To Prolifers: If you got your way and PP vanished... Posted: 04-27-08 23:08pm
...would you foot the bill for the women
that needed those clinics to get essential
checkups, prenatal care and mammograms?
If you were to succeed in closing down the
clinics that save female lives every day
by providing services that they otherwise
would not be able to get due to cost, will
YOU be paying for their pap tests,
mammograms, cervical examinations and
prenatal care? Because believe it or not,
there is more to a woman than popping out
babies and every woman regardless of
reproductive status needs checkups each
year.
I know a lot of prolifers hide behind the
"save the babies" smokescreen to disguise
what's truly just a hatred or disdain for
the female gender, otherwise they wouldn't
try so hard to restrict women from getting
protection from cervical cancer and they
wouldn't be against women preventing
pregnancy in the first place. Others
claim to be for pregnancy and cancer
prevention, so I'm curious if they'd be
willing to take Planned Parenthood's place
and provide affordable feminine care and
std treatment for women everywhere.
If you are not willing to do this out of
your own pockets than you are admitting
that your goal is to harm women, not to
save "babies". You're willing to martyr
thousands of women to feminine cancers and
disorders so that you can close down the
clinics that help them because of ONE
service they may or may not provide.
Should you succeed, someone is still going
to have to provide these other essential
and life saving services to women.
Something tells me it won't be you.
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 142
Thanked:13
Posted: 04-28-08 10:17am
No. They wouldn't.
Prolife advocates generally (yes, I am
generalizing) hold conservative ideals.
These same individuals at the polls vote
against taxes that would help the
disenfranchised because they worship the
almighty dollar in reality, and in a
facade they claim "Love them both".
|
jujujellybean
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Apr 2008 Posts: 133 Location: , US
Thanks: 0
Thanked:4
Posted: 04-28-08 16:59pm
*clears throat*
what is it with choicers and making
accusations with NO BASIS? Every year,
churches around the city in my state have
Christmas trees with things women need and
their babies need. People take a tag and
bring in the item. they go to pregnancy
centers. we have also donated to places
where they DO pay for women to have free
pregnancy tests and screenings and all
that jazz. i think many pregnancy centers
do that. when we donate in pro life month,
that's what the money goes to.
|
Reptar
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13
Posted: 04-28-08 17:01pm
Whoa, you have a whole MONTH to help the
women who have children born 365 days a
year. Way to go! How much have you
donated?
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 142
Thanked:13
Posted: 04-28-08 17:07pm
jujujellybean
wrote:
*clears throat*
what is it with choicers and making
accusations with NO BASIS? Every year,
churches around the city in my state have
Christmas trees with things women need and
their babies need. People take a tag and
bring in the item. they go to pregnancy
centers. we have also donated to places
where they DO pay for women to have free
pregnancy tests and screenings and all
that jazz. i think many pregnancy centers
do that. when we donate in pro life month,
that's what the money goes
to.
No basis? Really? You contend that
Christians aren't conservative, and
conservatives don't vote down taxes that
would help the disenfranchised? Are you
familiar with the political system you
live in?
|
cmyked
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 294
Thanks: 50
Thanked:4
Posted: 04-28-08 17:08pm
Reptar
wrote:
Whoa, you have a whole MONTH
to help the women who have children born
365 days a year. Way to go! How much have
you donated?
So, you help women with their children
every day of the year then?
|
Reptar
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13
Posted: 04-28-08 17:09pm
Nope, but I'm not telling every women I
see to go up and have all the children she
accidentally conceives.
Actually, since I'm all for women choosing
not to have children if they're not
ready/capable, I don't see how that even
applies. If pro-lifers got their way, we'd
not only be suffering from
over-population, we'd also be suffering
from millions of women without adequate
means to support another life. We'd like
to know where we're supposed to get these
means. Cause you know, sure, I'd have a
kid if someone gave me the hundreds of
thousands of dollars they cost.
|
cmyked
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 294
Thanks: 50
Thanked:4
Posted: 04-28-08 17:20pm
Lol. I don't know your stance on welfare,
but to some people, it does seem as if
they take that route.
