Hey scumbag you no nothing about me do not
ever insinuate that I am a racist again.
I thought that people on here wern't
allowed to be offensive?
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
Posted: 03-27-05 16:07pm
Steen can you never just be civil no one
was attacking you until you attacked?
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 03-27-05 16:09pm
Steen where was izzy lying are you saying
that history is wrong?Before the second
world war the worlds economy had collapsed
and jewish people were in charge of the
banks at the time{though I in no way blame
them for it so dont even attempt to call
me racist or anti sematic}all I am stating
are historical facts,the germans where
starving has was most of europe,whatever
hitlers reasons for the extermination,it
was the act of a madman,all izzy has done
is put his own interprtation on hitlers
reasons,that in no way makes him anti
sematic he is not hitler nor did he take
part in the extermination of jews.
|
Izzy
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 883 Location: Earth
Posted: 03-27-05 16:51pm
Neither do I condone such a vile act of
homicide, unlike some
|
2ferano
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 3717
Posted: 03-27-05 17:53pm
Steen commented on izzy's remark that
stated why the german's loved him. And
steen corrected that comment. I believe
that is what the "lie" was, but I don't
know.
Actually, I have never met a racist
prochoice person. It is usually quite
the contrary. Prochoice people are
generally more understanding and
open-minded and less likely to be
small-minded enough to be a racist. In
fact, even on this site the only racist
remarks are made by a prolife person.
Although, that really doesn't count as
there aren't many people on this forum to
begin with.
Regardless of why hitler was intimidated
by the jews and chose to try to get rid of
them, abortion is not like the holocaust.
Jlee I truly hope you are never raped by a
monster or have a pregnancy that will kill
both you and the baby and be forced to
make a decision that you never wanted to
have to make. But, even if you chose for
you and the baby to die or to have the
baby of your attacker, how can you
honestly expect every other woman to do
that? Have they not already been through
enough? Selfish or not, it is her body,
her life and her decision. I find others
trying to control what she does although
it has no affect on them whatsoever more
selfish than her making a decision that
affects her and her life. Just because
someone chooses to have an abortion
doesn't mean they are a hateful, awful or
selfish person. They were just put into
a situation that most people have never
been in. And the people who were in it
and chose to have the baby anyway, well
they were either stronger or just held
different beliefs. But, either way I
can't believe that you would honestly
judge them. All people are different,
need different things and are capable or
incapable of different things, and they
make their decisions based on that. Not
all decisions can be made based on what
you believe or what you think is "right."
i like how you ignore everything that any
prochoice person here states and say that
all we ever say is that it is about, "the
womans right to choose what affects her
body..." if you would read, you would see
that isn't all that "we" say and it is
quite foolish to say that.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
you really are sad steen,you
are trying to say that hitler was pro
life,
no, I am not I am saying
that izzy's post was downright
anti-semitic, and that you and your
prolife friends cheered him on, while
ridiculing my post pointing out the
anti-semitic items in izzy's post.
Not my fault that you cheered an
anti-semitic post. Perhaps you should
then have read more carefully?
Quote:
tr>
no I think you
will find he was pro
choice,
actually, hitler was
neither. He insisted on abortions for
jews, gypsies etc., and denied them for
"aryans."
and that is irrelevant. My response to
izzy has nothing to do with abortion. It
was solely per its anti-semitic content.
That you then speak out to disagree with
me and cheer izzy on, exactly what do you
think that makes you look like?
Quote:
tr>
izzy though maybe
not quite getting his point across was not
saying,nor did i,fishx or jlee,that he
hated jews.
but blamed the jews for
the stock market crash, claimed that they
run the worlds banking system and thus
were responsible for germany's economic
woes and thus hitler had a reason for the
holocaust. Did you miss that part of
izzy's post? Are you saying that izzy
merely was unclear in his posting? It
was very anti-semitic. And then all of
you immediately cheering him on and
attacking those who objected to the
anti-semitic tone, that speaks for
itself.
