Abortion Debate Forum - To Prolifers: If you got your way and PP vanished...
Medical questions     Health forums     MarketPlace     log in    

To Prolifers: If you got your way and PP vanished...

New Topic  Reply  Ask A Doctor - Offline
Medical Questions-> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> To Prolifers: If you got your way and PP vanished...
Medical Questions
Author Message
Darkmoon

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 414
Location: ,
Thanks: 87
Thanked:51
To Prolifers: If you got your way and PP vanished...
Posted: 04-27-08 23:08pm

...would you foot the bill for the women that needed those clinics to get essential checkups, prenatal care and mammograms? If you were to succeed in closing down the clinics that save female lives every day by providing services that they otherwise would not be able to get due to cost, will YOU be paying for their pap tests, mammograms, cervical examinations and prenatal care? Because believe it or not, there is more to a woman than popping out babies and every woman regardless of reproductive status needs checkups each year.

I know a lot of prolifers hide behind the "save the babies" smokescreen to disguise what's truly just a hatred or disdain for the female gender, otherwise they wouldn't try so hard to restrict women from getting protection from cervical cancer and they wouldn't be against women preventing pregnancy in the first place. Others claim to be for pregnancy and cancer prevention, so I'm curious if they'd be willing to take Planned Parenthood's place and provide affordable feminine care and std treatment for women everywhere.

If you are not willing to do this out of your own pockets than you are admitting that your goal is to harm women, not to save "babies". You're willing to martyr thousands of women to feminine cancers and disorders so that you can close down the clinics that help them because of ONE service they may or may not provide. Should you succeed, someone is still going to have to provide these other essential and life saving services to women. Something tells me it won't be you. Mad
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4038
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 142
Thanked:13

Posted: 04-28-08 10:17am

No. They wouldn't.

Prolife advocates generally (yes, I am generalizing) hold conservative ideals. These same individuals at the polls vote against taxes that would help the disenfranchised because they worship the almighty dollar in reality, and in a facade they claim "Love them both".
|
jujujellybean

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Location: , US
Thanks: 0
Thanked:4

Posted: 04-28-08 16:59pm

*clears throat*

what is it with choicers and making accusations with NO BASIS? Every year, churches around the city in my state have Christmas trees with things women need and their babies need. People take a tag and bring in the item. they go to pregnancy centers. we have also donated to places where they DO pay for women to have free pregnancy tests and screenings and all that jazz. i think many pregnancy centers do that. when we donate in pro life month, that's what the money goes to.
|
Reptar

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13

Posted: 04-28-08 17:01pm

Whoa, you have a whole MONTH to help the women who have children born 365 days a year. Way to go! How much have you donated?
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4038
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 142
Thanked:13

Posted: 04-28-08 17:07pm

jujujellybean wrote:
*clears throat*

what is it with choicers and making accusations with NO BASIS? Every year, churches around the city in my state have Christmas trees with things women need and their babies need. People take a tag and bring in the item. they go to pregnancy centers. we have also donated to places where they DO pay for women to have free pregnancy tests and screenings and all that jazz. i think many pregnancy centers do that. when we donate in pro life month, that's what the money goes to.


No basis? Really? You contend that Christians aren't conservative, and conservatives don't vote down taxes that would help the disenfranchised? Are you familiar with the political system you live in?
|
cmyked

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 294
Thanks: 50
Thanked:4

Posted: 04-28-08 17:08pm

Reptar wrote:
Whoa, you have a whole MONTH to help the women who have children born 365 days a year. Way to go! How much have you donated?


So, you help women with their children every day of the year then?
|
Reptar

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13

Posted: 04-28-08 17:09pm

Nope, but I'm not telling every women I see to go up and have all the children she accidentally conceives.

