Join Our Community!
Share
Debate Forums > Abortion Debate Forum > What Is the Difference Between This Boy And a Abortionist? (Page 5)
User Profile
lil_blaze2004
on June 9th, 2005
Supporter
So far so good! It was nice to see my ankles again-lol. Hey are you part canadian? You say eh alot... Lol also is it normal that I haven't had any braxton hicks contractions at all and I am 38 weeks (well will be on sat)

anyhoo since my "fetus" is now aged 36 weeks (38 gest weeks) can I call him something other than fetus as his movements are his own?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
steen
replied on June 9th, 2005
Extremely eHealthy
trina1 wrote:
pcforme wrote:
trina1 wrote:
they are completely human inside the womb and out.

fetus' born a 21 weeks have a survival rate of 10%. They are not ready to be outside the womb.

i have seen a number of them live and do just fine...How about you?
you are lying. Survival is at best 10%. Survival without what is considered serious mental and/or physical health problems is zero.

Top claim that they do fine is a lie. To claim that you have seen "a number of them" shows that you are a stinking scumbag liar, as dishonest as scumbag pl liers ever come.

It shows that you only care about your argument regardless of how much you must lie to make them. It shows that you are a scumbag troll pl liar. What a pathetic creep you are.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
lil_blaze2004
replied on June 9th, 2005
Supporter
mom2trevor wrote:
no you may not blaze because that is scientifically incorrect. Until the day he is born you *must* call him "the fetus" at all times. Only at birth can you call him trey...Sheesh...You should know this already.


well then.... Trey trey trey trey trey. Maybe it'll make him want to come out! And why when my doc talks to me does he say baby, and he. Maybe it is cause he's from scotland. Hmmm... Should I tell him to call him it and the fetus?

I reposted my above post since we all seemed to post at the same time and I wanted it seen.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
steen
replied on June 9th, 2005
Extremely eHealthy
trina1 wrote:
then how come babies are born at 21 weeks and are just fine?
steen wrote:
they are not "just fine."

oh but many are. They may need some time in the nicu....But they are often times as fine as a full-term baby.
you are lying.
Quote:
and you claim to be in the medical field.
yes, and I say you are lying.
Quote:
shame on you for not being better educated.
shame on you for lying.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
steen
replied on June 9th, 2005
Extremely eHealthy
trina1 wrote:
pcforme wrote:
trina1 wrote:
i have seen a number of them live and do just fine...How about you?

nope... They all have health problems.

nope...They don't. My sisters child was born at 21 weeks. He was on oxygen for 48 hours and today he is 6 and you would never know anything was wrong with him. So now whatcha got?
lungs aren't even remotely close to be developed until 32 weeks. At 21 weeks, it would have had to be on respirator and exhange transfusion for months, you stinking scumbag liar.

In the past, when 21 week preemies were still attempted to be "saved," their nicu time was about 8 months, after which they were transferred to a high-intensity medical group home to livbe out the remainder of their short lives, liar. That's why now, they are left to die.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
trina1
replied on June 9th, 2005
Active User, very eHealthy
steen wrote:
trina1 wrote:
a fetus is a baby.
you are lying.

Intermitting trina lies and trina drivel deleted.



Quote:
a woman who was scheduled to have her 22-week-along pregnancy ended at a florida abortion clinic instead delivered the baby alive in a restroom and says her pleading for help from medical staff went unheeded, even when an employee saw that the tiny boy was moving.
22 weeks is long before viability. Medical ethics demand that no heroic meassures are given such preemies, and that they instead are allowed to expire on their own instead of after hours/days of intensive attempts of keeping them alive.


Quote:
the mother, angele, who asked that her last name not be used, is now considering legal action against the facility.
which she will lose, as best medical practices dictate no heroic meassures for such preemies.


i didn't make it up...But of course....You don't agree with it...So it is drivel. At least I am secure enough in my position to respect your right to believe differently without calling you names. I would say someone is so insecure in their beliefs that they have to back up their posts with name calling and post bashing. And what is funny is that you blame me for something that was in newspapers and on the internet all over the country. Your position is obviously not as strong as you would like others to believe.

I know....I know...Let me see if I get this right.
Steen's next post to trina........

