| Edward22 wrote: |
|
Actually going from uncut to cut, as a sexually active adult is the *only* way to judge the affects of being cut on sensation. If these guys aren't happy about it, then it probably dulls sensation. |
| Quote: |
| I come from a rather wealthy area. The people I grew up with and I all came from affluence. None of us were circumcised, other than our Jewish friends. Rich people are often not cut, but poor people all seem to do it. I'm not sure why this is but I'm guessing it comes from the fact that poor people are more likely to have a dad from the military (which promoted the act) and also the fact that poor people tend to be less educated and thus believe that circumcision is useful or even beneficial, outside of religious purposes. I noticed the poster above said that penile cancer is "unheard of" in circumcised males. That's very interesting since actually African Americans represent a highly circumcised group in America and also the most likely group to develop penile cancer later in life. In addition, countries like Denmark that don't practice much circumcision (they are currently trying to outlaw it) have lower rates of penile cancer than other countries. |
| Quote: |
| Is there a correlation? I don't know. |
| Quote: |
| In addition, while the cut and uncut penises work about the same in a wet medium, I don't think the cut penis works as well in a dry medium. Even though, when erect, the glans of the uncut penis is exposed, the skin still retains elasticity. Thus, since women tend to become dry in their later years (and some if they go on "the pill") it's probably best to be uncut if you plan on sleeping with your wife/girlfriend as much as possible. |
| Edward22 wrote: |
| If a circumcised guy asks me if I'm circumcised I always say "yes, of course" even though I'm not cut. These guys need to hear that their friends are cut like they are in order to feel better about themselves for some reason. They pretend to be thankful for being circumcised, claiming they are cleaner or better in some way for it.
I've heard many people say that being cut and being uncut makes no difference in terms of sensation. Most uncut guys nod our heads when we hear this while secretly agreeing that this notion sounds rather absurd. I've known one guy who got circumcised as an adult and he doesn't seem too happy about it. Actually going from uncut to cut, as a sexually active adult is the *only* way to judge the affects of being cut on sensation. If these guys aren't happy about it, then it probably dulls sensation. I come from a rather wealthy area. The people I grew up with and I all came from affluence. None of us were circumcised, other than our Jewish friends. Rich people are often not cut, but poor people all seem to do it. I'm not sure why this is but I'm guessing it comes from the fact that poor people are more likely to have a dad from the military (which promoted the act) and also the fact that poor people tend to be less educated and thus believe that circumcision is useful or even beneficial, outside of religious purposes. I noticed the poster above said that penile cancer is "unheard of" in circumcised males. That's very interesting since actually African Americans represent a highly circumcised group in America and also the most likely group to develop penile cancer later in life. In addition, countries like Denmark that don't practice much circumcision (they are currently trying to outlaw it) have lower rates of penile cancer than other countries. I'm not for or against circumcision, per se, but just trying to give the lack of it a fair defense. I personally would not circumcise my child unless the mother insisted upon doing it for religious or familial reasons. The reason for this is simple: I have always had great relationships with women and I believe the main reason for this is because I enjoy sex more than most men. I think sex is a key component of a romantic relationship. Myself and my uncut friends have a lot of it with our girlfriends, yet the cut guys I know have seem to have less of it. Is there a correlation? I don't know. I do know that the idea of having sex without with a cut penis gives me the exact feeling of fingers being scraped across a chalkboard so maybe it doesn't feel as good. If I had a boy, I'd want him to have the best possible relationship with his future wife someday and thus I would not want to cut him. In addition, while the cut and uncut penises work about the same in a wet medium, I don't think the cut penis works as well in a dry medium. Even though, when erect, the glans of the uncut penis is exposed, the skin still retains elasticity. Thus, since women tend to become dry in their later years (and some if they go on "the pill") it's probably best to be uncut if you plan on sleeping with your wife/girlfriend as much as possible. |
| W0LF wrote: |
| Edward22.
I noticed most of the pro Circumcision members do not advocate circumcision for women which I'm sure they would think there is benefits of doing this as well. |
| W0LF wrote: |
| Edward22.
As does your posts. |
| Tags: sensitivity, vaginal, female, animal, penis, nose, male, sex, head, normal penis | ||
Saving |
|
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |