Join Our Community!
Share
Pregnancy Forum > Teen Pregnancy Forum > Iraq~no Wmd's. Good Job Bush. (Page 1)
What happens during labor? What do contractions feel like? And how do I know that labor has begun? Read on to learn about birthing basics....
Signs of labor occur after 36 weeks of pregnancy. Learn about the difference between real and false contractions. Plus, we outline signs of delivery complicati...
Almost all women worry about the pain of childbirth. Preparing for childbirth includes thinking about how you'd like to cope with the pain of labor. Read on for...
Avatar
Q: Iraq~no Wmd's. Good Job Bush.
asked by: smith8500 on October 7th, 2004
Especially eHealthy
Report: no wmd stockpiles in iraq
thursday, october 7, 2004 posted: 1:00 am edt (0500 gmt)


washington (cnn) -- saddam hussein did not possess stockpiles of illicit weapons at the time of the u.S. Invasion in march 2003 and had not begun any program to produce them, a cia report concludes.

In fact, the long-awaited report, authored by charles duelfer, who advises the director of central intelligence on iraqi weapons, says iraq's wmd program was essentially destroyed in 1991 and saddam ended iraq's nuclear program after the 1991 gulf war.

The iraq survey group report, released wednesday, is 1,200 to 1,500 pages long.

The massive report does say, however, that iraq worked hard to cheat on united nations-imposed sanctions and retain the capability to resume production of weapons of mass destruction at some time in the future.

"[saddam] wanted to end sanctions while preserving the capability to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction when sanctions were lifted," a summary of the report says.

Duelfer, testifying at a senate hearing on the report, said his account attempts to describe iraq's weapons programs "not in isolation but in the context of the aims and objectives of the regime that created and used them."

"i also have insisted that the report include as much basic data as reasonable and that it be unclassified, since the tragedy that has been iraq has exacted such a huge cost for so many for so long," duelfer said.

The report was released nearly two years ago to the day that president bush strode onto a stage in cincinnati and told the audience that saddam hussein's iraq "possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons" and "is seeking nuclear weapons."

"the danger is already significant and it only grows worse with time," bush said in the speech delivered october 7, 2002. "if we know saddam hussein has dangerous weapons today -- and we do -- does it make any sense for the world to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?"

speaking on the campaign trail in pennsylvania, bush maintained wednesday that the war was the right thing to do and that iraq stood out as a place where terrorists might get weapons of mass destruction.

"there was a risk, a real risk, that saddam hussein would pass weapons or materials or information to terrorist networks, and in the world after september the 11th, that was a risk we could not afford to take," bush said.

But sen. Jay rockefeller of west virginia, the top democrat on the senate intelligence committee, seized on the report as political ammunition against the bush administration.

"despite the efforts to focus on saddam's desires and intentions, the bottom line is iraq did not have either weapon stockpiles or active production capabilities at the time of the war," rockefeller said in a press release.

"the report does further document saddam's attempts to deceive the world and get out from under the sanctions, but the fact remains, the sanctions combined with inspections were working and saddam was restrained."

but british prime minister tony blair had just the opposite take on the information in the report, saying it demonstrated the u.N. Sanctions were not working and saddam was "doing his best" to get around them.

He said the report made clear that there was "every intention" on saddam's part to develop wmd and he "never had any intention of complying with u.N. Resolutions."

at a hearing of the senate armed services committee wednesday, panel chairman john warner, r-virginia, called the findings "significant."

"while the isg has not found stockpiles of wmd, the isg and other coalition elements have developed a body of fact that shows that saddam hussein had, first, the strategic intention to continue to pursue wmd capabilities; two, created ambiguity about his wmd capabilities that he used to extract concessions in the international world of disclosure and discussion and negotiation.

"he used it as a bargaining tactic and as a strategic deterrent against his neighbors and others."

"as we speak, over 1,700 individuals -- military and civilian -- are in iraq and qatar, continuing to search for facts about iraq's wmd programs," warner said.

But sen. Carl levin of michigan, ranking democrat on the committee, said 1,750 experts have visited 1,200 potential wmd sites and have come up empty-handed.

"it is important to emphasize that central fact because the administration's case for going to war against iraq rested on the twin arguments that saddam hussein had existing stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction and that he might give weapons of mass destruction to al qaeda to attack us -- as al qaeda had attacked us on 9/11," levin said.

Sen. Edward kennedy, d-massachusetts, asked duelfer about the future likelihood of finding weapons of mass destruction, to which duelfer replied, "the chance of finding a significant stockpile is less than 5 percent."

based in part on interviews with saddam, the report concludes that the deposed iraqi president wanted to acquire weapons of mass destruction because he believed they kept the united states from going all the way to baghdad during the first gulf war and stopped an iranian ground offensive during the iran-iraq war in the 1980s, senior administration officials said.

U.S. Officials said the duelfer report is "comprehensive," but they are not calling it a "final report" because there are still some loose ends to tie up.

One outstanding issue, an official said, is whether iraq shipped any stockpiles of weapons outside of the country. Another issue, he said, is mobile biological weapons labs, a matter on which he said "there is still useful work to do."

duelfer said wednesday his teams found no evidence of a mobile biological weapons capability.

The u.S. Official said he believes saddam decided to give up his weapons in 1991, but tried to conceal his nuclear and biological programs for as long as possible. Then in 1995, when his son-in-law hussain kamal defected with information about the programs, he gave those up, too.

