Right. I agree with the both of you, it's simply just an erroneous statement to say that there must be pain in order for there to be love, and even in the prescense of pain it is still perfect, because loving people want to ease pain, heal pain, not cause pain, and all that.
Great replies, thanks.
We're not in kansas anymore are we?
I mean there is some voice in my head and it talks against love, hmmmmm. Besides what I posted here it also says things like love is worthless, that it does no good, and it's pointless to do and undergo, that it helps noone. And then it comes up with this loony rule that love is imperfect because there has to be pain for there to be love, confusing the hell outta me, which obviously isn't that hard to do. I wanna go back to kansas.