Actually, since I'm all for women choosing not to have children if they're not ready/capable, I don't see how that even applies. If pro-lifers got their way, we'd not only be suffering from over-population, we'd also be suffering from millions of women without adequate means to support another life. We'd like to know where we're supposed to get these means. Cause you know, sure, I'd have a kid if someone gave me the hundreds of thousands of dollars they cost.
|
cmyked

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 294
Thanks: 50
Thanked:4

Posted: 04-28-08 17:20pm

Lol. I don't know your stance on welfare, but to some people, it does seem as if they take that route.

I just think it's pointless to accuse people of "not helping" when we all know that to completely help is impossible. I can't adopt all of the puppies at the pound no matter how much I want to; however I can adopt one, and refuse to buy purebreds. Just the same, a pro-lifer can't possibly help every single mother in her city; but she can donate during a season of giving.
|
Reptar

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13

Posted: 04-28-08 17:33pm

You do not want to hear about my stance of welfare Razz

I lived in a very dirty neighborhood filled with teenager mothers who had as many children as possible so as to obtain as much welfare as possible. By accusing her, I didn't mean her specifically (even though I'm fairly sure she's not done anything) but reinforcing what Darkmoon said. If every pregnant woman was forced to gestate, we'd have innumerable problems on our hand. They'd have innumerable debts to pay and with the current chance a pregnant teen has already, we'd be in a situation where it'd be impossible to deal with the problems. A pro-choicer not only understands this but understands that abortion is cheaper and hopefully the smarter route for someone who has no chance of taking care of another life. But supporting a womens choice for abortion, we're not causing any extra cost. However, by forcing a woman to give birth, we're forcing her to deal with many additional costs, not just the one time abortion fee.
|
Darkmoon

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 414
Location: ,
Thanks: 87
Thanked:51

Posted: 04-28-08 23:08pm

Not just pregnant women. Pay attention, prolifers. WHAT WILL YOU TO DO ENSURE THAT ALL WOMEN GET THE HEALTHCARE THAT YOU'VE DENIED THEM BY TAKING DOWN PP? How hard is that question to comprehend?

Again, you're ONLY focusing on the fetus and ignoring the WOMAN. Women- regardless of whether they are prenatal, pregnant or postnatal-require feminine health care and checkups to prevent cancer and severe health disorders. Planned parenthood PROVIDES those services to women that cannot afford to get them anywhere else (oh but they're so greedy, aren't they? Heaven forbid anyone provide cheap or free service to any woman for reasons other than pregnancy, right?)

How many of you are going to pay for every poor woman's yearly pelvic exams, ultrasounds (believe it or not this is not just used to look at growing fetuses, it's also used to detect ovarian cysts and scar tissue caused by endometriosis), vaccinations against HPV, birth control (yes, birth control is used for health reasons as well as pregnancy prevention, suck it up), mammograms, STD treatments, prenatal and postnatal care?

So many prolifers insist on ignoring the huge list of other services that PP provides for women and they never show even an ounce of concern for female health. Every time they open their mouths and keep going on and on about breeding and having babies I get the impression that we're little more than cattle to them.

If you wipe out these clinics because of one service they may or may not provide simply because you're arrogance has convinced you YOUR way is the ONLY way, thousands of women will have nowhere to go for BASIC FEMALE HEALTH CARE.

Enough with this "It's not my problem or my business unless I disagree with it" baloney. If you want to take our health care away from us you might as well just come clean and admit that you're seething with disdain for the female gender (and/or yourself if you're a woman suffering from Stockholm syndrome).
|
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4038
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 142
Thanked:13

Posted: 04-29-08 13:13pm

I know I used PP for exams, education, & birth control when I was a poor, young student. I would have been unable to obtain this care if PP had not been available.

*Moo*
|
Darkmoon

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 414
Location: ,
Thanks: 87
Thanked:51

Posted: 04-29-08 14:07pm

Ditto, Birch. There was a time when I didn't have the means to go to a gyno and I was having pelvic pains and needed to be checked out. I'll never forget that misogynist jerk that grabbed my arm and told me I was "sinning" on my way in.

