Abortion Debate Forum - Just a Thought.... page 2
medical questions | health forums

Just a Thought....

New Topic  This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Just a Thought....
Author Message
bluebubble888

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 499

Posted: 12-01-04 07:46am

Hey hey hey!! No name calling here!! First off I am not a liar or a, what was that steen?? "a silly dupe"?? ~i have read alot of research on how abortions are risky and more dangerous and unnatrual than childbirth. There are many web sites that support both claims; one being too risky than the other......So I will agree to diagree with you on that~and not apologize for anything since there is nothing to apologize for. Funny how you provide no facts or research in your claims~you just bash mine! Please you credible sources while disbanning mine instead of your own opinions! Thankx! Secondly when did I ever say abortion causes breast cancer!!!! If I weren't misquoted by a certain someone than it would be clear that I said ~abortions can increase the risk of breast cancer....And I will stand behind that untill the last breath in my body because it steen now who is making bogus claims. So now~this has come full circle and is just becoming silly.....All I see from steen is bashing of other peoples words. I could see if they were legid. Bashes~but most of what he is saying is backed by nothing rather than a stubborn mind. So let me turn the tables on you. If you are for abortions~go kill babies.......Bottom line: lies or no lies: the truth will always prevail......Abortion is a selfish answer to a selfish person.
Did you find this post useful?
|
SamiNSunisMa

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 1528

Posted: 12-01-04 07:52am

hotasfrick wrote:
funny, those who are against abortion were born. See, your "thoughts" make no sense. Obviously in order to develop a thought you would have to exist. Geez.

Let's see you get raped and fall pregnant with a pregnancy that would kill you if you continued with it. Then tell me you are against abortion.


as a victim of molestation and rape I understand what you are saying. But im sorry if you just plain didn't use a condom own up to ur mistake, b/c the kid will *n*o*t end up a mistake Wink
Did you find this post useful?
|
bluebubble888

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 499

Posted: 12-01-04 07:56am

Only 1% of rape victims fall pregnant...

Go ahead steen~see the little "qoute" button~go ahead call me a liar and a "dupe".....But do you understand that your words are just as credible as mine. (you can quote that too.. Wink )
Did you find this post useful?
|
SamiNSunisMa

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 1528

Posted: 12-01-04 08:01am

All I have to say to steen and bluebubble is no name calling, just b/c u dont agree doesnt mean they are a liar or stupid or a dupe Rolling Eyes
Did you find this post useful?
|
bd1012

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 1998

Posted: 12-01-04 09:15am

saminsunisma wrote:
hotasfrick wrote:
funny, those who are against abortion were born. See, your "thoughts" make no sense. Obviously in order to develop a thought you would have to exist. Geez.


Let's see you get raped and fall pregnant with a pregnancy that would kill you if you continued with it. Then tell me you are against abortion.


as a victim of molestation and rape I understand what you are saying. But im sorry if you just plain didn't use a condom own up to ur mistake, b/c the kid will *n*o*t end up a mistake Wink

don't tell people what to do with their pregnancies.. It's none of your business.
Did you find this post useful?
|
oopoopoop

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1520
Location: ,
Thanks: 78
Thanked:5

Posted: 12-01-04 09:25am

bluebubble888 wrote:
~i have read alot of research on how abortions are risky and more dangerous and unnatrual than childbirth. There are many web sites that support both claims;


illegal abortions are very risky -- women having themselves punched or even stabbed in the stomach, or inserting sharp objects or injecting poisons up into their vaginas to their uterus. Or going to backroom abortionists, where there may not be adequate hygeine. Yes -- illegal abortions are very risky.

Legal abortions are extremely safe, on the other hand. Much safer than pregnancy and childbirth.
Did you find this post useful?
|
SamiNSunisMa

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 1528

Posted: 12-01-04 09:33am

bd1012 wrote:
saminsunisma wrote:
hotasfrick wrote:
funny, those who are against abortion were born. See, your "thoughts" make no sense. Obviously in order to develop a thought you would have to exist. Geez.



