Back Pain Forum - Laser spine surgery page 63
medical questions | health forums

Laser spine surgery

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Back Pain -> Laser spine surgery
Author Message
djohn

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 11
Spinal Surgery
Posted: 08-27-08 18:36pm

Hello,

I have been reading through the posts in this thread, as I had some interest in investigating the laser surgery methods. I've looked into them and decided to go with a more mainstream surgery approach. One of the main reasons is that I want the surgery to be done close to where I live. I live in the Boston area and am currently consulting with two surgeons at New England Baptist Hosp. Any who live in the Boston area are probably familiar with this hospital as they specialize in back surgery. I have spinal stenosis at L4-L5. One of the surgeons I have consulted with so far is recommending a hemi-laminectomy procedure to remove bone growth/protrusions which are compressing the nerve at L4-L5. From my MRI it appears that I also have some L4-L5 compression where the nerve exits the spine. There does not seem to be any significant compression from the discs. This is an out-patient procedure and he expects that I can be back to work (in an office) in 2 - 3 weeks. I have another meeting scheduled with him, and a consultation with a second surgeon in a few weeks. I have been doing epidural injections for the past 2+ years and they have been helpful, but the last 2 seem to be less effective. The doctor tells me that the epidurals generally become less effective after 2 - 3 years.

For those who have had back surgery previously(or have researched it), I wanted to get your input on the following:

1) I understand that decompressing nerves where they exit the spine is trickier than decompression in the central spinal canal. I want to discuss this further with the surgeons. Does anyone have any experience with spinal nerve decompression where they exit the spine (foramens) ?

2) I understand that the development of scar tissue can occur in a small percentage of surgeries, and if it does then the nerve compression can return. And the scar tissue cannot be removed through surgery, so you can end up back where you started with nerve pain. This is obviously a major risk. Has anyone experienced this and are there any methods to try and prevent this during the surgery ?

3) In talking with the surgeon and other back doctors, they indicate that the removal (or partial removal) of a lamina will not affect the stability of the spine, since the lamina do not support any weight in the spine. However if a facet joint is removed then that will definitely impact spine stability and may require fusion. Has anyone heard of any negative impact from lamina removal or partial lamina removal ?

Thank you,
John
Did you find this post useful?
|
RichT

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 911
Thanks: 21
Thanked:0

Posted: 08-27-08 18:51pm

Hello Dijohn,

WELCOME to this forum and especially to this thread. I commend your efforts in reading through this "book". A lot of info is shared to say the least.

As soon as I read that you live in the Boston area I immediately knew you needed to contact Fran. She has a SUPERB spinal surgeon. I'd see the fellow myself, but as you so properly decided, it is best to go to the very best spinal surgeon in ones own area.

Permit me to make a small correction in your No. 2 - I do not know of a single surgery where there is not the development of scar tissue. The only question is was the surgery done in a manner that minimizes the formation of scar tissue.

SOOO Djohn, I'll let you and Fran have a good discussion.

Hope all goes well for you.

RichT
Did you find this post useful?
|
Marie B.

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 231
Location: Ohio
Your neck of the Woods
Posted: 08-27-08 19:14pm

John, If you are open to one more surgical opinion, Fran is up in your neck of the woods. She might be willing to help you get that one more surgical spinal opinion to your questions and give you more options.
She also can tell you more about the hospitals around that area.

I had Lamenectomies at L4 L5. To get to and remove the cause of my stenosis my spinal surgeon had to remove the entire Lamina..."they called it "taking the roof off" the vertebrae. This part of the procedure decompressed a buldging disc and its accompanied buckled and over grown ligamentum flavum that was pressing on the Cauda Equina. I also had Medial Facetemies. I had a lot of bone spurs present that needed to be addressed. This resulted in my having to have Fusion. I did not have rods and screws etc for the Fusion. My surgeon used the bone from the removed lamina as the grafts for fusing L4 and L5. The process was called Fusion In-Situ.

My surgeon did do Foraminotomies to give my exiting nerves more room. I did have at S1, a herniated disc that was sitting on the nerve seat. The foraminotomy took care of the exiting nerve by giving it more space. The nerve was not impinged. I did have a small impingement at the L4 on the right side of the vertebrae. The Foraminotomy relived the impingement and the nerve recovered nicely.

After 8 months I am doing absolutely fine. No pain at all and all the concern about limited motion at this point in time is gone. I am amazed at how much movement I have in my back. I can bend forward although I am careful not to push it too much.

Good Luck with your decision and if you can handle the pain, make sure you get as much information as possible to the surgical approach to your spinal surgery. Know what you are getting into ahead of time. If you find your doctor does not answer questions nor give you as much time as you need for you to make a decision, there is always another person to go to.
If you need this, Fran I'm sure will help with a name and a place.

Marie B.
Did you find this post useful?
|
djohn

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 11
Spinal Surgery
Posted: 08-27-08 20:53pm

RichT...thank you for the welcome to the forum. There is a lot of great information here! And thanks for the correction on the scar tissue.

Marie...it looks like your surgery has been very successful. You mentioned that you had an overgrown ligamentum flavum, which is a major ligament in the spine. The thickening of the ligamentum flavum seems to be a fairly common spine issue as people age. How is this decompressed ? Does the surgeon actually trim part of this ligament ?

Looking forward to Fran's input on her experiences with spine surgeons in Boston.

