Well, I don't really know where I am. I was just trying to point out that anything is possible, and if it is possible for a leader of one country, then why isn't is a possibility for the corruption of another leader?
Now, with that being said, I don't necessarily believe that our gov't had as much involvement as has been said to date. (now that I think about this, I probably should have posted this in the other thread) I still believe that the gov't knew that there was something going to happen, but that they didn't know WHEN it was going to happen. They in a sense "let" it happen.
I watched the video farenheight 911. And as much as I hate Michael Moore, he did have some good points...things that make you go hmmm....
I still don't believe that they participated, but like I said before, that they "let" it happen and didn't do enough to stop it.
I feel that either way you look at it, there isn't enough evidence to convince everyone in either direction.
So yeah I think I am still kinda on the fence about that topic.