Abortion Debate Forum - the True Right to Life Movement page 2
medical questions | health forums log in    

the True Right to Life Movement

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> the True Right to Life Movement
Author Message
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-05-07 13:26pm

futureshock wrote:
WHY are they nothing without the other? Why is the zygote anything MORE than the egg and sperm? The zygote by itself is NOTHING without a womb and until 9 months of complicated and near miraculous processes are carried out by the mother's body.


Please don't tell me you see no difference in blood or your tampon and sperm in a rubber than a developing human being! That is ridicules!! The zygote is something.. it is a developing human being. Egg and sperm are not..
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-05-07 13:29pm

An egg and sperm ARE THE ZYGOTE! I can't believe you cannot see this.

The zygote is only "developing" if it is in a woman's womb, being developed by her body. And the whole process does not start with the zygote! It begins with the formation of the egg and sperm.

All of the DNA that carry the information to make YOU exist WAY before the sperm and egg meet.
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-05-07 13:41pm

futureshock wrote:
An egg and sperm ARE THE ZYGOTE! I can't believe you cannot see this.

The zygote is only "developing" if it is in a woman's womb, being developed by her body. And the whole process does not start with the zygote! It begins with the formation of the egg and sperm.

All of the DNA that carry the information to make YOU exist WAY before the sperm and egg meet.

Right it begins with the formation of the egg and sperm, just like you said.. that is why I don't feel bad about the lady sweezing and out goes the serm or blood on the tampon.. It has not started yet.. That is why I said Big diff..
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-05-07 15:14pm

The formation of the egg and sperm are the beginning of the future person.
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-05-07 15:53pm

futureshock wrote:
The formation of the egg and sperm are the beginning of the future person.

yep when they come together ..
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-05-07 16:12pm

Why?
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-05-07 17:06pm

futureshock wrote:
Why?

because on their own they can not make a child.. it takes both!
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-07-07 08:00am

meblonde, a zygote cannot become a zygote without the egg and sperm. The zygote cannot become an embryo without either a petri dish or a woman's womb and many complex biochemical processes. An embryo cannot become a fetus without a woman's womb and many complex biochemical processes. A fetus cannot become a baby without a woman's womb and many complex biochemical processes.

Btw, any cell in our bodies, like a skin cell, can make an entire person. In stem cell nuclear transfer, scientists can take a human skin cell and grow it into an embryo. That embryo could be implanted in a woman and grown until it it born. This has already been done and is being done in mammals. Dolly the sheep was cloned from her mother's breast cell.
(That's why she was named Dolly, after Dolly Parton, lol!)

SO, according to you, every single cell in your body is a baby, right? Every time you wash your face and skin cells slough off, are you murdering babies? I guess so.
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-07-07 08:34am

No what I am saying is.. a baby is not forming until the egg and sperm meet!
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-07-07 12:07pm

Seriously, how can you say that? A baby begins forming when the DNA and everything else it takes to create that baby forms, which, interestingly enough, you could actually trace back that exact child's DNA tens of thousands of years.

However, when the child's mother is herself an embryo, is when that future child's DNA gets put into the egg that will become that child. Environmental factors also influence the development of a child, both while the egg is a germ cell and even right up until it's born. This is why most "identical" twins are not identical.



Most Identical Twins Are not Identical



The use of the adjective identical rather than monozygotic leads to misunderstandings about the biology of monozygotic twinning. Most monozygotic twin pairs are not identical; there may be major discordance for birth weight, genetic disease, and congenital anomalies. These indicate that postzygotic events may lead to the formation of two or more cell clones in the inner cell mass and early embryo that actually stimulate the monozygotic twinning event. There is also evidence that there may be unequal allocation of numbers of cells to the monozygotic twins; this may have widespread implications for the cascade of developmental events during embryogenesis, formation, and vascularization of the placenta..




Monozygous twins
share a common genotype. However, most monozygotic twin pairs are not identical; several types of phenotypic discordance may be observed.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-07-07 12:11pm

Additional reasons why a future person is not "complete" when the egg and sperm are created, and even after they join:

The egg and sperm combine to form one cell, which copies itself and becomes two, separate, identical cells. Which one of those cells contain "the soul"? Those two become 4, then 8, then 16, and I am sure you can figure out the rest. Would that make 16 souls?

You could take these 16 cells and make 16 babies. They do this in both IVF and stem cell research, to get more embryos and stem cells, respectively.

Where do you think the material comes from that becomes each new cell?
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-07-07 12:12pm

futureshock wrote:
Seriously, how can you say that? A baby begins forming when the DNA and everything else it takes to create that baby forms, which, interestingly enough, you could actually trace back that exact child's DNA tens of thousands of years.

However, when the child's mother is herself an embryo, is when that future child's DNA gets put into the egg that will become that child. Environmental factors also influence the development of a child, both while the egg is a germ cell and even right up until it's born. This is why most "identical" twins are not identical.



Most Identical Twins Are not Identical



The use of the adjective identical rather than monozygotic leads to misunderstandings about the biology of monozygotic twinning. Most monozygotic twin pairs are not identical; there may be major discordance for birth weight, genetic disease, and congenital anomalies. These indicate that postzygotic events may lead to the formation of two or more cell clones in the inner cell mass and early embryo that actually stimulate the monozygotic twinning event. There is also evidence that there may be unequal allocation of numbers of cells to the monozygotic twins; this may have widespread implications for the cascade of developmental events during embryogenesis, formation, and vascularization of the placenta..




Monozygous twins
share a common genotype. However, most monozygotic twin pairs are not identical; several types of phenotypic discordance may be observed.


AM i missign something here. can you make a baby without sperm? NO can you make a baby with out the egg? No.. it takes both..That is what I mean!
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-07-07 12:41pm

Can you make a baby without all of the other cells that come after the single celled zygote? NO, you cannot.

Can you make a baby without a sperm and egg? Technically yes but that is an entirely different subject. For the purposes of the question here, no you cannot.

Here is what you and many other pro-life people do not realize you are doing:

You are choosing one step out of many and arbitrarily deciding that THAT is the one
step that changes everything, and turns human tissue into people.

Step 1. Life begins millions of years ago.
Step 2. Human life begins hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Step 3. The DNA that will create the future child is formed thousands of years ago.
Step 4. The embryo of the grandmother of the future child, the child's mother, creates her germline which contains the egg which will become the future child. The DNA of that child is put into that egg while the grandmother is pregnant with the child's mother.
Step 5. The child's father's germline forms in a similar but not exact way.
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ -----------
Up to this point, environmental factors, internal factors, etc., can effect the future child, because he or she already exists. In fact, what the grandmother eats while she is pregnant with the child's mother influences the egg that will become the child.

Step 6. The germlines of the future child's parents mature.
Step 7. Sexual intercourse or IVF bring the egg and sperm together.
Step 8. The fertilized egg copies itself and splits in two identical cells.
Step 9. The mother's body creates each cell through a combination of biochemical, hormonal, and nutritional processes. The food she eats becomes the actual raw material from which she forms the body of the future child.
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ -------

What the future child's mother ingests, food, alcohol, tobacco, effects every single cell her body manufactures, since it is the raw material which makes the cells.

You are what your mother eats,

Thus a mother's diet may have an enduring influence on succeeding generations, independent of later changes in diet. [T]his study demonstrates that a specific mammalian gene can be subjected to germ-line epigenetic change.
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-07-07 12:46pm

futureshock wrote:
Can you make a baby without all of the other cells that come after the single celled zygote? NO, you cannot.

Can you make a baby without a sperm and egg? Technically yes but that is an entirely different subject. For the purposes of the question here, no you cannot.

Here is what you and many other pro-life people do not realize you are doing:

You are choosing one step out of many and arbitrarily deciding that THAT is the one
step that changes everything, and turns human tissue into people.

Step 1. Life begins millions of years ago.
Step 2. Human life begins hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Step 3. The DNA that will create the future child is formed thousands of years ago.
Step 4. The embryo of the grandmother of the future child, the child's mother, creates her germline which contains the egg which will become the future child. The DNA of that child is put into that egg while the grandmother is pregnant with the child's mother.
Step 5. The child's father's germline forms in a similar but not exact way.
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ -----------
Up to this point, environmental factors, internal factors, etc., can effect the future child, because he or she already exists. In fact, what the grandmother eats while she is pregnant with the child's mother influences the egg that will become the child.

Step 6. The germlines of the future child's parents mature.
Step 7. Sexual intercourse or IVF bring the egg and sperm together.
Step 8. The fertilized egg copies itself and splits in two identical cells.
Step 9. The mother's body creates each cell through a combination of biochemical, hormonal, and nutritional processes. The food she eats becomes the actual raw material from which she forms the body of the future child.
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ -------

What the future child's mother ingests, food, alcohol, tobacco, effects every single cell her body manufactures, since it is the raw material which makes the cells.

You are what your mother eats,

Thus a mother's diet may have an enduring influence on succeeding generations, independent of later changes in diet. [T]his study demonstrates that a specific mammalian gene can be subjected to germ-line epigenetic change.


I don't even know what it is you are trying to say,"prove" anymore. But it is FACT it take an egg,, and sperm to make a child.. I'm talking about between a man and a women! Have sex, making a child.. it take the two to make a child.. So what is your point what are you trying to prove?
|
Katrinadoodle

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Posts: 1231

Posted: 11-07-07 12:59pm

Someone's acting rather dense o.O
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-07-07 13:06pm

Katrinadoodle wrote:
Someone's acting rather dense o.O


lolzzz!


Here is yet ANOTHER perspective.

http://www.theistsunited.c om/man.html


Does man think that he will be left uncontrolled, (without purpose)? Was he not once a drop of ejected semen? Then he became a clot, so He created and fashioned him and made him into two sexes, male and female. Is He who does this not able to bring the dead to life? (Surat al-Qiyama: 36-40)

The first miracle of creation begins in a woman’s body, in the organ called the ovary, with the maturing of a single egg cell.
|
Verizon-y

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-07-07 13:16pm

meblonde01 wrote:


I don't even know what it is you are trying to say,"prove" anymore. But it is FACT it take an egg,, and sperm to make a child.. I'm talking about between a man and a women! Have sex, making a child.. it take the two to make a child.. So what is your point what are you trying to prove?


I know you get this. Playing dumb is a favorite pro-life tactic. It won't work with me.
As I have already stated:

You are choosing one step out of many and arbitrarily deciding that THAT is the one
step that changes everything, and turns human tissue into people.

I have just outlined 9 steps in human reproduction, and I haven't even gotten to the embryonic stage yet!

You have arbitrarily decided that step 7 is where life begins. Here is what arbitrary means:
Determined by chance, whim, or impulse, and not by necessity, reason, or principle

In summary, pro-lifers like yourself feel that because you, personally, have decided that step 7 is where life begins, abortion must be illegal.

I could understand if you felt that FOR YOURSELF, you wouldn't abort because you felt life began at step 7, but why do you have the right to force everyone else to be governed by your opinion?

I think life starts at step 1. How can you force me to agree with where you feel it begins?
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-07-07 13:46pm

What I have said over and over. And is fact. is it takes the sperm and the egg to make a child! Period! it can't happen without!! Period! what ever it is you are going around and around about does not change the fact that with out an egg or sperm. A CHILD IS NOT CREATED! PERIOD! that is not playing dumb.. That is FACT!!! It is you that is trying to play dumb to what I mean!
|
Rodge

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 905
Location: , England, UK
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0

Posted: 11-07-07 14:16pm

I think Futureshock means that if the egg and sperm together are so important to you, then why are they less important when apart? After all, each egg and each sperm represent a potential pregnancy. I'm pretty sure that's why the Catholic Church frowns on masturbation, for example.
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 11-07-07 14:55pm

Rodge wrote:
I think Futureshock means that if the egg and sperm together are so important to you, then why are they less important when apart? After all, each egg and each sperm represent a potential pregnancy. I'm pretty sure that's why the Catholic Church frowns on masturbation, for example.


Yeah I think you're right.. She is looking at it before they meet. I am looking at it after..
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
New Topic   Reply



Page 2 of 3
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.