Thanks!!
Did you find this post useful?
|
littleonefb

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Location: ,
Thanks: 18
Thanked:0
I'm Here, I'm Here
Posted: 08-27-08 23:02pm

I'm here, and wow, really. Thank you Rich and Marie for such sincere compliments on my knowledge and experience.
Believe me, I wish that I didn't have the experience, but glad to be able to help.

So Djohn, first off please remember that all that I say is either my own personal opinion, personal experience and some medical experience that I have had.
I AM NOT A DOCTOR, NURSE, OR ANY OTHER KIND OF MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL.

I've just had far to much experience in dealing with orthopedic problems since I was a kid. Between myself, my brother the accident prone kid, my sister and 2 varsity athletes for kids who played sports since they where 5, one is now 30 and the other 25, I have learned to read x-rays and some ability to read MRIs especially spinal ones.

I too am in the Boston area, actually northwest of Boston by about 25 miles and quite familiar with New England Baptist Hospital in Boston, all to familiar in more ways than one, which I will go into in a bit.

I grew up in Brookline, a first suburb out of Boston. I am now 57, and when I was growing up and until a few years ago, New England Baptist Hospital was considered the premier orthopedic hospital in the state, in the area, in New England, in the country and in the world.
They specialize in spinal surgery and do about 20,000 spinal surgeries a year.
And yes, they are the selected hospital of the Boston Celtics basketball team.

Now having said all of that, I will take an excellent guess that in the past few weeks, patients are running away from the New England Baptist Hospital faster than a "cat has kittens", as fast as rabbits multiply and any other saying you want to use.
That is based on a front page article that appeared in the Boston Globe about 3 weeks ago that stated over the past 2 1/2 years ago, New England Baptist Hospital and Lahey Clinic, both in MA accounted for 50% of the spinal surgery errors, and we are talking about serious spinal surgery errors. Things like fusing the wrong vertebrae during surgery, not finding out till after it was done.

This was serious enough that when the information was reported to the state by the Globe, the state ordered New England Baptist Hospital to hire an outside consultant to review the errors and their "blueprint for reducing errors"

Believe me, I was amazed to read this article and to think that I was there in 2006 and saw 2 different spine surgeons for other opinions before having my first spine surgery elsewhere.
I was even more amazed to read that this was going on in 2006 while at the same time New England Baptist Hospital was doing a massive blitz of advertising on every radio station in the state, every newspaper in the state and all over the local TV networks, about their expertise in spinal surgery, innovative procedures and the best in the world.

Before I go on, Djohn, i want to post this and then a link to the globe article

Fran
Did you find this post useful?
|
littleonefb

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Location: ,
Thanks: 18
Thanked:0
Re: Spinal Surgery
Posted: 08-28-08 00:32am

djohn wrote:
Hello,

I have been reading through the posts in this thread, as I had some interest in investigating the laser surgery methods. I've looked into them and decided to go with a more mainstream surgery approach. One of the main reasons is that I want the surgery to be done close to where I live. I live in the Boston area and am currently consulting with two surgeons at New England Baptist Hosp. Any who live in the Boston area are probably familiar with this hospital as they specialize in back surgery. I have spinal stenosis at L4-L5. One of the surgeons I have consulted with so far is recommending a hemi-laminectomy procedure to remove bone growth/protrusions which are compressing the nerve at L4-L5. From my MRI it appears that I also have some L4-L5 compression where the nerve exits the spine. There does not seem to be any significant compression from the discs. This is an out-patient procedure and he expects that I can be back to work (in an office) in 2 - 3 weeks. I have another meeting scheduled with him, and a consultation with a second surgeon in a few weeks. I have been doing epidural injections for the past 2+ years and they have been helpful, but the last 2 seem to be less effective. The doctor tells me that the epidurals generally become less effective after 2 - 3 years.

For those who have had back surgery previously(or have researched it), I wanted to get your input on the following:

1) I understand that decompressing nerves where they exit the spine is trickier than decompression in the central spinal canal. I want to discuss this further with the surgeons. Does anyone have any experience with spinal nerve decompression where they exit the spine (foramens) ?

2) I understand that the development of scar tissue can occur in a small percentage of surgeries, and if it does then the nerve compression can return. And the scar tissue cannot be removed through surgery, so you can end up back where you started with nerve pain. This is obviously a major risk. Has anyone experienced this and are there any methods to try and prevent this during the surgery ?

3) In talking with the surgeon and other back doctors, they indicate that the removal (or partial removal) of a lamina will not affect the stability of the spine, since the lamina do not support any weight in the spine. However if a facet joint is removed then that will definitely impact spine stability and may require fusion. Has anyone heard of any negative impact from lamina removal or partial lamina removal ?

Thank you,
John



Hi John,

I'm going to answer your post starting with your questions first.

I have never heard of lumbar surgery being more risky or more difficult than thoracic or cervical surgery. I've only heard the opposite from both my spinal surgeon and my PM doctor as well.

Scar tissue is always a risk with any type of surgery, whether it be spinal, abdominal, or anywhere in the body. With spinal surgery, it is true that if scar tissue builds up post op, you could end up right back where you started from with nerve pain.
Unfortunately, some people build up scar tissue and others don't and some people are more prone to it than others. There are some people that have a severe problem with scar tissue build up and they are poor candidates for surgery of any kind.
On the other hand, there are some doctors, including my own, that use a fairly new technique that is used in Japan that has an incredible result in preventing the build up of scar tissue of any kind post op. Trust me, I know this because I'm now recovering from my second spinal surgery and have no scar tissue build up at all and it has my PT in awe of what my spinal surgeon does with this technique. There are several patients at this PT facility and we all have the same results. The PT has 20 years experience and has never seen anything like it, except with my surgeon.

I have heard of bad results from having laminotomies done. I have not been able to figure out, even with a google search if a hemilaminectomy and a laminotomy are the same thing. I keep meaning to ask my spine surgeon when I see him, but never remember that one. Too many other questions about myself get in the way.
Anyways, the negatives I have heard are all because they shouldn't have had them done or they weren't done correctly. If there is any kind of spine slippage then a lamintomy or hemilaminectomy should not be done without some kind of hardware support being placed to keep the vertebrae from slipping.
If there is no slippage, then there is nothing to fear and I am the perfect example of that.

I had a partial laminotomy and widening of the lateral recess of the L4,L5/S1 in 2006 and just about 8 weeks ago I had done on the L3/L4 a bilateral laminotomy, partial facetectomy, widening of the lateral recess, widening of the central foramen and decompression.

Prior to this last surgery in June 2008, I was fully stable, with no loss of function once I recovered from the surgery. I had various types of setbacks that aren't uncommon to have, but 12 months post op and I was fine.

Fine that is until an accident last winter, which I posted about many pages back. It resulted in the need for the surgery I just had.

My first surgery was done in June 2006, and yes I keep telling my wonderful spine surgeon that this is getting to be a bad habit, meeting in the OR in June, every 2 years and it has to stop.

My first surgery ended up being an emergency because I started to suffer what is called cauda equina syndrome, loss of bladder control. Lucky for me, it started about 12 hours before scheduled surgery and I just went in as planned, but had I not been scheduled for that day and time, I would have been anyways, as you have no more than 48 hours at most to have surgery to relieve the nerve compression before the nerves are damaged for good and bladder control is lost forever.

It is true, that over a period of time, usually a couple of years, the epidurals become less effective and beyond that time, they generally start to just plain not work.

I fully understand wanting to stay in the same area that you are living in for your surgery and going for the conventional route for spinal surgery. I pretty much did the same thing.
I live northwest of Boston, had many "second opinions" before going with my original spinal surgeon and he is located on the north shore. So it is a ride for me, but easier and quicker than going into Boston.

I saw 2 different doctors at the New England Baptist Hospital and both docs where a horrible experience for me. Both misdiagnosed me, one said it was all in my head and told my husband to take me to a shrink. 4 days after seeing this doctor at the Baptist, I lost total bladder control.

The absurdity that you have to go through to get an appointment there for a second opinion already had me turned off, but the hospital itself was not a pleasant experience either.

It's location is bad news, up that horrible steep hill. The fees for parking where totally insane. in 2006, it was $9 for 2 hours. no discount for seeing doctors and we found out that if I had surgery there and it would have been day surgery, the charge would have been $18.

I could barely walk and to make that long, long walk to the doctor's office from the front door was impossible for me. I needed a wheel chair and there where none to get. We where told they where all in use and I would have to wait my turn to get one. Luckily we arrived 30 minutes early for the appt, and it took that long to get a wheel chair.
This was in an orthopedic hospital no less.

By the time we left the appt, the first one, 4 hours later, we where charged $18 for parking.

The second doctor I saw at the Baptist was really no better than the first one and I might add, they both told me that my spinal surgeon "was more than willing to operate on me for no reason to make money and there was nothing wrong with my spine." the second one told me that if he "where to do surgery on you and I'm not saying I would, because you are at least 10 pounds overweight (which is true), I could not do a minimally invasive surgical incision on you, I would have to do a 4-5 inch incision and there is no such thing as lateral recess stenosis."

That's when I said "thanks but no thanks, you can go straight to hell because it is well documented that the biggest reason for failed spinal surgery for decompression is not decompressing the lateral recess of the vertebrae and when the decompression fails, the next thing that's done is a spinal fusion and the patient is still in the same pain they where in before any spinal surgery is done; and if you think I would let you do that size incision for a decompression on 1 vertebrae you are insane. that is the size used for a fusion with intrumentation."

He just walked out of the room.

John, I don't know if you are aware, but it has been in the Boston Globe and other papers that many of the spinal surgeons that where at the Baptist have left their and gone over to Newton-Wellesley Hospital instead.
That says something to me as well.

I also know several people who have seen spinal surgeons as New England Baptist Hospital and where not satisfied with the doctors they saw there, The minute they started asking "too many questions", questioned something that the doctor said, the doctor got angry and had that attitude "i'm the doctor and I know best, you don't need to know the answers to those questions" attitude and they refused to answer the questions.
I've also talked with other people on other forums who have had surgery at the Baptist and did not have good results and when that happened the doctors where not pleased and just pawned them off to PM docs and they had a tough time finding another spine surgeon that would see them in the Boston area.

After the article that was in the Boston Globe, one of the last places I would even consider for spinal surgery would be New England Baptist and the other would be Lahey Clinic and that's without my own personal experience at the Baptist and others that I know personally and on Line.

You didn't say if the doctor at the Baptist was going to do your surgery with the use of an endoscope or with a traditional open spine incision, but if it is open spine surgery, your incision shouldn't be more than 1-1 1/2 inches. any more than that, then run for your life. That is all I had with both of mine.

As for being back to work in 2-3 weeks. Well it's possible, but I would highly doubt it.
It takes time to recover from spinal surgery and believe it or not, you are going to find yourself with very weak muscles after surgery not matter how the surgery is done.
You haven't been using your muscles correctly for some time, even if you are unaware of it, because your body has been compensating in various ways to deal with the pain you where having.
Once you start to stand up correctly and move correctly, you are going to have some very angry muscles that aren't going to be happy that you are using them again. You will also have nerves that are going to be even more angry and will need time to heal and regenerate after the surgery and you will have quite a bit of inflammation as well.

You may actually feel fine immediately after surgery and be all but moving normally for the first time in quite a while, BUT, those muscles are going to start to hurt and the nerves are going to start zapping you as you start to heal and some of your pre-op pain will return for a while as well. It's all perfectly normal to happen and will, in time, all vanish. The key is time.

You should get a 10 week course of physical therapy going twice a week, starting about 3 weeks post op. You will need to learn the proper exercises to strengthen the core muscles and keep your quads and hamstrings well stretched. Any doctor that doesn't order that for you after the type of surgery you are having is not one to use.
Those exercises will become a permanent part of your daily life and if you don't do them, you will pay for it dearly for several days. Take it from one who knows well.

It is also quite possible that once you are back on your feet, walking well and walking is a key component to healing from any kind of spinal surgery, that you will start having some problems in your feet and ankles. Again that can be normal. Remember you haven't been walking correctly for some time and now that you are standing correctly, walking correclty, etc. your using muscles in your ankles and feet that you haven't been using for some time. they aren't going to be happy with you either, and you might need a round of PT for those too, like I did and a permanent need for custom orthotics in your shoes like I have.

Another thing you will need, no matter who and where you have your spinal surgery done, is a good quality walking shoe. The number 1 shoe that good spine surgeons, foot and ankle orthopedic docs and podiatrists tell their patients to get, and these are docs from all over the country not just in MA are New Balance walking shoes, style 926.
My son lives in Kentucky and he was told to get those, a friend is in Texas and those are what she was told and my spine surgeon said the same thing and to have a brand new pair to wear into the hospital the day of surgery.

I live in mine and have several pairs. Good ones for going out in, a more worn pair to wear in lousy weather and the "dirty" pair that I wear working in the gardens. The feet love them, spine love them, the body loves them and they feel better than going barefoot.

I'm glad to see that you are getting more than one opinion before you have surgery. Don't be afraid to get more than that either. Spine surgery is serious stuff and several opinions is good.

If you would like the name of my spine surgeon, whom I have sent many a patient to and no one has ever gone anywhere else after seeing him. just pm me and I will be glad to send you the name.
And he isn't a knife happy doctor. 5 of the patients I sent to him where all advised to have a 1 or 2 level fusion for their disc problem. he told them no way jose. Sent them to 8 weeks of PT, saw them again and that was the last time he saw them. They have been fine for at least 2 years and their MRI is showing NO PROBLEMS.
If only I could have been that lucky.

Anyways, good luck with whatever you decide to do and please, feel free to PM me any time.

Fran
Did you find this post useful?
|
littleonefb

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Location: ,
Thanks: 18
Thanked:0

Posted: 08-28-08 00:34am

I have some comments I'd like to make about the article that I posted from the Boston Globe, but I'm going to bed, it's 1:30AM. Will post them later today.

Fran
Did you find this post useful?
|
ratter

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 51
ratter
Posted: 08-28-08 08:42am

I agree with the walking. Walking really helps the body and mind after an operation if you are able to do it. An excellent way to feel better and even if you have any leftover pain, walking eliviates its. Highly recomnd it. Even if you have to push yourself, you will be glad you did it.
Did you find this post useful?
|
djohn

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 11
Spinal Surgery
Posted: 08-28-08 08:53am

Fran,

Wow....thanks very much for taking the time to provide all that information. I had not seen that Boston Globe article, but I'm definitely having second thoughts about NEBH. The surgeon there was looking to do endoscopic surgery, so that may have been why he was saying 2 - 3 weeks to go back to work. I understand that the recovery time is a bit shorter with the endoscopic approach.

I recently went through a physical therapy program for about 6 weeks..doing stretches and strengthening exercises for lower back and core. I have continued these exercises and stretches and do them daily on my own. There are also a number of exercises that I learned through the therapy, that I do at my gym several times per week. The exercises are great for strengthening muscle to support the spine and should provide long term benefits, but have little or no impact on relieving pain from compressed spinal nerves. And since the epidurals are losing effectiveness, I'm now looking at the surgery option.

I will PM you to get the name of your surgeon. I'll also check out Newton-Wellesley.

Thanks!
Did you find this post useful?
|
Marie B.

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 231
Location: Ohio
See!!!
Posted: 08-28-08 13:02pm

See! John. Rich and I arm ourselves with Fran's information and when she doesn't know the information she has sources where she gets direct information.

From the New Balance Shoes to Grabbers, to long shower brushes, to almost anything, Fran is our Encyclopedia for spinal needs. A lot of people don't like to read all of that information that she provides. Heaven only knows why. Too many men and women go to surgical spinal doctors unarmed or like I tend to say "a lamb to slaughter"

You are a wise man, John, to be willing to get that one more spinal surgical opinion.
Once you do that, please keep us aware of what is happening to you, your thoughts and opinions as you proceed into this getting rid of spinal pain. Our hope is to help all people who read the postings here and to emphasize the need for a thorough search for a good spinal surgeon.

Marie B.
Did you find this post useful?
|
RichT

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 911
Thanks: 21
Thanked:0

Posted: 08-28-08 15:33pm

Hello Marie,

YES, John is a wise man. I too will look forward to his sharing his "process" in selecting the BEST spinal surgeon and hospital.

"a lamb to slaughter". I know what you mean. People blow my mind when they just bury their head in the sand and blindly have surgery by the first doc they meet on the street so to speak.

I'll tell you another one - A member of our church had a cochlear ear implant by a doctor at a university. I asked his wife how they selected the surgeon. Her response "we just went on blind faith". That about sent me through the roof!!!!! The good Lord expects more of us than that in my opinion. And sorry to say, less than a year later she died from a brain tumor. A very nice wonderful lady. I often wonder if she would still be alive today if she went to the best doctors she could find rather than "going on blind faith".

Take care.

RichT
Did you find this post useful?
|
ratter

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 51
Ratter
Posted: 08-28-08 15:59pm

Just got official word in writing from my HMO .......no more money they will not pay anymore than the $800 they sent. They said that on the phone, but they had to follow up in writing. As to trying to get ss disability, after seeing the Social Security Dr awhile back, I got a letter from SS saying although they aknowledge I have Arthritis problems based on all the info and their Dr's tests and so on, as long as a person can grasp something in their hand, they can find work. They then wished me the very best and I can anytime re-apply again for Disability. Heck at least they aknowledged my "problems". When you apply for Disability, you have to show them everything, all Xrays, MRI's and the whole works and as mentioned you have to then see their Back Dr. Don't get me wrong ethier Dr did say I had problems based on the MRI and other stuff, and he was a real nice guy, but no SS Disability was end result. He also wished me luck down the road......kinda makes me sweat when all the various Dr's keep saying that. Sounds like they are implying something. GULP!!
Did you find this post useful?
|
littleonefb

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Location: ,
Thanks: 18
Thanked:0

Posted: 08-28-08 16:23pm

Ratter, SS Disability is for people who really can't work. If you can hold things and move and do things, then you may have to change jobs, but you still can work. It's that simple.
They make it extremely difficult to obtain SS disability, more than they really should, but on the other hand they are trying to keep people form obtaining benefits that really don't deserve it.

As for your HMO not paying any more for you LSI bills, you should be grateful that they paid anything. Usually HMO's do not pay anything for out of network surgery or doctors unless it is a life or death situation.

As for doctors wishing you luck down the road. That can just be a courtesy comment and polite without any meaning. On the other hand, it could be an indication that you could or will have some further problems with your spine, arthritis etc. in their opinion.

No one can predict the future, not even the best spine surgeons or any doctors in the world, they can only give an estimated guess based on statistics. They can only deal with what is present in front of them.

How you deal with your present situation and/or medical situations is up to you and how you decide to treat them and with what kind of doctors is also up to you.

I only know that ignoring existing medical problems will not make them go away and pretending they don't exist won't do it either.

Fran
Did you find this post useful?
|
littleonefb

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Location: ,
Thanks: 18
Thanked:0
Re: Spinal Surgery
Posted: 08-28-08 16:39pm

djohn wrote:
Fran,

Wow....thanks very much for taking the time to provide all that information. I had not seen that Boston Globe article, but I'm definitely having second thoughts about NEBH. The surgeon there was looking to do endoscopic surgery, so that may have been why he was saying 2 - 3 weeks to go back to work. I understand that the recovery time is a bit shorter with the endoscopic approach.

I recently went through a physical therapy program for about 6 weeks..doing stretches and strengthening exercises for lower back and core. I have continued these exercises and stretches and do them daily on my own. There are also a number of exercises that I learned through the therapy, that I do at my gym several times per week. The exercises are great for strengthening muscle to support the spine and should provide long term benefits, but have little or no impact on relieving pain from compressed spinal nerves. And since the epidurals are losing effectiveness, I'm now looking at the surgery option.

I will PM you to get the name of your surgeon. I'll also check out Newton-Wellesley.

Thanks!


John,
Glad to help and I sent you a PM with the info for you.

Another thing, I personally wouldn't use any of the doctors at newton wellesly either, especially the ones that have left the Baptist to go there. We don't know who the doctors where that where involved in the spine problems, but I do know that these docs where there when all of it happened.

From what I have been able to find out, the records on the problems with the surgeries do not include any doctors names so we, as a public as well as other doctors, can not find out who the doctors are that where involved in the botched surgeries.

Something that most people don't realize about endoscopic surgery is that there is a 50/50 shot that you will end up with an open spine surgery instead.
The plan may be endoscopic surgery, but if the doctor finds he has more to do than he thought, or the visual field is not enough to do what is needed, then the endoscopic tube is removed and an incision is made.

Personally, I'm very uncomfortable with the idea of endoscopic surgery in my spine.
The visual field is very, very small through the tube, even with the view on a screen for the doctor to see. It may be enlarged on that screen but the view is still a very narrow view of what is going on inside.

The vertebrae in your spine are about 1 inch and that is small folks, real small. Inside there are all kinds of things to work on and not work on and that includes the spinal cord.
The risk is extremely low of causing paralysis at the lumbar level, but those nerves do go into some big time areas of the body that affect bowel and bladder control, male as well as female sexual function etc.

I'm of the old fashioned school of open me up and use your god given eyes and those magnifying glasses over them to see everything you need to see and be sure you are doing everything that is needed and not leaving anything behind, i.e. splinters of bone from enlarging the vertebrae or sealing disc etc.
Start with the smallest incision you need and then, if needed, enlarge it.

MRI's don't show everything that is possible as was the case in my surgery. The MRI was 2 weeks old before I had the surgery this past June and it did not show the disc to be as compressed as it was, nor did it show the nerves where as compressed as they where.
Had my spine surgeon started with an endoscope, it would have been pulled out and the incision made as he would not have had enough of a visual field to see all of what was going on.
I came as close as you can get to a fusion without having one. I was just lucky that the disc popped right up, nice and full and the nerves where not damaged, just squished about as squished as you can get and still survive.

And John, don't kid yourself about quick recovery from having the decompression done with an endoscope. It's the nerve compression post op that takes all the time to heal and get you back on your feet, not the incision. I had no incision pain, maybe 3 days post op from a 1 inch incision either time. It was all the lack of muscle use for so long and the nerve healing that goes on that slows the post op healing.
That doesn't change with an endoscope.

It's good that you have had PT and have exercises to do. Keep those up as the stronger the cores are pre-op the better they will be post op. But you have to be seen by PT post op for evaluation of how you are moving and not moving. Doing the wrong exercises will injure you and cause big time setbacks to recovery.
You need to start those exercises slowly and in a certain order, going out of order will doom you to problems post op.

Fran
Did you find this post useful?
|
ratter

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 51
Ratter
Posted: 08-28-08 17:14pm

I hear you Fran. I did see the Dr about my hand and he wanted to give me one perscription and 3 types of B12 and I forget the other two B vitamins. The perscription pills were suppose to do something to allow the blood to flow easier or something like that and stop the hand and fingers from cramping up. He said the pain people get when this happens is the blood being cut off causing the intense pain and then when the fingers or hand get stretched, that allows the blood to flow again stopping immediatly the pain. He said it was definatly Arthritis. If he is giving vitamin pills than I figure it couldn't be too bad so I tossed the perscription into the waste basket and its gone now. Dr also said I had to keep taking the perscription pills once started. I am soon to be 55 Sept 3rd and feel to young to take a plateful of pills but might have to soon. My father soon to be 85 says he has had lots of pain in his life (and he definatly has), says if you keep thinking about it, it hurts more, if you ignore it, it will go away. He also says that even if someone has constant pain, that the mind by itself will lessen the pain in time. I think he may mean you get use to it. I said to him how can anyone stop thinking about it when it keeps happening? He thinks it will go away by itself in 6 months to a year that the body has a way to heal itself. He said he doesn't hate Dr's and they are needed, but he definatly does not trust Dr's at all unless its like a broken bone and something obvious. I'm not saying he is totaly correct but he does have some points. Next time I go to Dr I will ask him for another perscription just to be sure. All this crap started after I hit 51. Again will get the Dr perscription again soon and start taking the pills. My HMO insurance pays for it anyway so it don't cost anything, nothing to lose. Hope you are feeling better with your surgery and I think you said you are in previous posts. Your in a lot worse shape than I am, good luck.
PS one other note...not to keep crying about myself, but my job is cleaning gutters on houses and most of the jobs are high 2 story 2.5 story and have various pitched roofs some I can get on and some I cannot and some I take a hell of a chance so I can get done faster than moving the ladder evrery few feet and climbing back up and down again and again. The job pays well but is highly dangerous but in 28 years in business no falls as of yet. I believe this was the cause or a contribution to my Arthritis big time. EVERY Dr I see now tell me I am nuts to continue cleaning gutters and strongly suggest I something else including LSI. Have been getting a couple very slight momentary dizzy spells but they clear right up. I have a big following of customers who count on me and only want me and no one else. But point being the job caused my Arthritis I think or the lifting of heavy ladders etc. Finally done.
Did you find this post useful?
|
littleonefb

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Location: ,
Thanks: 18
Thanked:0
My comments on the article in the Boston Globe
Posted: 08-28-08 17:38pm

wave Hello again, looks like once I start to post I just don't stop. but I did post early this morning that I wanted to make some comments on the article that I posted and linked to that was on the front page of the Boston Globe on July 30, 2008.

So here they are.

First of all, to be fair, there will always be mistakes made with all kinds of surgery. It's the "nature of the beast" as we are all human and that includes surgeons of all kinds. Human beings make mistakes and there really is no way around that.

On the other hand, everything possible needs to be done to try and prevent as many surgical mistakes as possible, no matter what kind of surgery is being done.
Excuses are not good enough, nor are they acceptable.

What is acceptable, is doing everything humanly possible to prevent as many surgical errors as humanly possible.

Every type of surgical procedure has its own set of risks and difficulties, so that in my opinion, there needs to be many areas to deal with in preventing surgical errors and each of them need to be tailored to the specific type of surgery as well as surgery in general.

