Smoking Is Actually Very Good For You - the Evidence Posted: 01-26-07 03:13am
Tobacco the definative link in healthy
aging.
Introduction:
it is a fact, all of the world's oldest
living people are classified as
chain-smokers[1]. A few of them drink
daily[2], one of them even smokes
marijuana[3]. As a researcher by
profession, posed with these facts, I have
done much searching for the exact reasons
why tobacco, among other taboo things, may
be good for you.. This article is meant
to explain that which I have found in a
non-partison fashion.
The pro's: tobacco
nicotine in tobacco is analogous to
vitamin b3 (niacin) [4] the discovery of
vitamin b3 was through tobacco research,
and nicotine (nicotinic acid) is also
present in foods such as tomato, spinach,
eggplant. The brain contains receptors
designed to receive nicotine specifically.
As it also contains special receptors
called "cannibinoid receptors, these
receptors are affected by chocolate and
marijuana in a very similar fashion. Vast
quantities of chocolate is known to
produce a "marijuana like high". It is
not a surprise that the worlds oldest
documented person consumed 2 pounds of
chocolate a week. [5] tobacco tar is
known to swedish researchers to actually
prevent lung cancer, protect against the
damaging effects of asbestos, and cure
asthma. I will provide the references to
all of these studies upon request. Some
of them will be readily available here [6]
an hiv-positive british man tested
negative to hiv after visiting native
american shamans in the amazons. He is
reported to have drank on 6 different
occasions a tobacco-based "beer" produced
by the shamans. I had read this story
years ago and am unable to find it again,
if anyone does come across this please let
me know at dandate2@
yahoo.Com
the cons: tobacco
a person is logged as a premature smoking
death no matter what age he dies,
including the worlds oldest living people,
meaning that if you smoke and die of any
disease you will feed the junk statistics
paid for by the pharmaceutical companies
which attempt to brainwash people into
thinking that smoking is bad for them
[10]. They do this so that you will
succumb to disease and be dependent on
medication, be dependant on nicotine
patches, and not live long enough to
sustain an ample amount of retiremant
checks. All research that shows tobacco
is bad is paid for by pharmaceuticals, we
can only trust the truth, all of the
worlds oldest living people were
smokers[1], nicotine is a vitamin [4],
smoking cures a wide array of diseases[6].
Most tobacco today is polluted with
harmful chemicals, however there is
organic/natural tobacco available on the
market. The damage posed by dangerous
chemicals added to tobacco is actually
shown by new studies claiming that
marijuana smoking is not linked to lung
cancer [11]. The obvious explanation
being that marijuana is typically not
treated with such chemicals.
The pro's: alcohol
some of the worlds oldest living people
were considered "moderate drinkers".
Moderate drinking means 1-3 glasses of
alcohol a day. The queen elizabeth lived
100 years drinking gin cocktails and
smoking cigarettes daily. "unfiltered"
beer is chalk full of b-vitamins, it is
known as "liquid bread".[8] moderate
drinking is known to provide over 50
different health benefits[9].
The cons: alcohol
most alcohol on the market is cheap and
shitty (no reference needed). Filtered
beer is crap, most alcohol is polluted
with preservatives and chemical
flavorings. For a good drink, buy quality
gin that has been distilled at least 3
times. I.E. "bombay sapphire", mix it
with all natural tonic water and squeeze
some grapefruit juice into it. Or try
drinking unfiltered beer for a real health
experience.
Summary:
read my sources, light up, have a drink,
encourage your children to smoke.
References:
1: the evidence - world's oldest - all
smokers http://
www.Forces.Org/evidence/hamilton/other/old
est.Htm
2:biography of madame jeanne calment http://www.Biogs.Com/fa
mous/calment.Html
3. 120 year-old woman claims smoking pot
every day is her secret to long life. Http://clipmarks.Com/clipmark/bf42971b
-82ed-4e28-ad4c-854caf51629b/
4. Encyclopedia entry for vitamin b3
(niacin) http://en.Wikipedia.Org/wiki
/niacin
5: a reference of biographical information
regarding jeanne calment and her
consumption of chocolate. Http://ww
w.Imminst.Org/forum/index.Php?S=&act=s
t&f=1&t=4845&st=0&#entry44
009
6. Smokers paradoxes, the health benefits
of smoking http://en.Wikipedia.Org/wiki/tobac
co_smoking#health_benefits_of_smoking
8.Vitamin b sources, wikipedia http://
en.Wikipedia.Org/wiki/vitamin_b#vitamin_b_
sources
9. Alcohol and health http://ww
w2.Potsdam.Edu/hansondj/alcoholandhealth.H
tml
10. Tobacco will kill 1 billion this
century http://www.Foxnews.Com/story/0,
2933,202810,00.Html?Spage=fnc.Health/cance
r
11. Pot smoking not linked to lung cancer
http
://www.Entheology.Org/edoto/anmviewer.Asp?
