Abortion Debate Forum - On: Love, Freedom, Abortion And God page 2
medical questions | health forums

On: Love, Freedom, Abortion And God

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> On: Love, Freedom, Abortion And God
Author Message
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-17-06 16:47pm

No, I disagree, because it is all different types, a husband and a child and a grand parent and a parent and a friend as well as an aunt and uncle and a cousin thry are all different to me, just like the smell after a rain or a pretty rainbow, now do you understand what I am getting at, or like a picture that you love or traveling around as I have done and you see something scenic that you love and it sticks in your head. True, it has nothing to do with abortion but it is about love.
Did you find this post useful?
|
ssparklers26

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 76

Posted: 04-19-06 15:03pm

I find it really interesting that religious people have this overwhelming tendency to try and force their beliefs on everyone else. Like somehow their beliefs are better then everyone elses. Christians believe they're right, catholics believe they're right, jehovah's witness' believe they're right, mormons etc. So who is right? Why should religous belief make law. I believe strongly in seperation of church and state. You follow your beliefs all you want. Live by the laws of your religion to the letter if you want. Just don't force me to, you don't have the right. If I don't believe in your god then I shouldn't have to follow your religions laws. Anymore then you would want to follow the teachings of the buddha, wicca or voodo. Choice is a right born of intelligence. We have the power to make our own choices no one regardless of their religious choice or lack thereof should have that choice taken away.
Did you find this post useful?
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Ssparklers26
Posted: 04-19-06 17:35pm

Well put 199 and9/9% I agree! I have always said this is not a religious forum, take it elsewhere, it does not belong here, start one somewhere else, it really gets old so,as .Eeri says, we just ignore it, hopefully it will go away! Religion and politics all it does is starts fights and hassels.
The best to you!
Did you find this post useful?
|
lsipes

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 325

Posted: 04-19-06 18:36pm

ssparklers26 wrote:
i find it really interesting that religious people have this overwhelming tendency to try and force their beliefs on everyone else. Like somehow their beliefs are better then everyone elses. Christians believe they're right, catholics believe they're right, jehovah's witness' believe they're right, mormons etc. So who is right? Why should religous belief make law. I believe strongly in seperation of church and state. You follow your beliefs all you want. Live by the laws of your religion to the letter if you want. Just don't force me to, you don't have the right. If I don't believe in your god then I shouldn't have to follow your religions laws. Anymore then you would want to follow the teachings of the buddha, wicca or voodo. Choice is a right born of intelligence. We have the power to make our own choices no one regardless of their religious choice or lack thereof should have that choice taken away.


i agree. Our country's framers were mostly religious men, however they knew that creating a constitution based on religion was only asking for trouble. There is no nationally mandated religion. While christianity is the most present, it's not the only one. No law should be based upon the beliefs of a religion, because that is directly violating everyone's first amendment right to freedom of religion by forcing those that don't believe in the religion that said hypothetical law was based on, to still have to follow and abide that law. (i hope that made sense) religion doesn't belong in politics and legislation. At all. It never will. It's fine for you to not get any abortion because it's forbidden by your religion, but don't keep my rights from me because of your god. I will not be a slave to a god that I don't believe in.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Izzy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth

Posted: 04-20-06 16:09pm

Seperation of church and state"

this is a human rights issue that was developed by the catholic church and promoted by them and many political organizations, the issue of seperation church as state is the basis of "religious freedom" for human beings allowing the church to be free from the state.

" what later came to be thought of as human rights. Among them were the right of the church to be free from governmental interference"

you say you wish to be free from religious laws, of course no one is forcing you to go to mass or forcing you to abstain from meat on good friday, these have to do with worship, that is mans relationship to god, however I am sure you mean in a much larger sense, the sense you want to be free from "human rights" human rights is a religious belief deveolped by the catholic church and promoted by both political and religious organizations, it is a religious belief because it is concerned with mans relationship to man based on judo christian beliefs... For example "the right to life" is based on "thou shalt not kill" the right to liberty and freedom based on "we are all equal in christ" to be free from religious laws in that sense would result in a unjust society, the strongest taking power and enslaving the weak, it is christianity that has built up freedom and human rights it has worked hard to liberate the despot and the slave from oppresion and you want to throw it all away...Based on what...Your own desire to kill human beings
Did you find this post useful?
|
ssparklers26