Quote:
tr>
once again you
choose to try and cause discord and
arguments steen,truley
pathetic.
no, I am challenging your
lending credence to a flagrantly
anti-semitic post by izzy merely because
he is a prolifer.
You should immediately have distanced
yourself from izzy's post. Did you
actually read it? I would advice you
going back and doing so before replying
again.
Quote:
tr>
it was this power
over the world the jews had that hitler
resented so
much
ah, and what "power" was
that? Oh please tell me how the jews
controlled the world, why don't you? Are
you going to lend credence to izzy's
anti-semitism now?
Quote:
tr>
how can you twist
what is clearly
written
i was not twisting
anything. Izzy wrote a piece of
hatemongering that attacked the jews,
essentially a justification for hitler's
holocaust. I am baffled that you could
have missed that.
Quote:
tr>
then try and call
other people,
you supported izzy's
post, didn't you? And you harped on
sandy and I for calling izzy on his
anti-semitic remarks. How does that not
make you supporting anti-semitism?
Perhaps you would like to rephrase your
support in a bit of a different form? I
frankly doubt that you are all
anti-semitic, but the way you all posted,
you were in clear support of
anti-semitism.
Quote:
tr>
as izzy put that
it was this power that he or pro life
hated
that "power" is a
anti-semitic deception. And no,
prolife/prochoice has nothing to do with
this.
Quote:
tr>
no he put it was
what hitler hated,but has hitler was pro
choice
no, he wasn't. Hitler
was the fascist leader of an incredibly
authoritarian state. There was no
"choice" about anything, that claim is
flat-out false. Again, this has nothing
to do with abortion or prolife/prochoice.
It has only to do with you guys cheering
on izzy's anti-semitism.
Quote:
tr>
i think using
your own twisted form of logic that this
must mean pro choice is anti
semetic,
you can stop your lies
and deception. This has nothing to do
with pl/pc.
Quote:
tr>
but we already
know most pro choicers are racists any
way,ie the founder of that great abortion
provider/informer planned
parenthood.
ah, yes. As usual, pl
lie as much as they possibly can stuff
into a post. "most pro choicers"? Yes,
I should have known you incapable of being
honest. So aside from being an outright
liar, are you also anti-semitic? Yes or
no?
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 03-27-05 22:03pm
fishx
wrote:
hey scumbag you no nothing
about me do not ever insinuate that I am a
racist again.
i am accusing you of
supporting a completely anti-semitic post.
Did you miss that? Are you agreeing
with izzy's anti-semitic post or not? If
not, then why cheering izzy on and
attacking those who were calling him on
it? We have very good reason to call you
guys on it. Do you suppoort the
anti-semitic claims in izzy's post? Yes
or no?
Quote:
tr>
i thought that
people on here wern't allowed to be
offensive?
anti-semitism is very
offensive. Yet you cheered it on. Care
to revise your support and accusations?
This is a test of your integrity, fishx.
Are prolifers always right even if they
preach anti-semitism? Are prochoice
always wrong, even if they challenge
anti-semitism?
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 03-27-05 22:08pm
foreverblue
wrote:
steen where was izzy lying
are you saying that history is
wrong?
i am saying that izzy's
portaryal of history is false.
Quote:
tr>
before the second
world war the worlds economy had collapsed
and jewish people were in charge of the
banks at the
time
nope. Some of the banks
had jewish ceos and similar. That
doesn't mean that the wordl's banking
system was under jewish control.
Quote:
tr>
{though I in no
way blame them for it so dont even attempt
to call me racist or anti
sematic}
i am challenging you on
your support for izzy's anti-semitic
claims. If you support his claim, you
support anti-semitism. It is that
simple.
Quote:
tr>
all I am stating
are historical
facts,
really? Prove
it!!!!!!!
