Abortion Debate Forum - Christian page 3
medical questions | health forums

Christian

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Christian
Author Message
where_is_the_line

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Posts: 173
Location: USA: NY & DC

Posted: 04-11-05 15:00pm

I must agree, is that really a law on the books? Suicide is a unique case. I've never heard of people being convicted for attempted homicide upon themselves. And if they are sucessful, there isn't much we can do about it after that fact anyway. People contemplating suicide need help, not to commit the act by the way. Having an anti-suicide law is kind of futile if we do.
Did you find this post useful?
|
where_is_the_line

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Posts: 173
Location: USA: NY & DC

Posted: 04-11-05 15:09pm

"my opinion: when it is their body that is being affected then yes, I believe so. I don't believe that anyone else should be able to make that decision for her.

Do men, women, anyone for that matter who isn't the one pregnant have the right to make her carry a pregnancy and give birth?"


i think a case can be made that the government is obligated to protect human life and the right to life as written in the declaration of independence and constitution. The issue is personhood. If a pre-born human being is a person before birth, and the event of birth is not what bestows personhood upon humans, then the government is obligated to act reasonably to protect human life.

The counter to that is obviously that a fetus is not a person, which I disagree with. Maybe we cannot sufficiently regulate abortion and must maintain a certain amount of availability based on certain factors of the situation, but the wrong message is being sent out by having abortion legal without any restrictions whatsoever.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 04-11-05 17:37pm

where_is_the_line wrote:
i think a case can be made that the government is obligated to protect human life and the right to life as written in the declaration of independence and constitution.
then it should be able to force you to give blood or give your extra kidney to somebody who would die without it, regardless of whether you want to donate or not. After all, if the "right to life" trumps bodily autonomy, why should you be able to refuse what could save a life?

Quote:
the issue is personhood. If a pre-born human being is a person before birth, and the event of birth is not what bestows personhood upon humans, then the government is obligated to act reasonably to protect human life.
it is guaranteed that the one with the bleeding cut or the failing kidney are very much persons.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 04-12-05 01:23am

This argument is getting old steen and it is about time it was put to bed once and for all.The difference steen between a kidney{or any other organ you wish to compare it to}and a fetus is extremely simple,can your kidney live away from your body after nine months,even with all the technology we have it,how long will it live steen outside of the body?


Can a nine month fetus\child live outside the womb,using the same criteria as above,how long will a fetus\baby survive steen?
Do you see the difference now steen we have tried every other way to prove it but you have closed your mind to any other opinion,maybe now it will be laid to rest.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 04-12-05 19:06pm

The relevance is whether a person can be forced to give of their bodily resources to save another life. Yes or no?

Certainly, the kidney patient who could receive the kidney is as alive as the fetus and even more so. That's the kidney patient you happily will let die, by the way.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 04-13-05 02:02am

steen wrote:
the relevance is whether a person can be forced to give of their bodily resources to save another life. Yes or no?


Certainly, the kidney patient who could receive the kidney is as alive as the fetus and even more so. That's the kidney patient you happily will let die, by the way.




ah steen but we are not debating organ donation are we? No we are arguing abortion so it has no relevence to the argument,why did you not answer my questions they are easy enough to answer even for you steen.



Are you not contradicting yourself steen because I am sure you have claimed earlier that a fetus is not alive,by the way I am never happy when someone dies if it was within my power,i would keep everyone alive untill a natural death occurs.Please answer the questions thank you
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 04-13-05 10:46am

foreverblue wrote:
ah steen but we are not debating organ donation are we?
we are arguing whether you can force somebody to give of their bodily resources against their will for any reason.

Quote:
by the way I am never happy when someone dies if it was within my power,i would keep everyone alive untill a natural death occurs.
yet, you won't force people to give of their bodily resources to keep "someone" alive?
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 04-13-05 10:52am

steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
ah steen but we are not debating organ donation are we?
we are arguing whether you can force somebody to give of their bodily resources against their will for any reason.


Quote:
by the way I am never happy when someone dies if it was within my power,i would keep everyone alive untill a natural death occurs.
yet, you won't force people to give of their bodily resources to keep "someone" alive?



what like you would rather a child was aborted than share bodily resources with the mother
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 04-13-05 21:22pm

foreverblue wrote:
what like you would rather a child was aborted than share bodily resources with the mother
nope. I just don;t want her to be forced to do so, particularly when prolifers yammer hypocritically about how they shouldn't be forced to give of their bodily resources even though they want to force the pregnant woman to do so.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 04-14-05 00:58am

steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
what like you would rather a child was aborted than share bodily resources with the mother
nope. I just don;t want her to be forced to do so, particularly when prolifers yammer hypocritically about how they shouldn't be forced to give of their bodily resources even though they want to force the pregnant woman to do so.




