No, I disagree, because it is all
different types, a husband and a child and
a grand parent and a parent and a friend
as well as an aunt and uncle and a cousin
thry are all different to me, just like
the smell after a rain or a pretty
rainbow, now do you understand what I am
getting at, or like a picture that you
love or traveling around as I have done
and you see something scenic that you love
and it sticks in your head. True, it has
nothing to do with abortion but it is
about love.
|
ssparklers26
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2006 Posts: 76
Posted: 04-19-06 15:03pm
I find it really interesting that
religious people have this overwhelming
tendency to try and force their beliefs on
everyone else. Like somehow their beliefs
are better then everyone elses.
Christians believe they're right,
catholics believe they're right, jehovah's
witness' believe they're right, mormons
etc. So who is right? Why should
religous belief make law. I believe
strongly in seperation of church and
state. You follow your beliefs all you
want. Live by the laws of your religion
to the letter if you want. Just don't
force me to, you don't have the right. If
I don't believe in your god then I
shouldn't have to follow your religions
laws. Anymore then you would want to
follow the teachings of the buddha, wicca
or voodo. Choice is a right born of
intelligence. We have the power to make
our own choices no one regardless of their
religious choice or lack thereof should
have that choice taken away.
|
sandyallen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Ssparklers26 Posted: 04-19-06 17:35pm
Well put 199 and9/9% I agree! I have
always said this is not a religious forum,
take it elsewhere, it does not belong
here, start one somewhere else, it really
gets old so,as .Eeri says, we just ignore
it, hopefully it will go away! Religion
and politics all it does is starts fights
and hassels.
The best to you!
|
lsipes
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 325
Posted: 04-19-06 18:36pm
ssparklers26
wrote:
i find it really interesting
that religious people have this
overwhelming tendency to try and force
their beliefs on everyone else. Like
somehow their beliefs are better then
everyone elses. Christians believe
they're right, catholics believe they're
right, jehovah's witness' believe they're
right, mormons etc. So who is right?
Why should religous belief make law. I
believe strongly in seperation of church
and state. You follow your beliefs all
you want. Live by the laws of your
religion to the letter if you want. Just
don't force me to, you don't have the
right. If I don't believe in your god
then I shouldn't have to follow your
religions laws. Anymore then you would
want to follow the teachings of the
buddha, wicca or voodo. Choice is a
right born of intelligence. We have the
power to make our own choices no one
regardless of their religious choice or
lack thereof should have that choice taken
away.
i agree. Our country's framers were
mostly religious men, however they knew
that creating a constitution based on
religion was only asking for trouble.
There is no nationally mandated religion.
While christianity is the most present,
it's not the only one. No law should be
based upon the beliefs of a religion,
because that is directly violating
everyone's first amendment right to
freedom of religion by forcing those that
don't believe in the religion that said
hypothetical law was based on, to still
have to follow and abide that law. (i
hope that made sense) religion doesn't
belong in politics and legislation. At
all. It never will. It's fine for you
to not get any abortion because it's
forbidden by your religion, but don't keep
my rights from me because of your god. I
will not be a slave to a god that I don't
believe in.
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 883 Location: Earth
Posted: 04-20-06 16:09pm
Seperation of church and state"
this is a human rights issue that was
developed by the catholic church and
promoted by them and many political
organizations, the issue of seperation
church as state is the basis of "religious
freedom" for human beings allowing the
church to be free from the state.
