How can the death penalty be against your
religion yet abortion not.You claim to be
a christian yet disobey the second
commandments in the didache
the second commandment: grave sin
forbidden. And the second commandment of
the teaching; you shall not commit
homicide, you shall not commit adultery,
you shall not commit pederasty, you shall
not commit fornication, you shall not
steal, you shall not practice magic, you
shall not practice witchcraft, you shall
not homicide a child by abortion nor kill
that which is born. You shall not covet
the things of your neighbor, you shall not
swear, you shall not bear false witness,
you shall not speak evil, you shall bear
no grudge. You shall not be double-minded
nor double-tongued, for to be
double-tongued is a snare of death. Your
speech shall not be false, nor empty, but
fulfilled by deed. You shall not be
covetous, nor rapacious, nor a hypocrite,
nor evil disposed, nor haughty. You shall
not take evil counsel against your
neighbor. You shall not hate any man; but
some you shall reprove, and concerning
some you shall pray, and some you shall
love more than your own life.
I do believe your own faith classes it as
homicide should I call you pro death,next
time you start with the anti choice then I
will start with the pro death.Your narrow
minded and stereotypical view of anyone
who dont agree with you is duly noted.I
like your generalization of prolifers,that
none of them have any chance of
understanding anything and all prochoicers
would be of the same mindset as you.Your
attempt at trying to imply that again I
have said something I havent it really is
getting boring steen.
I never said anything about if the law is
broken then they shouldnt recieve medical
help,are you delibratly missing the point
or are you unable to grasp the simplelist
of points you continuasly read into my
post things that are not there
|
msrosie
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 369 Location: Ontario, Canada
Thanks: 12
Thanked:2
Posted: 01-27-05 11:56am
kourtney08
wrote:
and I don't think suicide is legal, or
illegal. I mean, what are they gonna do
if someone kills themself? Send them to
jail because its illegal? :roll:
please. I know if you attempt suicide,
then you are sentenced to spend time in a
psychiatric
place.
you are not "sentenced", you are admitted
involuntarily, because you are a danger to
yourself. You can be committed
involuntarily for 1. Being a danger to
yourself, 2. Being a danger to others or
3. Being unable to take care of
yourself.
Rosie
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-27-05 12:08pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
steen please show me where I
said that any surgery should not be
performed.
Quote:
you have made
implications about the validity of medical
treatment based on risks. Yes, as I
questioned earlier, I am not sure you
really want to go here. You seem
woefully unprepared for the issues in that
discussion. Go read up on the oregon
helth plan and the bitter debates that
erupted over
that.
no steen I did not imply anything so that
is a lie a downright false hood,you tried
to imply that I had said something I had
not.
So an apology will be required before we
commence battle
again
bd1012 wrote:
yeah, there are health risks to open heart
surgery, should we ban that too?
Everything has it's risks and so does
pregnancy so that's why no one should be
forced to do either against their will..
Glad we cleared that up.
Do you really believe that open heart
surgery and abortion are even close,if you
do not have open heart surgery you most
probably die,are you trying to say that if
you dont have an abortion you will most
probably die?If that was the case shouldnt
pregnancy be banned?
<
span class="postbody">
here you tried to set up a risk gradien,
implying that risks should be used to
consider banning certaint procedures while
also trying to make such a differentiation
between abortion and open heart surgery.
Well, I just showed where you indeed did
make such an implication, so unless you
can explain that away, I see no need to
apologize for a direct observation. If
you can't stand by your own word, what
good is it to discuss with you?
Quote:
and for the
racist comment against the british
people.
pointing out that british
soldiers in belfast indeed have killed
children with rubber bullets is a fact, a
direct observation, not a racist comment.
What a nutty claim. Yes, I said it
in a harsh way to megamoron who had more
than warranted a harsh reply. So
what?
