Abortion Debate Forum - South Dakota law takes effect

Debate Forums > Abortion Debate Forum > South Dakota law takes effect

TOPICS DOCTOR QUESTIONS

Q: South Dakota law takes effect

asked by: Birch on July 21st, 2008

Extremely eHealthy

Hey, look what the nutjob right wing conservative prolife advocates pulled off in South Dakota:

Quote:

CHICAGO -- In a victory for antiabortion forces, doctors in South Dakota are now required to tell a woman seeking an abortion that the procedure "will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique living human being."

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit last week lifted a preliminary injunction that prevented the language from taking effect. A spokesman for Planned Parenthood, which runs the state's only abortion clinic, said doctors will begin reciting the script to patients as early as this week.

On another front, South Dakota voters will be asked in a Nov. 4 referendum to consider broad limits on abortion for the second time since 2006. The ballot measure includes exceptions for rape, incest and the woman's health that were not part of the 2006 wording rejected by voters.

Antiabortion forces in South Dakota have been trying for years to halt the procedure and to build a winnable challenge to Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion nationwide.

A law that took effect July 1 requires doctors to ask a woman seeking an abortion if she wants to see a sonogram of the fetus. About 700 abortions are performed in South Dakota each year.

The doctors' script that officially took effect Friday has been tied up in court since 2005, when Planned Parenthood challenged a law that instructed physicians what to tell abortion patients. Under the law, doctors must say that the woman has "an existing relationship" with the fetus that is protected by the U.S. Constitution and that "her existing constitutional rights with regards to that relationship will be terminated." Also, the doctor is required to say that "abortion increases the risk of suicide ideation and suicide."

The message must be delivered no earlier than two hours before the procedure. The woman must say in writing that she understands.

"The law is one more terrible, terrible barrier," said Sarah Stoesz, president of the regional Planned Parenthood office. She described the rules as "unprecedented interference in the doctor-patient relationship and unprecedented interference in a woman's life."

Stoesz also called the impetus for the law "ideological" and "non-science-based."

Mailee Smith, staff counsel at Chicago-based Americans United for Life, praised the regulations. "We do think it's a good law, because it does provide a woman with the broadest spectrum of information," she said.

While 32 states have informed consent regulations, Smith said, South Dakota alone includes the reference to a fetus as "a whole, separate, unique living human being."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte nt/article/2008/07/19/AR2008071901586.html ?hpid=moreheadlines

If they are so bloody interested in the "broadest spectrum of information" I think they should include facts about pregnancy such as a half a million women die annually from pregnancy related issues, links between carrying an unwanted pregnancy and domestic violence, abuse, mental health issues, physical health issues, and oh yeah, a section on prolife dishonest propaganda, the reasons behind establishing this law, what theocracy means, self esteem, autonomy, intelligence, respect, and the patient-doctor relationship.

Users who thank Birch for this post: Jincks013

Replies(2)

aochriss

replied on July 26th, 2008

Extremely eHealthy

"Post South Dakota law takes effect"
That's tragic.

"If they are so bloody interested in the "broadest spectrum of information" I think they should include facts about pregnancy such as a half a million women die annually from pregnancy related issues, links between carrying an unwanted pregnancy and domestic violence, abuse, mental health issues, physical health issues, and oh yeah, a section on prolife dishonest propaganda, the reasons behind establishing this law, what theocracy means, self esteem, autonomy, intelligence, respect, and the patient-doctor relationship."

EXCELLENT IDEA!

Jincks013

replied on July 28th, 2008

Extremely eHealthy

PL does not want the truth about pregnancy known they only want misiformation, outdated and disproven studies used, blatant lies and poor propaganda given out.
I think doctors ought to be required to tell women who elect to gestate all the facts about pregnancy including the fact that in America our rate of maternal death has nearly doubled.
I'm all for informed consent.. for both decisions.

Learn About Us

Get Help

Join In

Do More

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.

The site is not a replacement for professional medical opinion, examination, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your medical doctor or other qualified health professional before starting any new treatment or making any changes to existing treatment. Do not delay seeking or disregard medical advice based on information written by any author on this site. No health questions and information on eHealth Forum is regulated or evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and therefore the information should not be used to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease without the supervision of a medical doctor. Posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author, and not the administrators, moderators, or editorial staff and hence eHealth Forum and its principals will accept no liabilities or responsibilities for the statements made. Schizophrenia health sitemap.
This page was last updated on January 1, 2009.
© 2008 eForums, Inc