I feel you've misunderstood what I was conveying in my last message on this thread. The
fact, not opinion, is that
pro-choice and
pro-abortion have only a mere shread of difference, and in the vast majority of cases, they are identical. Both denote support for the legal right to abortion, although
pro-choice more subtly concentrates on the choice to abort, hence why someone who advocates forced abortion cannot be pro-choice but can be pro-abortion. This is the
ONLY situation in which the two differ.
I am
not in favour of forced abortion, but that does make me any less pro-abortion. You have made a logically fallacious statement [url=www.wikipedia.com/Affirming_the_conse
quent]affirming the consequent ("Forced abortion is pro-abortion. You are pro-abortion, therefore you support forced abortion"). It's as ridiculous as saying "Joe Bloggs is gay and his favourite colour is blue. Your favourite colour is blue, therefore you are gay".
I don't favour forced abortion because it is anti-choice. We are
both broadly pro-abortion because our belief is that we support the legal right to abortion.
Pro-choice really is just a more in-depth, exclusive idea that comes under pro-abortion. As I've said before, all pro-choicers are thus pro-abortion but not all pro-abortionists are pro-choice. If you claim to be pro-choice, you are
inherently pro-abortion. Forced abortion is the only situation in which you (and I) are not pro-abortion because the element of choice there doesn't exist.