My response was: "I'm sinning by making sure I don't have ovarian cancer?" Then I yanked my arm out of his grasp and spit at his feet. I hate these pigs and their efforts to endanger women. I hope I never have to go back to PP again...I should not have to suffer harassment for taking care of my body...but finances may not always allow for private care and the luxury of not having one's right to healthy plumbing and breasts questioned by raving sexists.
|
Cambion

Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 747
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0

Posted: 04-29-08 16:22pm

Of course they wouldn't, just like how none of them are interested in adopting the unwanted babies they "saved" or helping to fund the schools to educate those kids they "saved". Because, as we all well know, pro-lifers only care about fetuses and not women. And even then, it isn't about care entirely - it's about being able to control someone else's body and life through the manipulation of taboo issues.

I'm sure that just like the pro-liars who claim that women who get pregnant with unwanted babies should be punished by giving birth also believe that women should just deal with female cancers too becauses their God says it is a woman's purpose in life to suffer for Eve's sins. They do not care an ounce for women because they view women as objects and not humans. And, of course, if a woman dies from breast cancer or ovarian cancer, chances are, a ro-lifer will tell you that it was the woman's fault and that she must have sinned in her life, thus leading their God to punish her by making her ill.

No basis indeed - look at any of the posts made my pro-lifers on this forum and you will have basis coming out your ears.
|
jujujellybean

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Location: , US
Thanks: 0
Thanked:4

Posted: 04-29-08 20:54pm

Cambion wrote:
Of course they wouldn't, just like how none of them are interested in adopting the unwanted babies they "saved" or helping to fund the schools to educate those kids they "saved". Because, as we all well know, pro-lifers only care about fetuses and not women. And even then, it isn't about care entirely - it's about being able to control someone else's body and life through the manipulation of taboo issues.

I'm sure that just like the pro-liars who claim that women who get pregnant with unwanted babies should be punished by giving birth also believe that women should just deal with female cancers too becauses their God says it is a woman's purpose in life to suffer for Eve's sins. They do not care an ounce for women because they view women as objects and not humans. And, of course, if a woman dies from breast cancer or ovarian cancer, chances are, a ro-lifer will tell you that it was the woman's fault and that she must have sinned in her life, thus leading their God to punish her by making her ill.

No basis indeed - look at any of the posts made my pro-lifers on this forum and you will have basis coming out your ears.


OMG get a grip person! Seriously, this is really maddening. DO YOU THINK THAT WE CAN ADOPT EVERY BABY THAT WOULD BE ABORTED? If you hate euthanasia of animals, would you adopt every animal in the shelters? what is the deal? Can't I want the holocaust to stop without being able to support 3000+ babies a day?
And what the heck are you talking about when you say a pro lifer would want a woman to die? That's freaky! that's like saying we shouldnt' try to save anyone. Weird. I don't know if you are making this up or what but I suggest you stop because all this is wrong wrong wrong and you aren't getting anywhere but making yourself look bad.
Punished by giving birth eh? lets see...they have intercourse, they decide what they are doing with their body. The fetus's body happens to have a completely different genetic make up and is completely different than that of the mom's. It isn't her body. It may be dependant on her for survival, but as it isn't her body she doesn't have the right to kill it.
|
jujujellybean

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Location: , US
Thanks: 0
Thanked:4

Posted: 04-29-08 20:56pm

Reptar wrote:
Whoa, you have a whole MONTH to help the women who have children born 365 days a year. Way to go! How much have you donated?