Let's see you get raped and fall pregnant with a pregnancy that would kill you if you continued with it. Then tell me you are against abortion.


as a victim of molestation and rape I understand what you are saying. But im sorry if you just plain didn't use a condom own up to ur mistake, b/c the kid will *n*o*t end up a mistake Wink

don't tell people what to do with their pregnancies.. It's none of your business.


Rolling Eyes no its not but this *i*s a debate Rolling Eyes
Did you find this post useful?
|
Moira

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 302
Location: somewhere where it rains a lot

Posted: 12-01-04 10:05am

bluebubble888 wrote:
i have read alot of research on how abortions are risky and more dangerous and unnatrual than childbirth.


find me one independent site that says this. You can't. You can only show me biased propoganda sites.

bluebubble888 wrote:
there are many web sites that support both claims; one being too risky than the other......So I will agree to diagree with you on that


well if a lot of sites say it it must be true! Rolling Eyes show me this research and I will disprove it to you.

bluebubble888 wrote:
if I weren't misquoted by a certain someone than it would be clear that I said ~abortions can increase the risk of breast cancer....And I will stand behind that untill the last breath in my body because it steen now who is making bogus claims.


i wouldn't if I were you.
1) show me these studies that "prove" a link between abortion and breast cancer.
2) explain why these studies are more reliable than the one cited here http://news.Bbc.Co .Uk/1/hi/health/3568041.Stm

and I quote:

"results from these women showed that for those who had miscarried there was no increased risk of breast cancer compared to the general population. The risk was actually slightly lower among those who had an abortion.

Professor beral told bbc news online: "the results should make it clear that studies which are properly designed show pregnancies that end in abortion don't increase the risk of breast cancer."

she said previous studies have never been based on any biological evidence.

Delyth morgan, chief executive of breakthrough breast cancer, said: "we hope that this research will put a stop, once and for all, to the persistent claims that abortion is a risk factor for the disease and give reassurance to women."

she said concerns about breast cancer should not influence a woman's decision whether or not to have an abortion"

i advise you to retract your false claims.

bluebubble888 wrote:
so let me turn the tables on you. If you are for abortions~go kill babies.......


i have never killed a baby in my life, and never will. Abortion doesn't kill babies.

bluebubble888 wrote:
bottom line: lies or no lies: the truth will always prevail......Abortion is a selfish answer to a selfish person.


so it's selfish to refuse to donate your body and resources and harm yourself physically for another? I presume you only have one kidney because of course you've donated one. I presume you donate bone marrow and blood every 12 weeks. Because otherwise, according to you, you would be selfish.

And that's of course assuming that a fetus is a baby. And why don't you show us this truth of which you speak?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Izzy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth

Posted: 12-01-04 11:22am

"i presume you only have one kidney because of course you've donated one. I presume you donate bone marrow and blood every 12 weeks"

and what if he does?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Moira

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 302
Location: somewhere where it rains a lot

Posted: 12-01-04 11:35am

It will make him less of a hypocrite.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Izzy

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 883
Location: Earth

Posted: 12-01-04 11:54am

But it wouldnt make his post any more honest.

It would just mean that he was a little selfish to a point too - so what?

Abortion isnt about donating kidneys or bone marrow or blood, its about the direct killing of another human being.

If he dosnt donate bone marrow or blood or a kidney he isnt purposly killing someone - he is simply refusing to donate..... Maybe he would donate if he could have the gaurentee he would be able to use it himslef after he had donated and then have it back as entirely his after nine months.

You dont donate anything durring pregnancy.... You .S.H.A.R.E a limited number of things
Did you find this post useful?
|
bluebubble888

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 499

Posted: 12-01-04 12:17pm

bd1012 wrote:
saminsunisma wrote:
hotasfrick wrote:
funny, those who are against abortion were born. See, your "thoughts" make no sense. Obviously in order to develop a thought you would have to exist. Geez.



