same sac from m/c or new pregnancy Posted: 08-18-08 15:24pm
hi
ive recently posted on conception forum as
ive been very confused with things..
i m/c june 30th
was possible due 28th july
no period, posotive test and symptoms
ive been scanned and they said new pg ( as
i didnt have follow up scan after m/c) and
the yolk sac measured at 12mm 6 weeks
how do the calculate the 6 weeks because
if i count 6 weeks back from the scan i
was still bleeding after the m/c
im so confused about how the baby would
have been there to grow 3-4 days after my
m/c started?
does that make any sense to you guys?
the hospital wont even help and they are
making me wait another 10 days to confirm
wether its on going..
or would it be from the last pg? also she
said it was new but if it had been growin
there for 6 weeks then surley it cant be
possible gettin pregnant while i was
carryin an non-ongoing fetus for it to
start growin 3 days after A M/C
hope someone has some help with this its
getting me down
thanks
|
motherofhighspiritedones
Supporter
Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 750 Location: Silverdale, WA United States
Thanks: 117
Thanked:82
Posted: 08-18-08 15:30pm
The ultrasound can be off by one or two
weeks either way. So you could be four
weeks or five weeks. In any other case,
with the exception of yours, someone
measuring 6 weeks could also be up to 8
weeks. Just ride the 10 days out and wait
for the next ultrasound. The good news for
you is that a yolk sac was visible. Was an
actual embryo seen too?
|
motherofhighspiritedones
Supporter
Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 750 Location: Silverdale, WA United States
Thanks: 117
Thanked:82
Posted: 08-18-08 15:31pm
Oh another question: I am going to assume
that you were due for your period on the
28th of July...correct me if I am wrong.
|
marie0202
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Aug 2008 Posts: 8
Posted: 08-18-08 15:34pm
nothing else was seen...
can you maybe work out if the 17th of july
would be a date i concieved if the scan
may have been off?
yes i was possibly due on 28th but was
unsure due to m/c
thank you for your reply
|
motherofhighspiritedones
Supporter
Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 750 Location: Silverdale, WA United States
Thanks: 117
Thanked:82
Posted: 08-18-08 17:38pm
That could definitly be a date that you
concieved.
|
marie0202
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Aug 2008 Posts: 8
Posted: 08-19-08 01:47am
hi
how does it work out to be the 17th?
if i count 4 weeks from the scan date its
exactly 4 weeks..
the week i was due i had on off crampin
for 2 days and i swear i seen spotting
when i wiped but that was after we slept
togther so its hard to say but my cervix
was very low like i was goin to have a
period then the week after when i got my
posotive test my cervix was high
do you think thats a good enough
indication implantation occured? even 2
weeks after we last had sex or would it
have happend after that?
still cant work out why it would be
measuring to 12mm though if i was really
that early but i have read anything over
6mm is abnormal and if it reaches 12mm it
can be a failed pg
please write back with your advice
thank you
|
AyaMiyaki
Especially EHEALTHy
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Posts: 8535 Location: Floating on a cloud, United States
Thanks: 217
Thanked:15
Posted: 08-19-08 08:45am
The day you conceive, you're considered to
be 2 weeks pregnant already. When you miss
your period, you're technically only 2
weeks pregnant, but you're considered to
be 4 weeks pregnant.
When they told you you were 6 weeks
pregnant, you had been pregnant for 4
weeks. It's not 6 weeks gestationally, but
it's how they count it. Does that help?
|
marie0202
New User, Becoming EHEALTHy
Joined: 12 Aug 2008 Posts: 8
Posted: 08-19-08 12:58pm
thanks thats put me at ease finally, also
with my conception dates
when they scanned me they said i was 5/12
to 6 weeks but just said six the yolk sac
measures 12mm tho, ive read thats an
indication of a failed pg...