I just think it's pointless to accuse
people of "not helping" when we all know
that to completely help is impossible. I
can't adopt all of the puppies at the
pound no matter how much I want to;
however I can adopt one, and refuse to buy
purebreds. Just the same, a pro-lifer
can't possibly help every single mother in
her city; but she can donate during a
season of giving.
|
Reptar
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13
Posted: 04-28-08 17:33pm
You do not want to hear about my stance of
welfare
I lived in a very dirty neighborhood
filled with teenager mothers who had as
many children as possible so as to obtain
as much welfare as possible. By accusing
her, I didn't mean her specifically (even
though I'm fairly sure she's not done
anything) but reinforcing what Darkmoon
said. If every pregnant woman was forced
to gestate, we'd have innumerable problems
on our hand. They'd have innumerable debts
to pay and with the current chance a
pregnant teen has already, we'd be in a
situation where it'd be impossible to deal
with the problems. A pro-choicer not only
understands this but understands that
abortion is cheaper and hopefully the
smarter route for someone who has no
chance of taking care of another life. But
supporting a womens choice for abortion,
we're not causing any extra cost. However,
by forcing a woman to give birth, we're
forcing her to deal with many additional
costs, not just the one time abortion fee.
|
Darkmoon
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007 Posts: 414 Location: ,
Thanks: 87
Thanked:51
Posted: 04-28-08 23:08pm
Not just pregnant women. Pay attention,
prolifers. WHAT WILL YOU TO DO ENSURE
THAT ALL WOMEN GET THE HEALTHCARE THAT
YOU'VE DENIED THEM BY TAKING DOWN PP? How
hard is that question to comprehend?
Again, you're ONLY focusing on the fetus
and ignoring the WOMAN. Women- regardless
of whether they are prenatal, pregnant or
postnatal-require feminine health care and
checkups to prevent cancer and severe
health disorders. Planned parenthood
PROVIDES those services to women that
cannot afford to get them anywhere else
(oh but they're so greedy, aren't they?
Heaven forbid anyone provide cheap or free
service to any woman for reasons other
than pregnancy, right?)
How many of you are going to pay for every
poor woman's yearly pelvic exams,
ultrasounds (believe it or not this is not
just used to look at growing fetuses, it's
also used to detect ovarian cysts and scar
tissue caused by endometriosis),
vaccinations against HPV, birth control
(yes, birth control is used for health
reasons as well as pregnancy prevention,
suck it up), mammograms, STD treatments,
prenatal and postnatal care?
So many prolifers insist on ignoring the
huge list of other services that PP
provides for women and they never show
even an ounce of concern for female
health. Every time they open their mouths
and keep going on and on about breeding
and having babies I get the impression
that we're little more than cattle to
them.
If you wipe out these clinics because of
one service they may or may not provide
simply because you're arrogance has
convinced you YOUR way is the ONLY way,
thousands of women will have nowhere to go
for BASIC FEMALE HEALTH CARE.
Enough with this "It's not my problem or
my business unless I disagree with it"
baloney. If you want to take our health
care away from us you might as well just
come clean and admit that you're seething
with disdain for the female gender (and/or
yourself if you're a woman suffering from
Stockholm syndrome).
|
Birch
Supporter
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 142
Thanked:13
Posted: 04-29-08 13:13pm
I know I used PP for exams, education,
& birth control when I was a poor,
young student. I would have been unable
to obtain this care if PP had not been
available.
*Moo*
|
Darkmoon
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Dec 2007 Posts: 414 Location: ,
Thanks: 87
Thanked:51
Posted: 04-29-08 14:07pm
Ditto, Birch. There was a time when I
didn't have the means to go to a gyno and
I was having pelvic pains and needed to be
checked out. I'll never forget that
misogynist jerk that grabbed my arm and
told me I was "sinning" on my way in.
