diamond splinter
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:11pm
|
|
|
|
once again read what is written no where
did i say it wasn't a definition i said it
wasn't my definition grow a brain and
maybe you will comprehend i did not
personaly put the definition on what being
pro life means a much greater person did
though i am flattered that you seem to
think it was me personaly
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
yodavater
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:12pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Jincks013
wrote: | | [My advice is to try them
one at a time, because being attacked viciously by
a dozen rabid baby killers at one time can
be disheartening. I advise the old
"shake the dust off your feet" option when
that
happens.[/color] |
Thanks you for an accurate quote, even if
you did have to violate their copyright to
do it.
But where is the quote where I said this:
"He posted his intention to invade every
abortion debate board "out there" to
"educate" all of us and bring us to see
the light of the pro-life side. "
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yodavater
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:15pm
|
|
|
|
|
| diamond splinter
wrote: | | no where did i say it wasn't
a definition i said it wasn't my
definition |
Ah... so who was this "great person" who
made up that particular definition, and
does he work for any dictionary publishing
company?
If not, what gives him/her the authority
to dictate what the term means?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:26pm
|
|
|
|
|
Ilk means "kind" or "type". 
As has been stated many times, this topic
was not made to repeat endlessly the
dictionary definition of pro-life; it was
made to gain people's INTERPRETATIONS of
pro-life. Maybe if you'd read the first
post, you'd know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yodavater
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:41pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Eiri
wrote: | | Ilk means "kind" or "type".
|
I know that... but what is "MY" ilk/type?
| Eiri
wrote: |
As has been stated many times, this topic
was not made to repeat endlessly the
dictionary definition of pro-life; it was
made to gain people's INTERPRETATIONS of
pro-life. Maybe if you'd read the first
post, you'd know
that. |
Okay, I'm just curious..... what purpose
do "interpretations" serve that
definitions don't serve?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yodavater
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:41pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Eiri
wrote: | | Ilk means "kind" or "type".
|
I know that... but what is "MY" ilk/type?
| Eiri
wrote: |
As has been stated many times, this topic
was not made to repeat endlessly the
dictionary definition of pro-life; it was
made to gain people's INTERPRETATIONS of
pro-life. Maybe if you'd read the first
post, you'd know
that. |
Okay, I'm just curious..... what purpose
do "interpretations" serve that
definitions don't serve?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4144
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:52pm
|
|
|
|
|
| yodavater
wrote: |
...what purpose do "interpretations" serve
that definitions don't
serve? |
To learn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yodavater
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 818
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:54pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Birch
wrote: | | yodavater
wrote: |
...what purpose do "interpretations" serve
that definitions don't
serve? |
To learn. |
To learn what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4144
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
|
Posted: 12-14-07 13:57pm
|
|
|
|
|
| yodavater
wrote: | | Birch
wrote: | | yodavater
wrote: |
...what purpose do "interpretations" serve
that definitions don't
serve? |
To learn. |
To learn
what? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
diamond splinter
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 611
Location: ,
|
Posted: 12-14-07 14:00pm
|
|
|
|
|
| yodavater
wrote: | | diamond splinter
wrote: | | no where did i say it wasn't
a definition i said it wasn't my
definition |
Ah... so who was this "great person" who
made up that particular definition, and
does he work for any dictionary publishing
company?
If not, what gives him/her the authority
to dictate what the term
means? |
I have posted a short list of the people
who define what pro life means in the
other thread you asked for and if you
really were pro life you would not ofeven
had to ask for it as for what gives them
the authority to dictate what it means how
about them being the founders of the
movement
|
|
|
|
|
|
sociable_recluse
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Posts: 88
Location: , UK
|
Posted: 12-14-07 14:15pm
|
|
|
|
|
| yodavater
wrote: | | Eiri
wrote: | | Ilk means "kind" or "type".
|
I know that... but what is "MY" ilk/type?
|
The type of misogynist pro fetal lifers
who frequent PLA and place the fetus above
all else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 12-14-07 14:37pm
|
|
|
|
|
| yodavater
wrote: | | Eiri
wrote: | | Ilk means "kind" or "type".
|
I know that... but what is "MY"
ilk/type? |
Hard-core pro-lifers who want to make
abortion illegal no matter the
consequences.
| Quote: |
| Eiri
wrote: |
As has been stated many times, this topic
was not made to repeat endlessly the
dictionary definition of pro-life; it was
made to gain people's INTERPRETATIONS of
pro-life. Maybe if you'd read the first
post, you'd know
that. |
Okay, I'm just curious..... what purpose
do "interpretations" serve that
definitions don't
serve? |
You figure it out. Maybe you'll be able to
join this topic in a mature and
intelligent manner once you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jincks013
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 1180
Location: ,
Thanks: 23
Thanked:13
|
Posted: 12-14-07 21:35pm
|
|
|
|
|
| yodavater
wrote: | | Jincks013
wrote: | | [My advice is to try them
one at a time, because being attacked viciously by
a dozen rabid baby killers at one time can
be disheartening. I advise the old
"shake the dust off your feet" option when
that
happens.[/color] |
Thanks you for an accurate quote, even if
you did have to violate their copyright to
do it.
