Big bang
from wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
For the 1987 film by picha, see the big bang (1987 film)
according to the big bang theory, the universe originated in an extremely dense and hot state (bottom). Since then, space itself has expanded with the passage of time, carrying the galaxies with it.
Enlarge
according to the big bang theory, the universe originated in an extremely dense and hot state (bottom). Since then, space itself has expanded with the passage of time, carrying the galaxies with it.
In physical cosmology, the big bang is the scientific theory that the universe emerged from an enormously dense and hot state nearly 14 billion years ago. The big bang is a consequence of the observed hubble's law velocities of distant galaxies that when taken together with the cosmological principle implies that space is expanding according to the friedmann model of general relativity. Extrapolated into the past, these observations show that the universe has expanded from a primeval state, in which all the matter and energy in the universe was at an immense temperature and density. Physicists do not widely agree on what happened before this, although general relativity predicts a gravitational singularity.
The term big bang is used both in a narrow sense to refer to a point in time when the observed expansion of the universe (hubble's law) began—calculated to be 13.7 billion (1.37 × 1010) years ago—and in a more general sense to refer to the prevailing cosmological paradigm explaining the origin and expansion of the universe, as well as the composition of primordial matter through nucleosynthesis as predicted by the alpher-bethe-gamow theory.
One consequence of the big bang is that the conditions of today's universe are different from the conditions in the past or in the future. From this model, george gamow in 1948 was able to predict the existence of cosmic microwave background radiation (cmb). The cmb was discovered in the 1960s and served as a confirmation of the big bang theory over its chief rival, the steady state theory.
Proving the big bang (theory)
here's my logic (on this): now, this all leaves one question: how did all of that denseness and hotness get there? Answer: it's there because it's the stuff the universe is made up of or the result of what the universe is made up of. Think about it, if the cosmic explosion (the big bang) occured due to all of this denseness and hotness, the denseness and hotness would've always been there. It would've always been there because in order to create something new you'd need something (the stuff the universe is made up of) in order to create something new (the denseness and hotness). So, in order for the denseness and hotness to get powered up in order to cause the explosion, it would need that something (the stuff the universe is made up of) in order to create the new something (the denseness and hotness). Make any sense? The answer is by all accounts a yes. Now, we have a universe that's made up of denseness and hotness or something that can create denseness and hotness, correct? So, in order to have this, the denseness and hotness like i've said a few rows back would always have to be there. Now, since this denseness and hotness is at a constant rate of powering up, the big bang would always be going off. Thus, the big bang is (infact) real. Hence, the big bang is repetative. Hence, the universe is eternal. In other words, the universe has no beginning nor end. The universe is nothing more than a constant start or a never-ending beginning. You should catch my drift on this. Anyhow, there's your answer to the universe. It really does amaze me how no scientist has ever thought of this (conclusion). Because if there was any who actually have, wouldn't they've made it public? Afterall, an obvious fact of this magnitude would be... You know what? I don't even know what to say. Sorry, but by all means these people (scientists and the like) should have known this. I'm 15-years-old, living with my parents and in high school and the only thing it took me to figure this out was a bit of reasonable and logical thinking. Seriously, what makes more sense? The denseness and hotness always being there, or the universe just being itself and then bam... Now there's all of this denseness and hotness. Hell, even for the least of things it would make complete and explicit sense that the denseness would've always been there. If that bam were to happen the hotness could have been unleashed, but that doesn't make sense either, and we all know why. Plus, even if the theory of gravitational singularity were true the gravity would've had to unleash not only denseness, but hotness as well due to the fact that denseness and hotness or something that can create denseness and hotness is what the universe is made up of. You all know what I mean. I've made my point.
Disproving the biblical god, jehova
the biblical god, jehova doesn't exist contrary to the big bang. God claims to be eternal, but that doesn't matter considering how, well...
Now, god's handed down language was hebrew. God is all-knowing and omnipotent so it wouldn't matter what kinda langauge he chose to hand down to his creation, the humans. Anyhow, the definition of "day" in hebrew means a twenty-four hour period. God, considering hebrew is his (original) language would agree. Now, it wouldn't matter if god handed it (the hebrew langauge) down or some of the people who formed from gene activity from evolution thought of it themselves. It wouldn't matter because if these certain people who formed from gene activity from evolution did think of it themselves (which they did because it's quite obvious) they would've figured out that there are twenty-four of these periods of time that passes throughout (the) evening until the end of (the) morning. [genesis 1:5] "and god called the light day, and the darkness he called night. And the evening and the morning were the first day." here, he only mentions how "light" is what you would call "day" and how "darkness" is what you would call "night". That of which of coarse means that in the day there's light so we can see and at night there's not. Evening and morning, huh? Split them in two and what do you get? You get two twelve-hour periods, correct? One of which so we (humans) can re-energise (spend most of this twelve-hour period sleeping; perhaps god has given us an extra four hours incase we didn't get enough sleep or just felt like sleeping in) and the other so we can do our daily or day-to-day routine, if not just have god treat us like slaves and follow his every command while only featuring women so the species could continue so god could execute in even more slavery treatment (this last one I meant in reference to the bible, if you know what I mean). So, the evening plus the morning is what makes a day. Hence, the evening plus the morning add up to twenty-four hours. Thus, a day is a day. Now, the gmt (greenwich mean time; time zones) was created because by this time or point in history we knew or just had real good reason to believe due to evidence supporting this theory that the earth rotates. I mentioned the word "knew" and then the part about it being only a theory because I havn't done enough research yet to confirm such claims. Sir sanford fleming started the gmt by using hours. I also have yet to find information telling me that fleming started the gmt with hours because he got it out of the bible. But it should be obvious, eh? So yeah, like I said, I still have a bit of research to do. So, the big bang being a fact shows there's no biblical god, jehova. In another sense, there never has nor will there ever be a god! The big bang is real. Hence, evolution is real.
Haha... Delete not!
