Abortion Debate Forum - Physical Health Risks of Termination page 8


Physical Health Risks of Termination

Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Physical Health Risks of Termination

Author

Message

FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-30-05 10:19am

jlee77 wrote:

i think you know he cannot get past insulting.
It's his nature.
So instead of trying to make peace with a tyrant, tell it like it is and don't let him get to you. He's a laughing matter.
:o)

i agree he is,nt even man enough to accept an apology with good grace.

I don,t know why I bother :roll:

Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-30-05 13:49pm


<< It's his nature. >>> haahahaahahahahaahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh please. Im going to die laughing. Because this is exactly what you do. Wow...Can I use your words again? (i mean come on, they have to be said atleast once a day, you know, so let me do it today) pot...........Kettle...............Black!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Blacker then my boyfriend!

steen

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-30-05 14:47pm

foreverblue wrote:

no mention of what search engine or anything.Merriam websters is a medical dictionary,not a search engine.

it is the searchengine for terms used on their site. But the actual definition of words used in the science that medline reports is stedman's. The definitions used to publish the abstracts available that is stedman's. The one they would use for their site would be stedman's if stedman's did have any kind of online dictionary. It does not. As such, they are going with m-w. But medical definitions are not ultimately found in m-w, they are found in stedman's medical dictionary.

Quote:

can you understand what I am saying here,you open medlines home page it has a link for a dictionary,not an online search engine.

it is actually what they use for searching for terms on their site. So yes it is a search engine. Actual medical terminology used on medline is derived from stedman's, not m-w.

steen

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-30-05 14:48pm

fishx wrote:

i agree he is,nt even man enough to accept an apology with good grace.

I don,t know why I bother :roll:

really? Where did you appologize for your dishonesty and lies about methotrexate? If you offered an apology for that pack of lies, then I missed it.

FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-30-05 15:10pm


I stand by my post on methotrexate I was reffering to my apology on another forum where you still did,nt ven have the grace to accept the apology. How mature is that?

steen

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-30-05 15:12pm

fishx wrote:

i stand by my post on methotrexate

i have specifically proven that your claims about mtx are not true, yet you stand by them? In that case you are outright lying.

Quote:

i was reffering to my apology on another forum where you still did,nt ven have the grace to accept the apology. How mature is that?

if you are referring to the abortion support forum, yes I did accept your appology and admitted that we were all at fault for the arguments. Or was it somewhere else, that I am not aware off? Please clarify.

FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-30-05 15:21pm


Sorry my mistake was that you accepting it I thought it was just a comment .

steen

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-30-05 20:43pm

fishx wrote:

sorry my mistake was that you accepting it I thought it was just a comment .

no, I actually found your post a refreshing change from "the other" prolifers who is sabotaging the support forum.

Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 01-30-05 23:56pm


You're one to talk sweety.

FISHX

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Location: UK

Posted: 01-31-05 03:16am

steen wrote:

fishx wrote:

sorry my mistake was that you accepting it I thought it was just a comment .

no, I actually found your post a refreshing change from "the other" prolifers who is sabotaging the support forum.

why thank you steen thats the nicest thing you,v ever said to me.

foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 01-31-05 04:26am

steen wrote:

foreverblue wrote:

no mention of what search engine or anything.Merriam websters is a medical dictionary,not a search engine.

Quote:

can you understand what I am saying here,you open medlines home page it has a link for a dictionary,not an online search engine.

it is actually what they use for searching for terms on their site. So yes it is a search engine. Actual medical terminology used on medline is derived from stedman's, not m-w.

where does it say on medline that it uses stedmans because I cannot find it.What I did find was this
the merriam-webster medical dictionary allows you to look up definitions and spellings of medical words.
Look at the home page click on faqs,general questions,what is medline and this is what appears.Case closed I think steen as medline themselves say they use merriam websters medical dictionary.

steen

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 01-31-05 23:14pm

foreverblue wrote:

yes, it is their online search tool for such, as stedman's doesn't have an online function.

