I think the issue is that not ALL
pro-choicers are pro-abortion and not
ALL pro-lifers are anti-choice!!! So the
statements are very inaccurate when
applied to either side as an insult.
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 12-22-07 12:30pm
People know in their hearts what they are,
so it really doesn't matter!
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 12-22-07 12:36pm
Well what bothers me is that due to these
labels, you kind of feel like you HAVE to
adopt the popular ideals of the "name" you
choose. As a pro-choicer, I'm supposed to
approve of the woman's choice no matter
what it is. Well unfortunately, due to my
knowledge of gestation, I cannot possibly
approve of a voluntary late-term abortion.
In other cases, like the 14 year old who's
pregnant on the teen boards, I feel that
even though her pregnancy was intended she
should really abort it asap. It's not fair
or healthy for her or the baby.
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
Posted: 12-22-07 13:50pm
I believe that you have said before that
late term abortions are not your cup of
tea, either. Maybe we could add another
label to the table- "conditionary
prochoice"?
I know urban dictionary isn't anywhere
close to a reliable source, but it does
give an indication of how these labels are
viewed in society.
Here's pro-abortion:
1. One step beyond pro-choice. Polar
opposite of pro-life. Origin: I hate
sharing my {edit} with my younger
siblings. I wish those {edits} would have
been aborted.
2. The popular belief that abortion is a
very affective & usefull means of
curbing overpopulation. Abortion is
prevention.
Pro-abortionists unlike pro-choicers
believe that abortion should be mandatory
if you have had more than your fair shair
of kids.
And Anti-choice:
1. A person who claims to be pro-life
despite the fact that they disregard other
forms of terminating as being ok.
Anti-choice supporters are ok with such
forms homicide such as War and Capital
Punishment.
2. A more accurate title for someone who
claims to be "pro-life".
One who believes the fate of an unborn
fetus is more important than a woman's
life.
One who thinks people should not be able
to make choices about their own bodies and
lives, but thinks the government should
control this matter.
Ironically, they are usually also
Republicans, a party that's supposed to be
against government-controlled things. They
also usually favor the death penalty,
oppose education funds - basically they
only care about children until they are
born. They have been known to create
organizations that try to convince/force
women to keep pregnancies until birth, and
once the child is born they kick them out
and forget about them.
Anti-choicers also usually oppose
contraceptives, birth control and
realistic sex education, despite the fact
that they prevent countless unwanted
pregnancies.
3. One who is against abortion. The
opposite of one who is anti-life.
Just food for thought.
|
sociable_recluse
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 88 Location: , UK
Posted: 12-22-07 16:46pm
Birch
wrote:
I believe that you have said
before that late term abortions are not
your cup of tea, either. Maybe we could
add another label to the table-
"conditionary prochoice"?
What about "rabidly pro choice" for myself
who doesn't agree with limits on abortion
in either reason or gestation.
Quote:
tr>
And Anti-choice:
2. A more accurate title for someone who
claims to be "pro-life".
One who believes the fate of an unborn
fetus is more important than a woman's
life.
One who thinks people should not be able
to make choices about their own bodies and
lives, but thinks the government should
control this matter.
Ironically, they are usually also
Republicans, a party that's supposed to be
against government-controlled things. They
also usually favor the death penalty,
oppose education funds - basically they
only care about children until they are
born.
Those are the worst kind of "pro lifers"
IMO they preach about being as pro life as
they come, yet rapidly believe in the
death penalty on the premise of "a life
for a life" - obviously more pro fetal
life than anything else.
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 12-22-07 17:10pm
Birch
wrote:
2. A more accurate title for someone who
claims to be "pro-life".
One who believes the fate of an unborn
fetus is more important than a woman's
life.
One who thinks people should not be able
to make choices about their own bodies and
lives, but thinks the government should
control this matter.
Ironically, they are usually also
Republicans, a party that's supposed to be
against government-controlled things. They
also usually favor the death penalty,
oppose education funds - basically they
only care about children until they are
born. They have been known to create
organizations that try to convince/force
women to keep pregnancies until birth, and
once the child is born they kick them out
and forget about them.
