Abortion Debate Forum - Pro-choice, Anti-choice, Pro-life And Pro-abortion page 3
medical questions | health forums

Pro-choice, Anti-choice, Pro-life And Pro-abortion

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> Pro-choice, Anti-choice, Pro-life And Pro-abortion
Author Message
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 12-22-07 12:16pm

I think the issue is that not ALL pro-choicers are pro-abortion and not ALL pro-lifers are anti-choice!!! So the statements are very inaccurate when applied to either side as an insult.
Did you find this post useful?
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 12-22-07 12:30pm

People know in their hearts what they are, so it really doesn't matter!
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 12-22-07 12:36pm

Well what bothers me is that due to these labels, you kind of feel like you HAVE to adopt the popular ideals of the "name" you choose. As a pro-choicer, I'm supposed to approve of the woman's choice no matter what it is. Well unfortunately, due to my knowledge of gestation, I cannot possibly approve of a voluntary late-term abortion. In other cases, like the 14 year old who's pregnant on the teen boards, I feel that even though her pregnancy was intended she should really abort it asap. It's not fair or healthy for her or the baby.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4159
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16

Posted: 12-22-07 13:50pm

I believe that you have said before that late term abortions are not your cup of tea, either. Maybe we could add another label to the table- "conditionary prochoice"? Laughing

I know urban dictionary isn't anywhere close to a reliable source, but it does give an indication of how these labels are viewed in society.

Here's pro-abortion:
1. One step beyond pro-choice. Polar opposite of pro-life. Origin: I hate sharing my {edit} with my younger siblings. I wish those {edits} would have been aborted.

2. The popular belief that abortion is a very affective & usefull means of curbing overpopulation. Abortion is prevention.
Pro-abortionists unlike pro-choicers believe that abortion should be mandatory if you have had more than your fair shair of kids.

And Anti-choice:

1. A person who claims to be pro-life despite the fact that they disregard other forms of terminating as being ok.
Anti-choice supporters are ok with such forms homicide such as War and Capital Punishment.

2. A more accurate title for someone who claims to be "pro-life".
One who believes the fate of an unborn fetus is more important than a woman's life.
One who thinks people should not be able to make choices about their own bodies and lives, but thinks the government should control this matter.
Ironically, they are usually also Republicans, a party that's supposed to be against government-controlled things. They also usually favor the death penalty, oppose education funds - basically they only care about children until they are born. They have been known to create organizations that try to convince/force women to keep pregnancies until birth, and once the child is born they kick them out and forget about them.
Anti-choicers also usually oppose contraceptives, birth control and realistic sex education, despite the fact that they prevent countless unwanted pregnancies.

3. One who is against abortion. The opposite of one who is anti-life.

Just food for thought.
Did you find this post useful?
|
sociable_recluse

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Posts: 88
Location: , UK

Posted: 12-22-07 16:46pm

Birch wrote:
I believe that you have said before that late term abortions are not your cup of tea, either. Maybe we could add another label to the table- "conditionary prochoice"? Laughing



What about "rabidly pro choice" for myself who doesn't agree with limits on abortion in either reason or gestation.

Quote:

And Anti-choice:

2. A more accurate title for someone who claims to be "pro-life".
One who believes the fate of an unborn fetus is more important than a woman's life.
One who thinks people should not be able to make choices about their own bodies and lives, but thinks the government should control this matter.
Ironically, they are usually also Republicans, a party that's supposed to be against government-controlled things. They also usually favor the death penalty, oppose education funds - basically they only care about children until they are born.



Those are the worst kind of "pro lifers" IMO they preach about being as pro life as they come, yet rapidly believe in the death penalty on the premise of "a life for a life" - obviously more pro fetal life than anything else.
Did you find this post useful?
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 12-22-07 17:10pm

Birch wrote:

2. A more accurate title for someone who claims to be "pro-life".
One who believes the fate of an unborn fetus is more important than a woman's life.
One who thinks people should not be able to make choices about their own bodies and lives, but thinks the government should control this matter.
Ironically, they are usually also Republicans, a party that's supposed to be against government-controlled things. They also usually favor the death penalty, oppose education funds - basically they only care about children until they are born. They have been known to create organizations that try to convince/force women to keep pregnancies until birth, and once the child is born they kick them out and forget about them.
Anti-choicers also usually oppose contraceptives, birth control and realistic sex education, despite the fact that they prevent countless unwanted pregnancies.


accurate, as in, this is what you think or is there a source that says this? Because there are things in this statement that does not go along with what this pro-life person thinks..