A=246&z=9
|
Makoto
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 263 Location: Japan
Posted: 01-26-07 06:16am
This is from one of your sources
"health benefits of smoking
while smoking is synonymous with damaging
one's health, a few marginal health
benefits have been observed in smokers,
reducing their risk of several diseases.
It should be noted that the increased risk
of terminal illness from habitual smoking
is still widely believed to outweigh the
benefits and should not be taken as
evidence that smoking is healthful or
beneficial overall.
"
i think common sense would say that
smoking is not a natural thing for the
body. Breathing in smoke surely can not
be good for you at all. That thick black
smoke that soots up your clothes, room,
etc. You can not possibly be arguing
that smoking is good for you.
There might be some benefits, but those
benefits can be gotten in other ways.
Smoking is not the only answer. No
matter if it is organic cigarettes or not,
smoke is smoke. Humans were not meant to
be breathing in smoke on a regular
basis.
Common sense that is all it takes. When
we over think things, or try to
rationalize for our mistakes, we get
arugments like up above. Common sense
will trump arguments for smoking any day.
|
dandate
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 3
Posted: 01-26-07 19:58pm
In regards to your comment on common
sense. Milton berle once said, "if george
burns can live 105 years smoking 20 cigars
a day since the age of 12, why should I
worry if it is bad for me?".
|
Makoto
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 263 Location: Japan
Posted: 01-27-07 06:25am
You have to be joking. That is like every
smoker using the "my uncle fred smoked
until he died at the age of 99 excuse".
Every smoker knows of an uncle fred.
Funny thing, is uncle fred is more myth
than fact. Sure some live and smoke their
whole lives, and smoke hard. But consider
how many fell to cigarettes. Their
numbers are much greater.
If you compare all the "uncle freds" to
all the people out there dying of lung
cancer or have died of lung cancer from
smoking(during uncle fred's life time),
one will see where common sense lies. I
have no doubt that there are way more
smokers who have died from
cigars/cigarettes than there are geroge
burns.
Again, common sense. I do not need a
quote from some star(and who are they that
we should be taking advice about our
health) to tell me that if I put my hand
on a burner it is going to hurt. Common
sense will tell you that. So why is it so
hard to believe that breathing in smoke,
which is not natural, will cause you harm.
Again common sense that is all it takes.
Common sense and mother nature can not be
argued with or beaten.
|
The Godly One
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 76
Posted: 01-27-07 06:42am
The only thing that I know that it helps
with is motor tics that occur in tourettes
syndrome.
|
Makoto
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 263 Location: Japan
Posted: 01-27-07 10:30am
Understand what you are saying in terms of
this" motor tics that occur in tourettes
syndrome.". I think your spelling might
be wrong. Not sure, but hey. I am pretty
sure.,
"""it"". What is "it". Smoking, or
nicotene?? Are we talking abour cigars,
or cigarettes?? If you wanna pipe in here
please be able to keep up with the
conversation.
The phrase you are looking for is "turrets
syndrome". And as far as nicotene is
concerened when it comes to turrets,
please provide some proof.
Yes, there are things that nicotene might
be able to fix(i have my doubts, but will
withhold judgment), but anyone with half a
brian should be able to realize that
smoking crap is not the best way to have
nicotene enter your body.
Funny thing is the oringinator of this
post said that "smoking is actually very
good for you - the evidence
" which is very stupid to even start to
believe in. Smoking is not good for you
at all. Anyone trying to get off of
nicotene addiction should not believe in
such fairy tales.
Smoking is not natural, and therefore not
healthy. Is eating rocks natural??? No.
....Right? So, how in the hell can
smoking nicotene, a poison, be healthy for
you. By simple fact, it is a poison to
the human body, therefore, it can not be
healthy.
Is this as good as it is going to get
|
UCanQuit
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 109 Location: SEATTLE
Posted: 02-24-07 14:52pm
LOL
I see DanDate made it over to here to talk
about his slant on smoking being good for
you. He was at another doing the same
thing. So easily explainable to debunk
what he says. I debunked it at another
site.
You shouldn't sweat this guy so much.
