Abortion Debate Forum - Pro Choice = Pro Anarchy

Debate Forums > Abortion Debate Forum > Pro Choice = Pro Anarchy

Q: Pro Choice = Pro Anarchy

asked by: samie on May 14th, 2004

Active User, very eHealthy

If pro choice is right a persons right to choose (for any reason) superceeds another human beings right to life! Therefor the right to choose is the most important right.

The failure with this is - I choose to health question the leader of the country and take control - I can under the right to choose,

i hate beastly mongo's and decide to torture and mutilate as many as I want I can its my choice.

I want to rape women its my choice

i want to break any or every law and not go to prison I can its my choice

i want to create a huge atomic wepon that I will explode and destroy the world - its my choice.

Someone/somegroup decides I as a brownette have no right to live and as they are superior blonds have every right to cleanse society of brownettes - after all its their choice!

Where does the madness of choice stop - it all comes down to that ideology some mindless fool came up with - survival of the fitest. What is the point of society and governments its anarchy!

Replies(12)

JanetBee

replied on May 14th, 2004

Experienced User

You are just being silly now! The right to choose is more like -- having any elective surgery. Why should we let people have tattoos? Plastic surgery? I'm even pro-choice where someone wants to take ecstasy or heroin, knowing it will be bad for them, as long as they have all the information and take responsibility for their decision. The issue in pro-choice is being in control of your own body, not anyone else's, so posting something like this just looks ludicrous, its not the same thing at all.

samie

replied on May 14th, 2004

Active User, very eHealthy

All the issues relate the individual and do not conflict with another human beings right so I too am pro choice on these issues

jessechaseme

replied on May 15th, 2004

Experienced User

I don't think sami understands anarchy. Grow up.

purple333

replied on May 16th, 2004

Extremely eHealthy

Samie's guilt at having aborted her own child is causing her to run around attacking everyone who might possibly consider having an abortion regardless of why in a useless attempt to assuage her own guilt.

The thing is though that it is her guilt, not anyone else's, she made her choice and will have to live with it or deal with it, but I see no reason why she thinks we should or would suffer for her action.

I made my choice, I grieve for my son & the babies I lost to miscarriages but I would make the same decision again right now. Unlike samie, I dealt with my feelings & I understood why I aborted him, & I believe it was the right thing to do. I also believe that god not merely forgave me but that god understands & accepts us as human & accepts & understands when we make choices that others would disagree with. God made us all different , we were given minds to think with not to follow the decisions & rules set down by other humans who lack god's greatness, knowledge & compassion.

2ferano

replied on May 17th, 2004

Extremely eHealthy

Samie that is just nonsense. Obviously someone who is prochoice is openminded. Therefore, we are not going to want to take away someone's rights because of their haircolor. That was not even a valid example.

However, if the choice were taken away from us, then that would be more along the nazi way of thinking. Taking away women's rights.

oopoopoop

replied on May 17th, 2004

Extremely eHealthy

I think it would be more along the lines of many fundamentalist religions, which typically take away women's rights to protect men's positions. Afghanistan, saudi arabia, for example.

samie

replied on May 17th, 2004

Active User, very eHealthy

Poland, ireland etc are all hateful to women, I mean ireland has or did have a woman prime minister and she didnt change the laws - explaine that one!

jessechaseme

replied on May 18th, 2004

Experienced User

I think we left out... America!

samie

replied on May 18th, 2004

Active User, very eHealthy

A free society can not exist devolved from moral values - it will break down into chaos, no need for government no need for police - survival of the strongest - law of the jungle. History tells us so - each great civalization that has crumbled and fell lost their moral values first. Roman empire, aincent greece, british empire and now america. The morals will live on but the societies that reject them will fade or be destroyed.

oopoopoop

replied on May 18th, 2004

Extremely eHealthy

Ah, yes, the old decline--f-morality-causing-the-collapse-o f-society argument! Nothing to do with how economic systems develop, etc., forget political economy, it's all down to rampant sex! Well, interestingly enough, all sorts of societies have collapsed. The mayans used to like throwing their young children alive into pits to appease their gods. Inuit society existed for a long time even though if the first born child was a girl it was just left out in the snow.Cannibal societies were fine until the were "discovered" either by missionaries or anthropologists. There's lots of gods out there, and they all seem to expect different forms of sacrifice!

jessechaseme

replied on May 19th, 2004

Experienced User

Yep, sami, you don't understand anarchy.

chrysta1818

replied on May 20th, 2004

Experienced User

Excuse me samie but I am from ireland & I very offended about what you said "poland, ireland etc are all hateful to women, I mean ireland has or did have a woman prime minister and she didnt change the laws - explaine that one!"
now can u explain that?

Learn About Us

Get Help

Join In

Do More

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.

The site is not a replacement for professional medical opinion, examination, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your medical doctor or other qualified health professional before starting any new treatment or making any changes to existing treatment. Do not delay seeking or disregard medical advice based on information written by any author on this site. No health questions and information on eHealth Forum is regulated or evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and therefore the information should not be used to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease without the supervision of a medical doctor. Posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author, and not the administrators, moderators, or editorial staff and hence eHealth Forum and its principals will accept no liabilities or responsibilities for the statements made. Schizophrenia health sitemap.
This page was last updated on January 1, 2009.
© 2008 eForums, Inc