Iraq's nuclear program, which in 1991 was well-advanced, "was decaying" by 2001, the official said, to the point where iraq was -- if it even could restart the program -- "many years from a bomb."

cnn's wayne drash contributed to this report.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(22)
Avatar
IDABABY
replied on October 7th, 2004
Extremely eHealthy
I love bush all the way
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
mommabear16
replied on October 7th, 2004
Extremely eHealthy
*falls on the floor and dies*

you know..I've gotten into a debate type thingy with some people on here about bush but......I will say..

I hate bush.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
lauren22
replied on October 7th, 2004
Active User, very eHealthy
Do ya'll not think we are safer with him being captured? Wmd or not, the world is still safer because he is out of power!

And...I love bush!
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
mommabear16
replied on October 7th, 2004
Extremely eHealthy
[ummm ummm....We are still trying to catch saddam...Um.....I mean osma bin landin...] the last debate....Bush said something like that...Heh....Those werent his exacte words I know but ill I can remember is that he took like five minutes to say one very short sentance, and he kept saying um, and he said the wrong name. Blargh.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
smith8500
replied on October 7th, 2004
Especially eHealthy
I'm glad saddam is caught! Yes we're safer, i'm just proving that bush is stupid!
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Michelle1337
replied on October 7th, 2004
Extremely eHealthy
So what if bush is stupid...Kerry is even freakin stupider. Rolling Eyes

"the only thing consistent about my opponent is his inconsistency."

i love bush
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Darling
replied on October 7th, 2004
Active User, very eHealthy
If you had someone overseas or in the military then you might change your opinion of bush...Or kerry for that matter. Lets just say im happy im in canada
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
pitterpatter
replied on October 7th, 2004
Active User, very eHealthy
Umm... I'm not going to say I have anything against bush. However, there's a lot of stuff that's going on with schools because of bush and it's not all good. Then again that's my field so I have an inside scoop on it. I don't like it though when people go around saying they hate bush or they hate kerry I think that's really imature. They are just doing their job and they are doing there best at it. Whether it's right or wrong is one thing, but let's not criticize them for doing what they believe to be best.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
smith8500
replied on October 7th, 2004
Especially eHealthy
Well.... I hate bush.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
pitterpatter
replied on October 7th, 2004
Active User, very eHealthy
Oh chanda please........
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
pitterpatter
replied on October 7th, 2004
Active User, very eHealthy
Oh by the way.... I was watching this show about bush and sadaam and stuff and even thought they never found weapons they found out that sadaam was in the process of getting money together to get some mass destruction weapons so bush caught him ahead of time. That's pretty damm good if you ask me. Plus since he's been in office we've been pretty darn safe too! Atleast we can say we're still alive for the most part.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
smith8500
replied on October 7th, 2004
Especially eHealthy
Oh I wasn't trying to start anything. I'm just stating.... I don't like bush.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
cherriegurl
replied on October 7th, 2004
Extremely eHealthy
I hate politcal debates so im staying out of it good luck ladies!!
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
smith8500
replied on October 7th, 2004
Especially eHealthy
I'm not debating. I'm stating. I don't need to debate. I know what I like and what I don't. Laughing
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Michelle1337
replied on October 7th, 2004
Extremely eHealthy
I hate political debates too...There fun though! But completely pointless because you'll never change anyone elses mind about what they believe. Lol
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
linuxChique
replied on October 7th, 2004
Extremely eHealthy
pitterpatter wrote:
oh by the way.... I was watching this show about bush and sadaam and stuff and even thought they never found weapons they found out that sadaam was in the process of getting money together to get some mass destruction weapons so bush caught him ahead of time. That's pretty damm good if you ask me. Plus since he's been in office we've been pretty darn safe too! Atleast we can say we're still alive for the most part.


actually, they did find weapons. They found enough sarin gas to kill half a million people and they found ingredients for making wmds and instructions on how to do it. You just won't hear about it because the liberal media doesn't want us to know.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
pitterpatter
replied on October 7th, 2004
Active User, very eHealthy
Interesting......
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
LaurensEntourage
replied on October 8th, 2004
Extremely eHealthy
jlee77 wrote:
darling.....I'm sorry but I have to disagree with your comment. Thank you though for it, we all are entitled to our opinions. Once again, as I tell all "bush-haters" (not saying you are): those brave men signed up for a career in the military with the well known fact that they may someday go to war. It's not like it's an unknow fact that is thrown at you with deceit. That is their jobs. To me, when people whine about men being over there and it being wrong...It's insulting those over there performing their hard, brave work. They are fighting for our country and proudly. The military was formed to protect the us and I would say the same if my brother were fighting there. I have several people I care about over there. Props to the mean and woman and oh.....


I love bush too. Laughing


i knew someone stationed in iraq. Knew. He's dead. We corrosponded through e-mail until he died. He did join the marines willingly and he did expect to go into combat someday. What he didn't expect was to be brought into a ficticious war. He didn't agree with the war, but he still went because it was his duty to his country and he died for a cause he didn't belileve in. I have several friends in the armed forces and needless to say none of them are signing up to do more than what's asked of them.

I hate bush.

Lauren
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
smith8500
replied on October 8th, 2004
Especially eHealthy
L~i'm sorry about your friend!
Did you find this post useful?
|
12 >>
Quick Reply
Search