Quote:

look at the home page click on faqs,general questions,what is medline and this is what appears.Case closed I think steen as medline themselves say they use merriam websters medical dictionary.

no, medical terms are not defined through the m-w dictionary.

Gero

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy

Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 44

Posted: 02-01-05 11:07am

bd1012 wrote:

a woman can do whatever the fuck she wants with her body without any permission from you all, her husband, the president, or whatevery deity may or may not be out there.. I don't care what her reasons are.. It's her body and the fact that she didn't want to be pregnant is good enough for me. Selfish selfish selfish.. So fucking what? It's selfish to ttc when there are kids out there already waiting to be adopted..And the only reason that is is because of ideals like yours so you like adoption so much.. Put your money where your mouth is.. I think everyone who wants abortion illegal should be sterilized and have no other choice to adopt if they want a kid.

if the board administrator wasn't such a liberal, left-wing numbskull, he/she would get his/her head out of the sand and ban people like bd for using such profanity. P.S.--if a woman doesn't want to be pregnant, then she should start taking the responsibility to use contraception instead of being lazy and using abortion as her means of birth control. You people are always harping about women having control over their own bodies, but they don't seem to exercise their control when it comes to using contraception to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

steen

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 02-01-05 12:08pm

gero wrote:

p.S.--if a woman doesn't want to be pregnant, then she should start taking the responsibility to use contraception instead of being lazy and using abortion as her means of birth control. You people are always harping about women having control over their own bodies, but they don't seem to exercise their control when it comes to using contraception to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

as 58% of women who abort were using contraception, you are clearly speaking out your as.

bd1012

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 1998

Posted: 02-01-05 12:10pm


Gero.. Not everyone who has a upp wasn't using contraception.. I am on depo and have sex maybe two, three times a month.. Is that responsible enough for you?

foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 02-01-05 13:14pm

steen wrote:

foreverblue wrote:

yes, it is their online search tool for such, as stedman's doesn't have an online function.

Quote:

look at the home page click on faqs,general questions,what is medline and this is what appears.Case closed I think steen as medline themselves say they use merriam websters medical dictionary.

no, medical terms are not defined through the m-w dictionary.

I emailed medline to ask them what dictionary they used here is the email[minus my name and email address]

thank you for your comments on medlineplus. Your feedback helps us improve our
products and services.

The dictionary used on medlineplus consumer health site is merriam webster.

J.Cunningham
nih contractor
national library of medicine

steen

Extremely EHEALTHy

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Upper Midwest

Posted: 02-01-05 14:16pm


And if you ask them what dictionary is used for the definition of the medical terms used on medline? (or did you forget that this was the original issue?)

foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 02-01-05 14:51pm

steen wrote:

and if you ask them what dictionary is used for the definition of the medical terms used on medline? (or did you forget that this was the original issue?)

i have sent them an email asking what dictionary they use for medical definitions on medline,when it arrives I will show you what they say,one way or another ok

foreverblue

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 577

Posted: 02-01-05 16:42pm

steen wrote:

and if you ask them what dictionary is used for the definition of the medical terms used on medline? (or did you forget that this was the original issue?)

heres my reply steen im surprised it was so quick but here it is

this is in response to your request for information from the national library of
medicine (nlm).

The dictionary and all of the definitions listed on medlineplus are from merriam
webster.

You may contact merriam webster for further assistance.
Http://merriamwebster.Com

we hope you find this information useful.

J.Cunningham
nih contractor
national library of medicine

minus my name again

Kourtney08

Active User, Really EHEALTHy

Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 937
Location: Alaska

Posted: 02-01-05 17:17pm

Quote:

so what about the woman that did us bc? Do you think its okay for them to get one since they weren't lazy and were taking precautions? Probably not. But see, bc fails, everyday, and everyday those woman are faced with an unplanned, unwanted pregnancy, and if they were doing everything they could to prevent it, then they shouldn't have to go through a pregnancy they didn't want, didn't plan, and was doing everything to prevent.

Whether or not a woman uses birth control or not, she still has control over *her* body. Its not like "oh well woman who don't use birth control don't get to decide what happens to their bodies." thats ridiculous.

Post Reply