I am not republican, and I am not in favor of the death penalty, I have not, nor ever been in a organization to force a women to keep pregnancies. And I do not forget about babies born. So there are exception to all pro-lifers, just like I am sure there are pro-choicers..
Did you find this post useful?
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 12-22-07 17:12pm

Birch wrote:
I believe that you have said before that late term abortions are not your cup of tea, either. Maybe we could add another label to the table- "conditionary prochoice"? .


good point
Did you find this post useful?
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4159
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16

Posted: 12-22-07 18:30pm

sociable_recluse wrote:

What about "rabidly pro choice" for myself who doesn't agree with limits on abortion in either reason or gestation.


That works, too!

meblonde01 wrote:


accurate, as in, this is what you think or is there a source that says this? Because there are things in this statement that does not go along with what this pro-life person thinks..


I just quoted the source; I should have done it clearer. My bad. I do not necessarily endorse or approve of these opinions. And that was the "anti-choice" definition; one in which I do not think you would apply to yourself.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kypros

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 373
Location: Leicester
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 12-23-07 12:04pm

Eiri wrote:
I only have to quote you in one instance:

"Well, I honestly do not see it as a personal choice."

That's about as anti-choice as you can get, whether you're talking about abortion OR the freedom of thought. Should I hire you to the thought police?

(anyone read 1984?)


What? Are you pretending to have misunderstood what I meant? I hope you are. I meant that one doesn't choose one's own labels - they are attached naturally when considering one's opinions. You are pro-abortion by virtue of supporting legalised abortion. You may hate the term, but it doesn't change the facts. How on earth you relate this to 1984's thought police I don't know, but it's laughable.

Eiri wrote:
The other case is this:

Eiri wrote:
Besides, there's no constitutional way to enforce that and it would cause more harm than good. I don't always like the choices... but it is THEIR choice to make, not mine.

Kypros wrote:
Exactly, and that very mentality is also named pro-abortion. It doesn't mean "personally advocates abortion is right in every case", it means "supports the legal right to abortion". Only that. Nothing else. Therefore, all pro-choicers are pro-abortionists, too.

Since Pro-Abortion is not in the dictionary, its meaning is COMPLETELY based off of personal interpretations. You can't tell me I'm wrong for feeling the way I do.


Eiri, this is by no means an attempt to insult you, but you appear to be either ignorant, blind, or stupid. Pro-abortion IS in the dictionary, OK? I find it extremely aggrevating to have loud and clear references to pro-abortion freakishly ignored by you. Despite the criticism against me, it appears that you are obsessed with giving pro-abortion a totally different meaning to what it is and disregarding anybody who suggests otherwise.

Look here:
The pro-abortion movement

Here is a quote from it:

"Pro-abortion - Definition
Pro-abortion is the belief in the right to choose to terminate a fetus (fertilized embryo). Pro-abortion is also a movement, which fights for the rights of women to have a choice to end unwanted pregnancies."


And here is the dictionary definition that supposedly doesn't exist: Pro-abortion:

"pro·a·bor·tion /ˌproʊəˈbɔrʃən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[proh-uh-bawr-shuhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective pro-choice.

Also, pro-a·bor·tion.


------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------

[Origin: 1975–80; pro-1 + abortion]

—Related forms
pro·a·bor·tion·ism, noun
pro·a·bor·tion·ist, noun

pro-a·bor·tion (prō'ə-bôr'shən)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.

pro'a·bor'tion·ist n."


Did you see? No mention of personal opinions; pro-abortion is a term concerned with stance regarding abortion's legal status. It even says it's an alternative to pro-choice (shock, horror, scream, faint). Now, let's look at the official, correct, irrefutable definition of pro-choice:

"pro-choice /proʊˈtʃɔɪs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[proh-chois] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective supporting or advocating legalized abortion.

Also, pro·choice.
Compare pro-life.