" what later came to be thought of as
human rights. Among them were the right
of the church to be free from governmental
interference"
you say you wish to be free from religious
laws, of course no one is forcing you to
go to mass or forcing you to abstain from
meat on good friday, these have to do with
worship, that is mans relationship to god,
however I am sure you mean in a much
larger sense, the sense you want to be
free from "human rights" human rights is a
religious belief deveolped by the catholic
church and promoted by both political and
religious organizations, it is a religious
belief because it is concerned with mans
relationship to man based on judo
christian beliefs... For example "the
right to life" is based on "thou shalt not
kill" the right to liberty and freedom
based on "we are all equal in christ" to
be free from religious laws in that sense
would result in a unjust society, the
strongest taking power and enslaving the
weak, it is christianity that has built up
freedom and human rights it has worked
hard to liberate the despot and the slave
from oppresion and you want to throw it
all away...Based on what...Your own desire
to kill human beings
|
ssparklers26
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2006 Posts: 76
Posted: 04-20-06 17:49pm
Maybe in your way of thinking certain
things were based on christianity. But
let us not forget during the holy crusades
woman and children were raped and murdered
in the name of god. I meant what I said
I don't believe religious beliefs having
any business in law. I can believe that
it's wrong to steal, rape, or commit other
acts that are heinous and believe they're
wrong just because they're wrong. Not
because of any religious stand point.
You proved my point. Religious people
including christians believe that
everything traces back to god or their
religion. I don't. Buddhism has been
around longer then christianity. As has
the worship of mother earth. The worship
of multiple gods was around long before
singular god worship. Yet not many laws
are based on some of those relgions. I
believe in not harming other people. You
believe that an unborn child is a person.
Good for you I respect your beliefs but
don't force them on others. Many other
people don't believe that an unborn fetus
is a person. Who are you to tell them
they're wrong? Yes we have to have laws
and yes some of those laws coincide with
religious beliefs but that doesn't mean
that every law should have it's basis in
religion. Would you like it if suddenly
it became law that all male children had
to by law be circumcised, or your female
child had to be circumcised. There are
countries where it's "almost" law for a
girl to have her clitorous removed. What
i'm trying to point out is that we have to
have choice. And until (hopefully never)
we become a nation that's forced to live
under the laws of one religion then no one
has the right to tell me what I can do
with my body.
Oh and izzy please don't say i've said
things I haven't. I have never said I
have the desire to kill other human
beings. I have never said I think other
people should kill human beings. I've
talked about choice, a womans rights over
her own body and the right to not have my
medical treatment decided by religion.
There's a difference and you know it.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 04-20-06 23:59pm
izzy
wrote:
seperation of church and
state"
this is a human rights issue that was
developed by the catholic church and
promoted by them and many political
organizations, the issue of seperation
church as state is the basis of "religious
freedom" for human beings allowing the
church to be free from the state.
" what later came to be thought of as
human rights. Among them were the right
of the church to be free from governmental
interference"
you say you wish to be free from religious
laws, of course no one is forcing you to
go to mass or forcing you to abstain from
meat on good friday, these have to do with
worship, that is mans relationship to god,
however I am sure you mean in a much
larger sense, the sense you want to be
free from "human rights" human rights is a
religious belief deveolped by the catholic
church and promoted by both political and
religious organizations, it is a religious
belief because it is concerned with mans
relationship to man based on judo
christian beliefs... For example "the
right to life" is based on "thou shalt not
kill" the right to liberty and freedom
based on "we are all equal in christ" to
be free from religious laws in that sense
would result in a unjust society, the
strongest taking power and enslaving the
weak, it is christianity that has built up
freedom and human rights it has worked
hard to liberate the despot and the slave
from oppresion and you want to throw it
all away...Based on what...Your own desire
to kill human
beings
i do not desire to kill any human beings,
born or unborn. I don't want to
kill them. Do I wish for the right to
abort (kill) an unborn one when my
livelyhood is threatened, or when it would
be cruel to bring it into the world? Yes.
I believe in mercy.
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 883 Location: Earth
Posted: 04-21-06 10:06am
Quote: "maybe in your way of thinking
certain things were based on christianity.
But let us not forget during the holy
crusades woman and children were raped and
not a nice acted in the name of god. I
meant what I said I don't believe
religious beliefs having any business in
law. I can believe that it's wrong to
steal, rape, or commit other acts that are
heinous and believe they're wrong just
because they're wrong. Not because of any
religious stand point. You proved my
point. Religious people including
christians believe that everything traces
back to god or their religion. I don't.