Quote:
tr>
the germans where
starving has was most of europe,whatever
hitlers reasons for the extermination,it
was the act of a
madman,
agreed.
Quote:
tr>
all izzy has done
is put his own interprtation on hitlers
reasons,
yes, a decidely
anti-semitic revisionist historic spin.
I don't know what the @^%$%@$ you learn in
the schools in the the us or uk, but if
your history endorses izzy's claims, then
I would take a serious look at the
politics behind your revisionist history
book.
Quote:
tr>
that in no way
makes him anti sematic he is not hitler
nor did he take part in the extermination
of jews.
but he advocated
decidedly anti-semitic falsehoods. Do
you support him doing so? Are you saying
that izzy's post was accurate and
justified? Please say yes, and I will
document how you are anti-semitic, just
give me the chance.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 03-27-05 22:22pm
izzy
wrote:
neither do I condone such a
vile act of not a nice act, unlike
some
you don't condone
anti-semitism? Then why did you write in
support of it?
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
i see steen and ms.
Sandyallen have contributed their usual
jarble to this post. Boy...What a
contribution.
so you agree with izzy's
anti-semitism. Yes, I am not
surprised. Fundies sometimes hate
jews and cheer on hitler and his holocaust
like izzy just
did.
now that's just silly steen, to "note"
that I agree with hitler or in any way
admire him.
Sheesh.
ah, but you did agree
with izzy in support of his anti-semitic
post.
really? Please find where I said " I
agree with the anti-semitic post".
Thanks.
you criticized sandy and
me for our objection to izzy's
anti-semitic post. Thus you support what
izzy wrote. You support anti-semitism.
It is that simple. Care to revise your
support for izzy's anti-semitism now that
your attention has been directed at it?
I am giving all of you that chance under
the tentative assumption that you just
didn't pay attention to what you
supported.
|
2ferano
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 3717
Posted: 03-27-05 23:14pm
Yes, you have every right to debate. But
to say in general, as you did, that it
isn't about the woman's right to chose is
excluding rape, etc. So if you feel
differently in those circimstances then
instead of just stating that abortion is
wrong and that a woman doesn't have the
right to chose, maybe you should be more
specific. You were implying that all
prochoice people feel the exact same way
and that all we ever say is that it is the
woman's right to choose and you know as
well as everyone else that isn't true.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 03-28-05 00:59am
jlee77
wrote:
what I said was:
" see steen and ms. Sandyallen have
contributed their usual jarble to this
post. Boy...What a contribution.
:roll:"
....Because you were commenting on izzy
and sandy was cheering you on. It was a
simple observation of the petty little
insults and reference to your jumping to
conclusions as always, that's
all.
so you didn't like me
criticizing izzy's anti-semitism, and you
didn't like sandy supporting this
challenge of anti-semitism. And that
certainly makes you a supporter of izzy's
anti-semitism.
Yes, I noticed that you did not disawow it
yet. That is very telling.
Tell me, jlee, just so I know how extreme
you are, are you also one of those who
claim that the holocaust never happened,
or is your anti-semitism confined to
claims and complaints about the jewish
bankers that ran the world and ruined
christian nations?
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 03-28-05 04:42am
steen
wrote:
[
Quote:
tr>
that in no way
makes him anti sematic he is not hitler
nor did he take part in the extermination
of jews.
but he advocated
decidedly anti-semitic falsehoods. Do
you support him doing so? Are you
saying that izzy's post was accurate and
justified? Please say yes, and I will
document how you are anti-semitic, just
give me the
chance.
thank you steen you have just proved my
post.You state if I agree with izzy you
can prove me wrong,so therefore you must
have the evidence to do so,yes.Therefore
your first post to izzy was meant to cause
drama and discord,because if you can prove
me wrong then you should be able to prove
izzy wrong,so why did you not post your
facts and evidence,instead you choose to
argue and cause problems.