But where is the quote where I said this:
"He posted his intention to invade every
abortion debate board "out there" to
"educate" all of us and bring us to see
the light of the pro-life side.
" |
I used your exact post vater. Not all of
it perhaps but your exact words. Shall I
continue? I think the refreshing view of
your true intent feelings is very
obvious.
Perhaps you'd care instead for the post in
which you in your "pro life" best defended
faithman and his desire to shoot me
without a blindfold then pretend that
there was nothing wrong with that.
More "pro life" education perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jincks013
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 1180
Location: ,
Thanks: 23
Thanked:13
|
Posted: 12-15-07 07:36am
|
|
|
|
|
This was recently posted by Maggie on GN:
I thought it was particularly apt in for
the 'lets invade pc boards" crowd..FYI..
this a debate board; not a pc board.
It is easy to claim
support for the unborn. They do not have
opinions and they do not have actual needs
that the so called supporter must provide.
In picking the unborn to support they can
claim to actually be doing something while
all the while it is the woman wh is
carrying the pregnancy that bears all the
costs and risks.
In claiming to support the post born you
might be called out to actually provide
assistance both in time effort and cost.
It is not limited to months but you may be
involved for years or decades.
Supporting the postborn may put you in
conflict with what your fantasy for them
is and what they as folk with voices might
want.
Besides the prolife movement has never
been about babies born or unborn, it is
about exerting control over women in
regards to sex, life styles and
opportunities. Womens ability to bear
children has always been used to keep
women from competeing on a equal footing.
In the name of protecting walking
incubators women have been excluded from
most opportunities outside of the home.
It has been my experience that most of the
most vocal prolifers are either women who
want an excuse not to compete or men who
are afraid of competition from women.
I have always found it telling that these
people claim ownership of all unborn ZEFs
wanting to enforce their percieved claim
on the zef by insisting that the pregnancy
be continued, then when the infant is born
(unless theres a buck to be made off of an
adoption) they feel they have absolutely
no responsibility for the infants well
being. (in fact their only interest in the
post born child seems to be in
condemnation of the childs mother if she
does not fit their ideal).
|
|
|
|
|
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
|
Posted: 12-15-07 08:11am
|
|
|
|
|
If I wanted to read from another forum I
would go there. Not really sure why it is
so important to show post yodavatre posted
in another forum, Unless it is just to
discredit him/her. and if so, what's the
point??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jincks013
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 1180
Location: ,
Thanks: 23
Thanked:13
|
Posted: 12-15-07 08:37am
|
|
|
|
|
to bad I didn't ask your opinion blonde.
The post and point is valid to the current
discussion at hand. Are you or are you not
debating the legitimacy of the point? Or
do you agree?
|
|
|
|
|
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
|
Posted: 12-15-07 08:42am
|
|
|
|
|
I could care less. play your silly game!
run and find out all you can..  childish!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sistersister
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 145
Location: ,
|
Posted: 12-15-07 11:04am
|
|
|
|
|
That is my post from GN. If you want I
can repost it here verbatim as part of
this disscussion.
That would be silly and repitious, but if
you want I will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4144
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
|
Posted: 12-15-07 11:04am
|
|
|
|
|
| meblonde01
wrote: | | If I wanted to read from
another forum I would go there. Not really
sure why it is so important to show post
yodavatre posted in another forum, Unless
it is just to discredit him/her. and if
so, what's the
point?? |
If it had been a prolife view, would you
mind that as much?  
|
|
|
|
|
|
meblonde01
Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2132
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2
|
Posted: 12-15-07 11:10am
|
|
|
|
|
| Birch
wrote: | | meblonde01
wrote: | | If I wanted to read from
another forum I would go there. Not really
sure why it is so important to show post
yodavatre posted in another forum, Unless
it is just to discredit him/her. and if
so, what's the
point?? |
If it had been a prolife view, would you
mind that as much? |
I really don't even know what they where
"argueing about" I didn't follow all of
it.. I just think it was a little silly,
But to each their own..
From what I get most of what's his name?
"K.. whatever" says he sounds pro-life..
so to answer your question, I don't think
it would matter..
|
|
|
|
|