When it comes to spinal surgery, like any other surgery, it has it's own unique set of problems and they need to be dealt with.
Working on bones that encase the nerves of the spinal cord is very complicated and those bones, as stated in the article, are only about an inch in size. Some may be a little larger and if you are unique in height as Marie and I are, under 5 feet or a child, then you are and can be dealing with vertebrae that are even smaller than that.

It is also true that various problems in the spine including osteoperosis can make even a simple xray more difficult to read as well as an MRI and visualizing the vertebrae when the spine is seen with an open incision in the OR.

Having said that, I don't believe that any of that is an excuse for a doctor to make an error in what vertebrae are or are not fused or anything else that is done on the vertebrae.
That is what I believe the New England Baptist Hospital was trying to use and say as the reason for their high botched error in spine surgeries and to me, personally, it is not an excuse.

On the other hand, I can understand how confusion and errors happen with complicated spines and spines that do not present as the typical normal. I have one of those myself.

Yup, I got one of those so called "complicated spines" that can have the vertebrae counted differently depending on who the radiologist is that reads the x-ray, CT or MRI or all 3.

I'm just lucky enough to have a spine surgeon that doesn't go with just the radiologist's reading, but rather actually reads the MRI himself. Most times he does agree with the radiologist and with 3 MRI's I had he agreed, but the last one I had prior to my last surgery, he did not agree. The radiologist didn't count the vertebrae the same way as the prior ones had done.
He immediately contacted the radiologist and they went over the MRI report again and the radiologist then agreed with my spine surgeon that he just counted differently and it was impossible for my L4/L5 vertebrae to be the problem.

To be specific, my S1 is fused to my sacrum. I was born that way and so are many people. It doesn't create any problem for anyone unless you are counting the vertebrae. If the radiologist starts to count in one way, he uses that fusion as the S1 as he should and then counts up and everything is in the right numbered order. If the radiologist ignores that fused area, then the L4/L5 is counted as S1 and the numbers are all off in the count.
That is what the last radiologist did with the last MRI I had done.
So his interpretation had my L3/L4 counted as L4/L5 and that is where all the problem was in my spine this time.

Now, in reality, my spine surgeon couldn't make the mistake of doing the wrong vertebrae for this reason. He already knew that he had done a laminotomy on one side of the L4/L5 vertebrae 2 years ago and it would be impossible to do a bilateral one on the same vertebrae and it was quite clear that it was the vertebrae above that he was going to work on.
That made the surgery easy, but this radiologist would be available for consultation in the OR if needed and he needed to make sure that they where counting things the same way.

BUT,, and here's where it get's sticky. The MRI report had already gone into the insurance company as L4/L5 and if either the doctor sent in to approve the surgery with L3/L4, it would have been denied and he would have to go through that stupid appeals process and it would delay my surgery by about 6 weeks.
I was getting worse by the day and he didn't want to do that. They had approved the surgery, so he went with the approval and knew what he was going to do in the OR. He also knew that when the bills went in for the surgery, he would be delayed in getting paid till the info was straightened out.
He just got paid this week, for surgery done on June 27th, because the numbering had to be straightened out on his end with the insurance company.

Now there is an example of complicated spines, in my case not a real serious one, but if I had not had surgery before, I could have ended up with surgery on the wrong level. Rolling Eyes

There are far worse spine complications to deal with and that means that there needs to be a real serious effort around the world to be very careful how vertebrae are counted. There should be an automatic standard and a check for a simple fused like I have and I'm told about 30-40% of the population have. That's a lot of people that have the same thing.

Everything should be all figured out as carefully as possible long before the patient is in the OR, not after the fact as it appears to have been done at the Baptist and I would assume, many other hospitals as well.

There should be state of the art x-ray machines in the OR set up for spine surgeries and they should be ones that are digital so that they are the clearest possible, not the old film versions.
And there should be radiologist available at all times for an immediate consultation during that surgery and before any work is done on any vertebrae.

That just astounds me, that a hospital that specializes in spine surgery didn't have that until after the fact.

Once the patient's spine is opened up, xrays should be taken to be sure that things match what the ones did that went into the OR with the doctor.
Yes they do go into the OR with the doctor, all the MRI, CT and any x-rays that where taken prior to the surgery and they are all lined up for the doctor to see before surgery actually starts and during the surgery as well as well as all the ones that are and should be taken during the surgery and before the incision is closed.

How do I know this? Because of what I saw with my own eyes before both of my spine surgeries.

In the OR, before the "lights out time", my surgeon was in the OR looking at all the films of my spine and there was a weird looking machine in the OR and someone I hadn't met yet.
Being the "queen of nosey" as my kids call me to this day, I asked the doctor what he was doing, what the machine was, and who was this new person and hadn't met yet doing in the OR with us.

My surgeon just said to the effect of, "I keep telling you I'm not perfect, but I try to be as close to perfect as I can be. I'm doing a last minute review of that nasty looking vertebrae I've got to fix. I have this thing about liking to be sure I'm dicing up the right vertebrae. that's an x-ray machine, one of those new digital ones, and this is Dr. ##. He's going to help me be sure I don't screw up, so if I do, it's all his fault not mine, and here's your favorite xray tech from the office. She's going to make you glow in the dark while she takes x-rays of that nasty vertebrae and spine of yours before I dice, during the dicing and after, and the doc and I are going to make sure I'm doing the right one. Now, can you please SHUT UP long enough for me to look at these pics please. Hey Joe, turn on the switch and shut up Mrs. nosey."

next thing I knew I was waking up in the recovery room and crying because all my pain was gone and I couldn't believe it.

