WHY are they nothing without
the other? Why is the zygote anything
MORE than the egg and sperm? The zygote
by itself is NOTHING without a womb and
until 9 months of complicated and near
miraculous processes are carried out by
the mother's
body.
Please don't tell me you see no
difference in blood or your tampon and
sperm in a rubber than a developing human
being! That is ridicules!! The zygote is
something.. it is a developing human
being. Egg and sperm are not..
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-05-07 13:29pm
An egg and sperm ARE THE ZYGOTE! I can't
believe you cannot see this.
The zygote is only "developing" if it is
in a woman's womb, being developed by her
body. And the whole process does not
start with the zygote! It begins with the
formation of the egg and sperm.
All of the DNA that carry the information
to make YOU exist WAY before the sperm and
egg meet.
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 11-05-07 13:41pm
futureshock
wrote:
An egg and sperm ARE THE
ZYGOTE! I can't believe you cannot see
this.
The zygote is only "developing" if it is
in a woman's womb, being developed by her
body. And the whole process does not
start with the zygote! It begins with the
formation of the egg and sperm.
All of the DNA that carry the information
to make YOU exist WAY before the sperm and
egg meet.
Right it begins with the formation of the
egg and sperm, just like you said.. that
is why I don't feel bad about the lady
sweezing and out goes the serm or blood on
the tampon.. It has not started yet.. That
is why I said Big diff..
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-05-07 15:14pm
The formation of the egg and sperm are the
beginning of the future person.
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 11-05-07 15:53pm
futureshock
wrote:
The formation of the egg and
sperm are the beginning of the future
person.
yep when they come together ..
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-05-07 16:12pm
Why?
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 11-05-07 17:06pm
futureshock
wrote:
Why?
because on their own they can not make a
child.. it takes both!
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-07-07 08:00am
meblonde, a zygote cannot become a zygote
without the egg and sperm. The zygote
cannot become an embryo without either a
petri dish or a woman's womb and many
complex biochemical processes. An embryo
cannot become a fetus without a woman's
womb and many complex biochemical
processes. A fetus cannot become a baby
without a woman's womb and many complex
biochemical processes.
Btw, any cell in our bodies, like a skin
cell, can make an entire person. In stem
cell nuclear transfer, scientists can take
a human skin cell and grow it into an
embryo. That embryo could be implanted in
a woman and grown until it it born. This
has already been done and is being done in
mammals. Dolly the sheep was cloned from
her mother's breast cell.
(That's why she was named Dolly, after
Dolly Parton, lol!)
SO, according to you, every single cell in
your body is a baby, right? Every time
you wash your face and skin cells slough
off, are you murdering babies? I guess
so.
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 11-07-07 08:34am
No what I am saying is.. a baby is not
forming until the egg and sperm meet!
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-07-07 12:07pm
Seriously, how can you say that? A baby
begins forming when the DNA and everything
else it takes to create that baby forms,
which, interestingly enough, you could
actually trace back that exact child's DNA
tens of thousands of years.
However, when the child's mother is
herself an embryo, is when that future
child's DNA gets put into the egg that
will become that child. Environmental
factors also influence the development of
a child, both while the egg is a germ cell
and even right up until it's born. This is
why most "identical" twins are not
identical.
The use of the adjective identical rather
than monozygotic leads to
misunderstandings about the biology of
monozygotic twinning. Most monozygotic
twin pairs are not identical; there may be
major discordance for birth weight,
genetic disease, and congenital anomalies.
These indicate that postzygotic events may
lead to the formation of two or more cell
clones in the inner cell mass and early
embryo that actually stimulate the
monozygotic twinning event. There is also
evidence that there may be unequal
allocation of numbers of cells to the
monozygotic twins; this may have
widespread implications for the cascade of
developmental events during embryogenesis,
formation, and vascularization of the
placenta..
Monozygous twins share a common
genotype. However, most monozygotic twin
pairs are not identical; several types of
phenotypic discordance may be observed.
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-07-07 12:11pm
Additional reasons why a future person is
not "complete" when the egg and sperm are
created, and even after they join:
The egg and sperm combine to form one
cell, which copies itself and becomes two,
separate, identical cells. Which one of
those cells contain "the soul"? Those two
become 4, then 8, then 16, and I am sure
you can figure out the rest. Would that
make 16 souls?
