Just to clarify diamondz, a fetus is technically a human. It is not a p e r s o n, but it .I.S human. This is the stupidest post you could have possibly made.
And this comes from a pro choice website:
"is a fetus a human being because it has a complete set of human dna?
A fetus is human, in the sense that it contains human dna; however, a fetus, like an embryo, is not a human being, as it has no means of independent physiological existence (as does a baby, child, or adult). As such, it is a potential human being, just like an acorn is a potential oak tree. It contains all of the dna of an oak tree, but it is not an oak tree (see also leonard peikoff on abortion: real audio).
Is a fetus a human being because it has a complete set of human dna?
A fetus is a potential human being, and not an actual individual, because it does not have physiological independence outside its host—the pregnant woman.
(toward the end of a woman's pregnancy, a fetus does have the physiological means to live independently outside its host, the pregnant women, which makes the birth of a healthy child possible, though it remains physically dependent until birth. At birth the fetus becomes a physically independent baby/child.)"
abortionisprolife.Com/faq.htm