homerx
Supporter
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 3516 Location: Earth..usually, USA
Thanks: 431
Thanked:1269
|
Marijuana - NOT A GATEWAY DRUG
Posted: 01-29-08 17:08pm
|
|
|
|
Washington, DC: Marijuana experimentation
by adolescents does not lead to the use of
harder drugs, according to the findings of
a RAND study released Monday. The study
dismisses the so-called "gateway theory,"
and raises doubts regarding the legitimacy
of federal drug policies based upon its
premise.
"While the gateway theory has enjoyed
popular acceptance, scientists have always
had their doubts," said lead researcher
Andrew Morral, associate director of
RAND's Public Safety and Justice unit.
"Our study shows that these doubts are
justified."
After analyzing data from the U.S.
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse
(which measures patters and frequency of
self-reported drug use among Americans),
researchers concluded that teenagers who
tried hard drugs were predisposed to do so
whether or not they tried marijuana.
"The people who are predisposed to use
drugs and have the opportunity to use
drugs are more likely than others to use
both marijuana and harder drugs," Morral
said. "Marijuana typically comes first
because it is more available. Once we
incorporated these facts into our
mathematical model of adolescent drug use,
we could explain all of the drug use
associations that have been cited as
evidence of marijuana's gateway effect."
Morral said that the study raises serious
questions about the legitimacy of basing
national drug policy decisions on the
false assumption that pot is a gateway
drug. "For example, it suggests that
policies aimed at reducing or eliminating
marijuana availability are unlikely to
make any dent in the hard drug problem,"
he said.
NORML Foundation Executive Director Allen
St. Pierre praised the study's findings,
noting that population estimates on drug
use have consistently shown that most
people who try marijuana never graduate to
harder drugs. "Statistically, for every
104 Americans who have tried marijuana,
there is only one regular user of cocaine,
and less than one user of heroin," St.
Pierre said. "For the overwhelming
majority of marijuana smokers, pot is
clearly a 'terminus' rather than a
gateway."
St. Pierre further speculated that among
the minority of marijuana smokers who do
graduate to harder substances, it's pot
prohibition rather than the use of
marijuana itself that often serves as a
doorway to the world of hard drugs. "The
more users become integrated in an
environment where, apart from cannabis,
hard drugs can also be obtained, the
greater the chances they will experiment
with harder drugs," he said.
Previous studies criticizing the gateway
theory include a Canadian Senate report
released this past fall, and a 1999 report
by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences
Institute of Medicine. The latter study
concluded that marijuana was not a
"gateway drug to the extent that it is a
cause or even that it is the most
significant predictor of serious drug
abuse." It noted that the "most
consistent predictors of serious drug
abuse appear to be intensity of marijuana
use and co-occurring psychiatric disorders
or a family history of psychopathology,
including alcoholism."
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
backpain1955
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: 01-29-08 20:19pm
|
|
|
|
|
This is just an incorrect interpretation
of the same data use to arrive at the
opposite conclusion previousl
|
|
|
|
|
 |
homerx
Supporter
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 3516 Location: Earth..usually, USA
Thanks: 431
Thanked:1269
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
backpain1955
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: 01-29-08 21:47pm
|
|
|
|
|
Of course one may disagree! That is why
this forum is a debate on medical
marijuana. I would never expect some to
agree with conclusions that would in any
way limit the use of marijuana in any form
or in any amount.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:02pm
|
|
|
|
|
| backpain1955
wrote: | | This is just an incorrect
interpretation of the same data use to
arrive at the opposite conclusion
previousl |
How is the interpretation incorrect?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
backpain1955
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:04pm
|
|
|
|
|
The original analysis of the data drew a
diametrically opposed conclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:11pm
|
|
|
|
|
| backpain1955
wrote: | | The original analysis of the
data drew a diametrically opposed
conclusion. |
That doesn't answer my question, that just
throws around ten cent words - which, by
the way, I do understand.
Why is the "original analysis" necessarily
the "right" analysis?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
backpain1955
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:15pm
|
|
|
|
|
Why is the alternative analysis the
"right" analysis?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:21pm
|
|
|
|
|
EXACTLY. You have, I think, missed the
point. You cannot say EITHER analysis is
the right one or the wrong one. The
original is not necessarily right and the
alternative is not necessarily right. Or
perhaps both have valid points and could
be combined. But you can't sit here and
say "the original is right and that
automatically makes all others wrong!"
when you can't even support WHY the
original is "right".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
homerx
Supporter
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 3516 Location: Earth..usually, USA
Thanks: 431
Thanked:1269
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:24pm
|
|
|
|
|
Good point Eiri but alas I think you are
talking to a brick wall. He is only on
this forum at algosdoc's request...heck,
they may be one and the same!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:27pm
|
|
|
|
|
He may. I'll notify admin.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
homerx
Supporter
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 3516 Location: Earth..usually, USA
Thanks: 431
Thanked:1269
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:32pm
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I think you might out to do
that....its smelling very fishy. 
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
backpain1955
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:32pm
|
|
|
|
|
Oh I am no doctor, nor do I pretend to
be....
Just a guy with back pain looking for
answers that won't kill me
|
|
|
|
|
 |
homerx
Supporter
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 3516 Location: Earth..usually, USA
Thanks: 431
Thanked:1269
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:38pm
|
|
|
|
|
MJ wont kill you...but I am by no means
suggesting you try it...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12985
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:40pm
|
|
|
|
|
| backpain1955
wrote: | Oh I am no doctor, nor do I
pretend to be....
Just a guy with back pain looking for
answers that won't kill
me |
How strange... Algosdoc CLAIMED to be a
doctor... yet couldn't PROVE it! You're
NOT claiming to be a doctor... but you
sure ACT like one!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
backpain1955
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: 01-29-08 22:44pm
|
|
|
|
|
Why I will take that as a compliment!! I
am not a doctor or a nurse or
anything....I do spend a lot of time in
the Holiday Inn Express though...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Lilly Ivy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 1601 Location: Newell, WV
Thanks: 58
Thanked:93
|
Posted: 01-30-08 00:18am
|
|
|
|
|
blah blah blah, back to the point...
I've know MANY people go both ways on
this. I truly believe it's only a 'gateway
drug' if you have an addictive
personality, have easy access to other
types of drugs, and you like
experimenting. That's why my parents have
been enjoying about a joint a day to relax
while my one friend is on every drug know
to man (well, at least close to it). They
both started in early high school, and
took different roads. It all depends on
the person, that's why 'statistics' can be
'debunked' by a few people that don't fit
into it.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
bobbette
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 07 Jan 2008 Posts: 125 Location: ,
Thanks: 27
Thanked:4
|
Posted: 01-30-08 01:29am
|
|
|
|
|
Good points, Lilly Ivy!! I agree with
what ya talking about. Well put--thanks
Bobbette.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Lilly Ivy
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 1601 Location: Newell, WV
Thanks: 58
Thanked:93
|
Posted: 01-30-08 01:44am
|
|
|
|
|
lol, how's that for a non medical
conclusion that makes a lot of sense?!?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
backpain1955
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 69
|
Posted: 01-30-08 06:43am
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the problems may be due to an
addictive personality and some are due to
family influences. The family with a
pothead father and mother, setting an
example for their children everyday by
snubbing their noses at federal law and
sending the message that it is ok to do
illegal drugs, would also have quite an
influence. Nothing medical or scientific
about that but it is common sense.
|
|
|
|
|