You could take these 16 cells and make 16
babies. They do this in both IVF and stem
cell research, to get more embryos and
stem cells, respectively.
Where do you think the material comes from
that becomes each new cell?
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 11-07-07 12:12pm
futureshock
wrote:
Seriously, how can you say
that? A baby begins forming when the DNA
and everything else it takes to create
that baby forms, which, interestingly
enough, you could actually trace back that
exact child's DNA tens of thousands of
years.
However, when the child's mother is
herself an embryo, is when that future
child's DNA gets put into the egg that
will become that child. Environmental
factors also influence the development of
a child, both while the egg is a germ cell
and even right up until it's born. This is
why most "identical" twins are not
identical.
The use of the adjective identical rather
than monozygotic leads to
misunderstandings about the biology of
monozygotic twinning. Most monozygotic
twin pairs are not identical; there may be
major discordance for birth weight,
genetic disease, and congenital anomalies.
These indicate that postzygotic events may
lead to the formation of two or more cell
clones in the inner cell mass and early
embryo that actually stimulate the
monozygotic twinning event. There is also
evidence that there may be unequal
allocation of numbers of cells to the
monozygotic twins; this may have
widespread implications for the cascade of
developmental events during embryogenesis,
formation, and vascularization of the
placenta..
Monozygous twins share a common
genotype. However, most monozygotic twin
pairs are not identical; several types of
phenotypic discordance may be
observed.
AM i missign something here. can you make
a baby without sperm? NO can you make a
baby with out the egg? No.. it takes
both..That is what I mean!
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-07-07 12:41pm
Can you make a baby without all of the
other cells that come after the single
celled zygote? NO, you cannot.
Can you make a baby without a sperm and
egg? Technically yes but that is an
entirely different subject. For the
purposes of the question here, no you
cannot.
Here is what you and many other pro-life
people do not realize you are doing:
You are choosing one step out of many and
arbitrarily deciding that THAT is the one
step that changes everything, and turns
human tissue into people.
Step 1. Life begins millions of years
ago.
Step 2. Human life begins hundreds of
thousands of years ago.
Step 3. The DNA that will create the
future child is formed thousands of years
ago.
Step 4. The embryo of the grandmother of
the future child, the child's mother,
creates her germline which contains the
egg which will become the future child.
The DNA of that child is put into that egg
while the grandmother is pregnant with the
child's mother.
Step 5. The child's father's germline
forms in a similar but not exact way.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
-----------
Up to this point, environmental factors,
internal factors, etc., can effect the
future child, because he or she already
exists. In fact, what the grandmother
eats while she is pregnant with the
child's mother influences the egg that
will become the child.
Step 6. The germlines of the future
child's parents mature.
Step 7. Sexual intercourse or IVF bring
the egg and sperm together.
Step 8. The fertilized egg copies itself
and splits in two identical cells.
Step 9. The mother's body creates each
cell through a combination of biochemical,
hormonal, and nutritional processes. The
food she eats becomes the actual raw
material from which she forms the body of
the future child.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
-------
What the future child's mother ingests,
food, alcohol, tobacco, effects every
single cell her body manufactures, since
it is the raw material which makes the
cells.
Thus a mother's diet may have an enduring
influence on succeeding generations,
independent of later changes in diet.
[T]his study demonstrates that a specific
mammalian gene can be subjected to
germ-line epigenetic change.
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 11-07-07 12:46pm
futureshock
wrote:
Can you make a baby without
all of the other cells that come after the
single celled zygote? NO, you cannot.
Can you make a baby without a sperm and
egg? Technically yes but that is an
entirely different subject. For the
purposes of the question here, no you
cannot.
Here is what you and many other pro-life
people do not realize you are doing:
You are choosing one step out of many and
arbitrarily deciding that THAT is the one
step that changes everything, and turns
human tissue into people.
Step 1. Life begins millions of years
ago.
Step 2. Human life begins hundreds of
thousands of years ago.
Step 3. The DNA that will create the
future child is formed thousands of years
ago.
