Join Our Community!
Share
Debate Forums > Abortion Debate Forum > Federally Funded False And Misleading Information
Avatar
Q: Federally Funded False And Misleading Information
asked by: Verizon-y on November 26th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy

FALSE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY FEDERALLY FUNDED PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERS
PREPARED FOR
REP. HENRY A. WAXMAN


In December 2004, Rep. Waxman released a report by the Special Investigations Division
that evaluated the scientific accuracy of the curricula used in federally funded abstinence only
education programs. The report found that nearly all of the curricula contained
false, misleading, or distorted information about reproductive health. The curricula
included inaccurate information about disease and pregnancy prevention; erroneous
effectiveness rates for condoms; the presentation of religious belief as fact; and the
teaching of stereotypes about boys and girls as science.27



The centers provided false and
misleading information about a
link between abortion and breast
cancer.

Several centers quantified the claimed risk. One center
told the caller that there is an “extremely high,
increased risk of breast cancer” that “can be as much as
an 80% increase depending upon how the risk factors
fall into place.”38 A second center stated that abortion
increases the risk of breast cancer by 50%.39 A third
center asserted that an abortion elevates the average
lifetime risk of breast cancer by 50% and that more
abortions increase the risk even more.40

The centers provided false and
misleading information about the
effect of abortion on future
fertility.

The centers provided false and
misleading information about the
mental health effects of abortion.

Pregnancy resource centers often mask their pro-life mission in order to attract “abortionvulnerable
clients.”5 This can take the form of advertising under “abortion services” in
the yellow pages or obscuring the fact that the center does not provide referrals to
abortions in the text of an advertisement.6 Some centers purchase advertising on internet search engines under keywords that include “abortion” or “abortion clinics.”7 Other
advertisements represent that the center will provide pregnant teenagers and women with
an understanding of all of their options.
Separation of Church and State?

Prior to the Bush Administration, only a few pregnancy resource centers received federal funding. Beginning in 2001, however, federal funding of pregnancy resource centers
increased sharply. In total, over $30 million in federal funds went to more than 50 pregnancy resource centers between 2001 through 2005.13

An interview with a person who works at a crisis center:
"So people that come into your center that have already heard you, you get the chance to share the
Gospel with them, which is the ultimate thing of what we’re doing."
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(9)
User Profile
nightangel73
replied on November 26th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
I like the culture of life approach promoting abstinence and sex education. Unfortunatetly there will always be extremist that use some false arguments where they don't really need it like that of breast cancer mentioned. Breast cancer would be the last thing that would come to my mind when talking of abortion. They only just need to stick to the fact that abortion is a crime committed against the gestating unborn children.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Jincks013
replied on November 26th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
In your opinion NA it is a crime.. in mine it is a crime to subvert my rights .. the breast cancer thing has been disproven so many times I am suprised anyone actually buys into it.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Verizon-y
replied on November 27th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
I wish it were only extremists who lie, but clearly it is not. The referenced report in the original post clearly shows even federally funded pro-life groups LIE. Centers run by people on behalf of the President of the United States are LYING, and being paid with your tax dollars and mine to do it.

There is much more to that report than is seen in my post. To read more, follow the link. The lies go much further than just the fake breast cancer scare tactic. For example, two other areas of deceit included:

Claiming that after an abortion it might be difficult or impossible to have children, and also your mental health could be damaged by depression, among other things.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Jincks013
replied on November 27th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Never heard of PPD have they? I have seen no evidence suggesting women who abort are any more likely to have depression issues then women who gestate and give birth.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Verizon-y
replied on November 28th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
That's because there isn't any. (evidence to support that hypothesis, I mean) Smile
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
sillyakchick
replied on November 28th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Is anyone truly shocked that this administration and the GOP would provide false information to the public to further their own interests? Does not surprise me one iota.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
msrosie
replied on November 29th, 2007
Experienced User
I feel sorry for the intelligent US citizens who did not vote for this person. And I am so glad to live in a country where this would not be tolerated. (even though we have a conservative govt., most politicians know better than to try those deceptive tactics - and they know that to even seriously suggest making abortion illegal would be political suicide)
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
sillyakchick
replied on November 29th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
Its pretty disgusting. What's worse is that there is no mob outside of the white house demanding he be put on trial for his crimes.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Verizon-y
replied on November 29th, 2007
Extremely eHealthy
I agree. It's frightening, actually.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Quick Reply
Search