Quote:
i will answer the
rest of your posts then please do not post
to me untill you have apologized for the
lies.
as there were no lies, I
can only conclude that you are getting out
of your dept in our argument and seek the
cowards retreat with a silly reply shouted
over your shoulder. Like the kid who
got insulted about not being picked first
and takes his ball and goes home. How
lame and
pathetic.
right I have had enough of you mr
hypocrite,i am british and it was racially
offensive I think you are out of your
depth here pal because it is clear you do
not understand the racism laws.I see you
are not pulling bd about gradient of risk
and she was the one that tried to set it
up as you have shown everyone else
thankyou.You also use medline to back up
your claims but then you say that merriam
websters isnt a valid reference for a
medical dictionary{partial birth
abortion}do you remember,well clever clogs
what dictionary does med line use,yes you
got it merriam websters.So that makes you
an hypocrite.I have had enough of your
attempts to try and bring me down to your
level steen,i have more respect for the
issue than let you.
You have lied when you said I tried to put
a gradient of risk on certain types of
surgery,when all I did was state a fact,bd
put the gradient on surgery,but you wont
say anything to her because she is on your
side,so yes steen you have lied
|
msrosie
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 369 Location: Ontario, Canada
Thanks: 12
Thanked:2
Posted: 01-27-05 12:34pm
Here in canada, the complication rate is
far lower than 10%. See chart:
it's my understanding that bariatric
surgery (weight loss surgery) has a death
rate of 1 in 200 - much, much higher than
that of legal abortion. Shall we campaign
to outlaw it?
Rosie
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-27-05 12:38pm
foreverblue
wrote:
how can the death penalty be
against your religion yet abortion
not.
oh, so now we are down to
"your christianity is not a real
christianity. Yup, you are truly doing
great here.
Quote:
you claim to be a
christian yet disobey the second
commandments in the
didache
sorry, I read the bible,
not the didache.
Quote:
the second
commandment: grave sin
forbidden.
but then, abortion is not
a sin.
Quote:
and the second
commandment of the teaching; ........
and so on and so on
endlessly. I am not sure where you get
that from, but it is not from the bible.
So what do I care.
Quote:
i do believe your
own faith classes it as
homicide
nope. Your ignorance of
my faith doesn't make your misimpression
into reality.
Quote:
ishould I call
you pro
death,
i am not. I don't favor
death. So you have now resorted to the
usual antichoice babble and stupid
nonsense. Oh, this is deteriorating even
faster than I had expected, even though
you are a prolifer.
Quote:
next time you
start with the anti choice then I will
start with the pro
death.
well, have at it. If
you want to be stupid, who am I to stop
you. You already showed your lack of
desire for serious discussion, resorting
to stupid nonsense when your postulated
views were challenged, so I am not sure
much is lost ny you resorting to the usual
antichoice chicanery.
Quote:
your narrow
minded and stereotypical view of anyone
who dont agree with you is duly
noted.
ah, a prolifer talking to
the mirror. Yes, we see that a lot as
well.
Quote:
i like your
generalization of prolifers,that none of
them have any chance of understanding
anything and all prochoicers would be of
the same mindset as you.Your attempt at
trying to imply that again I have said
something I havent it really is getting
boring steen.
what did I imply?
Quote:
i never said
anything about if the law is broken then
they shouldnt recieve medical help,are you
delibratly missing the point or are you
unable to grasp the simplelist of points
you continuasly read into my post things
that are not
there
you were trying to
insinuate that I should have the utmost
care for them as a patient if they broke
that alw. As I said, you simply don't
have the mindset of a physician, so you
won't understand this at all. I already
once suggested that you drop it, and it
seems that I need to suggest that to you
again.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-27-05 12:38pm
msrosie
wrote:
here in canada, the
complication rate is far lower than 10%.
See chart:
it's my understanding that bariatric
surgery (weight loss surgery) has a death
rate of 1 in 200 - much, much higher than
that of legal abortion. Shall we
campaign to outlaw it?
Rosie
sorry but as prochoicers like to say that
site is biased,end of story.
I believe that any surgery that is not
medically required should not be
performed,this includes those to posh to
push c sections that all the rich and
famouse have.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-27-05 12:45pm
foreverblue
wrote:
you also use medline to back
up your
claims
yes, medline is the
reference source for medical, scientific
journal publications. That is where the
science and the research is reported.
That is a valid, scientific source.