Step 4. The embryo of the grandmother of
the future child, the child's mother,
creates her germline which contains the
egg which will become the future child.
The DNA of that child is put into that egg
while the grandmother is pregnant with the
child's mother.
Step 5. The child's father's germline
forms in a similar but not exact way.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
-----------
Up to this point, environmental factors,
internal factors, etc., can effect the
future child, because he or she already
exists. In fact, what the grandmother
eats while she is pregnant with the
child's mother influences the egg that
will become the child.
Step 6. The germlines of the future
child's parents mature.
Step 7. Sexual intercourse or IVF bring
the egg and sperm together.
Step 8. The fertilized egg copies itself
and splits in two identical cells.
Step 9. The mother's body creates each
cell through a combination of biochemical,
hormonal, and nutritional processes. The
food she eats becomes the actual raw
material from which she forms the body of
the future child.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
-------
What the future child's mother ingests,
food, alcohol, tobacco, effects every
single cell her body manufactures, since
it is the raw material which makes the
cells.
Thus a mother's diet may have an enduring
influence on succeeding generations,
independent of later changes in diet.
[T]his study demonstrates that a specific
mammalian gene can be subjected to
germ-line epigenetic
change.
I don't even know what it is you are
trying to say,"prove" anymore. But it is
FACT it take an egg,, and sperm to make a
child.. I'm talking about between a man
and a women! Have sex, making a child.. it
take the two to make a child.. So what is
your point what are you trying to prove?
Does man think that he will be left
uncontrolled, (without purpose)? Was he not once
a drop of ejected semen? Then he
became a clot, so He created and fashioned
him and made him into two sexes, male and
female. Is He who does this not able to
bring the dead to life? (Surat al-Qiyama:
36-40)
The first
miracle of creation begins in a
woman’s body, in the organ called the
ovary, with the maturing of a single egg
cell.
|
Verizon-y
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3291
Thanks: 2
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-07-07 13:16pm
meblonde01
wrote:
I don't even know what it is you are
trying to say,"prove" anymore. But it is
FACT it take an egg,, and sperm to make a
child.. I'm talking about between a man
and a women! Have sex, making a child.. it
take the two to make a child.. So what is
your point what are you trying to
prove?
I know you get this. Playing dumb is a
favorite pro-life tactic. It won't work
with me.
As I have already stated:
You are choosing one step out of many and
arbitrarily deciding that THAT is the one
step that changes everything, and turns
human tissue into people.
I have just outlined 9 steps in human
reproduction, and I haven't even gotten to
the embryonic stage yet!
You have arbitrarily decided that step 7
is where life begins. Here is what
arbitrary means:
Determined by chance, whim, or impulse,
and not by necessity, reason, or
principle
In summary, pro-lifers like yourself feel
that because you, personally, have decided
that step 7 is where life begins, abortion
must be illegal.
I could understand if you felt that FOR
YOURSELF, you wouldn't abort because you
felt life began at step 7, but why do you
have the right to force everyone else to
be governed by your opinion?
I think life starts at step 1. How can
you force me to agree with where you feel
it begins?
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 11-07-07 13:46pm
What I have said over and over. And is
fact. is it takes the sperm and the egg to
make a child! Period! it can't happen
without!! Period! what ever it is you are
going around and around about does not
change the fact that with out an egg or
sperm. A CHILD IS NOT CREATED! PERIOD!
that is not playing dumb.. That is FACT!!!
It is you that is trying to play dumb to
what I mean!
|
Rodge
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 905 Location: , England, UK
Thanks: 1
Thanked:0
Posted: 11-07-07 14:16pm
I think Futureshock means that if the egg
and sperm together are so important to
you, then why are they less important when
apart? After all, each egg and each sperm
represent a potential pregnancy. I'm
pretty sure that's why the Catholic Church
frowns on masturbation, for example.
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 2132 Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
Posted: 11-07-07 14:55pm
Rodge
wrote:
I think Futureshock means
that if the egg and sperm together are so
important to you, then why are they less
important when apart? After all, each egg
and each sperm represent a potential
pregnancy. I'm pretty sure that's why the
Catholic Church frowns on masturbation,
for example.
Yeah I think you're right.. She is looking
at it before they meet. I am looking at it
after..