------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------

[Origin: 1970–75]

—Related forms
pro-choicer, noun"


Oh, look! That just happens to be exactly the same as pro-abortion! But oh no, I guess the dictionary, which is a source of official, irrefutable, established, infallible meanings is wrong.

I kindly invite you now to read the meanings of pro-life:

"pro-life /proʊˈlaɪf/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[proh-lahyf] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective opposed to legalized abortion; right-to-life.

Compare pro-choice.


------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------

[Origin: 1960–65]

—Related forms
pro-lifer, noun"


And anti-choice:

"an·ti-choice (ān'tē-chois', ān'tī-)
adj. Opposed to the right of women to have the choice to terminate a pregnancy by induced abortion."


There's a pattern forming now, you see. I have consistently given you proof for why I have said pro-abortion equates pro-choice (and anti-choice with pro-life). Your ideas lack credibility and solid ground. You have not shown me any logical or established backing for your made-up semantics of the terms. For you to continue refusing to acknowledge their true meanings would make me think you're somewhat deluded.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Moo

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 1066
Location: London
Thanks: 21
Thanked:111

Posted: 12-23-07 14:17pm

sociable_recluse wrote:
Birch wrote:
I believe that you have said before that late term abortions are not your cup of tea, either. Maybe we could add another label to the table- "conditionary prochoice"? Laughing



What about "rabidly pro choice" for myself who doesn't agree with limits on abortion in either reason or gestation.


Unconditionally pro-choice is how I tend to view my own beliefs Wink
Did you find this post useful?
|
sociable_recluse

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Posts: 88
Location: , UK

Posted: 12-23-07 15:10pm

Moo wrote:
sociable_recluse wrote:


What about "rabidly pro choice" for myself who doesn't agree with limits on abortion in either reason or gestation.


Unconditionally pro-choice is how I tend to view my own beliefs Wink


D'oh! I never thought of it like that Embarassed
Did you find this post useful?
|
yodavater

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818

Posted: 12-23-07 15:10pm

Eiri wrote:

I read Pro-Abortion as "for abortion". .

I think perhaps I see one prominent reason for this misunderstanding.

Multi-word terms, and hyphenated words are NOT defined by taking them apart, defining the individual parts, and then putting it all back together again. That is simply NOT how our language works.

Take the term "hot dog" for example..... if you try to dissect that term, what do you have? An overheated canine? Seriously, such terms are defined as a WHOLE...... NOT as the "sum of their parts".

So, "proabortion" or "pro-abortion" is not defined as "being in favor of aborting everyone"...... it is defined as a whole term meaning "in favor of legal access to elective abortion" by the majority of our society.

Words are not like mathematics, where the components of an equation can be taken apart and analyzed..... that just isn't how it works.
Did you find this post useful?
|
yodavater

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818

Posted: 12-23-07 15:14pm

Jincks013 wrote:
Its always fascinating to watch PL play the dictionary game over a social issue insted of using social definitions with a social issue. .

Do you have a "social dictionary" that you use to look up "social definitions", or do you just make them up as you go?

You do yourself no good by accusing anyone of playing "games" when you yourself attempt to make up definitions, rather than simply citing legitimate ones.

In any other debate, citing actual documentation would be seen as a positive way of supporting your position. In this debate, you attempt to deride the use of legitimate academic resources, and claim superiority for your own opinions.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kypros

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 373
Location: Leicester
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 12-23-07 16:48pm

yodavater wrote:
Eiri wrote:

I read Pro-Abortion as "for abortion". .

I think perhaps I see one prominent reason for this misunderstanding.

Multi-word terms, and hyphenated words are NOT defined by taking them apart, defining the individual parts, and then putting it all back together again. That is simply NOT how our language works.

Take the term "hot dog" for example..... if you try to dissect that term, what do you have? An overheated canine? Seriously, such terms are defined as a WHOLE...... NOT as the "sum of their parts".

So, "proabortion" or "pro-abortion" is not defined as "being in favor of aborting everyone"...... it is defined as a whole term meaning "in favor of legal access to elective abortion" by the majority of our society.

Words are not like mathematics, where the components of an equation can be taken apart and analyzed..... that just isn't how it works.