so steen what is your argument to a female pro lifer they do give thier bodily resources and cannot be classed as hypocritical.I donate blood every 4 months steen I have done since I was 21 and now I am nearly 37 I am still giving blood.By the way steen is it not true that if you need a kidney it as to be a perfect match,such as another member of the family,so once again your argument is invalid,you are putting a criteria to what someones bodily resources can be used for steen and that is not your place.
Did you find this post useful?
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-14-05 14:21pm

Foreverblue, there are a lot of times that true family members kidneys are not a match so that is not true, mine was given to a stranger that was in need. I too give blood, I belonged to the gallon club for many years, I help kids to have a better home that are beaten abused, neglected, sexually molested and all you do is whine about giving a little blood and you do not even try to understand why their is a need for abortion, it is people like you who are selfish, self-centered and stupid. Just because you agree w/someone does not mean that you are married to that person or whatever, that has got to be the most stupidist comments I have heard and I have heard a bunch but I guess it can be expected from someone like you, I do not agree w/a lot of things that steen says. Me and my husband do not agree on a lot of things but we still love each other, so get a clue, get a life, get a brain.
Sincerely,
sandy
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 04-14-05 16:34pm

sandyallen wrote:
foreverblue, there are a lot of times that true family members kidneys are not a match so that is not true, mine was given to a stranger that was in need. I too give blood, I belonged to the gallon club for many years, I help kids to have a better home that are beaten abused, neglected, sexually molested and all you do is whine about giving a little blood and you do not even try to understand why their is a need for abortion, it is people like you who are selfish, self-centered and stupid. Just because you agree w/someone does not mean that you are married to that person or whatever, that has got to be the most stupidist comments I have heard and I have heard a bunch but I guess it can be expected from someone like you, I do not agree w/a lot of things that steen says. Me and my husband do not agree on a lot of things but we still love each other, so get a clue, get a life, get a brain.

Sincerely,
sandy




sandy get real you are such a mindless sheep I am surprised that you can even type without steens help.How did we know you would pop up and say you had donated a organ,you have done eveything though have'nt you sandy,you are the one who needs to get a grip silly woman,oh by the way do you not realize yet no one believes your bs anymore,you have done everything and been everywhere,i am surprised you haven't been granted a sainthood yet,so get real,maybe a dose of reality might do you good,failing that find a dark room somewhere and go hide away from reality because clearly you have no concept of what is real and what you have dreamt.
Did you find this post useful?
|
steen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 04-14-05 17:56pm

foreverblue wrote:
steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
what like you would rather a child was aborted than share bodily resources with the mother
nope. I just don;t want her to be forced to do so, particularly when prolifers yammer hypocritically about how they shouldn't be forced to give of their bodily resources even though they want to force the pregnant woman to do so.

so steen what is your argument to a female pro lifer they do give thier bodily resources and cannot be classed as hypocritical.
well, unless they favor forcing everybody to do so and favor forcing themselves to give a kidney, bone marrow and whatever else can be donmated while alive, then yes they are hypocritical. If they want to force the pregnant woman but not all other people, then they are hypocritical.
Quote:
i donate blood every 4 months steen I have done since I was 21 and now I am nearly 37 I am still giving blood.
but are you on the bone marrow registry? Are you set up to donate a kidney if there is a match? No? Why shouldn't you be forced to do so? How about giving plasma, which you can do every 2 weeks? Should you be forced to do that?

Quote:
by the way steen is it not true that if you need a kidney it as to be a perfect match,such as another member of the family,
eh?

Quote:
so once again your argument is invalid,you are putting a criteria to what someones bodily resources can be used for steen and that is not your place.
oh? Yet you insist that there is a criteria regarding the pregnnat woman's bodily resources. How hypocritical.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 04-15-05 09:26am

steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
steen wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
what like you would rather a child was aborted than share bodily resources with the mother
nope. I just don;t want her to be forced to do so, particularly when prolifers yammer hypocritically about how they shouldn't be forced to give of their bodily resources even though they want to force the pregnant woman to do so.

so steen what is your argument to a female pro lifer they do give thier bodily resources and cannot be classed as hypocritical.
well, unless they favor forcing everybody to do so and favor forcing themselves to give a kidney, bone marrow and whatever else can be donmated while alive, then yes they are hypocritical. If they want to force the pregnant woman but not all other people, then they are hypocritical.

Quote:
i donate blood every 4 months steen I have done since I was 21 and now I am nearly 37 I am still giving blood.
but are you on the bone marrow registry? Are you set up to donate a kidney if there is a match? No? Why shouldn't you be forced to do so? How about giving plasma, which you can do every 2 weeks? Should you be forced to do that?


Quote:
by the way steen is it not true that if you need a kidney it as to be a perfect match,such as another member of the family,
eh?