My response was: "I'm sinning by making
sure I don't have ovarian cancer?" Then I
yanked my arm out of his grasp and spit at
his feet. I hate these pigs and their
efforts to endanger women. I hope I never
have to go back to PP again...I should not
have to suffer harassment for taking care
of my body...but finances may not always
allow for private care and the luxury of
not having one's right to healthy plumbing
and breasts questioned by raving sexists.
|
Cambion
Active User, Really EHEALTHy
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 747
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
Posted: 04-29-08 16:22pm
Of course they wouldn't, just like how
none of them are interested in adopting
the unwanted babies they "saved" or
helping to fund the schools to educate
those kids they "saved". Because, as we
all well know, pro-lifers only care about
fetuses and not women. And even then, it
isn't about care entirely - it's about
being able to control someone else's body
and life through the manipulation of taboo
issues.
I'm sure that just like the pro-liars who
claim that women who get pregnant with
unwanted babies should be punished by
giving birth also believe that women
should just deal with female cancers too
becauses their God says it is a woman's
purpose in life to suffer for Eve's sins.
They do not care an ounce for women
because they view women as objects and not
humans. And, of course, if a woman dies
from breast cancer or ovarian cancer,
chances are, a ro-lifer will tell you that
it was the woman's fault and that she must
have sinned in her life, thus leading
their God to punish her by making her
ill.
No basis indeed - look at any of the posts
made my pro-lifers on this forum and you
will have basis coming out your ears.
|
jujujellybean
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Apr 2008 Posts: 133 Location: , US
Thanks: 0
Thanked:4
Posted: 04-29-08 20:54pm
Cambion
wrote:
Of course they wouldn't,
just like how none of them are interested
in adopting the unwanted babies they
"saved" or helping to fund the schools to
educate those kids they "saved". Because,
as we all well know, pro-lifers only care
about fetuses and not women. And even
then, it isn't about care entirely - it's
about being able to control someone else's
body and life through the manipulation of
taboo issues.
I'm sure that just like the pro-liars who
claim that women who get pregnant with
unwanted babies should be punished by
giving birth also believe that women
should just deal with female cancers too
becauses their God says it is a woman's
purpose in life to suffer for Eve's sins.
They do not care an ounce for women
because they view women as objects and not
humans. And, of course, if a woman dies
from breast cancer or ovarian cancer,
chances are, a ro-lifer will tell you that
it was the woman's fault and that she must
have sinned in her life, thus leading
their God to punish her by making her
ill.
No basis indeed - look at any of the posts
made my pro-lifers on this forum and you
will have basis coming out your
ears.
OMG get a grip person! Seriously, this is
really maddening. DO YOU THINK THAT WE CAN
ADOPT EVERY BABY THAT WOULD BE ABORTED? If
you hate euthanasia of animals, would you
adopt every animal in the shelters? what
is the deal? Can't I want the holocaust to
stop without being able to support 3000+
babies a day?
And what the heck are you talking about
when you say a pro lifer would want a
woman to die? That's freaky! that's like
saying we shouldnt' try to save anyone.
Weird. I don't know if you are making this
up or what but I suggest you stop because
all this is wrong wrong wrong and you
aren't getting anywhere but making
yourself look bad.
Punished by giving birth eh? lets
see...they have intercourse, they decide
what they are doing with their body. The
fetus's body happens to have a completely
different genetic make up and is
completely different than that of the
mom's. It isn't her body. It may be
dependant on her for survival, but as it
isn't her body she doesn't have the right
to kill it.
|
jujujellybean
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Apr 2008 Posts: 133 Location: , US
Thanks: 0
Thanked:4
Posted: 04-29-08 20:56pm
Reptar
wrote:
Whoa, you have a whole MONTH
to help the women who have children born
365 days a year. Way to go! How much have
you donated?
