Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 3795 Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 87
Thanked:71
Genetic Testing And Abortion Posted: 09-25-06 02:19am
There is a condition called .X-linked
.Retinitis .Pigmentosa (.R.P) in my
family. It leads to blindness, usually
by the age of 30.
I have gone through genetic testing to see
if I am a carrier of this condition
because carriers have a 50/50 chance of me
passing it on to any child they have.
I have been told by my genetic counsellor
that because they have identified the
specific gene that is causing this
condition in my family, if I fall pregnant
again then I can have the unborn baby
tested for the gene so that I can
terminate the pregnancy if it comes back
positive for .R.P.
I would be interested to hear from people
what they would do in these circumstances.
Would you terminate a pregnancy if tests
showed your baby would be born with a
condition that would leave them blind?
Just to clarify, I am not asking for
advice so don't worry about 'influencing'
me or anything. I just wanted to get
some opinions on this as I feel it is
pertinent to the abortion debate.
Many thanks.
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Re: Genetic Testing And Abortion Posted: 09-25-06 02:38am
purestgreen
wrote:
there is a condition called
.X-linked .Retinitis .Pigmentosa (.R.P) in
my family. It leads to blindness,
usually by the age of 30.
I have gone through genetic testing to see
if I am a carrier of this condition
because carriers have a 50/50 chance of me
passing it on to any child they have.
I have been told by my genetic counsellor
that because they have identified the
specific gene that is causing this
condition in my family, if I fall pregnant
again then I can have the unborn baby
tested for the gene so that I can
terminate the pregnancy if it comes back
positive for .R.P.
I would be interested to hear from people
what they would do in these circumstances.
Would you terminate a pregnancy if
tests showed your baby would be born with
a condition that would leave them blind?
Just to clarify, I am not asking for
advice so don't worry about 'influencing'
me or anything. I just wanted to get
some opinions on this as I feel it is
pertinent to the abortion debate.
Many thanks.
.
Simply put, no I would not.I do not
consider it as a viable reason for
termination because 30 odd years into
their life they will go blind, that is
like saying should I give birth because
the child is going to die in 80 years.
|
diamond splinter
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 611 Location: ,
Re: Genetic Testing And Abortion Posted: 09-25-06 03:51am
purestgreen
wrote:
there is a condition called
.X-linked .Retinitis .Pigmentosa (.R.P) in
my family. It leads to blindness,
usually by the age of 30.
I have gone through genetic testing to see
if I am a carrier of this condition
because carriers have a 50/50 chance of me
passing it on to any child they have.
I have been told by my genetic counsellor
that because they have identified the
specific gene that is causing this
condition in my family, if I fall pregnant
again then I can have the unborn baby
tested for the gene so that I can
terminate the pregnancy if it comes back
positive for .R.P.
I would be interested to hear from people
what they would do in these circumstances.
Would you terminate a pregnancy if
tests showed your baby would be born with
a condition that would leave them blind?
Just to clarify, I am not asking for
advice so don't worry about 'influencing'
me or anything. I just wanted to get
some opinions on this as I feel it is
pertinent to the abortion debate.
Many thanks.
i would not have the test it would make no
difrence to the fact that it is a human
being and no adjustments would be needed
to property before birth as you stated it
is a gradual condition.
|
Jules
Moderator
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 3795 Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 87
Thanked:71
Re: Genetic Testing And Abortion Posted: 09-25-06 08:39am
stillherelosers
wrote:
why don't you use this
information to make your choice as to get
pregnant in the first
place?
well that's a very interesting point and
something I thought long and hard about
before I got my results through.
Personally, my husband and I wanted
children and so were willing to take the
risk. We would not have chosen to have
the test done on the foetus because we
could not have aborted if the results were
positive.
Selfish? Perhaps. But that was our
choice.
Like I said in my original post, I am not
asking for advice because I already know
what my decision would be. I am
interested in what other people would do
in a similar situation. Stillhere has
made a very valid point - would anyone
decide not to have children in these
circumstances?
|
diamondsz
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 Posts: 3250 Location: , Candyland-Canada
Thanks: 87
Thanked:125
Posted: 09-25-06 11:00am
Purest I can actually offer you advice
because im going through a matter very
similar...