Quote:
so once again your argument is invalid,you are putting a criteria to what someones bodily resources can be used for steen and that is not your place.
oh? Yet you insist that there is a criteria regarding the pregnnat woman's bodily resources. How hypocritical.




www.Dictionary.Com learn to spell will you I can hardly understand your gibberish
Did you find this post useful?
|
jenn_smithson

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 808
Location: Texas

Posted: 04-15-05 09:54am

foreverblue wrote:
www.Dictionary.Com learn to spell will you I can hardly understand your gibberish
non-sequitur.
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 04-15-05 14:49pm

jenn_smithson wrote:
foreverblue wrote:
www.Dictionary.Com learn to spell will you I can hardly understand your gibberish
non-sequitur.



excuse me and your problem is?
What do mean it is'nt logical?If you read his posts you will see the evidence.
Did you find this post useful?
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Foreverblue
Posted: 04-15-05 18:40pm

There you go again, twisting people's words. I have never said that I have been everywhere and have done everything. I could care less what you believe. I enjoy what I do, what I have done and where I have been and where I am going and I never said that I was a saint, that's for sure. I live in the real world, I do grip reality everyday, so it truly sounds like you are the one who needs a grip on reality, little boy. Kidney organ transplants have more to do with this abortion debate forum topic than terri schiavo's(sp) situation. You, foreverblue are becomming more and more of a hypocrite. You, foreverblue cannot handle losing and why don't you stop your stupid drama.
Sincerely,
sandy
Did you find this post useful?
|
foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577
Re: Foreverblue
Posted: 04-16-05 04:37am

sandyallen wrote:
there you go again, twisting people's words. I have never said that I have been everywhere and have done everything. I could care less what you believe. I enjoy what I do, what I have done and where I have been and where I am going and I never said that I was a saint, that's for sure. I live in the real world, I do grip reality everyday, so it truly sounds like you are the one who needs a grip on reality, little boy. Kidney organ transplants have more to do with this abortion debate forum topic than terri schiavo's(sp) situation. You, foreverblue are becomming more and more of a hypocrite. You, foreverblue cannot handle losing and why don't you stop your stupid drama.


Sincerely,
sandy




no sandy we know you have'nt done everything,though you certainly like to make out that you have,as for me being a hypocrite I do not think so silly woman you and steen are the hypocrites,you constantly attack people for thier beliefs then cry when it happens to you.You and steen are the worst babys on this board,you both cry like two year olds and hide from the truth,you only ever come on here to support steen never for any other reason,so get a life you stupid,lying,unintelligant redneck.Now silly health forum stop answering me because you have nothing relevant to say to anyone and definitely nothing worth listening to,you like to accuse,well then I accuse you of being a racist.Using the same criteria that you and that other lying troll steen used to accuse me of being a racist,you cheered him on when he accused british soldiers of shooting children in northern ireland.It is because of people like you and steen that the rest of the civilised world dislikes america intensly,it was people like you two who made osama bin laden attack america,so I am sure you and that other person can feel proud you are the reason that thousands of innocent people are dying,bet you feel proud now.
Did you find this post useful?
|
sandyallen

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Foreverblue
Posted: 04-16-05 15:24pm

You are the biggest liar that has ever walked on this earth. I only attack after I have been attacked. You foreverblue, are below scum. You are the biggest whiner their has ever been. Me, a racist, lol, I have even helped your people, blacks and more that you can ever name, you are soooo weak. I said it before, you have already ruined one site, please do not ruin this one. I have no more time to spend on an stupid fool fool hypocrite that you are. Iam a better person than you will ever be, your time here is truly wasted foreverblue, as I feel I am here to debate abortion, not to listen or put up with your garbage.

Sincerely,
sandy


Last edited by sandyallen on 04-16-05 17:12pm; edited 1 time in total
Did you find this post useful?
|
2ferano

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Dec 2003
Posts: 3717

Posted: 04-16-05 17:10pm

No, no one goes to jail for trying to commit suicide, but if they are caught doing so (and not successful) then they are put into an institution of some sort against their will, medicated against their will (or whatever else the psychiatrists deem necessary) and not released until they can convince whomever is in charge that they don't want to die anymore. It isn't jail or even punishment per say, but really I don't see why a person doesn't have the right to take their own life. Don't get me wrong, I do think people who feel that way need and deserve help to at least see if there is a way for them to be happy, but if they decide that their isn't, then I don't think anyone has a right to stop them. Just my opinion though.
If the government "protected the life of the fetus" because it was a "person", then in doing so, they would be taking away the rights of the pregnant woman. There is no way to protect the fetus and the mother. It just isn't possible. At least not yet. But, let's say that the fetus could be "removed" and put in some kind of an incubator. Then what? Who is going to raise and care for all of these hundreds of thousands of unwanted children? Look how many children there are already with no homes, state "homes" or abusive homes with no one in the world to love them. Each fetus that you would add to this (if you had your way) is just going to become another child with no one in the world to care for them. Is that really better in your opinion?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 3 of 5
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.