Buddhism has been around longer then
christianity. As has the worship of
mother earth. The worship of multiple
gods was around long before singular god
worship. Yet not many laws are based on
some of those relgions. I believe in not
harming other people. You believe it is
wrong to have sex with children. Good for
you I respect your beliefs but don't force
them on others.
Many other people don't believe that it is
wrong to have sex with children. Who are
you to tell them they're wrong?
Yes we have to have laws and yes some of
those laws coincide with religious beliefs
but that doesn't mean that every law
should have it's basis in religion. Would
you like it if suddenly it became law that
all male children had to by law be
circumcised, or your female child had to
be circumcised. There are countries where
it's "almost" law for a girl to have her
clitorous removed. What i'm trying to
point out is that we have to have choice.
And until (hopefully never) we become a
nation that's forced to live under the
laws of one religion then no one has the
right to tell me what I can do with my
children."
the irony is you will complain I changed
your post saying "obviously pedophilia is
wrong"...But based on your argument should
you be able to force people who believe
having sex with children is ok to stop
having sex with children?
I dont think based on your arguement you
could tell anyone they were wrong, how
would you like it if a man raped you and
he was let off because...He didnt believe
it was wrong?
Or the bank decided to keep your money and
you could do nothing about it because the
bank didnt see anything wrong in doing
it.
The trouble is with people like you, is
you want to be free to act unjustly
towards others, but you want others to be
enslaved to laws that protect you. So its
fine for you to kill a unborn child, but
its wrong for gary glitter to rape young
children, you kil children on based on
your beliefs, gary glitter rapes children
based on his beliefs, you tell others they
have no right to say your beliefs are
wrong, yet you instantly call pedophillia
wrong.
You want abortion legal based on your
beliefs and gary glitter wants pedophilia
legal based on his, you kill children and
say you have a right to do it, he rapes
children and says he has a right to do
it...Who is worse the person who kills a
child or the person who rapes a child?
If a man is not religious is it ok for him
to rape a child?
Without religion who are the state or you
to impose your beliefs on a pedophile?
Ps who raped and murdered children durring
the crusades, could you provide one bit of
evidence to substantuate your claim.
|
ssparklers26
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2006 Posts: 76
Posted: 04-21-06 10:43am
You ask me if I can prove what happened
during the crusades. You won't believe
those things happened, but you believe in
a god you've never seen. And I never said
I didn't want laws or that I thought
everyone should do what ever they like. I
said laws shouldn't be based on religion.
I think most people believe pedophilia
should be illegal, along with homicide and
a whole list of things. That's why we
have laws made based on majority. Just to
point on you never answered my question
whose religion should we base laws on,
yours, mine, that guy over there's? And
if yours why? Why is yours better then
mine. I also never said someone should be
able to do something just because they
think it's okay. I don't hurt other
people, I don't want to hurt other people.
And to assume that I do or tat I want
pedophilia to be okay is insulting. I was
specific I said law shouldn't be based on
any one religon. That isn't to say we
should have no law at all. That's wy we
vote and the majority vote usually wins.
I say we agree to disagree, because I
don't think we'll ever see eye to eye.
Peace kat
|
ssparklers26
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Jan 2006 Posts: 76
Posted: 04-21-06 17:52pm
Lolbahlolbah I agree with you that is
how most religious believers think. And
to be fair that is what the bible teaches
them god made man etc. Most organized
religion believes everything traces back
to god and that witout him the world would
stop. I don't happen to believe that.
I respect their right to believe but I
also think it's bull. I don't think
everything traces back to a god that has
never been proven to exsist. Do I
believe there was a guy named jesus who
did good works, sure, do I think that
means I have to believe everything else
associated with that no way. If you
believe that having an abortion is the
taking of a life, then don't have one.
If you think it's wrong voice your
opinion, but don't tell me that I have to
do as you and your god say. It's like
the right to die issue. We'd rather let
people die in agony, writhing in pain then
allow them and there doctors to end their
lives with dignity. All because some
people consider it suicide. It's my life
and my death how I choose to end my life
is my desicion no one elses. I digress
though. How is everyone today?
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 883 Location: Earth
Posted: 04-21-06 18:09pm
"so "human rights" didn't exist until your
fairy tale god?"
oh we are being pedantic are we... Ok.