In our genes we have cerebal palsy and
muscular dystrophy, my sister and my
father have been affected by these
dieseases since they were born
unfortunatly both diesease affect males
over females.
I had my children, knowing there could
always be a possibility of these dieseases
attacking them but my sister and father
lead more than normal lives. My father
doesn not tell anyone he is disabled fo
the fact he does not want to be treated
differently but will tell ppl after. I
think as long as that person is treated
normal they will feel and act normal but
it is up to the parents to teach them that
moral!
However, I feel that if a child so severly
disabled they will never be able to reap
the benefits of life/ sit there and do
nothing/unable to comprehend anything then
preferably a mother should terminate
unless they can handle the sitiuation and
not ask of society to take care of them.
This is my opinion but I will never judge
force my opinions on someone, life should
be made equal to everyone but to someone
who will never be able to enjoy it why
bring them to life!
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Re: Genetic Testing And Abortion Posted: 09-25-06 11:11am
purestgreen
wrote:
there is a condition called
.X-linked .Retinitis .Pigmentosa (.R.P) in
my family. It leads to blindness,
usually by the age of 30.
I have gone through genetic testing to see
if I am a carrier of this condition
because carriers have a 50/50 chance of me
passing it on to any child they have.
I have been told by my genetic counsellor
that because they have identified the
specific gene that is causing this
condition in my family, if I fall pregnant
again then I can have the unborn baby
tested for the gene so that I can
terminate the pregnancy if it comes back
positive for .R.P.
I would be interested to hear from people
what they would do in these circumstances.
Would you terminate a pregnancy if
tests showed your baby would be born with
a condition that would leave them blind?
Just to clarify, I am not asking for
advice so don't worry about 'influencing'
me or anything. I just wanted to get
some opinions on this as I feel it is
pertinent to the abortion debate.
Many thanks.
they have until age 30? Doesn't your
husband also need the gene?
I would not abort a wanted child because
of this condition. They would have a
normal youth from what you're saying; and
many people live completely full lives
when blind. And I really do mean full; as
they are not mentally handicapped.
|
Jules
Moderator
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 3795 Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 87
Thanked:71
Re: Genetic Testing And Abortion Posted: 09-25-06 12:17pm
eiri
wrote:
they have until age 30? Doesn't your
husband also need the gene?
no, my husband is not an issue. It would
be carried down to my child on my dodgy x
chromosome alone.
Also, the condition progresses at
different rates. Males are usually
affected far worse. The males in my
family are usually registered blind by
mid-late teens. The women it is more
like early 30s. Blindness does not
suddenly occur but is a gradual process.
My councellor has gone through all the
science of the condition but i've got to
admit that I don't understand it all
because it is so complicated
|
Jules
Moderator
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 3795 Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 87
Thanked:71
Posted: 09-25-06 12:19pm
Stem cell research is where the cure will
be found for this condition. In .R.P.,
the retinal cells die and are not replaced
as they are in healthy people. Stem
cells could mean my family members could
regain their sight.
Another minefield there then!
|
Moo
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1066 Location: London
Thanks: 21
Thanked:111
Posted: 09-25-06 12:34pm
I don't think I would abort but I would
like to know - when I decide to have
children I will have the various tests
they offer to see if the fetus is healthy
or not. Personlly I don't think blindness
(especially at such a late age, although
it must be devastating to lose your
sight).
I would abort if there were serious
disabilities though
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 09-25-06 12:49pm
There are stem cless and other helpful
things to be garnered from a baby's cord
blood; and I think this would be an
excellent option for any children you may
have
|
Jules
Moderator
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 3795 Location: Merrie Englande, UK
Thanks: 87
Thanked:71
Posted: 09-25-06 12:56pm
eiri
wrote:
there are stem cless and
other helpful things to be garnered from a
baby's cord blood; and I think this would
be an excellent option for any children
you may have
thank you .Eiri.
|
jenn_smithson
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Nov 2004 Posts: 808 Location: Texas
Re: Genetic Testing And Abortion Posted: 09-25-06 14:15pm
purestgreen
wrote:
there is a condition called
.X-linked .Retinitis .Pigmentosa (.R.P) in
my family. It leads to blindness,
usually by the age of 30.