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 76

Posted: 04-20-06 17:49pm

Maybe in your way of thinking certain things were based on christianity. But let us not forget during the holy crusades woman and children were raped and murdered in the name of god. I meant what I said I don't believe religious beliefs having any business in law. I can believe that it's wrong to steal, rape, or commit other acts that are heinous and believe they're wrong just because they're wrong. Not because of any religious stand point. You proved my point. Religious people including christians believe that everything traces back to god or their religion. I don't. Buddhism has been around longer then christianity. As has the worship of mother earth. The worship of multiple gods was around long before singular god worship. Yet not many laws are based on some of those relgions. I believe in not harming other people. You believe that an unborn child is a person. Good for you I respect your beliefs but don't force them on others. Many other people don't believe that an unborn fetus is a person. Who are you to tell them they're wrong? Yes we have to have laws and yes some of those laws coincide with religious beliefs but that doesn't mean that every law should have it's basis in religion. Would you like it if suddenly it became law that all male children had to by law be circumcised, or your female child had to be circumcised. There are countries where it's "almost" law for a girl to have her clitorous removed. What i'm trying to point out is that we have to have choice. And until (hopefully never) we become a nation that's forced to live under the laws of one religion then no one has the right to tell me what I can do with my body.


Oh and izzy please don't say i've said things I haven't. I have never said I have the desire to kill other human beings. I have never said I think other people should kill human beings. I've talked about choice, a womans rights over her own body and the right to not have my medical treatment decided by religion. There's a difference and you know it.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-20-06 23:59pm

izzy wrote:
seperation of church and state"

this is a human rights issue that was developed by the catholic church and promoted by them and many political organizations, the issue of seperation church as state is the basis of "religious freedom" for human beings allowing the church to be free from the state.


" what later came to be thought of as human rights. Among them were the right of the church to be free from governmental interference"

you say you wish to be free from religious laws, of course no one is forcing you to go to mass or forcing you to abstain from meat on good friday, these have to do with worship, that is mans relationship to god, however I am sure you mean in a much larger sense, the sense you want to be free from "human rights" human rights is a religious belief deveolped by the catholic church and promoted by both political and religious organizations, it is a religious belief because it is concerned with mans relationship to man based on judo christian beliefs... For example "the right to life" is based on "thou shalt not kill" the right to liberty and freedom based on "we are all equal in christ" to be free from religious laws in that sense would result in a unjust society, the strongest taking power and enslaving the weak, it is christianity that has built up freedom and human rights it has worked hard to liberate the despot and the slave from oppresion and you want to throw it all away...Based on what...Your own desire to kill human beings


i do not desire to kill any human beings, born or unborn. I don't want to kill them. Do I wish for the right to abort (kill) an unborn one when my livelyhood is threatened, or when it would be cruel to bring it into the world? Yes. I believe in mercy.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Izzy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth

Posted: 04-21-06 10:06am

Quote: "maybe in your way of thinking certain things were based on christianity. But let us not forget during the holy crusades woman and children were raped and not a nice acted in the name of god. I meant what I said I don't believe religious beliefs having any business in law. I can believe that it's wrong to steal, rape, or commit other acts that are heinous and believe they're wrong just because they're wrong. Not because of any religious stand point. You proved my point. Religious people including christians believe that everything traces back to god or their religion. I don't. Buddhism has been around longer then christianity. As has the worship of mother earth. The worship of multiple gods was around long before singular god worship. Yet not many laws are based on some of those relgions. I believe in not harming other people. You believe it is wrong to have sex with children. Good for you I respect your beliefs but don't force them on others.

Many other people don't believe that it is wrong to have sex with children. Who are you to tell them they're wrong?

Yes we have to have laws and yes some of those laws coincide with religious beliefs but that doesn't mean that every law should have it's basis in religion. Would you like it if suddenly it became law that all male children had to by law be circumcised, or your female child had to be circumcised. There are countries where it's "almost" law for a girl to have her clitorous removed. What i'm trying to point out is that we have to have choice. And until (hopefully never) we become a nation that's forced to live under the laws of one religion then no one has the right to tell me what I can do with my children."

the irony is you will complain I changed your post saying "obviously pedophilia is wrong"...But based on your argument should you be able to force people who believe having sex with children is ok to stop having sex with children?

I dont think based on your arguement you could tell anyone they were wrong, how would you like it if a man raped you and he was let off because...He didnt believe it was wrong?

Or the bank decided to keep your money and you could do nothing about it because the bank didnt see anything wrong in doing it.

The trouble is with people like you, is you want to be free to act unjustly towards others, but you want others to be enslaved to laws that protect you. So its fine for you to kill a unborn child, but its wrong for gary glitter to rape young children, you kil children on based on your beliefs, gary glitter rapes children based on his beliefs, you tell others they have no right to say your beliefs are wrong, yet you instantly call pedophillia wrong.

You want abortion legal based on your beliefs and gary glitter wants pedophilia legal based on his, you kill children and say you have a right to do it, he rapes children and says he has a right to do it...Who is worse the person who kills a child or the person who rapes a child?

If a man is not religious is it ok for him to rape a child?

Without religion who are the state or you to impose your beliefs on a pedophile?

