Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Posts: 173 Location: USA: NY & DC
Posted: 04-11-05 15:00pm
I must agree, is that really a law on the
books? Suicide is a unique case. I've
never heard of people being convicted for
attempted homicide upon themselves. And
if they are sucessful, there isn't much we
can do about it after that fact anyway.
People contemplating suicide need help,
not to commit the act by the way. Having
an anti-suicide law is kind of futile if
we do.
|
where_is_the_line
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Posts: 173 Location: USA: NY & DC
Posted: 04-11-05 15:09pm
"my opinion: when it is their body that is
being affected then yes, I believe so. I
don't believe that anyone else should be
able to make that decision for her.
Do men, women, anyone for that matter who
isn't the one pregnant have the right to
make her carry a pregnancy and give
birth?"
i think a case can be made that the
government is obligated to protect human
life and the right to life as written in
the declaration of independence and
constitution. The issue is personhood.
If a pre-born human being is a person
before birth, and the event of birth is
not what bestows personhood upon humans,
then the government is obligated to act
reasonably to protect human life.
The counter to that is obviously that a
fetus is not a person, which I disagree
with. Maybe we cannot sufficiently
regulate abortion and must maintain a
certain amount of availability based on
certain factors of the situation, but the
wrong message is being sent out by having
abortion legal without any restrictions
whatsoever.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 04-11-05 17:37pm
where_is_the_line
wrote:
i think a case can be made
that the government is obligated to
protect human life and the right to life
as written in the declaration of
independence and constitution.
then it should be able to
force you to give blood or give your extra
kidney to somebody who would die without
it, regardless of whether you want to
donate or not. After all, if the "right
to life" trumps bodily autonomy, why
should you be able to refuse what could
save a life?
Quote:
tr>
the issue is
personhood. If a pre-born human being is
a person before birth, and the event of
birth is not what bestows personhood upon
humans, then the government is obligated
to act reasonably to protect human
life.
it is guaranteed that the
one with the bleeding cut or the failing
kidney are very much persons.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 04-12-05 01:23am
This argument is getting old steen and it
is about time it was put to bed once and
for all.The difference steen between a
kidney{or any other organ you wish to
compare it to}and a fetus is extremely
simple,can your kidney live away from your
body after nine months,even with all the
technology we have it,how long will it
live steen outside of the body?
Can a nine month fetus\child live outside
the womb,using the same criteria as
above,how long will a fetus\baby survive
steen?
Do you see the difference now steen we
have tried every other way to prove it but
you have closed your mind to any other
opinion,maybe now it will be laid to rest.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 04-12-05 19:06pm
The relevance is whether a person can be
forced to give of their bodily resources
to save another life. Yes or no?
Certainly, the kidney patient who could
receive the kidney is as alive as the
fetus and even more so. That's the
kidney patient you happily will let die,
by the way.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 04-13-05 02:02am
steen
wrote:
the relevance is whether a
person can be forced to give of their
bodily resources to save another life.
Yes or no?
Certainly, the kidney patient who could
receive the kidney is as alive as the
fetus and even more so. That's the
kidney patient you happily will let die,
by the way.
ah steen but we are not debating organ
donation are we? No we are arguing
abortion so it has no relevence to the
argument,why did you not answer my
questions they are easy enough to answer
even for you steen.
Are you not contradicting yourself steen
because I am sure you have claimed earlier
that a fetus is not alive,by the way I am
never happy when someone dies if it was
within my power,i would keep everyone
alive untill a natural death occurs.Please
answer the questions thank you
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 04-13-05 10:46am
foreverblue
wrote:
ah steen but we are not
debating organ donation are
we?
we are arguing whether
you can force somebody to give of their
bodily resources against their will for
any reason.
Quote:
tr>
by the way I am
never happy when someone dies if it was
within my power,i would keep everyone
alive untill a natural death
occurs.
yet, you won't force
people to give of their bodily resources
to keep "someone" alive?
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 04-13-05 10:52am
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
ah steen but we are not
debating organ donation are
we?
we are arguing whether
you can force somebody to give of their
bodily resources against their will for
any reason.
Quote:
tr>
by the way I am
never happy when someone dies if it was
within my power,i would keep everyone
alive untill a natural death
occurs.
yet, you won't force
people to give of their bodily resources
to keep "someone"
alive?
what like you would rather a child was
aborted than share bodily resources with
the mother
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 04-13-05 21:22pm
foreverblue
wrote:
what like you would rather a
child was aborted than share bodily
resources with the
mother
nope. I just don;t want
her to be forced to do so, particularly
when prolifers yammer hypocritically about
how they shouldn't be forced to give of
their bodily resources even though they
want to force the pregnant woman to do so.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 04-14-05 00:58am
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
what like you would rather a
child was aborted than share bodily
resources with the
mother
nope. I just don;t
want her to be forced to do so,
particularly when prolifers yammer
hypocritically about how they shouldn't be
forced to give of their bodily resources
even though they want to force the
pregnant woman to do
so.
