Ok, sure get tested. I'm confident it will be negative.
The fingering issue is not so simple as 'virus getting into the bloodstream'. In fingering, we must consider scientific, dermatalogical issues. And it is far more complex than simply assuming that once the virus enters the bloodstream, infection will occur. I extracted this from the words of an expert at the aidsmeds forum:
'when fingering, only menstrual blood carries any significantly infectious fluids. This is because the vaginal secretions found in the vaginal walls and the opening of the vagina are relatively uninfectious. It is the cervical fluids, deeper in the vaginal area, which pose a greater infectivity risk due to a higher concentration of active hiv, [which is what the penis can be exposed to in unprotected sex].'
plus -
'so the odds of an active, viable viral particle finding it's way into your bloodstream, finding a receptive white blood cell (dendritic and t cells) and then successfully injecting it with it's genetic material - through a cut in the finger which almost instantly seals itself from external danger, and which bombards the area with elements specifically dsigned to protect and heal the skin - is purely in the realm of the theoretical.
It has never been documented to happen. In the real world, the one we live in, it does not happen. It is hell on wheels to even make something like that occur in a carefully monitored laboratory. Even a petri dish is no friend to hiv.'
it has never happened in the known 25 years of hiv. It is scientifically documented that in actual fact, this really isn't a viable route, based on far more complex biological issues than most people could grasp.
In the words of hugh grant - 'fuhgeddabowdid'