wow hold on a minute I just
read though some of your previouse posts
and you are saying on one hand that
children of 13 are not mature enough to be
having sex and getting pregnant yet you
are clearly advocating that 12 year olds
are/were mature enough paedophilia is
wrong now and always has been some
coumtry's still have laws permiting the
minors father to take her virginity that
does not make them right.
A nonce by the way is a sex
offender.
i do not believe that modern 13 year old
american children are mature enough for
sex. Do I know history and know that in
the past, 13 year old girls were married
off to 20+ year old men? Yes; and there
is no sense in denying that. Do I know
that his still happens today in other
countries? Yes. And it is also known
that in some countries, girls are raised
from a very young age to be mothers and
wives, and that by age 13, threy are ready
for marriage. Do I think it is
necessarily right? Not really; but many
of those countries are desparate, poor,
etc.
Just because it is right in another
country doesn't make it right in america;
our people have decided that it is not,
and I tend to agree with them. We have
also decided that the right to have an
abortion is legal.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Re: Age of Consent Posted: 04-24-06 09:45am
cowboys
wrote:
rosh
wrote:
i think cowboy etc have
convienient tunnel-vision on this one.
The legal age of consent for sex is an
arbitrary number for legal purposes.
It has changed over time and is different
according to country or state. But
whatever lets you take the moral
high-ground.
i have convienient tunnel vision,what is
wrong do you want to be able to have sex
with children, I am in england you sick
.E.D.I.T. And the legal age of consent
is sixteen there is also a law to stop
sick twisted peados like you from
corrupting the morals of a minor.It is nor
arbitory number it is a legal number and
is there to protect children from sick
.E.D.I.T. Like you who think it is
alright to abuse children and who has the
morals of an alley cat.If I am taking the
moral high ground because I dont want to
have sex with children and you apparently
do, then so be it.
Eiri romeo and juliet was a play and also
written a couple of hundred years ago when
it was legal to do a lot of stuff, such as
own slaves, shoot each other, rape
servants and face no criminal procedings,
so your anology falls a bit flat
no it doesn't; because I mentioned that it
was in the past, when things like that
were legal; and that I felt it was no
longer appropriate. You people need to
learn reading comprehension.
Quote:
and if that
happened today romeo would be charged with
u.S.I underage sexual intercourse and
placed on the sex offenders register.What
is it with you pro choicers, do you want
more teen preganancies thereby more
abortions,
no. Go actually read and understand my
post; then you'll see what i'm saying is
actually that I don't want any teens
having sex.
Quote:
more young girls
whos lives have been ruined, more young
girls homeless and pennyless or are you
going to use the figures of teen
pregnancies to keep abortion legal because
you feel that you are
losing.
no, no, and no. Go re-read my post; it's
assigned homework.
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Re: Age of Consent Posted: 04-24-06 10:08am
eiri
wrote:
cowboys
wrote:
rosh
wrote:
i think cowboy etc have
convienient tunnel-vision on this one.
The legal age of consent for sex is an
arbitrary number for legal purposes.
It has changed over time and is different
according to country or state. But
whatever lets you take the moral
high-ground.
i have convienient tunnel vision,what is
wrong do you want to be able to have sex
with children, I am in england you sick
.E.D.I.T. And the legal age of consent
is sixteen there is also a law to stop
sick twisted peados like you from
corrupting the morals of a minor.It is nor
arbitory number it is a legal number and
is there to protect children from sick
.E.D.I.T. Like you who think it is
alright to abuse children and who has the
morals of an alley cat.If I am taking the
moral high ground because I dont want to
have sex with children and you apparently
do, then so be it.
Eiri romeo and juliet was a play and also
written a couple of hundred years ago when
it was legal to do a lot of stuff, such as
own slaves, shoot each other, rape
servants and face no criminal procedings,
so your anology falls a bit flat
no it doesn't; because I mentioned that it
was in the past, when things like that
were legal; and that I felt it was no
longer appropriate. You people need to
learn reading comprehension.
Quote:
and if that
happened today romeo would be charged with
u.S.I underage sexual intercourse and
placed on the sex offenders register.What
is it with you pro choicers, do you want
more teen preganancies thereby more
abortions,
no. Go actually read and understand my
post; then you'll see what i'm saying is
actually that I don't want any teens
having sex.