Ps who raped and murdered children durring the crusades, could you provide one bit of evidence to substantuate your claim.
Did you find this post useful?
|
ssparklers26

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 76

Posted: 04-21-06 10:43am

You ask me if I can prove what happened during the crusades. You won't believe those things happened, but you believe in a god you've never seen. And I never said I didn't want laws or that I thought everyone should do what ever they like. I said laws shouldn't be based on religion. I think most people believe pedophilia should be illegal, along with homicide and a whole list of things. That's why we have laws made based on majority. Just to point on you never answered my question whose religion should we base laws on, yours, mine, that guy over there's? And if yours why? Why is yours better then mine. I also never said someone should be able to do something just because they think it's okay. I don't hurt other people, I don't want to hurt other people. And to assume that I do or tat I want pedophilia to be okay is insulting. I was specific I said law shouldn't be based on any one religon. That isn't to say we should have no law at all. That's wy we vote and the majority vote usually wins.

I say we agree to disagree, because I don't think we'll ever see eye to eye.

Peace kat
Did you find this post useful?
|
ssparklers26

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 76

Posted: 04-21-06 17:52pm

Lolbahlolbah I agree with you that is how most religious believers think. And to be fair that is what the bible teaches them god made man etc. Most organized religion believes everything traces back to god and that witout him the world would stop. I don't happen to believe that. I respect their right to believe but I also think it's bull. I don't think everything traces back to a god that has never been proven to exsist. Do I believe there was a guy named jesus who did good works, sure, do I think that means I have to believe everything else associated with that no way. If you believe that having an abortion is the taking of a life, then don't have one. If you think it's wrong voice your opinion, but don't tell me that I have to do as you and your god say. It's like the right to die issue. We'd rather let people die in agony, writhing in pain then allow them and there doctors to end their lives with dignity. All because some people consider it suicide. It's my life and my death how I choose to end my life is my desicion no one elses. I digress though. How is everyone today?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Izzy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth

Posted: 04-21-06 18:09pm

"so "human rights" didn't exist until your fairy tale god?"

oh we are being pedantic are we... Ok. Then yes human rights didnt exist until then.... But of course god esites before the entire universe so, human rights existed before that, only people didnt recognise them.


"you ask me if I can prove what happened during the crusades. You won't believe those things happened, but you believe in a god you've never seen. "

i never said that, I only asked for proof.


"i said laws shouldn't be based on religion."

what should they be based on?


" I think most people believe pedophilia should be illegal, along"

does the fact majority think so make it wrong?


"that's why we have laws made based on majority."

the majority of people think abortion should be restricted to rape, incest and disablity... Do you agree then?


"just to point on you never answered my question whose religion should we base laws on"

depends what the majority think!


Since 76% of americans are christian, you have your answer!


"is yours better then mine. "

i dunno whats your religion?


"i also never said someone should be able to do something just because they think it's okay."

thats exactly what you said in a round about way.


"i don't hurt other people, I don't want to hurt other people. "

well thats what we are debating...Is it not?


"to assume that I do or tat I want pedophilia to be okay is insulting."

well whats the differnce if you can kill children, why cant tom richard or harry molest childern?


"i was specific I said law shouldn't be based on any one religon."

what should it be based on?



"that's wy we vote and the majority vote usually wins. "

so if "the pedophile party" stood for election and won, you would be suportive of majority vote?


"i say we agree to disagree, because I don't think we'll ever see eye to eye"

the words of a looser not willing to conceed!


Peace.... I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives.









I
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-22-06 16:20pm

Well, pedophelia is "obviously" wrong to me (although I can see circumstances when it would not be "bad", but my age limit is 12 on that one. Romeo and juliet anyone?). But that's because I was raised american, and in the american culture, pedophelia is bad.

I maintain that morality is subjective; and so people must decide these things for themselves; and that on a whole humans decided that they needed a government of some kind in order to maintain order; and thus it wsa developed; and thus people are willing and want to use it to have their culture's general ethical ideas made into laws.
Did you find this post useful?
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-22-06 20:40pm

That is why they say while tending bar that always get the subject changed if someone gets started on religion and politics as they both start fights all of the time. Which religion would you want this based on, izzy, mormon, protestant, trinity, jehovah, come on. No, I know we need laws but we need new leadership '.A .Woman.' still with pms not all about money, about reality someone that will straighten the.U.S.A up, a strong one that will quit sending all of our work overseas, someone that will put a bite in this welfare, free living, transient garbage, the right to work, the right to life, the right to choice, the right to speech, the right to help others and the right to help ourselves. Not all of these people that go around suing just to make companies go down, bring back the working people, no work, no pay, unless you are unable too. The same health insurance for all. The right to say bless.America, .God bless.America or or whomever you believe in. Life can be fun!
Did you find this post useful?
|
diamond splinter

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,

Posted: 04-23-06 02:28am

eiri wrote:
well, pedophelia is "obviously" wrong to me (although I can see circumstances when it would not be "bad", but my age limit is 12 on that one. Romeo and juliet anyone?). But that's because I was raised american, and in the american culture, pedophelia is bad.



you mean you support a nonces choice to abuse a 12 year old you are one low sick individual.


