My view is that a woman has the right to control her body. That means, if she does not want to be pregnant, she should have the right to abort. At the same time, I can understand the view that the fetus may have its own right to live -- provided it does not compromise the woman's control over her body.

If the fetus could survive on its own, that would be fine -- just deliver it. However, we know that very few abortions take place after the point at which a fetus could survive outside the womb, and very few of those are for anything other than a threat to the woman's health. (handicaps and deformities can generally be picked up before 15 weeks, although some may only be seen on later ultrasound images accounting for additional late abortions.)

what I would suggest is that those who disapprove of abortion start funding the development of artificial wombs. Instead of destroying a fetus during an abortion, I would propose that it could be delivered, the woman released from all responsibility or "ownership", and placed in an artificial incubator -- the adopting parents, perhaps, could pay for the costs of the incubation. Maybe those fetuses aborted for deformity or handicap reasons could be "adopted" by donations from anti-abortion groups, who could also come up with homes for any that survived after "birth".

I'm guessing that some pregnant women would not be in favour of this, because they would feel it was the same as giving a baby up for adoption -- i.E. They don't know that it will go to a good family, they don't want to think that there is a child of theirs out there somewhere. But really, it would be not a lot different from being a sperm donor.

This plan would mean there was no destruction of embryos/fetuses, but also that women could end an unwanted pregnancy.