He's knighted in .England.
He put out an album called ".Made in .England"
he is so british

I voted yes, because gay people pay taxes and deserve to have equal rights, notice I said equal rights and not special rights.

They deserve to have health and life insurance and should be able to be on their partners policy.

I vote no, just my belief. Guess they can if they want to cause in the end we will all face god and he makes the final decision on whats right and wrong.

Yes...

A few decades ago it was illegeal for blacks and white to marry, but now its not and rightly so, its ok for old people to marry and rightly so, its ok for disabled people to marry and rightly so...I think you know where im going with this

its legel for people to get married then have it annuled the next day

its legel for people to get divorce just because they want to

why cant 2 homosexual people who love eachother be able to get married...Because its taboo? Well so was interracial marrige...Because they cant reproduce? Well neither can old people....Because its not honored in the church? What happened to seperation of church and state?...It ruins the sanctity? Have you seen the divorce rate (as someone else said)

yeah...Im for it...Plus the fact that im bisexual and I have a lot of friends who are bi, gay, trans, etc....There is no way I could say no

~alicia~

I voted yes to. I mirror what everyone else says that people should have equal rights

I voted no, my beliefs are marriage is for a man and a woman. I do believe that everyone has a right to believe whatever they want in america all the "religions or non-religions" need to understand that everyone has a right to their own opinion.

On the other had I do believe that people who live together as a couple and such should have the same tax-breaks and ability to make medical/legal decisions. If they are sharing money, bills, a house, cars and everything they should have that advantage. Some married couples don't "share" that well. I think these things are legal advantages not marrital advantages.

I don't think one person's beliefs should override another person's rights. Understand that any law agreeing with your opinion is affecting someone else's life.

Yes yes and yes. Everyone should be lucky to find happiness with a man or woman. I think it should be emraced with open arms, but then again I live in mtl where we have a huge opne gay community so i'm used to it.


Donkey, I love your avatar.

I say yes, because they arnt hurting anyone, its there lives not mine, let them do wat they please

It would be fine if "civil unions" carried identical rights and respect that marriage does. But they really don't, at least not in our country. If you get "united" in a state that allows it and travel to another state that doesn't, they don't recognize your union.

I voted "no". I rather not go into details why. Its just how I was raised. Im not the type to bash on the gay marriage either. I usually just keep this subject to myself. I beleive everyone has the right to beleive and have opinions on things so if you said "yes" thats cool too. :d

I voted yes because gay people should have the same rights as anyone else and who am I to judge or say who can and cannot get married??
It does not effect me in a negative way. Why should anyone care so much about someone elses personal life? And if you don't want to call it "marriage" then at least be able to have civil unions so gay couples can have the same rights as married couples, ex: hospitals, health insurance etc..