There's really nothing to debate here. Every woman should research the opptions and make the best decision for her well-being and the baby's well being.
That being said, having done the research I am absolutely certain that a homebirth will be best for me and definitely be best for my future baby's well-being - assuming that I have a low-risk pregnancy. I have no health conditions that would make a pregnancy high-risk so in all likelihood I will get homebirths. Husband is 100% supportive of homebirth, especially after talking with a (male) co-worker who told him how wonderful their homebirths (plural) were.
I am not pregnant, not trying and not ready to start trying.... so this is all hypothetical/done the research/here's what I think.
Homebirth is just not possible for some - for example my friend with a heart condition who had a pacemaker installed at age 25. A heart-specialist guy (cardiac doctor/specialist/whatever) will need to be present for a scheduled c-section delivery if she has a baby someday. A less-than-ideal birthing situation, but that is the safest option for her and the baby.
Waterbirth is great for some but some women prefer dry land. I plan to have it available, and expect to use it but I would follow my instincts when I'm in the moments and just go with it. Waterbirth has excellent benefits - it makes tearing much less likely (dontcha love that idea????) for example.
Edited to add: Midwifery is a regulated profession here, and all midwifery services are fully-covered by our public/"free" health plan. This includes midwife-assisted births in hospitals or at home. Thus, a midwife-assisted homebirth is a much more feasible option here than in some states where midwifery is not regulated (i.e. midwives' services can be considered illegal) or if a person's insurance coverage will not pay for homebirths (or midwifery services).