so steen what is your argument to a female
pro lifer they do give thier bodily
resources and cannot be classed as
hypocritical.I donate blood every 4 months
steen I have done since I was 21 and now I
am nearly 37 I am still giving blood.By
the way steen is it not true that if you
need a kidney it as to be a perfect
match,such as another member of the
family,so once again your argument is
invalid,you are putting a criteria to what
someones bodily resources can be used for
steen and that is not your place.
|
sandyallen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 04-14-05 14:21pm
Foreverblue, there are a lot of times that
true family members kidneys are not a
match so that is not true, mine was given
to a stranger that was in need. I too
give blood, I belonged to the gallon club
for many years, I help kids to have a
better home that are beaten abused,
neglected, sexually molested and all you
do is whine about giving a little blood
and you do not even try to understand why
their is a need for abortion, it is people
like you who are selfish, self-centered
and stupid. Just because you agree
w/someone does not mean that you are
married to that person or whatever, that
has got to be the most stupidist comments
I have heard and I have heard a bunch but
I guess it can be expected from someone
like you, I do not agree w/a lot of things
that steen says. Me and my husband do
not agree on a lot of things but we still
love each other, so get a clue, get a
life, get a brain.
Sincerely,
sandy
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 04-14-05 16:34pm
sandyallen
wrote:
foreverblue, there are a lot
of times that true family members kidneys
are not a match so that is not true, mine
was given to a stranger that was in need.
I too give blood, I belonged to the
gallon club for many years, I help kids to
have a better home that are beaten abused,
neglected, sexually molested and all you
do is whine about giving a little blood
and you do not even try to understand why
their is a need for abortion, it is people
like you who are selfish, self-centered
and stupid. Just because you agree
w/someone does not mean that you are
married to that person or whatever, that
has got to be the most stupidist comments
I have heard and I have heard a bunch but
I guess it can be expected from someone
like you, I do not agree w/a lot of things
that steen says. Me and my husband do
not agree on a lot of things but we still
love each other, so get a clue, get a
life, get a brain.
Sincerely,
sandy
sandy get real you are such a mindless
sheep I am surprised that you can even
type without steens help.How did we know
you would pop up and say you had donated a
organ,you have done eveything though
have'nt you sandy,you are the one who
needs to get a grip silly woman,oh by the
way do you not realize yet no one believes
your bs anymore,you have done everything
and been everywhere,i am surprised you
haven't been granted a sainthood yet,so
get real,maybe a dose of reality might do
you good,failing that find a dark room
somewhere and go hide away from reality
because clearly you have no concept of
what is real and what you have dreamt.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 04-14-05 17:56pm
foreverblue
wrote:
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
what like you would rather a
child was aborted than share bodily
resources with the
mother
nope. I just don;t
want her to be forced to do so,
particularly when prolifers yammer
hypocritically about how they shouldn't be
forced to give of their bodily resources
even though they want to force the
pregnant woman to do
so.
so steen what is your argument to a female
pro lifer they do give thier bodily
resources and cannot be classed as
hypocritical.
well, unless they favor
forcing everybody to do so and favor
forcing themselves to give a kidney, bone
marrow and whatever else can be donmated
while alive, then yes they are
hypocritical. If they want to force the
pregnant woman but not all other people,
then they are hypocritical.
Quote:
tr>
i donate blood
every 4 months steen I have done since I
was 21 and now I am nearly 37 I am still
giving blood.
but are you on the bone
marrow registry? Are you set up to
donate a kidney if there is a match? No?
Why shouldn't you be forced to do so?
How about giving plasma, which you can do
every 2 weeks? Should you be forced to
do that?
Quote:
tr>
by the way steen
is it not true that if you need a kidney
it as to be a perfect match,such as
another member of the
family,
eh?
Quote:
tr>
so once again
your argument is invalid,you are putting a
criteria to what someones bodily resources
can be used for steen and that is not your
place.
oh? Yet you insist that
there is a criteria regarding the pregnnat
woman's bodily resources. How
hypocritical.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 04-15-05 09:26am
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
what like you would rather a
child was aborted than share bodily
resources with the
mother
nope. I just don;t
want her to be forced to do so,
particularly when prolifers yammer
hypocritically about how they shouldn't be
forced to give of their bodily resources
even though they want to force the
pregnant woman to do
so.
so steen what is your argument to a female
pro lifer they do give thier bodily
resources and cannot be classed as
hypocritical.
well, unless they favor
forcing everybody to do so and favor
forcing themselves to give a kidney, bone
marrow and whatever else can be donmated
while alive, then yes they are
hypocritical. If they want to force the
pregnant woman but not all other people,
then they are hypocritical.
Quote:
tr>
i donate blood
every 4 months steen I have done since I
was 21 and now I am nearly 37 I am still
giving blood.
but are you on the bone
marrow registry? Are you set up to
donate a kidney if there is a match?
No? Why shouldn't you be forced to do
so? How about giving plasma, which you
can do every 2 weeks? Should you be
forced to do that?
Quote:
tr>
by the way steen
is it not true that if you need a kidney
it as to be a perfect match,such as
another member of the
family,
eh?