I am not anti jewish and for you to
assume,because I pulled you on your
post,that I am really makes me laugh.You
remind me of the british goverment if you
complain about the immigration problems in
this country then they label you a
racist,if you complain about the war then
you are a traitor.So you see steen I am
used to people like you attacking when
shown to be in the wrong.Now if and this
i9s a big if you have the evidence then
show it and prove history wrong,as if you
could.
i see steen and ms.
Sandyallen have contributed their usual
jarble to this post. Boy...What a
contribution. :roll:
very well written kjn...But please don't
expect people like steen and the obvious
are going to accept the truth. It's
simply too painful and true to them.
They turn their heads and try and believe
their "truth", it's easier for them that
way. They feel the baby in the womb
does not have as many rights as the jews
did because of the number we call age.
Typical of such arrogance. Get used to
it if you plan on frequenting this site.
Just a forewarning.
And jenn (brianbaby), your very right.
Blah blah about "woman's right to choose
what to do with her body". That's all
it is ever about with pro-choice. The
issue is the killing of a human life due
to various different reasons and what
makes it wrong is when it's for selfish
immature reasons, such as "not being
ready". Cry me a river. Get over it
and adjust your life to your blood.
It's the decent right thing to do. God
created us...Not to be
destroyed.
bravo I bow to the mighty jlee :wink:
sincerly
fishx.
this is what I responded to steen I can
find nothing anti semetic in this post so
show me please.
I didn't even aknowledge nor respond to
izzy's post.
i see steen and ms.
Sandyallen have contributed their usual
jarble to this post. Boy...What a
contribution. :roll:
very well written kjn...But please don't
expect people like steen and the obvious
are going to accept the truth. It's
simply too painful and true to them.
They turn their heads and try and believe
their "truth", it's easier for them that
way. They feel the baby in the womb
does not have as many rights as the jews
did because of the number we call age.
Typical of such arrogance. Get used
to it if you plan on frequenting this
site. Just a forewarning.
And jenn (brianbaby), your very right.
Blah blah about "woman's right to choose
what to do with her body". That's all
it is ever about with pro-choice. The
issue is the killing of a human life due
to various different reasons and what
makes it wrong is when it's for selfish
immature reasons, such as "not being
ready". Cry me a river. Get over
it and adjust your life to your blood.
It's the decent right thing to do.
God created us...Not to be
destroyed.
bravo I bow to the mighty jlee :wink:
sincerly
fishx.
this is what I responded to steen I can
find nothing anti semetic in this post so
show me please.
I didn't even aknowledge nor respond to
izzy's post.
fishx...Huh? That wasn't directed at you
hun. ??
;o)
i know that your post wasn't directed at
me mine was directed at steen trying to
insinuate that I am racist just pointing
out that I posted nothing to state that I
am racist.
You know I have taken some insults on this
site but this is the most offencive insult
I have ever had.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
this is what I responded to steen I can
find nothing anti semetic in this post so
show me please.
I didn't even aknowledge nor respond to
izzy's post.
you supported jlee in her
cheering on izzy's anti-semitism
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 03-28-05 12:00pm
jlee77
wrote:
steen
wrote:
so you didn't like me
criticizing izzy's anti-semitism, and you
didn't like sandy supporting this
challenge of anti-semitism. And that
certainly makes you a supporter of izzy's
anti-semitism.
Yes, I noticed that you did not disawow it
yet. That is very telling.
Tell me, jlee, just so I know how extreme
you are, are you also one of those who
claim that the holocaust never happened,
or is your anti-semitism confined to
claims and complaints about the jewish
bankers that ran the world and ruined
christian
nations?
again....No. I was commenting on your
and sandyallen's tendency to
ramble?
oh? Back-pedalling?
Quote:
tr>
no, I never said
the holocaust didn't happen, now that
would be ridiculous wouldn't
it?
that's nice. Now., what
about izzy's post in general? Do you
support the anti-semitism in his post?
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest