Join Our Community!
Share
Conditions and Diseases > TMJ Forum > surgery for locked jaw ?
Avatar
Q: surgery for locked jaw ?
asked by: webo on January 8th, 2008
New User
I've had jaw problems for about 10 years. I was able to deal with them until about a year ago, when I started developing intense pain that lasted for 2-3-week periods, and then started lasting longer. I saw an oral surgeon who made a splint. I initially experienced some relief, but after wearing it for about six months, I woke up nearly every morning with my loud popping in my right side. I was always able to manipulate my jaw to get the popping to stop.

I was referred to another oral surgeon. An MRI revealed displaced discs on both sides and osteoarthritis on the right side. He suggested I stop wearing the splint. That helped, but my jaw would occasionally lock temporarily while eating, and there was a lot of popping. He suggested an arthrocentesis procedure, saying that it would likely improve my situation and at the very worst, my jaw would remain the same. Well, not exactly. I came out of the procedure with a permanently locked jaw. My previous jaw opening of 56mm became about 35mm. I can't get a sub sandwich into my mouth, or anything really beyond a normal sandwich.

The most recent MRI shows "anterior subluxation of the right temperomandibular disc without reduction" and "minimal sclerosis of the right mandibular condyle (is) suspected." I have no idea what this means in layman's terms, but I know my jaw is locked. My oral surgeon said there are adhesions preventing the disc from returning to its previous position. He suggests three options: (1) he could put me under mild anesthesia and try to manipulate the disc into position (he tried unsuccessfully a few times in the office); (2) he could do a 2-hour surgery in which the disc is pulled back into place and attached to my jaw with a Mitek anchor; or (3) I could wait and gradually my jaw opening would increase but the disc ultimately would tear away, leaving me with bone on bone.

I did some research on the Mitek surgery, and the reports were not good. Some people suffered irreversible nerve damage to that side of their face. Many others found that the anchor tore away. I am reluctant to do any surgery, particularly after this supposedly minor arthrocentesis went so horribly wrong, but I also have been warned that bone on bone isn't good. This is impacting my life tremendously, so I sought a second opinion.

The new specialist said a lot of people misunderstand the discs. They aren't like a train running on a track. They can get out of place sideways, too, and in multiple angles. He says he believes there are some adhesions that are preventing my jaw from opening. He disagrees with the previous oral surgeon, who claims that if I wait too long, the disc will tear away and leave me with bone on bone. He doesn't believe a splint would help me, unless I am severely grinding or clenching, and even then it would do nothing to open my jaw. He also says that although he has done the Mitek surgery multiple times, he has yet to see permanent benefit. He's not big on it and doesn't recommend it for me. He is reluctant to do surgery because he says the joint does not like to be invaded; there is no direct blood supply to the joint.

He says he could do an arthroscopy, but that would be more to see what's there than actually repair anything. He says the downside is that you can't see behind the instrument when it's in there.

A few days ago, he injected painkiller around my jaw and asked me to manipulate it. He then injected it right into the jaw and I did the same. The largest opening I could manage was 42mm.

He said I could just live with this; many do. There might be medical developments down the road that could do wonders. I don't see an arthroscopy in my immediate future. And I DEFINITELY am not going to do the Mitek unless my condition worsens dramatically and I am in severe pain, or if I read more positive reports about it.

Your thoughts? Thanks for any help you can give. Blessings.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(7)
User Profile
TMJWorld
replied on January 8th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
let me just say that im alot like you--i had my discs replaced--not taken out they were put back with out surgery. arthrocentisis iss not very good at treating as it only deals with one joint cavity while there are 2. pm me and we can talk some ore. i dont see a need for mitek--that would probably be your last last option and i highly doubt that it will come to that.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
webo
replied on January 8th, 2008
New User
How do I PM? I just joined this site.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
mominashoe
replied on January 9th, 2008
Moderator
Click on her name or her picture to the left of the messages and that will bring up her profile page. Then click on the link that says "Send her a message" under the profile picture.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
MaggieMay78
replied on January 9th, 2008
New User
I realize that your normal jaw opening is pretty wide...but I was told that most surgeons consider a 35mm opening to be a successful outcome of TMJ surgery!!! In other words, if the patient comes out of surgery, and after therapy is able to open 35mm...that is a success! And just so you know, my "normal" opening is only about 40-43mm because I have a naturally small mouth. Same for my sister. Now, I know that you're in pain too, but I don't think TMJ surgeries are typically recommended just to relieve pain. I am not saying this is the case for everyone...BUT, many people seem to end up in the same amount of pain or worse after surgery! I would think long and hard before having surgery on the TMJs. Hang in there...your opening isn't all that bad...Are you currenly taking any kind of pain medication? I hope things improve, please keep us posted!
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
TMJWorld
replied on January 9th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
not all end up with the same amount of pain--the whole purpose is to get rid of the pain--im 90% pain free after surgery. surgery is the last resort--when there is no where else to go. you have to do your physical therapy afterwards or its a little pointless to go through it. your muscles will just atrophy and then you have a bigger problem on your hands
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
webo
replied on January 10th, 2008
New User
MaggieMay78 wrote:
I realize that your normal jaw opening is pretty wide...but I was told that most surgeons consider a 35mm opening to be a successful outcome of TMJ surgery!!! In other words, if the patient comes out of surgery, and after therapy is able to open 35mm...that is a success!



Yes, but this wasn't really surgery. It was arthrocentesis -- termed a "minor procedure" designed to rid my jaw of the popping and temporary lockups. I was told that there was no chance that it would do anything but help or keep my jaw the same. So when you come out of it with a locked jaw and 35% reduction in jaw opening, that's not a success.

I took Voltaren for awhile, but it was disruptive on my digestive system. My mom told me about this Christian company called LifeSource. I bought their product called, "Arthritis Relief Joint Rebuilder." Each tablet has 100mg of glucosamine, along with 28 other ingredients. The company's Web site says it picks up where glucosamine and MSM leave off. It claims to be the "biggest selling arthritis relief on the market" and it claims that it "helps rebuild the joints, tissues and tendons, as well as lubrication of the joints." I've been taking them for a few months with pretty good results.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
TMJWorld
replied on January 11th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
its still considered surgery
Did you find this post useful?
|
Quick Reply
Search