Your posts make my epidermis crawl and although I have only my dictionary and thesarus in which to be able to post extended vocabulary words, I want you to know that your posts are ignorant drivel, and although I only have my egocentric opinions to back up anything I might verbalize here.....I still think you are a liar. Although I have no proof....Just my large vocabulary and my over inflated ego which makes me always believe I am right.
Hows that for you steen....Now you don't even have to post.Lol
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
mom2trevor
replied on June 9th, 2005
Active User, very eHealthy
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
mom2trevor wrote:
no you may not blaze because that is scientifically incorrect. Until the day he is born you *must* call him "the fetus" at all times. Only at birth can you call him trey...Sheesh...You should know this already.


well then.... Trey trey trey trey trey. Maybe it'll make him want to come out! And why when my doc talks to me does he say baby, and he. Maybe it is cause he's from scotland. Hmmm... Should I tell him to call him it and the fetus?

I reposted my above post since we all seemed to post at the same time and I wanted it seen.



my dr never refered to trevor as fetus either. Noone every asked me how my fetus was doing? The general public views it as a baby. They don't say "when's the fetus due".....

Anyway..Trey is snug as a bug in a rug :) he'll be here soon.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
lil_blaze2004
replied on June 9th, 2005
Supporter
steen wrote:
quote] at 21 weeks, it would have had to be on respirator and exhange transfusion for months, you stinking scumbag liar.


you called her nephew "it", that's not very nice.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
steen
replied on June 9th, 2005
Extremely eHealthy
trina1 wrote:
so know you have admitted that they are alive and human....
correct. We have never claimed otherwise, your dishonest remark none withstanding.
Quote:
but they aren't babies.
correct, as the "baby" developmental stage doesn't begin until birth. That you are stupid and dishonest enough to obfuscate this just shows what a scumbag lying pl you are.

I am sure you are making all prolife proud with your outright lies. I have noted that they have not stepped in to salvage pl integrity by distancing themselves from your made-up outright lies.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
mom2trevor
replied on June 9th, 2005
Active User, very eHealthy
Over in the abortion forum a girl (mychoiceisabortion) quoted that she felt bad that she killed her baby. But then when the political aspect came in she said it was only a 7 week fetus?????
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
trina1
replied on June 9th, 2005
Active User, very eHealthy
[quote="steen"]
trina1 wrote:
pcforme wrote:
trina1 wrote:
i have seen a number of them live and do just fine...How about you?

nope... They all have health problems.

nope...They don't. My sisters child was born at 21 weeks. He was on oxygen for 48 hours and today he is 6 and you would never know anything was wrong with him. So now whatcha got?
lungs aren't even remotely close to be developed until 32 weeks. At 21 weeks, it would have had to be on respirator and exhange transfusion for months, you stinking scumbag liar.


No sir...I am completely truthful. Yes he should have had to have been on a respirator (my 27 week old was for 3 months...Of course he caught candida because his embilical line wasn't removed soon enough...But that is another story), at any rate...No one was more amazed than the nicu doc. Staley was in the nicu until he reached 5 lbs which was about 3 months....But he was on room air within 48 hours.

Quote]
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
steen
replied on June 9th, 2005
Extremely eHealthy
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
steen wrote:
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
off topic....Steen, the sock/ace bandage thing worked! Thanks for the info.
wonderful. Just be careful of folds and skin irritation. Can't be long now, eh?


nope so far so good! It was nice to see my ankles again-lol. Hey are you part canadian? You say eh alot...
i spend 1/2 year on a farm near berwyn/peace river in n alberta in 1984, which was when I really statred using english outside of the daniish school system.
Quote:
lol also is it normal that I haven't had any braxton hicks contractions at all and I am 38 weeks (well will be on sat)
not all women get them.
Quote:
anyhoo since my "fetus" is now aged 36 weeks (38 gest weeks) can I call him something other than fetus as his movements are his own?
his movements are on his own at least many of them ;-)
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
lil_blaze2004
replied on June 9th, 2005
Supporter
steen wrote:


Quote:
anyhoo since my "fetus" is now aged 36 weeks (38 gest weeks) can I call him something other than fetus as his movements are his own?
his movements are on his own at least many of them ;-)


so can I call him somthing other than fetus now??
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
trina1
replied on June 9th, 2005
Active User, very eHealthy
steen wrote:
trina1 wrote:
so know you have admitted that they are alive and human....
correct. We have never claimed otherwise, your dishonest remark none withstanding.