Let's see you get raped and fall pregnant with a pregnancy that would kill you if you continued with it. Then tell me you are against abortion.


as a victim of molestation and rape I understand what you are saying. But im sorry if you just plain didn't use a condom own up to ur mistake, b/c the kid will *n*o*t end up a mistake Wink

don't tell people what to do with their pregnancies.. It's none of your business.



don't tell other people what they can and can't say~Wink
Did you find this post useful?
|
bluebubble888

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 499

Posted: 12-01-04 12:22pm

First off~i'm a girl Wink

i don't see any link between the direct intenion of killling a human life~and the lack of donating organs to someone who is allready dying.

And of course in a hearbeat~i would donate any organ that I do not allready need to save the life of someone else.

It is senless and stupid to call the baby a "fetus"....Tell me then~when does it directly become a baby?
Did you find this post useful?
|
bd1012

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 1998

Posted: 12-01-04 12:27pm

It becomes a baby when it takes it's first breath.. Actually it becomes a baby whenever it exists and someone loves it.. Baby is a term of endearment. The correct term is infant or neonate. It becomes and infant/neonate at birth, when it takes it's first breath. Neonate is a stage of development so it can't be a fetus and neonate at the same time. Fetus is not a made up term to dehumanize the "child" but an actual term used to describe a stage of development. There's your answer.. Take it or leave it.
Did you find this post useful?
|
bluebubble888

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 499

Posted: 12-01-04 12:32pm

There's too many sites to even put on here.....Go to google.Com and type in abortion and breast cancer. Some sites say it increases the risks others say it dosn't. I'm not going to waste my time.
Did you find this post useful?
|
bluebubble888

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 499

Posted: 12-01-04 12:34pm

I think the argument of when something becomes a "baby" or what not is bogus. Life in general starts at the moment of conception.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Moira

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 302
Location: somewhere where it rains a lot

Posted: 12-01-04 12:54pm

bluebubble888 wrote:
there's too many sites to even put on here.....Go to google.Com and type in abortion and breast cancer. Some sites say it increases the risks others say it dosn't. I'm not going to waste my time.


you're skirting the issue, probably because you know you're wrong. If you're right, you can easily prove it to me.

You are the one claiming abortion causes breast cancer. You have to back this statement up.

Show me the study you base this belief on and I will disprove it to you.

Explain to me why you think studies only posted on biased and therefore unreliable sites are more reliable than the one I posted further up the page. Explain why you think the lancet and the chief executive of breakthrough breast cancer are wrong.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Moira

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 302
Location: somewhere where it rains a lot

Posted: 12-01-04 12:55pm

bluebubble888 wrote:
i think the argument of when something becomes a "baby" or what not is bogus. Life in general starts at the moment of conception.


all of our laws, rights and the whole constitution is based on personhood. Why do you think this notion should be overturned?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Moira

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 302
Location: somewhere where it rains a lot

Posted: 12-01-04 13:03pm

bluebubble888 wrote:
first off~i'm a girl Wink


and?

blue wrote:
i don't see any link between the direct intenion of killling a human life~and the lack of donating organs to someone who is allready dying.


of course not, you've shown by your stubborn refusal to admit that the breast cancer-abortion link is a lie that you only believe what you want to.

In pregnancy the womans body and resources are being donated to the fetus, causing her physical and emotional harm. The woman then cuts off this donation. In both the kidney donation scenario and the pregnancy scenario, a person dies because of a lack of donation (taking the zef to be a person).

blue wrote:
and of course in a hearbeat~i would donate any organ that I do not allready need to save the life of someone else.


off you go then, there are plenty of people who need it. And of course you want to make this law, just like you want to make abortion illegal. You'd be a hypocrite otherwise.

blue wrote:
it is senless and stupid to call the baby a "fetus"....Tell me then~when does it directly become a baby?


and why are medical terms "senseless and stupid"? So not only do you want to throw the law in regards to personhood to the wind, you now want to overturn medical thinking. Fascinating. From now on all doctors refer to fetus' as "snuggly wuggly babykins" because you've said so. I see.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Moira

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 302
Location: somewhere where it rains a lot

Posted: 12-01-04 13:06pm

izzy wrote:

if he dosnt donate bone marrow or blood or a kidney he isnt purposly killing someone - he is simply refusing to donate.....


just like the woman is.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
New Topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.



Page 2 of 4
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.