Quote:
but then you say
that merriam websters isnt a valid
reference for a medical dictionary{partial
birth abortion}do you
remember,
i am saying that it is
not the dictionary standard for the
medical profession as it is not
scientifically vetted. That is why
stedman's medical dictionary is the
authority. Because its definitions are
guaranteed to be medically accurate.
Because it is scientifically correct.
Quote:
well clever clogs
what dictionary does med line use,yes you
got it merriam
websters.
it uses stedman's medical
dictionary. Why are you lying?
Quote:
so that makes you
an hypocrite.I have had enough of your
attempts to try and bring me down to your
level steen,i have more respect for the
issue than let
you.
ah, so your lies makes me
a hypocrite?
Quote:
you have lied
when you said I tried to put a gradient of
risk on certain types of surgery,when all
I did was state a
fact,
not at all. I just
showed where you did so.
Quote:
bd put the
gradient on surgery,but you wont say
anything to her because she is on your
side,so yes steen you have
lied
nope, I am not saying
anything to her because she didn't try to
imply some stupid idea such as that only
some procedures are valid. I am not
objecting to th medical gradient. I am
onjecting to the medical gradient applied
in a form to somehow speaking out agianst
abortion. Thus, you used it in an
invalid form, while bd didn't.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-27-05 12:48pm
foreverblue
wrote:
i believe that any surgery
that is not medically required should not
be performed,this includes those to posh
to push c sections that all the rich and
famouse have.
and who makes the
determination about what is 'required"
prolifers? Or is it better that such
decisions are done by the physicians,
those who actually know what is going on?
Well, guess what, it is already doctors
who make that decision. As such, you can
just butt out. Unless, that is, you can
show that you know better than the medical
professionals. Which sofar you have
failed abysmally to do.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-27-05 12:52pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
how can the death penalty be
against your religion yet abortion
not.
oh, so now we are down to
"your christianity is not a real
christianity. Yup, you are truly doing
great here.
Quote:
you claim to be a
christian yet disobey the second
commandments in the
didache
sorry, I read the bible,
not the didache.
Quote:
the second
commandment: grave sin
forbidden.
but then, abortion is not
a sin.
[.
Quote:
ishould I call
you pro
death,
i am not. I don't
favor death. So you have now resorted
to the usual antichoice babble and stupid
nonsense. Oh, this is deteriorating
even faster than I had expected, even
though you are a prolifer.
Quote:
next time you
start with the anti choice then I will
start with the pro
death.
well, have at it. If
you want to be stupid, who am I to stop
you. You already showed your lack of
desire for serious discussion, resorting
to stupid nonsense when your postulated
views were challenged, so I am not sure
much is lost ny you resorting to the usual
antichoice chicanery.
Quote:
i like your
generalization of prolifers,that none of
them have any chance of understanding
anything and all prochoicers would be of
the same mindset as you.Your attempt at
trying to imply that again I have said
something I havent it really is getting
boring steen.
what did I imply?
Answer the whole post pal because your
childish attempts at deception is obvious
to everyone,i was simply pointing out that
there are risks to everything,you were the
one that degenerated this to the level you
are used to because that is all you can do
steen is try and cause arguments,
Quote:
your narrow
minded and stereotypical view of anyone
who dont agree with you is duly
noted.
ah, a prolifer talking to
the mirror. Yes, we see that a lot as
well.
So your hypocrisy knows no bounds then
steen as you said that about me did you
not or are you going to deny that.
Quote] and the second commandment of the
teaching; ........
and so on and so on
endlessly. I am not sure where you get
that from, but it is not from the bible.
So what do I care.
Quote:
i do believe your
own faith classes it as
homicide
nope. Your ignorance
of my faith doesn't make your
misimpression into reality
your a christian therefore the didache
{christian teachings}state you shall not
cause a child to be m.U.R.D.E.Red by
abortion.So are you a christian or not.