Excellent, as usual. That was spot on. I must admit that in many of my posts I split up pro-abortion to get "for abortion", but not for the same reasons as you have stated (i.e. the hot dog example). I was simply showing that the term is literally rendered "for abortion" and NOT "for abortion as the only result of every pregnancy".

Anyway, I do feel the pro-choicers here are misunderstanding most of your posts entirely and not giving your intelligence the credit it's worth.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Jincks013

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 1180
Location: ,
Thanks: 23
Thanked:13

Posted: 12-23-07 18:49pm

Dictionary is but one way to define a word. I've proven this with the words 'human' and 'gay' which have an entirely different defination; more commonly accepted actually, then the dictionary definition.
Why do you keep returning to dictionary definitions? Is your arguement so hollow?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Tylanas

Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 12-23-07 19:49pm

Well of course they've banded together.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kypros

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 373
Location: Leicester
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 12-24-07 09:53am

No, we haven't. I like his no-nonsense, deadpn approach to the matter. No fumbling around in fantasies, just gets to the point. We haven't "banded together", as you put it; it would be difficult given that he's anti-choice and I'm pro-abortion. Nonetheless, it doesn't mean that we are separated on every matter, as Jincks would have you believe. I recently signed a petition to remove the British troops from Iraq, but it was organised by the Socialist Party. I am not a socialist (far from it), but I still signed because the pragmatics were irrelevant. It's the same thing with me and yoda. I'm sure you'll come across future threads in which we bickerand disagree! I've agreed and disagreed with you, Eiri, in the past, it's the nature of debate. I don't hate anybody here, but I think a couple "have it in for me" for not comforming to the widespread pro-choice phenomenon that is "invent-a-word".
Did you find this post useful?
|
msrosie

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 369
Location: Ontario, Canada
Thanks: 12
Thanked:2

Posted: 12-24-07 16:51pm

Regardless of what the dictionary says a word means, if someone says they are offended at being called that word and the person doing the calling continues to do so, then s/he is doing it to insult and offend. Otherwise, they'd stop out of consideration of the person's feelings.

Another thing - I've had people call me pro abortion and then when they find out it doesn't bother me, they've called me pro-death instead. In that case, they obviously were doing it to offend.

Now, regarding the issue of being pro choice but not pro abortion. Yes, people can be so, especially if they look upon the term pro-abortion as being in favour of abortion (not the legality, the procedure). I think prostitution should be legal but I am not pro-prostitution; I think smoking should be legal but I am not pro-smoking. In fact, I despise it.

Finally, I am going to say that definitions of words can and do change with the times. The dictionary is merely a listing of the common meanings of words. It is by no means the be all and end all of definitions. For example, the word "gay" used to mean happy, now it also means "homosexual".
Did you find this post useful?
|
Kypros

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 373
Location: Leicester
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 12-24-07 18:16pm

msrosie wrote:
Regardless of what the dictionary says a word means, if someone says they are offended at being called that word and the person doing the calling continues to do so, then s/he is doing it to insult and offend. Otherwise, they'd stop out of consideration of the person's feelings.


I personally find it offensive that pro-abortionists refuse to associate themselves with the word that describes a stance they should be proud of supporting, but c'est la vie. I would never, ever call anyone pro-abortion if they truly took offence to it; I just wat them to accept that they are pro-abortion, nonetheless. It's ludicrous.

msrosie wrote:
Another thing - I've had people call me pro abortion and then when they find out it doesn't bother me, they've called me pro-death instead. In that case, they obviously were doing it to offend.


Firstly, congratulations on not taking offence to something that describes "being in favour of the right to choose abortion". Pro-death is totally different and entirely inaccurate. Personally, I wouldn't take offence to it because it would be too laughable.