By the way Makoto. Nicotine is spelled
with an I not an E as in Nicotene.
Hajimemashite! Yoroshiku onegaishimasu
|
UCanQuit
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 109 Location: SEATTLE
Posted: 02-24-07 14:55pm
This post won't let me say hajimemashite?
|
UCanQuit
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 109 Location: SEATTLE
Posted: 02-24-07 14:56pm
Oic, it is because of the spelling in it
spells an english bad word. I'll take out
the letter I
Hajimemashte
|
Makoto
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 263 Location: Japan
Posted: 02-24-07 15:09pm
ok dude you too lol
|
AbsentMinded20
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Feb 2007 Posts: 24 Location: Canada
Posted: 02-24-07 17:44pm
this is a retarded post....this person
really wants to keep on smoking.
|
The Godly One
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 76
Posted: 04-01-07 15:55pm
Makoto
wrote:
Understand what you are
saying in terms of this" motor tics that
occur in tourettes syndrome.". I think
your spelling might be wrong. Not sure,
but hey. I am pretty sure.,
"""it"". What is "it". Smoking, or
nicotene?? Are we talking abour cigars,
or cigarettes?? If you wanna pipe in here
please be able to keep up with the
conversation.
The phrase you are looking for is "turrets
syndrome". And as far as nicotene is
concerened when it comes to turrets,
please provide some proof.
Yes, there are things that nicotene might
be able to fix(i have my doubts, but will
withhold judgment), but anyone with half a
brian should be able to realize that
smoking crap is not the best way to have
nicotene enter your body.
Funny thing is the oringinator of this
post said that "smoking is actually very
good for you - the evidence
" which is very stupid to even start to
believe in. Smoking is not good for you
at all. Anyone trying to get off of
nicotene addiction should not believe in
such fairy tales.
Smoking is not natural, and therefore not
healthy. Is eating rocks natural??? No.
....Right? So, how in the hell can
smoking nicotene, a poison, be healthy for
you. By simple fact, it is a poison to
the human body, therefore, it can not be
healthy.
Is this as good as it is going to get
My spelling is correct. It is also
correct to say that smoking helps with
motor tics. The way in which you take it
is up to you.
As for proof, Google is your friend.
|
UCanQuit
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 109 Location: SEATTLE
Posted: 04-02-07 20:37pm
LMAO,
You still trying to make it sound like
smoking is good for you?
Smoking is not good for you. Get over it!
Smoking is not good for tourettes
syndrome.
Small amounts of nicotine helps with
tourettes syndrome. It is not smoking. It
is nicotine. You don't need to smoke to
get nicotine.
Reseach has shown that LSD may help people
with mental issues, but that doesn't mean
you advocate dropping acid.
Smoking is bad for you, period. Even
natural tobacco.
The combustion of natural tobacco causes
the person to inhale carbon monoxide and
400 other carcinogens and poisons.
Including but not limited to hydrogen
cyanide, ammonia and carcinogenic
hydrocarbons.
This isn't from additives. This is from
the combustion of NATURAL TOBACCO.
Get over it!
|
The Godly One
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 76
Posted: 04-03-07 01:25am
UCanQuit
wrote:
LMAO,
You still trying to make it sound like
smoking is good for you?
Smoking is not good for you. Get over it!
Smoking is not good for tourettes
syndrome.
Small amounts of nicotine helps with
tourettes syndrome. It is not smoking. It
is nicotine. You don't need to smoke to
get nicotine.
Reseach has shown that LSD may help people
with mental issues, but that doesn't mean
you advocate dropping acid.
Smoking is bad for you, period. Even
natural tobacco.
The combustion of natural tobacco causes
the person to inhale carbon monoxide and
400 other carcinogens and poisons.
Including but not limited to hydrogen
cyanide, ammonia and carcinogenic
hydrocarbons.
This isn't from additives. This is from
the combustion of NATURAL TOBACCO.
Get over it!
I do not even smoke.
Of course it is the nicotine that helps,
but there is no need to point out every
little detail.
Nodody apart from the thread starter (who
is obviously winding you lot up) is
claiming that it is good for one's health
in the ultimate sense.
|
UCanQuit
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 109 Location: SEATTLE
Posted: 04-03-07 08:25am
Actually, I thought you were Dandate under
a different nic.
|
The Godly One
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 76
Posted: 04-03-07 21:33pm
UCanQuit
wrote:
Actually, I thought you were
Dandate under a different
nic.
Ah, I thought so. That was unfortunate.
Well, my post was just a chime in on a
topic that I briefly skimmed over.