Look. The pro life movement is so big,
there are people donating to stuff like
this ALL THE TIME. Do you think that I
could spend every second donating and
doing that? Where would I get the money to
donate in the first place? That is SOOOO
illogical. I am doing all my station
allows right now, so NO ONE can ask me to
do more because it wouldn't be possible.
|
jujujellybean
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 15 Apr 2008 Posts: 133 Location: , US
Thanks: 0
Thanked:4
Posted: 04-29-08 20:58pm
Birch
wrote:
jujujellybean
wrote:
*clears throat*
what is it with choicers and making
accusations with NO BASIS? Every year,
churches around the city in my state have
Christmas trees with things women need and
their babies need. People take a tag and
bring in the item. they go to pregnancy
centers. we have also donated to places
where they DO pay for women to have free
pregnancy tests and screenings and all
that jazz. i think many pregnancy centers
do that. when we donate in pro life month,
that's what the money goes
to.
No basis? Really? You contend that
Christians aren't conservative, and
conservatives don't vote down taxes that
would help the disenfranchised? Are you
familiar with the political system you
live in?
I am NOT going to get into that now
because I DON'T know enough about it to
properly argue. That doesn't mean that I
don't do anything, though, because
seriously, I am doing what I can.
|
Reptar
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13
Posted: 04-29-08 21:27pm
jujujellybean
wrote:
Reptar
wrote:
Whoa, you have a whole MONTH
to help the women who have children born
365 days a year. Way to go! How much have
you donated?
Look. The pro life movement is so big,
there are people donating to stuff like
this ALL THE TIME. Do you think that I
could spend every second donating and
doing that? Where would I get the money to
donate in the first place? That is SOOOO
illogical. I am doing all my station
allows right now, so NO ONE can ask me to
do more because it wouldn't be
possible.
Where would I get the money TO GIVE BIRTH?
Where would I get the money for pre-natals
and for doctors appointments. Do you have
any idea how much just being pregnant
costs?! Oh right, now you'll tell me to
give my baby up for adoption even though
you JUST ADMITTED there is no way we have
enough people to adopt all the babies we'd
"save" if there wasn't any abortion. So
what, my child would rot in the adoption
system and so would all the others, and of
course, taxes would raise so much because
we'd have hundreds of thousands of babies
just living in foster care. Do you have
any idea of how much money it would cost
to take care of those babies. No, you
actually have none. Just like you have no
concept of what money is, how hard it is
to earn it, and how financially damaging a
baby is.
I am NOT going to get into that now
because I DON'T know enough about it to
properly argue.
Yet you feel perfectly comfy making
personal medical decisions for women you
don't know?
jujujellybean
wrote:
The fetus's body happens to
have a completely different genetic make
up and is completely different than that
of the mom's. It isn't her body. It may be
dependant on her for survival, but as it
isn't her body she doesn't have the right
to kill it.
Incidentally, she does have right to kill
it. It was a SCOTUS decision.
|
oopoopoop
Extremely EHEALTHy
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 1359 Location: ,
Thanks: 58
Thanked:3
Posted: 04-30-08 09:47am
jujujellybean
wrote:
OMG get a grip person! Seriously, this is
really maddening. DO YOU THINK THAT WE CAN
ADOPT EVERY BABY THAT WOULD BE ABORTED? If
you hate euthanasia of animals, would you
adopt every animal in the shelters? what
is the deal? Can't I want the holocaust to
stop without being able to support 3000+
babies a day?
I don't understand -- what, then, do you
propose happens to all these unwanted
sproggen after they are born? Because
banning abortion isn't going to mean that
unplanned pregnancies stop. Do you propose
to build vast orphanages? And I wonder who
is going to look after all the disabled
people, and the ones with serious
congenital abnormalities? Because they
don't stop needing to be looked after,
ever.
If you seriously want to ban abortions,
then you seriously need to come up with a
plan for what to do with the fallout of
that.