I said yes, but let me clarify a little.
To me marriage in it's correct sense is holy matrimony between a man and woman for the purposes of procreation.
Religion should not change to fit people. Religion is thousands of years old and you either join it for what it is you you choose not to.
"marriage" outside of the church is not marriage in it's truest sense - it is a civil partnership - a contract.
I do not judge people on their choice of "togetherness" - do what is right for you.
I won't get married because I am agnostic as is steve. To be married in a church here you need to be part of the church. I refuse to "pretend" to belong to someone elses religion for my own gains - that to me is just wrong.
So, I won't get married. I also won't get a civil partnership because it just doesn't cut it for me.
But we have a gay couple who are good friends who did recently get "married" at a civil ceremony.
So when I say yes, I do think they should be allowed to get "married" in the eyes of the law but not in the eye of the church.
Does that make sense?