Because it was my first time on this
particular forum I assumed that this was
the sort of discussion that you guys
usually get.
Obviously my comments were very
inappropriate in a forum designed for
support purposes.
organic weed, and tobacco and natural
stuff like that arent as bad for you, but
when you get the nicotine and tar and caca
like that, thats what kills you. even just
the heat from the cigarette burns your
insides and messed up your immune systems
and stuff, so nothing about smoking can be
good.
|
UCanQuit
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 109 Location: SEATTLE
Posted: 06-21-07 12:04pm
These pro smoking statements are basically
slants to make smoking look like it might
be good for you. While some of it might be
true. It is in a context that doesn't tell
the whole story.
It is true that niacin was discovered in
nicotine. Also it is true that nicotine is
in nightshade foods such as potatoes,
tomatoes, eggplants etc.
WhyQuit.com as an article talking about
this.
Yes there is nicotine in night shade
foods. The amount though is so small that
there is no effect. It is a trace amount.
It is so small in fact that when it was
discovered in nightshade foods that they
thought that the farmers might be using
nicotine as a pesticide since it is
naturally the tobacco's plant insecticide.
It is possible that if a person ate a very
large amount of nightshades that cotonine(
a byproduct of nicotine showing that
nicotine has been metabolized) might be
present. To be clear though, the actual
nicotine would be so small it wouldn't
cause the effect of withdrawal.
Also nightshade foods can be bad for
people. Nightshade foods are the natural
foods that seem to give people the most
problems. People who suffer from
arthritis, bursitis, eczema, acid reflux
disease, lupus and many other diseases and
conditions, are reccomended to remove all
nightshade foods from their diet. Once
nightshade foods are eliminated from their
diet, a lot of people report improvemnet
of their ailments.
While in trace amounts nicotine is no big
deal, just like flouride, in larger
amounts it becomes toxic. 60mg of
nicotine(3 drops) can kill a person. So to
use smoking as a health benefit is
deceptive at the very least and saying it
is dangerous is an understatement. It is
like saying swallowing larger amounts of
flouride is going to make your teeth
stronger. When in reality, flouride makes
a great rat poison.
To tell someone to smoke to get Vitamin B3
is ridiculous. Niacin and nicotine
actually create different effects. Niacin
increases the diameter of veins promoting
better blood flow. That's why some people
become flush when they take it. Nicotine
on the other hand, restricts arteries. It
raises the heartbeat by around 20 beats a
minute and a chemical interaction in the
body causes the body to release it's own
stored fats and cholesterols. The carbon
monoxide from combustable tobacco (natural
or not) poisons the blood's ability to
carry oxygen. A smoker who is thin, will
probably have a higher bad cholesterol
count and higher blood pressure and poorer
circulation
People can get there daily need of Niacin
just from eating fish and poultry. You
don't need to smoke to do it. Smoking
actually hampers Vitamin C. Also eating
fish will give the person the essential
oils they need.
Don't be too hyped up about Niacin. Niacin
itself can be dangerous. If people
continue to take Niacin at higher doses.
Doses that it is sold at in drug stores,
it can cause liver damage. Niacin in
natural foods is enough.
We do not have receptors specifically made
to receive nicotine. They are specifically
made for the neurotransmitter
acetylcholine. Nicotine mimics this and it
releases a large amount of dopamine. Sound
positive? Well the problem is, the brain
needs to regulate this. It cannot regulate
nicotine as it is a foreign
substance(poison) so it has no other
choice but to turn down it's own
sensitvity to acetylcholine. This make the
smoker rely a lot more on the cigarette to
feel good or more accurately, feel
nicotine normal. I see no benefit to
hamper our own natural neurotransmitters
only to rely on a poison to give us a
false sense of accomplishment. To make us
think we feel better when we do smoke.
Smoking does not make people calm. It only
relieves withdrawal. A withdrawal that was
never there before we smoked. This is what
smokers focus on. The relief of withdrawal
instead of realizing it was the previous
cigarette that created the stress.
Read my post on Stress and quitting and
you'll see the illusion that smoking
causes smokers to believe about this.
I don't know about Swedish researchers and
their findings, but nicotine hamper's
Vitamin A and new research has shown that
nicotine on it's own can malform cells,
and might be tied to at least one form of
lung cancer. Also most deaths are from
circulatory conditions and not Cancer.
Now as far as asthma. I have a friend who
by the way is a triplet. He smokes a lot
of marijuana. He suffers from asthma. His
other 2 brothers do not smoke. They have
no problems. Their sister smokes
cigarettes. She suffers from asthma.