Quote:
more young girls
whos lives have been ruined, more young
girls homeless and pennyless or are you
going to use the figures of teen
pregnancies to keep abortion legal because
you feel that you are
losing.
no, no, and no. Go re-read my post;
it's assigned
homework.
grow up edit you think you are a teacher
or something, you make me laugh, I am 38
you are a teenager so get some life
experiance before trying to tell anyone to
learn to read.I have read your post and
you stated that personal preference was 12
so go take a hike liar.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Re: Age of Consent Posted: 04-24-06 12:19pm
cowboys
wrote:
eiri
wrote:
cowboys
wrote:
rosh
wrote:
i think cowboy etc have
convienient tunnel-vision on this one.
The legal age of consent for sex is an
arbitrary number for legal purposes.
It has changed over time and is different
according to country or state. But
whatever lets you take the moral
high-ground.
i have convienient tunnel vision,what is
wrong do you want to be able to have sex
with children, I am in england you sick
.E.D.I.T. And the legal age of consent
is sixteen there is also a law to stop
sick twisted peados like you from
corrupting the morals of a minor.It is nor
arbitory number it is a legal number and
is there to protect children from sick
.E.D.I.T. Like you who think it is
alright to abuse children and who has the
morals of an alley cat.If I am taking the
moral high ground because I dont want to
have sex with children and you apparently
do, then so be it.
Eiri romeo and juliet was a play and also
written a couple of hundred years ago when
it was legal to do a lot of stuff, such as
own slaves, shoot each other, rape
servants and face no criminal procedings,
so your anology falls a bit flat
no it doesn't; because I mentioned that it
was in the past, when things like that
were legal; and that I felt it was no
longer appropriate. You people need to
learn reading comprehension.
Quote:
and if that
happened today romeo would be charged with
u.S.I underage sexual intercourse and
placed on the sex offenders register.What
is it with you pro choicers, do you want
more teen preganancies thereby more
abortions,
no. Go actually read and understand my
post; then you'll see what i'm saying is
actually that I don't want any teens
having sex.
Quote:
more young girls
whos lives have been ruined, more young
girls homeless and pennyless or are you
going to use the figures of teen
pregnancies to keep abortion legal because
you feel that you are
losing.
no, no, and no. Go re-read my post;
it's assigned
homework.
grow up fool you think you are a teacher
or something, you make me laugh, I am 38
you are a stupid teenager so get some life
experiance before trying to tell anyone to
learn to read.I have read your post and
you stated that personal preference was 12
so go take a hike
liar.
i'm 21 going on 22, so you're obviously
the ignorant one. I never said I was
older than you; people of all ages can
stand to learn a thing or two. I did not
state that my personal preference was 12.
I said that if another culture viewed
pedophelia as right, that the youngest I
would mentally be able to go and still
comprehend their culture would be 12. I
also reiterated that I still felt it was
wrong.
|
lsipes
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 325
Posted: 04-26-06 02:15am
Age doesn't make you smart, .E.D.I.T..
As you've well proven.
I understand completely what she's saying.
Why are you unable to comprehend?
Maybe early onset of ahlzheimers...
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Posted: 04-26-06 07:18am
lsipes
wrote:
age doesn't make you smart,
health question. As you've well
proven.
I understand completely what she's saying.
Why are you unable to comprehend?
Maybe early onset of
ahlzheimers...
look another sychophantic anti-lifer
crawls out of the wood work, was it posted
to you .E.D.I.T., no but like the rest of
the anti lifers, oh I mean pro aborts you
cannot keep your nose out and claim we are
the ones who interfere, when have you ever
disagreed with or even not understood a
anti-lifer, never you lot are just a bunch
of sychophantic brown nosers.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 04-26-06 09:35am
This topic needs to be locked or edited...
People are getting off topic here.
|
lsipes
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 325
Posted: 04-26-06 12:09pm
cowboys
wrote:
lsipes
wrote:
age doesn't make you smart,
e.D.I.T.You've well proven.
I understand completely what she's saying.
Why are you unable to comprehend?