Quote:
but they aren't babies.
correct, as the "baby" developmental stage doesn't begin until birth. That you are stupid and dishonest enough to obfuscate this just shows what a scumbag lying pl you are.

I am sure you are making all prolife proud with your outright lies. I have noted that they have not stepped in to salvage pl integrity by distancing themselves from your made-up outright lies.

You are so funny. You can't truly prove anything I have said is untrue with anything other than your opinion. And that and a quarter won't buy you a cup of coffee. Your cute though when all you have left is name calling and temper tantruming.

Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
lil_blaze2004
replied on June 9th, 2005
Supporter
pcforme wrote:
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
so can I call him somthing other than fetus now??


oh, what a surprise it would be if trey became tracy!


oh no we know he's a he. Here in montreal we have ultrasounds more than once. I've had 3 since his sexe could be shown. We all know he's a he. I saw his penis nice and clearly at my last u/s.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
trina1
replied on June 9th, 2005
Active User, very eHealthy
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
steen wrote:


Quote:
anyhoo since my "fetus" is now aged 36 weeks (38 gest weeks) can I call him something other than fetus as his movements are his own?
his movements are on his own at least many of them ;-)


so can I call him somthing other than fetus now??


i'd say....Call him your precious baby son. By the way...I love the name trey. All the trey's I have ever known have grown up to be good, strong men. :)
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
lil_blaze2004
replied on June 9th, 2005
Supporter
trina1 wrote:
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
steen wrote:


Quote:
anyhoo since my "fetus" is now aged 36 weeks (38 gest weeks) can I call him something other than fetus as his movements are his own?
his movements are on his own at least many of them ;-)


so can I call him somthing other than fetus now??


i'd say....Call him your precious baby son. By the way...I love the name trey. All the trey's I have ever known have grown up to be good, strong men. :)


i do. Everyone calls him trey. Except here I call him my fetus-lol yes he's kind of named after daddy and grandpa as they are both michaels. So trey (which means 3) is gonna be michael-trey for michael the 3rd! But we will call him trey as there are enough michaels in both our families.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
trina1
replied on June 9th, 2005
Active User, very eHealthy
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
trina1 wrote:
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
steen wrote:


Quote:
anyhoo since my "fetus" is now aged 36 weeks (38 gest weeks) can I call him something other than fetus as his movements are his own?
his movements are on his own at least many of them ;-)


so can I call him somthing other than fetus now??


i'd say....Call him your precious baby son. By the way...I love the name trey. All the trey's I have ever known have grown up to be good, strong men. :)


i do. Everyone calls him trey. Except here I call him my fetus-lol yes he's kind of named after daddy and grandpa as they are both michaels. So trey (which means 3) is gonna be michael-trey for michael the 3rd! But we will call him trey as there are enough michaels in both our families.


is he going to be your first?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
mom2trevor
replied on June 9th, 2005
Active User, very eHealthy
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
trina1 wrote:
lil_blaze2004 wrote:
steen wrote:


Quote:
anyhoo since my "fetus" is now aged 36 weeks (38 gest weeks) can I call him something other than fetus as his movements are his own?
his movements are on his own at least many of them ;-)


so can I call him somthing other than fetus now??


i'd say....Call him your precious baby son. By the way...I love the name trey. All the trey's I have ever known have grown up to be good, strong men. :)


i do. Everyone calls him trey. Except here I call him my fetus-lol yes he's kind of named after daddy and grandpa as they are both michaels. So trey (which means 3) is gonna be michael-trey for michael the 3rd! But we will call him trey as there are enough michaels in both our families.


that's cool....My best friend named her son dylan chase iii and they call him trey also because he is the third :)
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
lil_blaze2004
replied on June 9th, 2005
Supporter
mom2trevor wrote:


that's cool....My best friend named her son dylan chase iii and they call him trey also because he is the third :)


great minds must think alike-:d

is our forum up and running again yet??? Ugh no.. Hopefully it will tomorrow.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Quick Reply
Search