I have read this debate about the significance or not of the
endothelial dysfunction. Don't you think that you overreact a little bit?
This guy, gallos, may be an insensitive jerk, but he opened a few leads
of thought and research for the patients following this forum. It seems
that nobody found a solution to the problem, but everybody looks like
they would like to fry this guy because he told us a totally different story
about anxiety and panick attacks and burry the whole argumentation
with what seems to be a witch hunt.
Are we trying to find the truth, through dialog, regardless of what that
truth is or if it hurts or not, or are we going to chase our tails with
different stories that cannot be measured, observed or quantified?
Did any doctor cured the panick attacks or at least gave a definite
explanation (that can be verified by tests) of what happens with the
panick attacks? Because if not, I don't think that the patients on this
forum can come up with an efficient solution.
Nobody can make a claim about the cure of the panick attacks as long
as his health is not followed up for years for stability, because otherwise
we are just talking about a health snapshot.
It seems that the state of the art in the study of panick attacks and
endothelial dysfunction revolves around genomic research which escapes
to most if not all of the people on this forum
but for some reason there are people that after a brief internet search
can dictate that they found out that a certain disease is of a minimal
significance and therefore we do not need to worry about it anymore.
Myself, I have read on the web that the severity of the endothelial
dysfunction can be measured by the levels of the c-reactive protein,
also called crp. The bigger the value, the more serious the endothelial
dysfunction (ed) is. And the fact that ed is progressive, we have to
think about it where does it stop? Because if we can cope with it now,
in a few months or years when it will be worse we may not be able to
do it. What happens then and how are the doctors will respond to that?
These questions are very important and we have to think and respond
to them through dialog. Some of them are actually more deeper and
more philosophical than they appear.