. The procedure also carries an extremely low risk of uterine infection (less than one in 1,000), which can cause miscarriage.

Studies suggest that the risk of miscarriage following first-trimester amniocentesis may be three times higher than the risk after second-trimester amniocentesis. A 1998 Canadian study found the risk of miscarriage was 2.6 percent after early amniocentesis, compared to 0.8 percent after second-trimester amniocentesis. The study also found a striking increase in the risk of a foot deformity called clubfoot after early amniocentesis. The risk of clubfoot was increased ten-fold after early amniocentesis (1.3 percent vs. 0.1 percent or 1 in 1,000 following second-trimester amniocentesis). The incidence of clubfoot following second-trimester amniocentesis does not differ from that seen in all U.S. babies. Based upon this and other studies, doctors are rethinking the role of early amniocentesis, and many believe that if first-trimester prenatal testing is necessary, chorionic villus sampling appears safer than early amniocentesis.

The risk of pregnancy loss following amniocentesis is lower when the physician performing the procedure is highly experienced. Experienced doctors often are located at major medical centers. Health care providers and genetic counselors usually can provide pregnant women with referrals to experienced physicians.
http://www.marchofdimes.com/professionals/ 681_1164.asp


That said, you'll want to consider the small risk that the procedure will cause you to miscarry. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the risk of miscarriage from amniocentesis is between one in 200 and one in 400, depending on the skill and experience of the doctor performing it. You'd also have a slight risk of uterine infection in the days following the procedure (less than one in 1,000), which can sometimes lead to miscarriage. These are all things you should discuss with your partner, your practitioner, and a genetic counselor

http://ehealthforum.com/health/posting.php ?mode=reply&t=86370
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 16th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Most all of the research ive done on amniocentesis shows this statistic. Also im a child development major in all of my text books the same risk is shown. I can give you the titles of those books along with the researchers who performed them in youd like.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 16th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Maybe you were thinking about the risks of the test when done in later pregnancy?
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 16th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
vanessalouanne wrote:
Most all of the research ive done on amniocentesis shows this statistic. Also im a child development major in all of my text books the same risk is shown. I can give you the titles of those books along with the researchers who performed them in youd like.


no, thanks. i was just stating what i had literally just read minutes before.

this is what it said in parents magazine:

amnio just got less stressful-- you've probably heard scary stats about the link between amnio and miscarriage. but new research shows that the test may be much safer than experts once thought. according to a study in obstetrics & gynecology, the amnio-related miscarriage rate is one in 1,600 pregnancies--much lower than the one-in-200 figure that's been cited for decades.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 16th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
When other researchers show that to be true then i will believe it. If the procedure hasnt changed then i dont see how the statistic would. Im not saying that your magazine didnt say that, im just saying that the majority is till set on the 1 in 200 and 1 in 400 with a more experienced doctor. Hey if it is getting safer then thats awesome. I hope it is. I think it would be exciting if were getting safer.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 16th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
vanessalouanne wrote:
If the procedure hasnt changed then i dont see how the statistic would.


no, when doctors have more practice and can train better, they perform better.

nothing is mastered on the first try. it always takes time.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 17th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
the test has been around since the mid 70's.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

User Profile
replied March 17th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
vanessa, not trying to gang up on you but im pretty sure your books are based on information that is at least a few years old, and a few years in the scientific comminity can be like centuries in any other place, they can make so much progress so fast sometimes

to the original poster, i had an amnio at about 21 weeks cause i was at risk for a downs syndrom baby like sarah, but it turns out she doesnt have it, the only problem i had was slight cramping and a little pain where they stuck the needle of course...and it didnt help that the baby kept kicking the exact spot they stuck it

im sure whatever you decide will be the right choice for you, if you have conserns you should talk wtih your doctor instead of getting info from the computer and people you dont know, it can scare you so easily because there are so many horror stories on the internet

~alicia~
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 17th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
vanessalouanne wrote:
the test has been around since the mid 70's.


exactly.

Which means they have had alteast 30 years to master the technique.

There are lots of doctors out there that are experienced doing amnio's.

WHen triple bypass surgery first came out yes, it was dangerous and risky, but now they are performed on such a routine basis theres pretty much nothing to it.

Same goes with an amnio.

With any procedure there are risks. i personally wouldnt have one done, i dont think its worth the small risk there is. I would keep my child no matter what their defects were. So whats the point in finding out early?
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 17th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
100% agreed.
|
Did you find this post helpful?

replied March 17th, 2007
Especially eHealthy
rainfire1424 wrote:
I would keep my child no matter what their defects were. So whats the point in finding out early?


i think i'd want to know before they were born so i have time to prepare myself. i would keep them no matter what but i think i'd have an easier time accepting things if i knew ahead of time. i don't really know how to explain it, especially since i haven't been through it, but i kind of think i might have a hard time bonding with my baby from birth if i were "surprised" with them being born with downs syndrome (for example).
|
Did you find this post helpful?
12 >>