Anti-choicers also usually oppose
contraceptives, birth control and
realistic sex education, despite the fact
that they prevent countless unwanted
pregnancies.
accurate, as in, this is what you think or
is there a source that says this? Because
there are things in this statement that
does not go along with what this pro-life
person thinks..
I am not republican, and I am not in favor
of the death penalty, I have not, nor ever
been in a organization to force a women to
keep pregnancies. And I do not forget
about babies born. So there are exception
to all pro-lifers, just like I am sure
there are pro-choicers..
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 12-22-07 17:12pm
Birch
wrote:
I believe that you have said
before that late term abortions are not
your cup of tea, either. Maybe we could
add another label to the table-
"conditionary prochoice"?
.
good point
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
Posted: 12-22-07 18:30pm
sociable_recluse
wrote:
What about "rabidly pro choice" for myself
who doesn't agree with limits on abortion
in either reason or gestation.
That works, too!
meblonde01
wrote:
accurate, as in, this is what you think or
is there a source that says this? Because
there are things in this statement that
does not go along with what this pro-life
person
thinks..
I just quoted the source; I should have
done it clearer. My bad. I do not
necessarily endorse or approve of these
opinions. And that was the "anti-choice"
definition; one in which I do not think
you would apply to yourself.
"Well, I honestly do not see it as a
personal choice."
That's about as anti-choice as you can
get, whether you're talking about abortion
OR the freedom of thought. Should I hire
you to the thought police?
(anyone read
1984?)
What? Are you pretending to
have misunderstood what I meant? I hope
you are. I meant that one doesn't choose
one's own labels - they are attached
naturally when considering one's opinions.
You are pro-abortion by virtue of
supporting legalised abortion. You may
hate the term, but it doesn't change the
facts. How on earth you relate this to
1984's thought police I
don't know, but it's laughable.
Eiri
wrote:
The other case is this:
Eiri wrote:
Besides, there's no constitutional way to
enforce that and it would cause more harm
than good. I don't always like the
choices... but it is THEIR choice to make,
not mine.
Kypros wrote:
Exactly, and that very mentality is also
named pro-abortion. It doesn't mean
"personally advocates abortion is right in
every case", it means "supports the legal
right to abortion". Only that. Nothing
else. Therefore, all pro-choicers are
pro-abortionists, too.
Since Pro-Abortion is not in the
dictionary, its meaning is COMPLETELY
based off of personal interpretations. You
can't tell me I'm wrong for feeling the
way I do.
Eiri, this is by no means an attempt to
insult you, but you appear to be either
ignorant, blind, or stupid. Pro-abortionIS in the
dictionary, OK? I find it extremely
aggrevating to have loud and clear
references to pro-abortion freakishly
ignored by you. Despite the criticism
against me, it appears that you are obsessed with
giving pro-abortion a totally
different meaning to what it is and
disregarding anybody who suggests
otherwise.
"Pro-abortion - Definition
Pro-abortion is the belief in the right
to choose
to terminate a fetus (fertilized embryo).
Pro-abortion is also a movement, which
fights for the rights of women to have a
choice
to end unwanted pregnancies."
And here is the dictionary definition that
supposedly doesn't exist: Pro-abortion:
"pro·a·bor·tion
/ˌproʊəˈbɔrʃən/ Pronunciation Key -
Show Spelled
Pronunciation[proh-uh-bawr-shuhn]
Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective pro-choice.
—Related forms
pro·a·bor·tion·ism, noun
pro·a·bor·tion·ist, noun
pro-a·bor·tion (prō'ə-bôr'shən)
adj. Favoring or
supporting legalized
abortion.
pro'a·bor'tion·ist n."
Did you see? No mention of
personal opinions; pro-abortion is a term
concerned with stance regarding abortion's
legal status. It even says it's an
alternative to pro-choice (shock, horror,
scream, faint). Now, let's look at the
official,
correct, irrefutable definition of
pro-choice:
"pro-choice /proʊˈtʃɔɪs/
Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled
Pronunciation[proh-chois] Pronunciation
Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective supporting or
advocating legalized
abortion.
Oh, look! That just happens to be exactly
the same as pro-abortion!
But oh no, I guess the dictionary, which
is a source of official, irrefutable,
established, infallible
meanings is wrong.