Quote:
i never said
anything about if the law is broken then
they shouldnt recieve medical help,are you
delibratly missing the point or are you
unable to grasp the simplelist of points
you continuasly read into my post things
that are not
there
you were trying to
insinuate that I should have the utmost
care for them as a patient if they broke
that alw. As I said, you simply don't
have the mindset of a physician, so you
won't understand this at all. I already
once suggested that you drop it, and it
seems that I need to suggest that to you
again.[/quote]
i never insinuated anything you chose to
read into my post what would fit your
ideas of prolifers.
And yes I can understand that you will
have a different point of view because of
your training,but im not a doctor so your
point to this inane comment
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-27-05 13:29pm
foreverblue
wrote:
answer the whole
post
really? What
significant part did I miss?
Quote:
and the second
commandment of the teaching; ........
Quote:
and so on and so
on endlessly. I am not sure where you
get that from, but it is not from the
bible. So what do I care.
i do believe your own
faith classes it as homicide
Quote:
nope. Your
ignorance of my faith doesn't make your
misimpression into
reality
your a christian
therefore the didache {christian
teachings}state you shall not cause a
child to be m.U.R.D.E.Red by
abortion.
as this "didache" you are
talking about has never showed up anywhere
else that I have ever seen, I can only
conclude that your claim is false.
Obviously this "didache" does not define
christianity. Rather, the bible does.
I suspect that it might hold some
significance within your particular brand
of christianity, but your generalization
obviously is seriously off-base.
Quote:
so are you a
christian or
not.
yes, I am. And no, I
read the bible, not this "didcahe" you are
talking about? What particular church
does that come from?
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-27-05 15:12pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
answer the whole
post
really? What
significant part did I miss?
as this "didache" you are
talking about has never showed up anywhere
else that I have ever seen, I can only
conclude that your claim is false.
Obviously this "didache" does not define
christianity. Rather, the bible does.
I suspect that it might hold some
significance within your particular brand
of christianity, but your generalization
obviously is seriously off-base.
Quote:
so are you a
christian or
not.
yes, I am. And no, I
read the bible, not this "didcahe" you are
talking about? What particular church
does that come from?[/quote]
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-27-05 15:18pm
foreverblue
wrote:
www.Earlychristianwritings.C
om/didache.Html
open your
eyes
that still isn't the
bible. So please sow where it defines
christians.
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
Posted: 01-27-05 15:20pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
www.Earlychristianwritings.C
om/didache.Html
open your
eyes
that still isn't the
bible. So please sow where it defines
christians.
early christian writings I think the name
of the link says it all.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-27-05 15:22pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
you also use medline to back
up your
claims
yes, medline is the
reference source for medical, scientific
journal publications. That is where the
science and the research is reported.
That is a valid, scientific source.
Quote:
but then you say
that merriam websters isnt a valid
reference for a medical dictionary{partial
birth abortion}do you
remember,
i am saying that it is
not the dictionary standard for the
medical profession as it is not
scientifically vetted. That is why
stedman's medical dictionary is the
authority. Because its definitions are
guaranteed to be medically accurate.
Because it is scientifically correct.
Quote:
well clever clogs
what dictionary does med line use,yes you
got it merriam
websters.
it uses stedman's medical
dictionary. Why are you lying?
Quote:
so that makes you
an hypocrite.I have had enough of your
attempts to try and bring me down to your
level steen,i have more respect for the
issue than let
you.
ah, so your lies makes me
a hypocrite?
Quote:
you have lied
when you said I tried to put a gradient of
risk on certain types of surgery,when all
I did was state a
fact,
not at all. I just
showed where you did so.
Quote:
bd put the
gradient on surgery,but you wont say
anything to her because she is on your
side,so yes steen you have
lied
nope, I am not saying
anything to her because she didn't try to
imply some stupid idea such as that only
some procedures are valid. I am not
objecting to th medical gradient. I am
onjecting to the medical gradient applied
in a form to somehow speaking out agianst
abortion. Thus, you used it in an
invalid form, while bd
didn't.
You must be stupid or ignorant not to see
the point steen you will insist on proving
my points for me you are a hypocrite,as
for racism laws im in england so try our
laws you lying racist,
i have proved you a liar again now why
dont you give up,once again you try to
attribute to me something that isnt there
just how stupid are you.