I have gone through genetic testing to see
if I am a carrier of this condition
because carriers have a 50/50 chance of me
passing it on to any child they have.
I have been told by my genetic counsellor
that because they have identified the
specific gene that is causing this
condition in my family, if I fall pregnant
again then I can have the unborn baby
tested for the gene so that I can
terminate the pregnancy if it comes back
positive for .R.P.
I would be interested to hear from people
what they would do in these circumstances.
Would you terminate a pregnancy if
tests showed your baby would be born with
a condition that would leave them blind?
Just to clarify, I am not asking for
advice so don't worry about 'influencing'
me or anything. I just wanted to get
some opinions on this as I feel it is
pertinent to the abortion debate.
Many thanks.
i would terminate a
pregnancy for a variety of genetic
disorders that run in both my and my
husbands family (.R.P is one of them as
well). We have not gone through genetic
testing yet because we are nowhere near
ready to have children but when the time
comes, we both will and will re-evaluate
our child bearing decisions at that time.
If it is just too risky (risk of 50% or
greater for any of the more worst
disorders), then we could very well decide
not to have biological children. We've
always said that if we made enough money,
that we would adopt a child and that will
not change if we have biological children
or not so one way or another, I will raise
a child later on in my life (hopefully,
though if we never get out of the working
poor class, we'll never have any).
I would not wish some of the disorders
that run in our family on anyone and I do
believe that an abortion can be more
merciful than the "life" the fetus might
lead outside of the uterus.
|
diamond splinter
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 611 Location: ,
Posted: 09-25-06 15:32pm
diamondsz
wrote:
purest I can actually offer
you advice because im going through a
matter very similar...
In our genes we have cerebal palsy and
muscular dystrophy, my sister and my
father have been affected by these
dieseases since they were born
unfortunatly both diesease affect males
over females.
I had my children, knowing there could
always be a possibility of these dieseases
attacking them but my sister and father
lead more than normal lives. My father
doesn not tell anyone he is disabled fo
the fact he does not want to be treated
differently but will tell ppl after. I
think as long as that person is treated
normal they will feel and act normal but
it is up to the parents to teach them that
moral!
However, I feel that if a child so severly
disabled they will never be able to reap
the benefits of life/ sit there and do
nothing/unable to comprehend anything then
preferably a mother should terminate
unless they can handle the sitiuation and
not ask of society to take care of them.
This is my opinion but I will never judge
force my opinions on someone, life should
be made equal to everyone but to someone
who will never be able to enjoy it why
bring them to
life!
diamondz I thought that cp was a
neurodevelopmental condition nor genetic
one of my boys got his cp through
meningitis and when we asked if it could
affect any children he may wish to have
meaning could he still physicaly have them
we were told that there was no medical
factor involved as it isn't a genetic
disorder.
|
Cambion
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 747
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 09-25-06 17:15pm
I would abort no matter what, but for a
moment i'll pretend like i'm somewhat
pro-life. If I knew a child I was
carrying had any kind of deformity, I
would abort it. It's both cruel and
selfish to deliberately bring a child into
existence that you know has something very
wrong with it. Although there's not much
of anything good to see in today's
overpopulated, warring world, I think it
would be quite mean to let a child be born
without the ability to see, and heaven
knows how much the child will hate its
mother if they find out one day that she
birthed them with the knowledge of their
blindness. All I can say is if I couldn't
see and my mother knew it...Or if I had
anything else wrong with me, I would want
to be aborted - to save myself from
unnecessary suffering and to save my
family from unneeded hospital bills
(depending on the severity of the
problem).
|
nightangel73
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 2607 Location: ,
Thanks: 17
Thanked:13
Posted: 09-25-06 20:08pm
I would have it and I wouldn't do any
genetic testing.
The bf of my bf's mom didn't had children
afraid of passing the diseases of the
family. His mom had schizophrenia and his
dad parkingson so he decided to not have
children.
I personally wouldn't like to get
pregnant, get all excited about the
pregnancy, then receive news the baby has
this genetic disorder, then go through the
abortion and all the trauma that comes
with it. For that I rather not get
pregnant in the first place.