Maybe early onset of
ahlzheimers...
look another sychophantic anti-lifer
crawls out of the wood work, was it posted
to you .E.D.I.T., no but like the rest of
the anti lifers, oh I mean pro aborts you
cannot keep your nose out and claim we are
the ones who interfere, when have you ever
disagreed with or even not understood a
anti-lifer, never you lot are just a bunch
of sychophantic brown
nosers.
excuse me? How can you claim to know
what my opinions and views are? For
your information, I used to be a die-hard
pro-lifer. So yes, I have disagreed
with "anti-lifers"... Until I became
educated. You judgemental piece of
.E.D.I.T. You hadn't noticed this is a
public board and it doesn't have to be
addressed to me for me to have an opinion
on it, and share my opinion on it. Get
over yourself.
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Posted: 04-26-06 12:57pm
lsipes
wrote:
cowboys
wrote:
lsipes
wrote:
age doesn't make you smart,
health question. As you've well
proven.
I understand completely what she's saying.
Why are you unable to comprehend?
Maybe early onset of
ahlzheimers...
look another sychophantic anti-lifer
crawls out of the wood work, was it posted
to you health question, no but like the
rest of the anti lifers, oh I mean pro
aborts you cannot keep your nose out and
claim we are the ones who interfere, when
have you ever disagreed with or even not
understood a anti-lifer, never you lot are
just a bunch of sychophantic brown
nosers.
excuse me? How can you claim to know
what my opinions and views are? For
your information, I used to be a die-hard
pro-lifer. So yes, I have disagreed
with "anti-lifers"... Until I became
educated. You judgemental piece of
health question health questions. And
if you hadn't noticed this is a public
board and it doesn't have to be addressed
to me for me to have an opinion on it, and
share my opinion on it. Get over
yourself.
amazing another anti-lifer sinking to
gutter level with the insults, now if you
had offered an opinion on the thread then
maybe you would of looked like you had
integrity but no you anti-lifers must
insult and attack.
Your post is totally irrelavant just like
you, as I never mentioned your views, as
it happens I was born in wedlock so that
shows how much you know.Amazing another
anti-lifer accusing us of judging yet wow
they cannot judge just accuse freaking
hypocrite, so when you offer an opinion
then offer it untill then stay out of it.
|
lsipes
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 325
Posted: 04-26-06 21:16pm
cowboys
wrote:
lsipes
wrote:
cowboys
wrote:
lsipes
wrote:
age doesn't make you smart,
.E.D.I.T.. As you've well proven.
I understand completely what she's saying.
Why are you unable to comprehend?
Maybe early onset of
ahlzheimers...
look another sychophantic anti-lifer
crawls out of the wood work, was it posted
to you health question, no but like the
rest of the anti lifers, oh I mean pro
aborts you cannot keep your nose out and
claim we are the ones who interfere, when
have you ever disagreed with or even not
understood a anti-lifer, never you lot are
just a bunch of sychophantic brown
nosers.
excuse me? How can you claim to know
what my opinions and views are? For
your information, I used to be a die-hard
pro-lifer. So yes, I have disagreed
with "anti-lifers"... Until I became
educated. You judgemental piece of
e.D.I.T. Question e.D.I.T.. And if
you hadn't noticed this is a public board
and it doesn't have to be addressed to me
for me to have an opinion on it, and share
my opinion on it. Get over
yourself.
amazing another anti-lifer sinking to
gutter level with the insults, now if you
had offered an opinion on the thread then
maybe you would of looked like you had
integrity but no you anti-lifers must
insult and attack.
Your post is totally irrelavant just like
you, as I never mentioned your views, as
it happens I was born in wedlock so that
shows how much you know.Amazing another
anti-lifer accusing us of judging yet wow
they cannot judge just accuse freaking
hypocrite, so when you offer an opinion
then offer it untill then stay out of
it.
when you insult me with no basis or
reason, and assume to know my opinion
better than I do it's going to .E.D.I.T.
E.D.I.T. E.D.I.T.. My post reflected
that. End of story. You did mention
my views, so don't claim that you didn't.
"when have you ever disagreed with or even
not understood a anti-lifer, never you lot
are just a bunch of sychophantic brown
nosers."
up until this point I have not resulted to
personal insults or name-calling. You,
however e.D.I.T. E.D.I.T. E.D.I.T..
You are not holier than thou, you are not
smarter and your opinion is not more
valued because you're older. And "as it
happens" I wasn't meaning "e.D.I.T. In
the literal sense. E.D.I.T.
