Join Our Community!
Share
Debate Forums > General Debate Forum > Earth Doomed to Fiery End, Experts Predict
Avatar
Q: Earth Doomed to Fiery End, Experts Predict
asked by: Verizon-y on February 22nd, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
Earth Doomed to Fiery End, Experts Predict


By Darren Osborne

February 23, 2008 01:00am
Article from: The Daily Telegraph

OUR planet faces a fiery doom inside the sun unless future generations work out how to change its orbit.

New calculations by University of Sussex astronomers predict the Earth will be burnt to a cinder then swallowed up by the sun in about 7.6 billion years.

Emeritus reader in astronomy Professor Robert Smith and his team thought they calculated that we may escape destruction but new figures take into account the effect of drag caused by the sun's outer atmosphere.

"We showed previously that, as the sun expanded, it would lose mass in the form of a strong wind, much more powerful than the current solar wind," Professor Smith said.

"This would reduce the gravitational pull of the sun on the Earth, allowing the Earth's orbit to move outwards, ahead of the expanding sun.

"However, the tenuous outer atmosphere of the sun extends a long way beyond its visible surface, and it turns out the Earth would be orbiting within these very low density outer layers."

He said the drag caused by the low-density gas would be enough to cause the planet to drift inward to be consumed by the sun.

However, if Earth remains in its current orbit, life isn't likely to be here in 7.6 billion years.

As the sun expands in its end sequence, Earth's surface temperatures will rapidly rise causing oceans to evaporate, leaving a hot, dry and uninhabitable ball.

Professor Smith suggested future generations may extend the planet's life by using the gravitational effect of a close passing asteroid to "nudge" our orbit away from the encroaching sun.

"It seems the energy requirements are just about possible and the technology could be developed over the next few centuries," he said.

Such a solution doesn't come without risk. Miscalculate, and the asteroid may hit Earth.

"A safer solution may be to build a fleet of interplanetary 'life rafts' that could manoeuvre themselves always out of reach of the sun, but close enough to use its energy," he said.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(15)
User Profile
Birch
replied on February 23rd, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
Yup.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Cambion
replied on February 23rd, 2008
Active User, very eHealthy
I'll be dead by the time this is set to happen, so I won't care.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Cambion
replied on February 23rd, 2008
Active User, very eHealthy
I'll be dead by the time this is set to happen, so I won't care.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on February 23rd, 2008
Especially eHealthy
Anyone who knows anything about astronomy already knows this... it's no big surprise. It's just part of the natural life cycle of our solar system. Humans will be long gone from Earth by then.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Lilly Ivy
replied on February 23rd, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
why do humans insist we must change everything? IMO we're scared that someday we might all die, so we try to prevent everything we can. Death will come sooner or later, and I don't think any of my offspring will be alive in 7.6 BILLION years. We'll probably have turned back into monkeys at that point anyway...
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Verizon-y
replied on February 24th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
I think it's a very noble goal to try to devise ways to save the planet from a fiery end.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
killbill
replied on February 24th, 2008
Experienced User
if i'm still alive i'll bring the marshmallows.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on February 24th, 2008
Especially eHealthy
futureshock wrote:
I think it's a very noble goal to try to devise ways to save the planet from a fiery end.

Are you going to save Mercury and Venus too, or do they not matter just because people don't live on them?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
woops
replied on February 24th, 2008
Experienced User
With the way things are going down here, I'd be glad if it happened tomorrow.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
killbill
replied on February 25th, 2008
Experienced User
futureshock wrote:
I think it's a very noble goal to try to devise ways to save the planet from a fiery end.


Laughing delusions of grandeur

how about focusing on fixing the problems we have now for a start? Confused

or we can just transfer the AIDS epidemic and all the wars over to the interplanetary life rafts. i just hope we get to wear cool 70's disco clothes like in star wars.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Verizon-y
replied on February 26th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
Who said we aren't trying to fix the problems we have now?
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Lilly Ivy
replied on February 26th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
because we'd rather land on the moon, look for asteroids, and predict the world will end in 7 billion years than find a cure for cancer/AIDS/etc, or end world hunger.

You never see donations for space projects, so they seem to be getting all the money they need while there are a million programs out there for feeding the poor because they can't get any money except for donations.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on February 26th, 2008
Especially eHealthy
Don't be pedantic. NASA has one of the smallest budgets out of any of the governmental programs!! They have barely enough staff and not even enough money to continue research and development. Do you think they'd be using a 20 year old shuttle design that has now blown up TWICE if they had enough money to design a better one? No.

Now if you want to say "We'd rather invade countries that have never attacked us than cure AIDS" you'd be right. I may be pro-military but the current cluster-muck in the middle east is ridiculous.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
killbill
replied on February 26th, 2008
Experienced User
Has anyone seen the movie 'Sunshine'? It had such potential to be interesting but they turned it into a monster chase movie in the end. They were trying to reignite the sun to save the earth. I just meant that, it's 7 billion years away. The way we're going right now there won't be anyone here to save (or worth saving.)
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
killbill
replied on February 26th, 2008
Experienced User
Lilly Ivy wrote:
We'll probably have turned back into monkeys at that point anyway...



Laughing Laughing Laughing

or amoebas.

or bacteria...or something...
Did you find this post useful?
|
Quick Reply
Search