Coincedence?
Also their is a disease almost exclusive
to smokers called Buergers Disease. It is
a circulatory condition that causes loss
of circulation, gagne green and amputation
of extremeties. The interesting thing
though is that when the person quits
smoking before gagne green sets in. The
condition usually fully reverses itself,
but once they start to smoke again the
condition comes back very quickly and with
full force.
You can't argue with the fact that natural
tobacco is better than major label brand
cigarettes. When you remove most of the
chemicals it will make smoking safer, but
it will not make smoking safe.
Smoking kills cilia. Natural tobacco or
not. By saying that firewood is harsher or
that people cooked with it, doesn't make a
valid point that smoking is good for you.
Even if it is true, at best it says that
smoking is not as bad as huffing away on
firewood. Saying one thing is bad does not
make another thing good.
He mentioned that smokers were the most
social people you know. He's right,
smoking is social, when you're around
other smokers! Other than that, I see
smokers as being some of the most anti
social people around.
The HIV case is not the first that a
person has had it and then become HIV
negative. There are reports on this and
researchers have found that it might have
to do with some people having a missing
part of a chromosome. This makes it so the
HIV virus cannot attach itself to the cell
and it ends up dying. The HIV virus needs
a host. Scientists believe that it is the
same missing link that makes it so that
some people seem immune to chicken pox.
While research has shown that small
amounts of nicotine produces positive
reactions in research to people suffering
from Parkinson's and Alzheimers and even
Schizophrenia. One thing to note. Smoking
has been tied to memory loss and
depression. Most shizophrenics are smokers
and 70% of those smokers are heavy
smokers. So what came first? The chicken
or the egg?
Even if there are no health hazards to
smoking (hypothetically). Is being
addicted to a substance a way to live. Is
Smelling like smoke sounding appealing? Is
paying thousands of dollars a year to
smoke, for the rest of your life a great
way to spend your money? Even if there
weren't hazards to smoking, a person is
still left with negatives about smoking.
He gives a few examples of people living
long lives. There are 50,000 centurions in
America. Out of all of them how many do
you really think smoke? My great grandad
lived until he was 97. He didn't smoke.My
step great aunt is still going strong at
95 right now. She detests it. The real
facts are that people's life spans are
starting to become longer in general.
From my own personal experience, my life
has become so much better since I quit
smoking. I feel better. I have been able
to buy new things for myself. I have more
energy. I can breathe way better. I feel
more confident and calm. I'm experiencing
life alot more now. How bout you fellow
non smokers?
Even if smoking did make a person live
longer, who wants to live longer when
they're not living life each day to the
fullest? I have saved over 10,000 by not
smoking. 10,000 dollars?! I would have
spent over 10,000 for what?! Nothing!!
Eric
|
olsons98
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 1
Closet Smoker Posted: 08-06-07 12:22pm
I have smoked about 1 pack of cigarettes
per week. A far cry from some who smoke
multiple packs per day. I suppose I could
justify the minimal amount I smoke but I
would be fooling myself. I had my last
cigarette last Thursday. Since I smoked
so little I have not had the the physical
withdrawals others may have. With me it's
more psychological then physical. I just
take it one day at a time and keep
thinking of the positive aspects of
quitting: my health and staying healthy
for my family.
My father is 78 and he has smoked about 3
to 4 packs a day since he was a teenager.
He's in good health and it would be easy
for me to say my one pack per week is
nothing compared to his usage. But I
can't. Everyone is different. It's all in
the genes. Sure, maybe I could keep
smoking and there would never be any long
term negative effects but I don't know
that. I've decided not to take the
chance.
I expect I'll have some bumps in the road
but in the long run I'm confident that I
will never again light up.
|
melemel
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Jul 2007 Posts: 15 Location: Gloucestershire, UK
Posted: 11-10-07 09:58am
ROFL ****, i gave up a year ago but im
gonna start agin now.
yeah!
The site is not a replacement for professional medical opinion, examination, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your medical doctor or other qualified health professional before starting any new treatment or making any changes to existing treatment. Do not delay seeking or disregard medical advice based on information written by any author on this site. No health questions and information on eHealth Forum is regulated or evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and therefore the information should not be used to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease without the supervision of a medical doctor. Posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author, and not the administrators, moderators, or editorial staff and hence eHealth Forum and its principals will accept no liabilities or responsibilities for the statements made.
Schizophreniahealth
This page was last updated on June 11, 2008