On another note, I don't see why it should be viewed as pejorative. We will then end up in a dystopia of political correctness (which I U]LOATHE[/U] with a burning passion). Some hospitals have banned the use of the 'offensive' word "husband" (apparently women have partners, not husbands); my local councillor threatened to evict residents a few years ago if they didn't remove the 'offensive' English flags from their homes during the World Cup; it seems that there are a lot of people who find "Christmas" repugnant and ineffable. I will NEVER cease to say these words, because they are not pejorative and banning them is the worst face of anti-democracy I have ever come across. Ergo, I will not stop saying "pro-abortion" because a select few find it pejorative for totally unfounded reasons.

msrosie wrote:
Now, regarding the issue of being pro choice but not pro abortion. Yes, people can be so, especially if they look upon the term pro-abortion as being in favour of abortion (not the legality, the procedure). I think prostitution should be legal but I am not pro-prostitution; I think smoking should be legal but I am not pro-smoking. In fact, I despise it.


This goes back to what yodavater said previously. In English, we have established, fixed terms that are not the same as their verbatim insinuations. As he pointed out, a hot dog is not an over-heated canine, contrary to what it would literally imply. In the same way, pro-abortion is a fixed term, meaning "being in favour of the right to choose to have an abortion", rather than just "for abortion", which may lead to ambiguity over whether it supports the choice. In fact, pro-choice is established terminology, as its literal "for choice" makes very little sense. If I were to use its word-for-word denotation, I could apply it to absolutely anything ("for the choice" to smoke, "for the choice" to spend more than £100 in one week on jeans" wtc.), leading to ridiculous conclusions. This is what the people I have debated with on this thread are doing: they are taking pro-abortion's literal "for abortion" and then creating hypothetical situations in which something is "for abortion" and not "for choice". It isn't justified.

As you, I support the legalisation of prostitution and oppose the public smoking ban in the UK (despite being repulsed by smoking). Since there are no official, established terms such as "pro-prostitution" and "pro-smoking" denoting a limited and precise view, they can be used freely and more loosely to describe personal views. This logic cannot be applied to pro-abortion and anti-choice, which are established and refer to a specific opinion (identical to pro-choice and pro-life respectively).

msrosie wrote:
Finally, I am going to say that definitions of words can and do change with the times. The dictionary is merely a listing of the common meanings of words. It is by no means the be all and end all of definitions. For example, the word "gay" used to mean happy, now it also means "homosexual".


Yes, that's correct, but pro-abortion hasn't (yet) changed into "supporting abortion as the only right solution to all pregnancies", so it's irrelevant. Until that day comes, I'd appreciate it if the pro-abortionists and anti-choicers accepted what they are.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 12-24-07 19:18pm

Eiri wrote:
Birch wrote:
I haven't said anything about this whole definition business yet because I've been carefully reading what everyone has to say. I'm going to put my two cents in now.

Proabortion and prochoice are the same thing.

Prolife and antichoice are the same thing.

I recognize that slang definitions may be attached by the misinformed so I will restrain myself from using 'proabortion' and 'antichoice' to avoid a barrage of semantic mud slinging that only clouds the issue and inadvertently makes people look, well, ridiculously in denial or immensely insecure.

Do you think it may be time in this long debate to widen out scope? I've met so many pro-lifers who aren't obsessed with stopping every single abortion; yet they and I would never classify them as pro-choice. I've stopped trying to tell someone who considers them-self pro-life that they are pro-choice. Instead, I have realised that what I need to do is redefine my concepts of pro-choice and pro-life. That's the major thing I've learned on this forum.

The abortion debate is not black and white - I've always known that. It thus seems ridiculous to me that the "sides" are black and white too.

I've remained pro-choice, but my views of the other side have changed considerably. I think just because someone has remained a brick-wall in their beliefs doesn't make them commendable. If a pro-lifer had said what Kypros just said, you would tell them they're just blinding themselves. Talk about a double standard.


The reason why it is dangerous to confuse the definitions of these terms is because:

"Pro-life" is regarded by the majority of people to mean overturning Roe v. Wade, to make abortion illegal.

If you are speaking to a person who considers herself "pro-life" but DOES NOT want abortion to be illegal, you should correct her terminology BECAUSE:

She may vote for a candidate for office, governor, president, senator, etc., because they say they are "pro-life", and she thinks that means the candidate thinks like she does. Do you see what I mean here? She'll be helping to make abortion illegal and not even realize it!

Also, if polls are being taken and a polster asks her if she is pro-life or pro-choice, if she answers "pro-life", that makes the numbers for the pro-life side go up and it makes it seem like more people want abortion to be illegal than really do.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 3 of 5