Quote:
tr>
so once again
your argument is invalid,you are putting a
criteria to what someones bodily resources
can be used for steen and that is not your
place.
oh? Yet you insist
that there is a criteria regarding the
pregnnat woman's bodily resources. How
hypocritical.
www.Dictionary.Com
learn to spell will you I can hardly
understand your gibberish
|
jenn_smithson
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Nov 2004 Posts: 808 Location: Texas
Posted: 04-15-05 09:54am
foreverblue
wrote:
www.Dictionary.Com learn
to spell will you I can hardly understand
your
gibberish
non-sequitur.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 04-15-05 14:49pm
jenn_smithson
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
www.Dictionary.Com learn
to spell will you I can hardly understand
your
gibberish
non-sequitur.
excuse me and your problem is?
What do mean it is'nt logical?If you read
his posts you will see the evidence.
|
sandyallen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Foreverblue Posted: 04-15-05 18:40pm
There you go again, twisting people's
words. I have never said that I have
been everywhere and have done everything.
I could care less what you believe. I
enjoy what I do, what I have done and
where I have been and where I am going and
I never said that I was a saint, that's
for sure. I live in the real world, I do
grip reality everyday, so it truly sounds
like you are the one who needs a grip on
reality, little boy. Kidney organ
transplants have more to do with this
abortion debate forum topic than terri
schiavo's(sp) situation. You,
foreverblue are becomming more and more of
a hypocrite. You, foreverblue cannot
handle losing and why don't you stop your
stupid drama.
Sincerely,
sandy
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Re: Foreverblue Posted: 04-16-05 04:37am
sandyallen
wrote:
there you go again, twisting
people's words. I have never said that
I have been everywhere and have done
everything. I could care less what you
believe. I enjoy what I do, what I
have done and where I have been and where
I am going and I never said that I was a
saint, that's for sure. I live in the
real world, I do grip reality everyday, so
it truly sounds like you are the one who
needs a grip on reality, little boy.
Kidney organ transplants have more to do
with this abortion debate forum topic than
terri schiavo's(sp) situation. You,
foreverblue are becomming more and more of
a hypocrite. You, foreverblue cannot
handle losing and why don't you stop your
stupid drama.
Sincerely,
sandy
no sandy we know you have'nt done
everything,though you certainly like to
make out that you have,as for me being a
hypocrite I do not think so silly woman
you and steen are the hypocrites,you
constantly attack people for thier beliefs
then cry when it happens to you.You and
steen are the worst babys on this
board,you both cry like two year olds and
hide from the truth,you only ever come on
here to support steen never for any other
reason,so get a life you
stupid,lying,unintelligant redneck.Now
silly health forum stop answering me
because you have nothing relevant to say
to anyone and definitely nothing worth
listening to,you like to accuse,well then
I accuse you of being a racist.Using the
same criteria that you and that other
lying troll steen used to accuse me of
being a racist,you cheered him on when he
accused british soldiers of shooting
children in northern ireland.It is because
of people like you and steen that the rest
of the civilised world dislikes america
intensly,it was people like you two who
made osama bin laden attack america,so I
am sure you and that other person can feel
proud you are the reason that thousands of
innocent people are dying,bet you feel
proud now.
|
sandyallen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4580
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Foreverblue Posted: 04-16-05 15:24pm
You are the biggest liar that has ever
walked on this earth. I only attack
after I have been attacked. You
foreverblue, are below scum. You are
the biggest whiner their has ever been.
Me, a racist, lol, I have even helped
your people, blacks and more that you can
ever name, you are soooo weak. I said
it before, you have already ruined one
site, please do not ruin this one. I
have no more time to spend on an stupid
fool fool hypocrite that you are. Iam a
better person than you will ever be, your
time here is truly wasted foreverblue, as
I feel I am here to debate abortion, not
to listen or put up with your garbage.
Sincerely,
sandy
Last edited by sandyallen on 04-16-05 17:12pm; edited 1 time in total
|
2ferano
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 3717
Posted: 04-16-05 17:10pm
No, no one goes to jail for trying to
commit suicide, but if they are caught
doing so (and not successful) then they
are put into an institution of some sort
against their will, medicated against
their will (or whatever else the
psychiatrists deem necessary) and not
released until they can convince whomever
is in charge that they don't want to die
anymore. It isn't jail or even
punishment per say, but really I don't see
why a person doesn't have the right to
take their own life. Don't get me wrong,
I do think people who feel that way need
and deserve help to at least see if there
is a way for them to be happy, but if they
decide that their isn't, then I don't
think anyone has a right to stop them.
Just my opinion though.
If the government "protected the life of
the fetus" because it was a "person", then
in doing so, they would be taking away the
rights of the pregnant woman. There is
no way to protect the fetus and the
mother. It just isn't possible. At
least not yet. But, let's say that the
fetus could be "removed" and put in some
kind of an incubator. Then what? Who
is going to raise and care for all of
these hundreds of thousands of unwanted
children? Look how many children there
are already with no homes, state "homes"
or abusive homes with no one in the world
to love them. Each fetus that you would
add to this (if you had your way) is just
going to become another child with no one
in the world to care for them. Is that
really better in your opinion?