|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
|
|
|
|
 |
marvel
Supporter
Joined: 09 Sep 2007 Posts: 1104 Location: Toronto, Ontario (but only a private message away)
Thanks: 50
Thanked:8
|
Posted: 04-15-08 08:36am
|
|
|
|
|
Whoa. Hang on.
I'm out of the loop. Eiri is now Tylanas?
Am I right?
Anyways, back to the discussion.
Fortunately here in Canada, Gay couples
are recognized as legal and can therefore
claim their taxes as a couple. The
contention was always what to call it. Gay
Marriage? Gay Civil Union? Gay
Partnership? The word marriage was what
was the problem. So it was more a war of
terminology.
In any case, I think it's a travesty how
governments are putting such strict
conditions on what love can be. Separate
but Equal my arse.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Birch
Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
|
Posted: 04-15-08 11:39am
|
|
|
|
|
Single people are being penalized because
they haven't found someone they want to
commit to, either. What about people who
are widowed? Divorced? Discriminated
against for their life
choices/circumstances as well.
Solution? No marriage tax benefits for
anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 04-15-08 14:37pm
|
|
|
|
|
There is a POINT to the marriage tax
benefits, and it's NOT just to screw over
single people.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Birch
Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
|
Posted: 04-15-08 15:32pm
|
|
|
|
|
Uh, again, since we don't want to
discriminate against anyone, eliminating
marriage tax benefits would fit the bill.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 04-15-08 17:23pm
|
|
|
|
|
Uh, since we're not all marriage haters,
your argument makes no sense.
Just read this site.
http://www.religi
oustolerance.org/mar_bene.htm
A civil union may give a couple some of
the state rights, but not the federal
rights of marriage.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Reptar
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 389
Thanks: 44
Thanked:13
|
Posted: 04-15-08 17:28pm
|
|
|
|
|
How about we just allow gay marriage or
change the definition of civil union so
they can reap the same benefits. Or apply
benefits and call them civil union
benefits. To get rid of them for everyone
when they serve a purpose is unnecessary.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Birch
Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
|
Posted: 04-15-08 18:29pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Tylanas
wrote: | Uh, since we're not all
marriage haters, your argument makes no
sense.
Just read this site.
http://www.religi
oustolerance.org/mar_bene.htm
A civil union may give a couple some of
the state rights, but not the federal
rights of
marriage. |
I'm not arguing with you, I'm providing a
possible solution.
Eliminating marriage tax
benefits eliminates discrimination
against individuals ineligible for
marriage.
Note: nothing said of eliminating marriage
or "hating" marriage.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Mabel
Moderator
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 8956 Location: Grinning like a Cheshire Cat,
Thanks: 179
Thanked:198
|
Posted: 04-15-08 18:54pm
|
|
|
|
|
What are the marriage tax benefits?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 04-15-08 19:16pm
|
|
|
|
|
You pay less taxs; pretty obvious. And I
think married couples deserve tax breaks.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 04-15-08 19:16pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Reptar
wrote: | | How about we just allow gay
marriage or change the definition of civil
union so they can reap the same benefits.
Or apply benefits and call them civil
union benefits. To get rid of them for
everyone when they serve a purpose is
unnecessary. |
Exactly my point. But right now the
extremist christians in America don't want
to allow that.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Birch
Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
|
Posted: 04-15-08 19:37pm
|
|
|
|
|
There is of course the marriage penalty,
which will return in 2011, at which point
couples who have income disparities will
find it to be to their advantage to not be
married.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tylanas
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 12984
Thanks: 3
Thanked:0
|
Posted: 04-15-08 22:19pm
|
|
|
|
|
That sounds like propaganda made up by
people who dislike marriage.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Birch
Moderator
Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4159 Location: Bliss,
Thanks: 159
Thanked:16
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Moderator
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5557 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 90
Thanked:32
|
Posted: 04-16-08 18:11pm
|
|
|
|
|
Um, I'm not sure what the tax breaks for
married people are, anyone care to
enlighten me? I checked out Eiri's link
and only found property tax benefits in
case of death of a spouse.....but nothing
else. I'm a little curious.... I'm
married!! Why don't I pay less taxes? Or
do I, and I just don't know it?
I quickly checked the economic stimulus
package to see that single people get $600
and couples get $1200... which makes
perfect sense. (although perhaps the
package is the subject of a different
debate!)
Ok, but I would like to clarify that I
realize there are a lot of benefits
(economic and otherwise) to marriage, I
would never argue that there aren't.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Moderator
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5557 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 90
Thanked:32
|
Posted: 04-16-08 18:14pm
|
|
|
|
|
Does it have to do with fitting into a
different income tax bracket?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Moderator
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5557 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 90
Thanked:32
|
Posted: 04-16-08 18:15pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Birch
wrote: | Single people are being
penalized because they haven't found
someone they want to commit to, either.
What about people who are widowed?
Divorced? Discriminated against for their
life choices/circumstances as well.
Solution? No marriage tax benefits for
anyone. |
Single heterosexuals are mentioned in
eiri's article, too.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Moderator
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5557 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 90
Thanked:32
|
Posted: 04-16-08 18:19pm
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, so all I'm finding online is that
married couples usually have a combined
income that places them in a higher tax
bracket (therefore, the pay more taxes
bracket) than they normally would be in...
isn't this the 'marriage penalty"?
sorry, just trying to figure it out.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Georgia59
Moderator
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 5557 Location: Along the Mississippi, USA
Thanks: 90
Thanked:32
|
Posted: 04-16-08 18:22pm
|
|
|
|
|
Here's what I'm finding, and it seems
marriage is a benefit in some cases and a
penalty in others. It depends on your
personal financial situation.
"Now, as for getting married or not,
that's almost always a personal decision
instead of a tax decision. Strictly from a
tax perspective, getting married makes the
most sense when one spouse earns income
and the other spouse doesn't earn income.
That because one income is being spread
over two people, and the income is now tax
at the more favorable Married Filing Joint
tax rates, and the married couple can
enjoy higher limitations on retirement
savings and other tax benefits. Again,
strictly from a tax perspective, staying
single makes the most sense when both
life-partners earn income. That's because
you can use different tax strategies for
each partner. For example, the person with
the lower income can take advantage of
various child-related tax benefits (head
of household filing status, child tax
credit, earned income credit), while the
person with the higher income can take
advantage of various income-related tax
strategies (as I discussed above)."
from http:/
/taxes.about.com/od/taxplanning/qt/marriag
e_tax.htm
Again, not that I'm denying that married
people get multiple other benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
rainstorm
Experienced User , Rather EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 68
|
Posted: 04-18-08 07:20am
|
|
|
|
|
| Tylanas
wrote: | | Reptar
wrote: | | How about we just allow gay
marriage or change the definition of civil
union so they can reap the same benefits.
Or apply benefits and call them civil
union benefits. To get rid of them for
everyone when they serve a purpose is
unnecessary. |
Exactly my point. But right now the extremist
christians in America don't want to
allow that. |
There's a despicable group of people for
you.
|
|
|
|
|