I kindly invite you now to read the
meanings of pro-life:
"pro-life
/proʊˈlaɪf/ Pronunciation Key -
Show Spelled Pronunciation[proh-lahyf]
Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective opposed to legalized
abortion; right-to-life.
"an·ti-choice (ān'tē-chois',
ān'tī-)
adj. Opposed to the right
of women to have the choice to terminate a
pregnancy by induced
abortion."
There's a pattern forming now, you see. I
have consistently given you proof for why I
have said pro-abortion equates pro-choice (and anti-choice with pro-life). Your ideas lack
credibility and solid ground. You have not
shown me any logical or established
backing for your made-up semantics of the
terms. For you to continue refusing to
acknowledge their true meanings would make
me think you're somewhat deluded.
|
Moo
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 1066 Location: London
Thanks: 21
Thanked:111
Posted: 12-23-07 14:17pm
sociable_recluse
wrote:
Birch
wrote:
I believe that you have said
before that late term abortions are not
your cup of tea, either. Maybe we could
add another label to the table-
"conditionary prochoice"?
What about "rabidly pro choice" for myself
who doesn't agree with limits on abortion
in either reason or gestation.
Unconditionally pro-choice is how I tend
to view my own beliefs
|
sociable_recluse
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 88 Location: , UK
Posted: 12-23-07 15:10pm
Moo
wrote:
sociable_recluse
wrote:
What about "rabidly pro choice" for myself
who doesn't agree with limits on abortion
in either reason or gestation.
Unconditionally pro-choice is how I tend
to view my own beliefs
D'oh! I never thought of it like that
|
yodavater
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007 Posts: 818
Posted: 12-23-07 15:10pm
Eiri
wrote:
I read Pro-Abortion as "for abortion".
.
I think perhaps I see one prominent reason
for this misunderstanding.
Multi-word terms, and hyphenated words are
NOT defined by taking them apart, defining
the individual parts, and then putting it
all back together again. That is simply
NOT how our language works.
Take the term "hot dog" for example.....
if you try to dissect that term, what do
you have? An overheated canine?
Seriously, such terms are defined as a
WHOLE...... NOT as the "sum of their
parts".
So, "proabortion" or "pro-abortion" is not
defined as "being in favor of aborting
everyone"...... it is defined as a whole
term meaning "in favor of legal access to
elective abortion" by the majority of our
society.
Words are not like mathematics, where the
components of an equation can be taken
apart and analyzed..... that just isn't
how it works.
|
yodavater
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007 Posts: 818
Posted: 12-23-07 15:14pm
Jincks013
wrote:
Its always fascinating to
watch PL play the dictionary game over a
social issue insted of using social
definitions with a social issue.
.
Do you have a "social dictionary" that you
use to look up "social definitions", or do
you just make them up as you go?
You do yourself no good by accusing anyone
of playing "games" when you yourself
attempt to make up definitions, rather
than simply citing legitimate ones.
In any other debate, citing actual
documentation would be seen as a positive
way of supporting your position. In this
debate, you attempt to deride the use of
legitimate academic resources, and claim
superiority for your own opinions.
I think perhaps I see one prominent reason
for this misunderstanding.
Multi-word terms, and hyphenated words are
NOT defined by taking them apart, defining
the individual parts, and then putting it
all back together again. That is simply
NOT how our language works.
Take the term "hot dog" for example.....
if you try to dissect that term, what do
you have? An overheated canine?
Seriously, such terms are defined as a
WHOLE...... NOT as the "sum of their
parts".
So, "proabortion" or "pro-abortion" is not
defined as "being in favor of aborting
everyone"...... it is defined as a whole
term meaning "in favor of legal access to
elective abortion" by the majority of our
society.
Words are not like mathematics, where the
components of an equation can be taken
apart and analyzed..... that just isn't
how it works.
Excellent, as usual. That was spot on. I
must admit that in many of my posts I
split up pro-abortion to get "for
abortion", but not for the same reasons as
you have stated (i.e. the hot dog
example). I was simply showing that the
term is literally rendered "for abortion"
and NOT "for abortion as the only
result of every pregnancy".