Then yes human rights didnt exist until
then.... But of course god esites before
the entire universe so, human rights
existed before that, only people didnt
recognise them.
"you ask me if I can prove what happened
during the crusades. You won't believe
those things happened, but you believe in
a god you've never seen. "
i never said that, I only asked for
proof.
"i said laws shouldn't be based on
religion."
what should they be based on?
" I think most people believe pedophilia
should be illegal, along"
does the fact majority think so make it
wrong?
"that's why we have laws made based on
majority."
the majority of people think abortion
should be restricted to rape, incest and
disablity... Do you agree then?
"just to point on you never answered my
question whose religion should we base
laws on"
depends what the majority think!
Since 76% of americans are christian, you
have your answer!
"is yours better then mine. "
i dunno whats your religion?
"i also never said someone should be able
to do something just because they think
it's okay."
thats exactly what you said in a round
about way.
"i don't hurt other people, I don't want
to hurt other people. "
well thats what we are debating...Is it
not?
"to assume that I do or tat I want
pedophilia to be okay is insulting."
well whats the differnce if you can kill
children, why cant tom richard or harry
molest childern?
"i was specific I said law shouldn't be
based on any one religon."
what should it be based on?
"that's wy we vote and the majority vote
usually wins. "
so if "the pedophile party" stood for
election and won, you would be suportive
of majority vote?
"i say we agree to disagree, because I
don't think we'll ever see eye to eye"
the words of a looser not willing to
conceed!
Peace.... I leave with you; my peace I
give you. I do not give to you as the
world gives.
I
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 04-22-06 16:20pm
Well, pedophelia is "obviously" wrong to
me (although I can see circumstances when
it would not be "bad", but my age limit is
12 on that one. Romeo and juliet
anyone?). But that's because I was raised
american, and in the american culture,
pedophelia is bad.
I maintain that morality is subjective;
and so people must decide these things for
themselves; and that on a whole humans
decided that they needed a
government of some kind in order to
maintain order; and thus it wsa developed;
and thus people are willing and want to
use it to have their culture's general
ethical ideas made into laws.
|
sandyallen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 04-22-06 20:40pm
That is why they say while tending bar
that always get the subject changed if
someone gets started on religion and
politics as they both start fights all of
the time. Which religion would you want
this based on, izzy, mormon, protestant,
trinity, jehovah, come on. No, I know we
need laws but we need new leadership '.A
.Woman.' still with pms not all about
money, about reality someone that will
straighten the.U.S.A up, a strong one that
will quit sending all of our work
overseas, someone that will put a bite in
this welfare, free living, transient
garbage, the right to work, the right to
life, the right to choice, the right to
speech, the right to help others and the
right to help ourselves. Not all of
these people that go around suing just to
make companies go down, bring back the
working people, no work, no pay, unless
you are unable too. The same health
insurance for all. The right to say
bless.America, .God bless.America or or
whomever you believe in. Life can be
fun!
|
diamond splinter
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 611 Location: ,
Posted: 04-23-06 02:28am
eiri
wrote:
well, pedophelia is
"obviously" wrong to me (although I can
see circumstances when it would not be
"bad", but my age limit is 12 on that one.
Romeo and juliet anyone?). But
that's because I was raised american, and
in the american culture, pedophelia is
bad.
you mean you support a nonces choice to
abuse a 12 year old you are one low sick
individual.
How the .E.D.I.T. Can you say
peadophellia is wrong then go on to say it
isn,t so bad as long as the victim is 12
or above?
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Posted: 04-23-06 03:11am
eiri
wrote:
well, pedophelia is
"obviously" wrong to me (although I can
see circumstances when it would not be
"bad", but my age limit is 12 on that one.
Romeo and juliet anyone?). But that's
because I was raised american, and in the
american culture, pedophelia is bad.
I maintain that morality is subjective;
and so people must decide these things for
themselves; and that on a whole humans
decided that they needed a
government of some kind in order to
maintain order; and thus it wsa developed;
and thus people are willing and want to
use it to have their culture's general
ethical ideas made into
laws.
so what is the legal age
in your state is it 12 or
16 or 18.You say you were raised to
believe peadophilia is wrong[ true it is
very very wrong ] yet support the choice
to have sex with minors [ 12 year olds and
above] that is totally
contradictory.Anyone who has sex with a
minor [ someone the law states is below
the legal limit ] is a sex offender and as
such should have no rights whatsoever.
|
Rosh
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 39 Location: NZ
Age of Consent Posted: 04-23-06 18:30pm
I think cowboy etc have convienient
tunnel-vision on this one. The legal age
of consent for sex is an arbitrary number
for legal purposes. It has changed over
time and is different according to country
or state. But whatever lets you take the
moral high-ground.
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12976
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 04-23-06 19:02pm
diamond splinter
wrote:
eiri
wrote:
well, pedophelia is
"obviously" wrong to me (although I can
see circumstances when it would not be
"bad", but my age limit is 12 on that one.
Romeo and juliet anyone?). But
that's because I was raised american, and
in the american culture, pedophelia is
bad.
you mean you support a nonces choice to
abuse a 12 year old you are one low sick
individual.
How the .E.D.I.T. Can you say
peadophellia is wrong then go on to say it
isn,t so bad as long as the victim is 12
or above?
what is a nonces? I said it was wrong
only to my own personal morality. And
what if the 12 year old is voluntarily
having sex with another 12 year old?
That I can't conceieve as abuse. Shades
of grey.
Do I personally think that it is
innapropriate for an adult to have sex
with a 12 year old? Yes; and I will not
allow my children to have sex at that age,
period. I don't think there is any
reason for anyone in america to be having
sex with 12 year olds; and the nation
agrees, which is why it is illegal.
But, in years gone by (medeival ages) it
was quite normal to marry off 12 and 13
year olds; girl's bodies were actually
more mature at that age than they are
nowadays. Juliet from "romeo and juliet"
was a 13 year old girl, and romeo was
around 18 or 19. Yet everyone loves that
play.
|
Rosh
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 39 Location: NZ
Posted: 04-23-06 20:07pm
Dead right, eiri.
|
diamond splinter
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 611 Location: ,
Posted: 04-24-06 01:11am
Wow hold on a minute I just read though
some of your previouse posts and you are
saying on one hand that children of 13 are
not mature enough to be having sex and
getting pregnant yet you are clearly
advocating that 12 year olds are/were
mature enough paedophilia is wrong now and
always has been some coumtry's still have
laws permiting the minors father to take
her virginity that does not make them
right.
A nonce by the way is a sex offender.
|
Meandering Away
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 535
Re: Age of Consent Posted: 04-24-06 01:35am
rosh
wrote:
i think cowboy etc have
convienient tunnel-vision on this one.
The legal age of consent for sex is an
arbitrary number for legal purposes. It
has changed over time and is different
according to country or state. But
whatever lets you take the moral
high-ground.
i have convienient tunnel vision,what is
wrong do you want to be able to have sex
with children, I am in england you sick
.E.D.I.T. And the legal age of consent is
sixteen there is also a law to stop sick
twisted peados like you from corrupting
the morals of a minor.It is nor arbitory
number it is a legal number and is there
to protect children from sick .E.D.I.T.
Like you who think it is alright to abuse
children and who has the morals of an
alley cat.If I am taking the moral high
ground because I dont want to have sex
with children and you apparently do, then
so be it.
Eiri romeo and juliet was a play and also
written a couple of hundred years ago when
it was legal to do a lot of stuff, such as
own slaves, shoot each other, rape
servants and face no criminal procedings,
so your anology falls a bit flat and if
that happened today romeo would be charged
with u.S.I underage sexual intercourse and
placed on the sex offenders register.What
is it with you pro choicers, do you want
more teen preganancies thereby more
abortions, more young girls whos lives
have been ruined, more young girls
homeless and pennyless or are you going to
use the figures of teen pregnancies to
keep abortion legal because you feel that
you are losing.