Now that I have proved you a liar again
are you going to stop lying and be
honest,if there is no reason to argue with
someone steen dont twist a post so you can
have a reason
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-27-05 15:25pm
fishx
wrote:
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
www.Earlychristianwritings.C
om/didache.Html
open your
eyes
that still isn't the
bible. So please sow where it defines
christians.
early christian writings
I think the name of the link says it
all.
really? Some early
christian writings are known as the
gnostic bible. Are you saying then, that
everything in the gnostic bible is
defining christianity? What is it that
makes you define something else than the
bible as defining for christians?
Hmm, is it that kind of tools you use to
defend the nonsense about god speaking out
against abortion when it isn't even
mentioned in the bible? That would be
quite dishonest if that's what you guys
are doing.
|
FISHX
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 920 Location: UK
Posted: 01-27-05 15:28pm
foreverblue
wrote:
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
you also use medline to back
up your
claims
yes, medline is the
reference source for medical, scientific
journal publications. That is where
the science and the research is reported.
That is a valid, scientific source.
Quote:
but then you say
that merriam websters isnt a valid
reference for a medical dictionary{partial
birth abortion}do you
remember,
i am saying that it is
not the dictionary standard for the
medical profession as it is not
scientifically vetted. That is why
stedman's medical dictionary is the
authority. Because its definitions are
guaranteed to be medically accurate.
Because it is scientifically correct.
Quote:
well clever clogs
what dictionary does med line use,yes you
got it merriam
websters.
it uses stedman's medical
dictionary. Why are you lying?
Quote:
so that makes you
an hypocrite.I have had enough of your
attempts to try and bring me down to your
level steen,i have more respect for the
issue than let
you.
ah, so your lies makes me
a hypocrite?
Quote:
you have lied
when you said I tried to put a gradient of
risk on certain types of surgery,when all
I did was state a
fact,
not at all. I just
showed where you did so.
Quote:
bd put the
gradient on surgery,but you wont say
anything to her because she is on your
side,so yes steen you have
lied
nope, I am not saying
anything to her because she didn't try to
imply some stupid idea such as that only
some procedures are valid. I am not
objecting to th medical gradient. I am
onjecting to the medical gradient applied
in a form to somehow speaking out agianst
abortion. Thus, you used it in an
invalid form, while bd
didn't.
You must be stupid or ignorant not to see
the point steen you will insist on proving
my points for me you are a hypocrite,as
for racism laws im in england so try our
laws you lying racist,
i have proved you a liar again now why
dont you give up,once again you try to
attribute to me something that isnt there
just how stupid are you.
Now that I have proved you a liar again
are you going to stop lying and be
honest,if there is no reason to argue with
someone steen dont twist a post so you can
have a reason
i,v just been it does use merriam
websters dictionary.
|
steen
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Upper Midwest
Posted: 01-27-05 15:34pm
foreverblue
wrote:
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
you also use medline to back
up your
claims
yes, medline is the
reference source for medical, scientific
journal publications. That is where
the science and the research is reported.
That is a valid, scientific source.
Quote:
but then you say
that merriam websters isnt a valid
reference for a medical dictionary{partial
birth abortion}do you
remember,
i am saying that it is
not the dictionary standard for the
medical profession as it is not
scientifically vetted. That is why
stedman's medical dictionary is the
authority. Because its definitions are
guaranteed to be medically accurate.
Because it is scientifically
correct.
Quote:
well clever clogs
what dictionary does med line use,yes you
got it merriam
websters.
it uses stedman's medical
dictionary. Why are you lying?
Quote:
so that makes you
an hypocrite.I have had enough of your
attempts to try and bring me down to your
level steen,i have more respect for the
issue than let
you.
ah, so your lies makes me
a hypocrite?
Quote:
you have lied
when you said I tried to put a gradient of
risk on certain types of surgery,when all
I did was state a
fact,
not at all. I just
showed where you did so.