How the .E.D.I.T. Can you say peadophellia is wrong then go on to say it isn,t so bad as long as the victim is 12 or above?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Meandering Away

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 535

Posted: 04-23-06 03:11am

eiri wrote:
well, pedophelia is "obviously" wrong to me (although I can see circumstances when it would not be "bad", but my age limit is 12 on that one. Romeo and juliet anyone?). But that's because I was raised american, and in the american culture, pedophelia is bad.

I maintain that morality is subjective; and so people must decide these things for themselves; and that on a whole humans decided that they needed a government of some kind in order to maintain order; and thus it wsa developed; and thus people are willing and want to use it to have their culture's general ethical ideas made into laws.



so what is the legal age in your state is it 12 or 16 or 18.You say you were raised to believe peadophilia is wrong[ true it is very very wrong ] yet support the choice to have sex with minors [ 12 year olds and above] that is totally contradictory.Anyone who has sex with a minor [ someone the law states is below the legal limit ] is a sex offender and as such should have no rights whatsoever.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Rosh

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 39
Location: NZ
Age of Consent
Posted: 04-23-06 18:30pm

I think cowboy etc have convienient tunnel-vision on this one. The legal age of consent for sex is an arbitrary number for legal purposes. It has changed over time and is different according to country or state. But whatever lets you take the moral high-ground.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-23-06 19:02pm

diamond splinter wrote:
eiri wrote:
well, pedophelia is "obviously" wrong to me (although I can see circumstances when it would not be "bad", but my age limit is 12 on that one. Romeo and juliet anyone?). But that's because I was raised american, and in the american culture, pedophelia is bad.


you mean you support a nonces choice to abuse a 12 year old you are one low sick individual.


How the .E.D.I.T. Can you say peadophellia is wrong then go on to say it isn,t so bad as long as the victim is 12 or above?


what is a nonces? I said it was wrong only to my own personal morality. And what if the 12 year old is voluntarily having sex with another 12 year old? That I can't conceieve as abuse. Shades of grey.

Do I personally think that it is innapropriate for an adult to have sex with a 12 year old? Yes; and I will not allow my children to have sex at that age, period. I don't think there is any reason for anyone in america to be having sex with 12 year olds; and the nation agrees, which is why it is illegal.

But, in years gone by (medeival ages) it was quite normal to marry off 12 and 13 year olds; girl's bodies were actually more mature at that age than they are nowadays. Juliet from "romeo and juliet" was a 13 year old girl, and romeo was around 18 or 19. Yet everyone loves that play.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Rosh

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 39
Location: NZ

Posted: 04-23-06 20:07pm

Dead right, eiri.
Did you find this post useful?
|
diamond splinter

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,

Posted: 04-24-06 01:11am

Wow hold on a minute I just read though some of your previouse posts and you are saying on one hand that children of 13 are not mature enough to be having sex and getting pregnant yet you are clearly advocating that 12 year olds are/were mature enough paedophilia is wrong now and always has been some coumtry's still have laws permiting the minors father to take her virginity that does not make them right.

A nonce by the way is a sex offender.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Meandering Away

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 535
Re: Age of Consent
Posted: 04-24-06 01:35am

rosh wrote:
i think cowboy etc have convienient tunnel-vision on this one. The legal age of consent for sex is an arbitrary number for legal purposes. It has changed over time and is different according to country or state. But whatever lets you take the moral high-ground.


i have convienient tunnel vision,what is wrong do you want to be able to have sex with children, I am in england you sick .E.D.I.T. And the legal age of consent is sixteen there is also a law to stop sick twisted peados like you from corrupting the morals of a minor.It is nor arbitory number it is a legal number and is there to protect children from sick .E.D.I.T. Like you who think it is alright to abuse children and who has the morals of an alley cat.If I am taking the moral high ground because I dont want to have sex with children and you apparently do, then so be it.


Eiri romeo and juliet was a play and also written a couple of hundred years ago when it was legal to do a lot of stuff, such as own slaves, shoot each other, rape servants and face no criminal procedings, so your anology falls a bit flat and if that happened today romeo would be charged with u.S.I underage sexual intercourse and placed on the sex offenders register.What is it with you pro choicers, do you want more teen preganancies thereby more abortions, more young girls whos lives have been ruined, more young girls homeless and pennyless or are you going to use the figures of teen pregnancies to keep abortion legal because you feel that you are losing.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 2 of 3
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.