Look. The pro life movement is so big, there are people donating to stuff like this ALL THE TIME. Do you think that I could spend every second donating and doing that? Where would I get the money to donate in the first place? That is SOOOO illogical. I am doing all my station allows right now, so NO ONE can ask me to do more because it wouldn't be possible.
|
jujujellybean

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Location: , US
Thanks: 0
Thanked:4

Posted: 04-29-08 20:58pm

Birch wrote:
jujujellybean wrote:
*clears throat*

what is it with choicers and making accusations with NO BASIS? Every year, churches around the city in my state have Christmas trees with things women need and their babies need. People take a tag and bring in the item. they go to pregnancy centers. we have also donated to places where they DO pay for women to have free pregnancy tests and screenings and all that jazz. i think many pregnancy centers do that. when we donate in pro life month, that's what the money goes to.


No basis? Really? You contend that Christians aren't conservative, and conservatives don't vote down taxes that would help the disenfranchised? Are you familiar with the political system you live in?


I am NOT going to get into that now because I DON'T know enough about it to properly argue. That doesn't mean that I don't do anything, though, because seriously, I am doing what I can.
|
Reptar

Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13

Posted: 04-29-08 21:27pm

jujujellybean wrote:
Reptar wrote:
Whoa, you have a whole MONTH to help the women who have children born 365 days a year. Way to go! How much have you donated?


Look. The pro life movement is so big, there are people donating to stuff like this ALL THE TIME. Do you think that I could spend every second donating and doing that? Where would I get the money to donate in the first place? That is SOOOO illogical. I am doing all my station allows right now, so NO ONE can ask me to do more because it wouldn't be possible.


Where would I get the money TO GIVE BIRTH? Where would I get the money for pre-natals and for doctors appointments. Do you have any idea how much just being pregnant costs?! Oh right, now you'll tell me to give my baby up for adoption even though you JUST ADMITTED there is no way we have enough people to adopt all the babies we'd "save" if there wasn't any abortion. So what, my child would rot in the adoption system and so would all the others, and of course, taxes would raise so much because we'd have hundreds of thousands of babies just living in foster care. Do you have any idea of how much money it would cost to take care of those babies. No, you actually have none. Just like you have no concept of what money is, how hard it is to earn it, and how financially damaging a baby is.
|
Users who thank Reptar for this post: aochriss 
Birch

Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 4038
Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 142
Thanked:13

Posted: 04-30-08 08:57am

jujujellybean wrote:

I am NOT going to get into that now because I DON'T know enough about it to properly argue.


Confused Yet you feel perfectly comfy making personal medical decisions for women you don't know?

jujujellybean wrote:
The fetus's body happens to have a completely different genetic make up and is completely different than that of the mom's. It isn't her body. It may be dependant on her for survival, but as it isn't her body she doesn't have the right to kill it.


Incidentally, she does have right to kill it. It was a SCOTUS decision. Very
Happy
|
oopoopoop

Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 1359
Location: ,
Thanks: 58
Thanked:3

Posted: 04-30-08 09:47am

jujujellybean wrote:

OMG get a grip person! Seriously, this is really maddening. DO YOU THINK THAT WE CAN ADOPT EVERY BABY THAT WOULD BE ABORTED? If you hate euthanasia of animals, would you adopt every animal in the shelters? what is the deal? Can't I want the holocaust to stop without being able to support 3000+ babies a day?


I don't understand -- what, then, do you propose happens to all these unwanted sproggen after they are born? Because banning abortion isn't going to mean that unplanned pregnancies stop. Do you propose to build vast orphanages? And I wonder who is going to look after all the disabled people, and the ones with serious congenital abnormalities? Because they don't stop needing to be looked after, ever.

If you seriously want to ban abortions, then you seriously need to come up with a plan for what to do with the fallout of that.
|
meblonde01

Supporter
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 2131
Location: ,
Thanks: 6
Thanked:2

Posted: 04-30-08 10:15am

what do pro-choice people to?
|
Related Topics
This Forum This Category All Forums
Jump to:  
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
New Topic   Reply
Medical Questions -> Health Forums -> Abortion Debate -> To Prolifers: If you got your way and PP vanished...



Page 1 of 6
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.