Join Our Community!
Share
Debate Forums > Abortion Debate Forum > Why Does Personhood Matter? And Other Questions... (Page 1)
Avatar
Q: Why Does Personhood Matter? And Other Questions...
asked by: alternativethinker on March 5th, 2006
New User
Why does it matter that an unborn child not have what you would call personhood? Is not that unborn life still alive?


Why does it matter what you call the unborn life inside of a mother? Is not the unborn life as a human life enough to make worthy of the chance to live?


How can you possibly say that an unborn child is a part of a womans body?


Why does a woman have the right to excercise bodily autonomy when she is incapable or unwilling to excercise bodily autonomy in her sexual choices?


Why is the purely elective abortion not homicide when there is absolutely
no reason that the child could not be carried to term?


Is not life under any circumstances with all of its potential positive outcomes better than certain death by abortion?



Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(51)
Avatar
Moo
replied on March 5th, 2006
Extremely eHealthy
Re: Why Does Personhood Matter? And Other Questions...
alternativethinker wrote:
why does it matter that an unborn child not have what you would call personhood? Is not that unborn life still alive?

no one denies it's alive. Personhood matters because it's the concept by which rights are conferred, it matters because that human is now an independant and existing by it's own right.


alternativethinker wrote:
why does it matter what you call the unborn life inside of a mother? Is not the unborn life as a human life enough to make worthy of the chance to live?

if it doesn't matter then why can you not use the correct terms (i.E zygote/embryo/fetus)?
It's nothing about the degree of "human - ness" of the fetus, it's about the .W.O.M.A.N



alternativethinker wrote:
how can you possibly say that an unborn child is a part of a womans body?

i don't say that, however, surely you are aware that the fetus cannot survive .W.I.T.H.O.U.T thw womans body. It needs her body to exist


alternativethinker wrote:
why does a woman have the right to excercise bodily autonomy when she is incapable or unwilling to excercise bodily autonomy in her sexual choices?

because sex doesn't automatically mean pregnancy, because contraception fails


alternativethinker wrote:
why is the purely elective abortion not not a nice act when there is absolutely
no reason that the child could not be carried to term?

homicide applies to persons, it applies to those who do not need anothers body to even exist. If the woman doesn't want to host the pregnancy for 9months then there .I.S a reason why it cannot be carried to term - pregnancy isn't all about the fetus you know

alternativethinker wrote:
is not life under any circumstances with all of its potential positive outcomes better than certain death by abortion?

no
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on March 5th, 2006
Especially eHealthy
You coverd everything that I would say :)
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Meandering Away
replied on March 6th, 2006
Active User, very eHealthy
Re: Why Does Personhood Matter? And Other Questions...
alternativethinker wrote:
why does it matter that an unborn child not have what you would call personhood? Is not that unborn life still alive?


to most sane people personhood makes no difference, which is why there will always be objections to things like abortion and slavery [ slaves were classed as none persons ]


Quote:
why does it matter what you call the unborn life inside of a mother? Is not the unborn life as a human life enough to make worthy of the chance to live?


to dehumanize the fetus, the only place I have heard it called a fetus, embryo or zygote is from pro choicers, in 37 years and 8 pregnancys I have never heard it called them names in the real world only on the net by pro choice.

Quote:
how can you possibly say that an unborn child is a part of a womans body?


it is part of her body but that alone does not give them the right to have that child killed, can I kill someone because they are living in my house claiming benefits off my tax, they are living off me and could not live without me, so can I kill them.?



Quote:
why does a woman have the right to excercise bodily autonomy when she is incapable or unwilling to excercise bodily autonomy in her sexual choices?


contraception is not 100% effective and has for abstinence, never going to happen, better contraception and free and available contraception, better sex ed would be a bloody start.



Quote:
why is the purely elective abortion not not a nice act when there is absolutely
no reason that the child could not be carried to term?



Is not life under any circumstances with all of its potential positive outcomes better than certain death by abortion?


no abortion is nice, whether elective or because of medical problems, some are needed, not all life is worth living, certain pain and short life are they worth putting the child through, when it would be kinder for that child to go whilst it has no sense of pain.




sorry but religion has no part in abortion debate, you has a catholic should know that to each individual the bible means different things, has different answers to each persons problems, so can be used for both sides.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Moo
replied on March 6th, 2006
Extremely eHealthy
Re: Why Does Personhood Matter? And Other Questions...
cowboys wrote:
to dehumanize the fetus, the only place I have heard it called a fetus, embryo or zygote is from pro choicers, in 37 years and 8 pregnancys I have never heard it called them names in the real world only on the net by pro choice.

wrong, it has nothing to do with "dehumanizing" the fetus, it's about using the correct terms and not manipulating words to aid your cause. Yes, most people will call their fetus a baby before it's born, I called my fetus peanut - it wasn't a peanut anymore than it is a baby but people do attach emotion to their fetuses.

Quote:

it is part of her body but that alone does not give them the right to have that child killed, can I kill someone because they are living in my house claiming benefits off my tax, they are living off me and could not live without me, so can I kill them.?

you could kick them out of your house, just as I can remove a fetus from my body. If the person cannot survive without your house it is not your problem.

Quote:

contraception is not 100% effective and has for abstinence, never going to happen, better contraception and free and available contraception, better sex ed would be a bloody start.

agreed (although contraception is free here sex ed needs to be drastically improved)
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Meandering Away
replied on March 6th, 2006
Active User, very eHealthy
moo wrote:
i called my fetus peanut - it wasn't a peanut anymore than it is a baby but people do attach emotion to their fetuses.


there is the perfect example of what I was saying, why did you give it a special name when you were pregnant yet when arguing for it to be aborted you dehumanize it.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Moo
replied on March 6th, 2006
Extremely eHealthy
cowboys wrote:

there is the perfect example of what I was saying, why did you give it a special name when you were pregnant yet when arguing for it to be aborted you dehumanize it.



i was saying that just because someone attaches emotion to the fetus doesn't make it anything other than a fetus (and it's not about "dehumanizing" it, it's about leaving the emotion away and acknowledging what it is)

(and I don't have children, btw)
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Meandering Away
replied on March 6th, 2006
Active User, very eHealthy
moo wrote:
cowboys wrote:

there is the perfect example of what I was saying, why did you give it a special name when you were pregnant yet when arguing for it to be aborted you dehumanize it.



i was saying that just because someone attaches emotion to the fetus doesn't make it anything other than a fetus (and it's not about "dehumanizing" it, it's about leaving the emotion away and acknowledging what it is)

(and I don't have children, btw)



yet you said this
moo wrote:
i called my fetus



so my sympathys on your loss, was it a miscarrage.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Moo
replied on March 6th, 2006
Extremely eHealthy
I have had one miscarriage and one abortion
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
jimmyjackers
replied on March 6th, 2006
Experienced User
moo wrote:
i have had one miscarriage and one abortion



one was natural and one was deliberate.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Moo
replied on March 6th, 2006
Extremely eHealthy
jimmyjackers wrote:

one was natural and one was deliberate.

yes. Did I say different???

Quote:
which came first?

the miscarriage
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
jimmyjackers
replied on March 6th, 2006
Experienced User
bahahahahaha123 wrote:
moo wrote:
Quote:
which came first?

the miscarriage


how is the fundie going to blame the spontaneous abortion on the elective abortion now?


one was natural and one was deliberate.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on March 6th, 2006
Especially eHealthy
bahahahahaha123 wrote:
moo wrote:
Quote:
which came first?

the miscarriage


how is the fundie going to blame the spontaneous abortion on the elective abortion now?


yeah, i'd like to see that. Join me in ignoring him like I did jillian? It worked; and the two of us actually agree on things now.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Meandering Away
replied on March 7th, 2006
Active User, very eHealthy
eiri wrote:
bahahahahaha123 wrote:
moo wrote:
Quote:
which came first?

the miscarriage


how is the fundie going to blame the spontaneous abortion on the elective abortion now?


yeah, i'd like to see that. Join me in ignoring him like I did jillian? It worked; and the two of us actually agree on things now.



how about we ignore the two biggest shytestirrers on here you and the freak bahahaha123, just how many times do you lot need to attack and try to immaturely insult someones belief, when you two grow up to accept other people do not want to hear your hate filled messages then maybe just maybe you will get to debate, I doubt you will ever be mature enough.By the way eiri religious hatred is now illegal so watch your potty mouth.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on March 7th, 2006
Especially eHealthy
cowboys wrote:
eiri wrote:
bahahahahaha123 wrote:
moo wrote:
Quote:
which came first?

the miscarriage


how is the fundie going to blame the spontaneous abortion on the elective abortion now?


yeah, i'd like to see that. Join me in ignoring him like I did jillian? It worked; and the two of us actually agree on things now.



how about we ignore the two biggest shytestirrers on here you and the freak bahahaha123, just how many times do you lot need to attack and try to immaturely insult someones belief, when you two grow up to accept other people do not want to hear your hate filled messages then maybe just maybe you will get to debate, I doubt you will ever be mature enough.By the way eiri religious hatred is now illegal so watch your potty mouth.


hahah .X.D

i don't hate christians silly, you all hate me! So! Why don't you be careful, hmn?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on March 7th, 2006
Especially eHealthy
skar wrote:
no but it is illegal for you to let your hubby have sex your son so you can spend the time on here you messing around sick nerd no wonder you have nothing against the homosexual your let your hubby practise on your son every night messing around sick freak


i don't even think bhaha's married, or has children.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on March 7th, 2006
Especially eHealthy
skar wrote:
no she just pimps her sons arse out instead


you need to shut up, you fucking sick whore! Both of you! You're fucking disgusting!! I don't give a sh*t who's right or wrong! You both need to have more respect for your own children, and for others!

Talking about child molestation, rape, incest; I don't care if you're trying to "out-insult" each other. If your children ever saw any of this, they'd be scarred for life.

Wake up to what the hell you're doing.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Meandering Away
replied on March 7th, 2006
Active User, very eHealthy
eiri wrote:
cowboys wrote:
eiri wrote:
bahahahahaha123 wrote:
moo wrote:
Quote:
which came first?

the miscarriage


how is the fundie going to blame the spontaneous abortion on the elective abortion now?


yeah, i'd like to see that. Join me in ignoring him like I did jillian? It worked; and the two of us actually agree on things now.



how about we ignore the two biggest shytestirrers on here you and the freak bahahaha123, just how many times do you lot need to attack and try to immaturely insult someones belief, when you two grow up to accept other people do not want to hear your hate filled messages then maybe just maybe you will get to debate, I doubt you will ever be mature enough.By the way eiri religious hatred is now illegal so watch your potty mouth.


hahah .X.D

i don't hate christians silly, you all hate me! So! Why don't you be careful, hmn?




one thing I am not a christian and I have yet to see anyone post hatefilled posts accusing your priests of raping children or calling all buddists psycho hate filled names like you have, so there is religious intolerance and inciting religious hatred by you, but from the other posts where your sick twisted have sex wit friend accused me of all sorts you said nothing, you just let it ride but oh boy when my wife started back at her you defended her and attacked my wife doing it scumbag hypocrite.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on March 9th, 2006
Especially eHealthy
Would you say that those priests who molested those boys were real priests? Truly devoted to the ideals of christianity?

True buddhism is appaled at these things; and true buddhism doesn't promote abstaining from sex or the complete suppression of all desires. These are fringe groups, just like there are crazy fringe christians. True buddhism is about moderation and the discovery of the truth in the world. These are crazy people, burning babies in the name of buddha, kind of like the christians sent children out in the crusades in the name of god.

Nice muckraking, but your past is as soiled as mine. True buddhism says homicide is wrong, so these priests are violating one of our prime rules. Buddhists do not believe necrophelia is right, nor is rape, or "magic rituals". We are as against magic rituals as you can get,without being agnostic. Ceremony and ritual are useless fluff that clouds one's mind to what the religion is really about, which is questioning everything.

There are bad people in every religion.

On an off note, I didn't notice any raping of little boys in there.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
jimmyjackers
replied on March 9th, 2006
Experienced User
eiri wrote:
would you say that those priests who molested those boys were real priests? Truly devoted to the ideals of christianity?



True buddhism is appaled at these things; and true buddhism doesn't promote abstaining from sex or the complete suppression of all desires. These are fringe groups, just like there are crazy fringe christians. True buddhism is about moderation and the discovery of the truth in the world. These are crazy people, burning babies in the name of buddha, kind of like the christians sent children out in the crusades in the name of god.



Nice muckraking, but your past is as soiled as mine. True buddhism says not a nice act is wrong, so these priests are violating one of our prime rules. Buddhists do not believe necrophelia is right, nor is rape, or "magic rituals". We are as against magic rituals as you can get,without being agnostic. Ceremony and ritual are useless fluff that clouds one's mind to what the religion is really about, which is questioning everything.



There are bad people in every religion.

On an off note, I didn't notice any raping of little boys in there.


murder is a greater crime then rape.

Murder is the biggest and most destructive of sins, almost every religion acknowledges this.

And I notice the buddhist priests committed these crimes.


End of argument.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Search