Anyway, I do feel the pro-choicers here
are misunderstanding most of your posts
entirely and not giving your intelligence
the credit it's worth.
|
Jincks013
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 1180 Location: ,
Thanks: 23
Thanked:13
Posted: 12-23-07 18:49pm
Dictionary is but one way to define a
word. I've proven this with the words
'human' and 'gay' which have an entirely
different defination; more commonly
accepted actually, then the dictionary
definition.
Why do you keep returning to dictionary
definitions? Is your arguement so hollow?
No, we haven't. I like his no-nonsense,
deadpn approach to the matter. No
fumbling around in fantasies, just gets to
the point. We haven't "banded together",
as you put it; it would be difficult given
that he's anti-choice and I'm
pro-abortion. Nonetheless, it doesn't mean
that we are separated on every matter, as
Jincks would have you believe. I recently
signed a petition to remove the British
troops from Iraq, but it was organised by
the Socialist Party. I am not a socialist
(far from it), but I still signed because
the pragmatics were irrelevant. It's the
same thing with me and yoda. I'm sure
you'll come across future threads in which
we bickerand disagree! I've agreed and
disagreed with you, Eiri, in the past,
it's the nature of debate. I don't hate
anybody here, but I think a couple "have
it in for me" for not comforming to the
widespread pro-choice phenomenon that is
"invent-a-word".
|
msrosie
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 369 Location: Ontario, Canada
Thanks: 12
Thanked:2
Posted: 12-24-07 16:51pm
Regardless of what the dictionary says a
word means, if someone says they are
offended at being called that word and the
person doing the calling continues to do
so, then s/he is doing it to insult and
offend. Otherwise, they'd stop out of
consideration of the person's feelings.
Another thing - I've had people call me
pro abortion and then when they find out
it doesn't bother me, they've called me
pro-death instead. In that case, they
obviously were doing it to offend.
Now, regarding the issue of being pro
choice but not pro abortion. Yes, people
can be so, especially if they look upon
the term pro-abortion as being in favour
of abortion (not the legality, the
procedure). I think prostitution should be
legal but I am not pro-prostitution; I
think smoking should be legal but I am not
pro-smoking. In fact, I despise it.
Finally, I am going to say that
definitions of words can and do change
with the times. The dictionary is merely a
listing of the common meanings of words.
It is by no means the be all and end all
of definitions. For example, the word
"gay" used to mean happy, now it also
means "homosexual".
Regardless of what the
dictionary says a word means, if someone
says they are offended at being called
that word and the person doing the calling
continues to do so, then s/he is doing it
to insult and offend. Otherwise, they'd
stop out of consideration of the person's
feelings.
I personally find it offensive that
pro-abortionists refuse to associate
themselves with the word that describes a
stance they should be proud of supporting,
but c'est la vie. I would never, ever call
anyone pro-abortion if they truly
took offence to it; I just wat them to
accept that they are
pro-abortion, nonetheless. It's
ludicrous.
msrosie
wrote:
Another thing - I've had
people call me pro abortion and then when
they find out it doesn't bother me,
they've called me pro-death instead. In
that case, they obviously were doing it to
offend.
Firstly, congratulations on not taking
offence to something that describes "being
in favour of the right to choose abortion".
Pro-death is totally
different and entirely inaccurate.
Personally, I wouldn't take offence to it
because it would be too laughable.
On another note, I don't see why it should
be viewed as pejorative. We will then end
up in a dystopia of political correctness
(which I U]LOATHE[/U] with a burning
passion). Some hospitals have banned the
use of the 'offensive' word "husband"
(apparently women have partners, not
husbands); my local councillor threatened
to evict residents a few years ago if they
didn't remove the 'offensive' English
flags from their homes during the World
Cup; it seems that there are a lot of
people who find "Christmas" repugnant and
ineffable. I will NEVER cease to
say these words, because they are not
pejorative and banning them is the worst
face of anti-democracy I have ever come
across. Ergo, I will not stop saying
"pro-abortion" because a select few find
it pejorative for totally unfounded
reasons.
msrosie
wrote:
Now, regarding the issue of
being pro choice but not pro abortion.