Quote:
bd put the
gradient on surgery,but you wont say
anything to her because she is on your
side,so yes steen you have
lied
nope, I am not saying
anything to her because she didn't try to
imply some stupid idea such as that only
some procedures are valid. I am not
objecting to th medical gradient. I am
onjecting to the medical gradient applied
in a form to somehow speaking out agianst
abortion. Thus, you used it in an
invalid form, while bd
didn't.
they use m-w to search
terms on their site, yes. But that is
all it does. That's because stedman's is
not on-line, you have to buy it. But the
medical definitions used in medline is
from stedman's.
And you can see that when you do a search
on "stedman's" it directs you to various
glossaries and similar that shows
stedman's used as the reference for the
glossaries
(f.Ex. Here: http://www.Bpkids.O
rg/community/glossary.Htm go to the
borrom where they list references,
including: "stedman's medical dictionary,
27th edition. (2000). Baltimore,
maryland: lippincott williams &
wilkins. ")
Quote:
as for racism
laws im in
england
well, I am in the us.
That aside, I am still waiting for you to
actually prove your claim.
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-27-05 15:36pm
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
steen
wrote:
foreverblue
wrote:
you also use medline to back
up your
claims
yes, medline is the
reference source for medical, scientific
journal publications. That is where
the science and the research is reported.
That is a valid, scientific source.
Quote:
but then you say
that merriam websters isnt a valid
reference for a medical dictionary{partial
birth abortion}do you
remember,
i am saying that it is
not the dictionary standard for the
medical profession as it is not
scientifically vetted. That is why
stedman's medical dictionary is the
authority. Because its definitions
are guaranteed to be medically accurate.
Because it is scientifically
correct.
Quote:
well clever clogs
what dictionary does med line use,yes you
got it merriam
websters.
it uses stedman's medical
dictionary. Why are you lying?
Quote:
so that makes you
an hypocrite.I have had enough of your
attempts to try and bring me down to your
level steen,i have more respect for the
issue than let
you.
ah, so your lies makes me
a hypocrite?
Quote:
you have lied
when you said I tried to put a gradient of
risk on certain types of surgery,when all
I did was state a
fact,
not at all. I just
showed where you did so.
Quote:
bd put the
gradient on surgery,but you wont say
anything to her because she is on your
side,so yes steen you have
lied
nope, I am not saying
anything to her because she didn't try to
imply some stupid idea such as that only
some procedures are valid. I am not
objecting to th medical gradient. I
am onjecting to the medical gradient
applied in a form to somehow speaking out
agianst abortion. Thus, you used it
in an invalid form, while bd
didn't.
they use m-w to search
terms on their site, yes. But that is
all it does. That's because stedman's
is not on-line, you have to buy it. But
the medical definitions used in medline is
from stedman's.
And you can see that when you do a search
on "stedman's" it directs you to various
glossaries and similar that shows
stedman's used as the reference for the
glossaries
(f.Ex. Here: http://www.Bpkids.O
rg/community/glossary.Htm go to the
borrom where they list references,
including: "stedman's medical dictionary,
27th edition. (2000). Baltimore,
maryland: lippincott williams &
wilkins. ")
Quote:
as for racism
laws im in
england
well, I am in the us.
That aside, I am still waiting for you to
actually prove your
claim.
you backpedal any quicker steen and you
are going to fall over still no apology
for calling me a liar when I wasnt lying
|
lil_blaze2004
Supporter
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6492 Location: ,
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 01-27-05 16:02pm
Foreverblue
i've come to learn steen will never admit
he's wrong and never apologize for
anything. I bet he steps on someone's
foot and makes them apologize..
Please note this is my opinion--lmao
|
foreverblue
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 577
Posted: 01-27-05 16:06pm
lil_blaze2004
wrote:
foreverblue
i've come to learn steen will never admit
he's wrong and never apologize for
anything. I bet he steps on someone's
foot and makes them apologize..
Please note this is my
opinion--lmao
I have noticed he likes to avoid the
threads<which he calls treads,a doctor
who cannot spell,i dont believe
it>which prove him wrong or he posts
some bs about how he has proved it in
other threads.I have actually read 99% of
his threads on this forum and the abortion
forum,and he has posted less than 10
links to prove himself and some of them
are back to this forum.