That's the perfect set up to do everything humanly possible to not make a mistake in surgery. It won't guarantee it won't happen, but it sure will make it far more difficult. And by the way, this was not going on in a major Boston hospital or any huge well known big hospital, but rather in a small community hospital.
So obviously it can be done anywhere and should be.

Personally, I have to say that I never thought about the wrong vertebrae being operated on, fused or anything, until my first surgery and my doctor told me what he did in the OR.
but I sure didn't expect to read about it at one of the leading spine surgery hospitals in the country, let alone in my back yard.

As for Lahey Clinic, well their refusal to talk to reporters or anything doesn't surprise me. I wouldn't take my cat to Lahey Clinic for any orthopedic surgery or treatment before I read this article and I do consider spinal surgery as both orthopedic and neurosurgical.

An interesting side note to Lahey clinic and New England Baptist Hospital.
In terms of the top to hospitals with the most botched spinal surgeries.
All of the spinal surgeons at New England Baptist are orthopedic spinal surgeons. All of the spine surgeons and Lahey Clinic are neurosurgeons.
So we can't say that one kind is better than the other.
It still comes down to the skills of the surgeons and the hospitals that they do their surgeries in.

OK, I've talked enough here, time for someone else to speak up.

Fran
Did you find this post useful?
|
djohn

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 11
Spinal Surgery
Posted: 08-28-08 21:11pm

Fran,

Thanks for the great information and details from your experiences. Spinal surgery is quite an adventure! I think one of my biggest fears is coming out of the surgery worse off than what I am now. I don't really have any muscle restriction, but the nerve pain down the left leg can get pretty bad at times. I find that the nerve pain seems to be pretty draining on the entire body in terms of energy levels. Sometimes the day after I work out at the gym, my body feels like I've been run over by a truck!

I'm a big golfer and I can get through a round okay with some motrin, so my fear is coming out of surgery and never being able to play again!

But with the epidurals not working effectively any longer, I think the surgery is the best option I have. Just need to find the right surgeon.

Thanks for the referral with your surgeon. I'll schedule a consultation and keep everyone posted on how things go.
Did you find this post useful?
|
littleonefb

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Location: ,
Thanks: 18
Thanked:0

Posted: 08-29-08 00:24am

John, with my first surgery, I didn't think I had any muscle restriction either. Post op I felt pretty good and when I finally was able to start PT, 3 weeks post op I thought it was kind of a waste of my time and money, but, if the doctor said I needed to go, fine, he knew more than me.

Oh did I get a shock, when I went in for my PT evaluation. Everything seemed fine until the PT asked me to stand on my right leg only. That was the side that was affected. Oops, I almost fell over. Then I was asked to stand on my left leg and moe my right leg out to the side. Oops, leg didn't go very far and it felt like lead, dead weight and I was just bowled over with shock.

That's called muscle weakness and if it is not worked on post op, you will stay that way for ever. Last time I ever thought I didn't need PT when the doctor said I did, and the last time I ever questioned how great I felt.

My biggest fear was the post op and what would go wrong too, John. On the other hand, I couldn't go on the way I was either and I wanted my life back. My choices where living in hell with the pain or trying to get my life back to at least some level of normal.

I was a sudden onset of symptoms the beginning of Feb. 2006 and by June I could barely move. The ESI didn't help me at all and I had so little ability to move my right leg because of the pain, that PT wouldn't help either.

In the scheme of spinal surgeries, laminotomies are on the low level of severity and complications, but that is not to say that it isn't major spinal surgery and there are risks involved.

But in the end, I made the decision to get this over with and get moving on to the next chapter of my life without the pain or as little of it as possible. I decided to refuse to think about the negatives that could happen and only think about the positive.

Before I was wheeled into the the OR itself from the pre-OR room, I told my spine surgeon "to hurry up and get the show on the road, time's a wasting and I've got a lot of living to do without pain." He looked at me like I was nuts and said "you heard the lady, lets get a move on it, NOW."

Fran
Did you find this post useful?
|
valrossie

New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 29 Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Back Pain
Posted: 08-29-08 05:55am

Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder causing back pain in the lumbar vertebrae. It can be either acute, subacute or chronic in its clinical presentation. Typically, the symptoms of low back pain do show significant improvement within two to three months from its onset.
-------------------------
Did you find this post useful?
|
littleonefb

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 394
Location: ,
Thanks: 18
Thanked:0

Posted: 08-29-08 08:33am

Valrossie,

I'm not sure what the purpose of your post is, but those of us who are and have posted on this thread are not suffering from a simple strained back that would be caused from simple over use or poor body mechanics. Nor will we show any kind of significant improvement within a short period of time.

If you had bothered to read any of the many, many posts over the 63 pages of this thread, you would have seen and read that we have been diagnosed with serious spinal disorders that require serious, big time medical and/or surgical treatment.

Posting what you did was an waste of our time to read, and is extremely misleading information.

I would advise anyone reading your post to fully ignore it and seek immediate medical attention for any kind of low back pain and not ignore it and wait a period of 1-3 months to see if it improves.
Delaying seeking medical attention and waiting can cause serious complications to spinal issues that should be addressed when they occur.

Fran
Did you find this post useful?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums