There are many safe techniques that can be done to stretch the shaft skin into a foreskin. Though it isn't authentic, it does the job that a natural foreskin would do. You can find many methods online. There are also kits that you can buy. Make sure to do your research with them to make sure you find the one that's best for you. There are also surgical procedures, but they can be costly.

Cool, thanks!

So this isn't another 'Naturally grow your penis' story?

Hmm? Are you asking whether or not stretching shaft skin will result in a bigger penis? Sorry, I'm misunderstanding!

No. What I mean is, is restoring a foreskin a myth?

ohhhh.

Sorry.

No, it's not a myth. It can be done. HOWEVER.... the restored 'foreskin' isn't actually a foreskin. It's just stretched shaft skin, so it's not as sensitive or as tight as the original foreskin would have been. It also takes some time.... up to two years for some men who's skin just doesn't stretch as well as others.

we have studies about uncut males giving female vagina cancer, because they are un-cut, you should keep it the way is now, for sure is more clean, and sensation is increased. You don't have to make sure to remove the smerma this is a source of bacterias and bad odor... and cancer for your girlfriend...

Oh please... "We" have studies? Go find them. I think your post is full of nonsense.

Sensation is actually severely DECREASED for cut males. The foreskin is full of tons of nerves, and circumcision cuts them off. The head of the penis itself on uncut men is very sensitive... on cut males, orgasm can be hard to reach without strong friction and hard trusting. An uncut male can gently glide his way to orgasm without pounding his partner's brains out.

Yeah, let's see the studies where it says that. There's nothing wrong with trying go back to the natural uncut state and it surely is not a cancer threat.

The first link discussed the pros and cons of circumcision and the doctor himself came to the conclusion like this:

"Second, the risks from an uncircumcised boy only exists if he has poor hygiene during his life, usually associated with scarring of the foreskin so that it cannot be pulled back, called phimosis. The risks go up if he smokes. These guys are the ones that have a higher risk for penile cancer. It all comes down to regular washing away of the cancer-causing irritating substances that normally build up under the foreskin.

This is the end of the debate in my eyes. Preventing a devastating cancer has never been so easy - soap and water."

Don't be a dirty slob and you're fine being uncircumcised.

As for the second article... it didn't work.

It makes SENSE that cannot be denied that if you cut off you fingers, you will no longer be able to feel things with them. Duh. When you circumcise a male, you are cutting of skin FULL of nerve endings. He now no longer has these nerve endings. How can he POSSIBLY feel the same amount of stimulation as an uncircumcised male? He just can't. It doesn't make any sense that he could.

Well my post was removed, well well well. All what you said is ok with me. But the fact is Circumcised is healthy for the female and for the male. All about nervs and etc do not change the fact. Circumcised male are healthier and do not give any cancer or anything to the female. And is not ok to remove a forum just because...
everything posted here was factual and medically proved. Education is needed for a lot of people in this forum.

Hey, I didn't report it so maybe someone else was offended. If you're being offensive then that's your own fault. I personally think everything you have posted are lies, and that's probably why someone else reported the post. E-Health does not like spreading false information, and the common myths about uncircumcised men being dirty and unhealthy are just that, myths. They are not real. So the fact that you are perpetuating these lies annoys many people, not just me.

You're not exactly someone I would consider a definitive source on circumcision anyway.

yeah, my post was removed too. I don't get it... it's been happening elsewhere as well.

I think greenboy is reporting every post that refutes his "amazing and true" information on circumcision - all of which is lies.

ugh. I figured as much as well.

Yes its lies like that that result in some women asking a guy if he's been circumcised before dating him!
I know of one woman who wont go out with a guy if he is 'uncut'!
Ridiculous!

Tc

It's possibly true some women prefer uncut guys, because they tend to have gentler sex which is what women need, not the violent pounding you get with cut guys.

So is that why my previous boyfriends have been really violently pounding me while we have sex?? I thought all guys were like that until my current uncircumcised bf and I had sex.

Checkout the two sites below.
First one is about how much skin and nerves you get rid of with circumcision
and the second is a sensitivity test for circumcised men to see how much they have lost.

Anyone arguing about uncircumcised men giving women cancer there
is now an Australian vaccine for women to stop cervical cancer.

http://www.noharmm.org/snip.htm
http://www.fathermag.com/health/circ/sensi tivity-test/