Yes, people can be so, especially if they
look upon the term pro-abortion as being
in favour of abortion (not the legality,
the procedure). I think prostitution
should be legal but I am not
pro-prostitution; I think smoking should
be legal but I am not pro-smoking. In
fact, I despise
it.
This goes back to what yodavater said
previously. In English, we have
established, fixed terms that are not the
same as their verbatim insinuations. As he
pointed out, a hot dog is not an
over-heated canine, contrary to what it
would literally imply. In the same way,
pro-abortion is a fixed
term, meaning "being in favour of the
right to choose to have an abortion",
rather than just "for abortion", which may
lead to ambiguity over whether it supports
the choice. In fact, pro-choice is established
terminology, as its literal "for choice"
makes very little sense. If I were to use
its word-for-word denotation, I could
apply it to absolutely anything ("for the
choice" to smoke, "for the choice" to
spend more than £100 in one week on
jeans" wtc.), leading to ridiculous
conclusions. This is what the people I
have debated with on this thread are
doing: they are taking pro-abortion's literal "for
abortion" and then creating hypothetical
situations in which something is "for
abortion" and not "for choice". It isn't
justified.
As you, I support the legalisation of
prostitution and oppose the public smoking
ban in the UK (despite being repulsed by
smoking). Since there are no official,
established terms such as
"pro-prostitution" and "pro-smoking"
denoting a limited and precise view, they
can be used freely and more loosely to
describe personal views. This logic cannot
be applied to pro-abortion and anti-choice, which are
established and refer to a specific
opinion (identical to pro-choice and
pro-life respectively).
msrosie
wrote:
Finally, I am going to say
that definitions of words can and do
change with the times. The dictionary is
merely a listing of the common meanings of
words. It is by no means the be all and
end all of definitions. For example, the
word "gay" used to mean happy, now it also
means
"homosexual".
Yes, that's correct, but pro-abortion hasn't (yet)
changed into "supporting abortion as the
only right solution to all pregnancies",
so it's irrelevant. Until that day comes,
I'd appreciate it if the pro-abortionists
and anti-choicers accepted what they are.
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 12-24-07 19:18pm
Eiri
wrote:
Birch
wrote:
I haven't said anything
about this whole definition business yet
because I've been carefully reading what
everyone has to say. I'm going to put my
two cents in now.
Proabortion and prochoice are the same
thing.
Prolife and antichoice are the same
thing.
I recognize that slang definitions may be
attached by the misinformed so I will
restrain myself from using 'proabortion'
and 'antichoice' to avoid a barrage of
semantic mud slinging that only clouds the
issue and inadvertently makes people look,
well, ridiculously in denial or immensely
insecure.
Do you think it may be time in this long
debate to widen out scope? I've met so
many pro-lifers who aren't obsessed with
stopping every single abortion; yet they
and I would never classify them as
pro-choice. I've stopped trying to tell
someone who considers them-self pro-life
that they are pro-choice. Instead, I have
realised that what I need to do is
redefine my concepts of pro-choice and
pro-life. That's the major thing I've
learned on this forum.
The abortion debate is not black and white
- I've always known that. It thus seems
ridiculous to me that the "sides" are
black and white too.
I've remained pro-choice, but my views of
the other side have changed considerably.
I think just because someone has remained
a brick-wall in their beliefs doesn't make
them commendable. If a pro-lifer had said
what Kypros just said, you would tell them
they're just blinding themselves. Talk
about a double
standard.
The reason why it is dangerous to confuse
the definitions of these terms is
because:
"Pro-life" is regarded by the majority of
people to mean overturning Roe v. Wade, to
make abortion illegal.
If you are speaking to a person who
considers herself "pro-life" but DOES NOT
want abortion to be illegal, you should
correct her terminology BECAUSE:
She may vote for a candidate for office,
governor, president, senator, etc.,
because they say they are "pro-life", and
she thinks that means the candidate thinks
like she does. Do you see what I mean
here? She'll be helping to make abortion
illegal and not even realize it!
Also, if polls are being taken and a
polster asks her if she is pro-life or
pro-choice, if she answers "pro-life",
that makes the numbers for the pro-life
side go up and it makes it seem like more
people want abortion to be illegal than
really do.